Autonomy, democracy and solidarity. The defining principles of collaborative civil society housing and some mechanisms that may challenge them

References

• Barber, B. 1984. Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. 1992. “Not the Middle Way but Both Ways – Cooperative Housing in Sweden.” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 9 (Supplement 2): 87–104. doi:10.1080/02815737.1992.10801445.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. 1998. “Tenants’ Dilemma – On Collective Action in Housing.” Housing Studies 13 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1080/02673039883515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. 2000. “Solving the Tenants´ Dilemma: Collective Action and Norms of Co-Operation in Housing.” Housing, Theory and Society 17 (4): 175–187. doi:10.1080/140360900300108618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., and N. Hertting. 2014. “Generalization by Mechanism: Thin Rationality and Ideal-Type Analysis in case Study Research.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (6): 707–732. doi:10.1177/0048393113506495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., and H. Ruonavaara. 2010. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Path Dependence in Housing.” Housing, Theory and Society 27 (3): 193–203. doi:10.1080/14036090903326411.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., and H. Ruonavaara. 2011. “Comparative Process Tracing in Housing Studies.” International Journal of Housing Policy 11 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1080/14616718.2011.626603.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., and H. Ruonavaara. 2017. “Comparative Process Tracing – Making Historical Comparison Structured and Focused.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (1): 44–66. doi:10.1177/0048393116658549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., and K.A.S. Svensson. 1995. Demokrati och ekonomi i bostadsrätt, 1. Gävle: Meyers.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, H.M. 2013. “Cohousing as Civic Society: Cohousing Involvement and Political Participation in Massachusetts.” New England Journal of Political Science 7 (1): 2–24.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, H.M. 2017. “Cohousing as Civic Society: Cohousing Involvement and Political Participation in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (1): 57–72. doi:10.1111/ssqu.2017.98.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, T., and S. Kohl. 2018. “Urban Heritages: How History and Housing Finance Matter to Housing Form and Homeownership Rates.” Urban Studies 1–20. doi:10.1177/0042098018757414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., and S. Denéfle. 2015. “Diversity of Self-Managed Co-Housing Initiatives in France.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecodhas Housing Europe, and ICA Housing. 2012. Profiles of a Movement: Co-Operative Housing around the World. Ottawa: Cecodhas Housing Europe and ICA Housing
   Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F., and V. Baglione. 2014. “Living Together Privately: For a Cautious Reading of Cohousing.” Urban Research & Practice 7 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.827905.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, D.L. 2003. Creating a Life Together. Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities. Gabriola Island. Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohousing association of the United States. 2016. Accessed 5 October 2016. http://www.cohousing.org/cohous
   Google Scholar
• Cohousing Australia. 2016. Accessed 5 October 2016. http://www.communities.org.au/communities/about
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., and M. Rodman. 1990. “Conflicts over Use Values in an Urban Canadian Housing Cooperative.” City & Society 4 (1): 44–57. doi:10.1525/city.1990.4.1.44.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, F., J. Haaken, L. Moskovitz, and S. Jackson. 2016. “Rethinking Prefigurative Politics: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4 (1): 114–127. doi:10.5964/jspp.v4i1.640.
   Google Scholar
• Coudroy de Lille, L. 2015. “Housing Cooperatives in Poland. The Origins of a Deadlock.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, L. 2018. “Self-Organised Housing in Australia: Housing Diversity in an Age of Market Heat.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 15–34. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. 2018. “Collaborative Housing and Housing Providers: Towards an Analytical Framework of Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Housing Co-Production.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droste, C. 2015. “German Co-Housing: An Opportunity for Municipalities to Foster Socially Inclusive Urban Development?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 79–92. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1989. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by P. Hedström and R. Swedberg, 45–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelsman, U., M. Rowe, and A. Southern. 2018. “Community Land Trusts, Affordable Housing and Community Organising in Low-Income Neighbourhoods.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 103–123. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M.W., and B. Foley. 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 38–52. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2012. “Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair.” Built Environment 38 (3): 364–394. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.364.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S. 2010. “Enabling Housing Cooperatives: Policy Lessons from Sweden, India and the United States.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (2): 365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojer Bruun, M. 2012. “Social Life and Moral Economies in Danish Cooperative Housing. Community, Property and Value.” PhD-diss., University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, P., and H.G. Larsen. 2018. “An Alternative for Whom? the Evolution and Socio-Economy of Danish Cohousing.” Urban Research & Practice 1–17. doi:10.1080/17535069.2018.1465582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2015. “Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Social Architecture of Co-Housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 93–105. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, L., O. Kirkegaard, and D.O. Pedersen. 1999. Beboerdemokrati og forvaltning i den almene boligsektor. Idealer og praksis. Hørsholm: Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg, B., and A. Victorin. 2004. “Housing Tenures in the Nordic Countries.” In Housing and Housing Policy in the Nordic Countries, edited by M. Lujanen, 57–78. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged Mortensen, J., and L. Seabrooke. 2008. “Housing as Social Right or Means to Wealth? Property Booms in Australia and Denmark.” Comparative European Politics 1 (6): 305–324. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.13.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., C. Carriou, and D. Czischke. 2018. “Collaborative Housing Research (1990-2017): A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Field.” Housing, Theory and Society 1–30. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1536077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and A. Novy. 2014. “Cooperative Housing and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social Capital.” European Planning Studies 22 (8): 1744–1764. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.800025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and H. Stoeger. 2018. “The Role of the Local Institutional Context in Understanding Collaborative Housing Models: Empirical Evidence from Austria.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marckmann, B., K. Gram-Hansen, and T. Haunstrup Kristensen. 2012. “Sustainable Living and Co-Housing: Evidence from a Case Study of Eco-Villages.” Built Environment 38 (3): 413–429. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.413.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, C.B. 1998. The Truth of History. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. 2018. “Replication through Partnership: The Evolution of Partnerships between Community Land Trusts and Housing Associations in England.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 82–102. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., D. Czischke, and G. Van Bortel. 2013. Hybridising Housing Organisations. Meanings, Concepts and Processes of Social Enterprise in Housing. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., and T. Moore. 2018. “Self-Organised and Civil Society Participation in Housing Provision.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/19491247.2018.1422320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 1985. Disorganized Capitalism. Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. [1965] 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Revised ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–179. doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotke, D. 1997. “Representation Is Democracy.” Constellations 4 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1111/cons.1997.4.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Poley, L.D. 2007. “Community and the Habits of Democratic Citizenship: An Investigation into Civic Engagement, Social Capital and Democratic Capacity-Building in U.S. Cohousing Neighborhoods.” PhD diss., Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.S. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B.L. 2008. “Assessing Variation in Civil Society Organizations: China’s Homeowner Associations in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (9): 1240–1264. doi:10.1177/0010414007302340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runonavaara, H. 1993. “Types and Forms of Housing Tenure: Towards Solving the Comparison/Translation Problem.” Scandinavian Planning and Housing Research 10 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1080/02815739308730315.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. 2005. “How Divergent Housing Institutions Evolve: A Comparison of Swedish Tenant Co‐Operatives and Finnish Shareholders’ Housing Companies.” Housing, Theory and Society 22 (4): 213–236. doi:10.1080/14036090500375373.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. 2012. “Deconstructing Explanation by Mechanism.” Sociological Research Online 17 (2): 1–10. doi:10.5153/sro.2504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert, S., and L. Benítez. 2005. “Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives: Defining a Niche in the Low-Income Housing Market.” Journal of Planning Literature 19 (4): 427–439. doi:10.1177/0885412204274169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstedt, E., and S. Westin. 2015. “Beyond Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Cohousing Life in Contemporary Sweden.” Housing, Theory and Society 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1080/14036096.2015.1011687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. 2008. Fra totalreguleringsambisjoner til markedsstyring. Arbeiderpartiet og reguleringen av boligomsetningen 1970-1989. Oslo: NOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J. 2014. “The Politics of Cooperative Housing in Norway and Sweden 1960-1990 (1945-2013) – The Swedish deregulation of 1968 and the Norwegian Liberalization of the 1980s.” PhD-diss.. Faculty of the Humanities, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., and B. Bengtsson. 2018a. “The Pyrrhic Victory of Civil Society Housing? Co-Operative Housing in Sweden and Norway.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 124–142. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1162078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., and B. Bengtsson. 2018b. “Mechanisms of Solidarity in Collaborative Housing – The Case of Co-Operative Housing in Denmark 1980–2017.” Housing, Theory and Society 1–17. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1467341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stjernø, S. 2004. Solidarity in Europe. The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. 2018. “From Co-Ops to Community Land Trusts: Tracing the Historical Evolution and Policy Mobilities of Collaborative Housing Movements.” Housing, Theory and Society 1–19. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1517822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranøy, B.S. 2000. “Losing Credit. The Politics of Liberalization and Macro-Economic Change in Norway 1980-92.” PhD diss., University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, I.L. 2015a. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards a Long-Term Perspective of Self-Managed Collaborative Housing Initiatives.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, I.L. 2015b. “Understanding Co-Housing from a Planning Perspective: Why and How?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 64–78. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, I.L. 2016. “The Re-Emergence of Self-Managed Co-Housing in Europe: A Critical Review of Co-Housing Research.” Urban Studies 53 (10): 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK cohousing network. 2016. Accessed 5 October 2016. http://cohousing.org.uk/about-uk-cohousing-network
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D.U., and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Equality – The History of Cohousing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 315–335. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.315.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, P. 1989. Corporatism in Perspective. An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar