Unpacking social learning in planning: who learns what from whom?

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, C., T. Zimmermann, J. Knieling, and C. von Haaren. 2012. “Social Learning Can Benefit Decision-Making in Landscape Planning: Gartow Case Study on Climate Change Adaptation, Elbe Valley Biosphere Reserve.” Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (4): 347–360. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T. 2014. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” The American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–631.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., L. Coenen, and J. Vang. 2007. “Face-To-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 (5): 655–670. doi:10.1068/c0648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1971. “Social Learning Theory.” Social Learning Theory. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. 1983. Planners and Public Expectations. Cambridge: Schenkman Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. 1987. The Invisible Bureaucracy: The Unconscious in Organizational Problem Solving. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. 2015. “Planning with Half a Mind: Why Planners Resist Emotion.” Planning Theory & Practice 16 (4): 498–516. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1071870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and O. Schnur. 2016. Mittler, Macher, Protestierer. Berlin: Jovis Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y., Ed. 2016. The Participatory City. Berlin: Jovis Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. 2017. “Exploring the Intersections between Local Knowledge and Environmental Regulation: A Study of Shale Gas Extraction in Texas and Lancashire.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35 (3): 417–433. doi:10.1177/0263774X16664905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., and M. Howlett. 1992. “The Lessons of Learning : Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25 (3): 275–294. doi:10.1007/BF00138786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, C. 2007. “What Kinds of Knowledge, Knowing and Learning are Required for Addressing Resource Dilemmas? A Theoretical Overview.” Environmental Science and Policy 10 (6): 512–525. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, C., Ed. 2010. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, C., and J. Jiggins. 2007. “Editorial: Social Learning: An Alternative Policy Instrument for Managing in the Context of Europe’s Water.” Environmental Science & Policy 10: 493–498. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., P. J. Richerson, and J. Henrich. 2011. “The Cultural Niche: Why Social Learning Is Essential for Human Adaptation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (Suppl): 10918–10925. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100290108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brookfield, K. 2016. “Getting Involved in Plan-Making: Participation in Neighbourhood Planning in England.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35 (3): 397–416. doi:10.1177/0263774X16664518.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. 2004. “What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques.” Public Management Review 6 (1): 21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. (2017). A Culture of Co-Creation. Accessed August 3 2017. https://reveconsulting.com/co-creation/
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, P. J., and J. Scott, Eds. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. R. V., and F. Luthans. 1980. “A Social Learning Approach to Organizational Behavior.” Academy of Management Review 5 (2): 281–290. doi:10.5465/amr.1980.4288758.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2015. “Planning as Practice of Knowing.” Planning Theory 14 (3): 316–331. doi:10.1177/1473095215575919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, E. A., W. Arthur Jr, and D. Gettman. 2001. “Knowledge Structures and the Acquisition of a Complex Skill.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (5): 1022–1033. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., E. Di Paolo, and S. Gallagher. 2010. “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10): 441–447. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Neufville, J. I. 1983. Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap Journal of Planning Education and Research, 3 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1177/0739456X8300300105
   Google Scholar
• Deyle, R., and C. Schively Slotterback. 2009. “Group Learning in Participatory Planning Processes: An Exploratory Quasiexperimental Analysis of Local Mitigation Planning in Florida.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29: 23–38. doi:10.1177/0739456X09333116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44 (2): 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitru, A., I. Lema-Blanco, and R. García Mira. 2016. Social Learning in Social Innovation Initiatives: Learning about Systemic Relations and Strategies for Transformative Change. TRANSIT Deliverable 2.3. TRANSIT:EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant Agreement n.613169.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2014. Social Innovation A Decade of Changes. Luxembourgh: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (n.d.). Horizon 2020 the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Accessed August 26 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ehlen, C. G. J. M. 2015. Co-Creation of Innovation : Investment with and in Social Capital Education - Industry - Government. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. 2013. “Emotions in Planning Practice: A Critical Review and A Suggestion for Future Developments Based on Mindfulness.” Town Planning Review 84 (6): 703–719. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.37.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2002. “Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (4): 353–366. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, S., J. Niemans, and F. Soeterbroek. 2015. Het nieuwe stadmaken. Haarlem: trancity*valiz..
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J., and G. Abonyi. 1976. “Social Learning: A Model for Policy Research.” Environment and Planning A 8 (8): 927–940. doi:10.1068/a080927.
   Google Scholar
• Gelauff, G., and P. van der Knaap. 2016. Leren van en voor nieuw beleid: Twee essays met perspectieven op leren en mobiliteitsbeleid. Den Haag: Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, J. P., and S. Lambert. 2007. “The Story of Knowledge: Writing Stories that Guide Organisations into the Future.” Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (2): 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., A. A. Ghazanfar, B. Galantucci, S. Garrod, and C. Keysers. 2012. “Brain-to-Brain Coupling: A Mechanism for Creating and Sharing A Social World.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (2): 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992. “Planning through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” The Town Planning Review 63 (2): 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. 2016. “Who Knows? Metacognitive Social Learning Strategies.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (3): 204–213. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. 2009. “Planning Craft: How Planners Compose Plans.” Planning Theory 8 (3): 219–241. doi:10.1177/1473095209105528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M. 2008. “Social Learning in Planning: Seattle’s Sustainable Development Codebooks.” Progress in Planning 69 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M., A. H. Esfahani, and A. Scerri. 2014. “Facilitated and Emergent Social Learning in Sustainable Urban Redevelopment: Exposing a Mismatch and Moving Towards Convergence.” Urban Research and Practice 7 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/17535069.2014.885735.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. 1991. “Organizational Learning : The Contributing Processes and the Literatures.” Organization Science 2 (1): 88–115. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., B. Dai, D. Peng, C. Zhu, L. Liu, and C. Lu. 2012. “Neural Synchronization during Face-to-Face Communication.” Journal of Neuroscience 32 (45): 16064–16069. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkstein, D. A., T. Kleiman, C. J. Wakslak, N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2016. “Social Learning across Psychological Distance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1037/pspa0000042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W. 2015. “Using Social Network Analysis to Examine Planner Involvement in Environmentally Oriented Planning Processes Led by Non-Planning Professions.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (11): 1961–1987. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.973478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, Eds. 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Muro, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2008. “A Critical Review of the Theory and Application of Social Learning in Participatory Natural Resource Management Processes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (3): 325–344. doi:10.1080/09640560801977190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, L. 2015. “Socio-Spatial Learning: A Case Study of Community Knowledge in Participatory Spatial Planning.” Progress in Planning 111. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2006. “The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains.” Ecology and Society 11 (1): 10. doi:10.5751/ES-01542-110110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, D., and G. Lloyd. 2008. “Re-Generating Learning in the Public Realm: Evidence-Based Policy Making and Business Improvement Districts in the UK.” Public Policy and Administration 23 (2): 189–205. doi:10.1177/0952076707086255.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G., and M. A. Nowak. 2013. “Human Cooperation.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (8): 413–425. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M., A. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, … L. Stringer. 2010. “What Is Social Learning?” Ecology and Society 15: 4. doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, … L. C. Stringer. 2009. “Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5): 1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooij, R., and A. I. Frank. 2016. “Educating Spatial Planners for the Age of Co Creation: The Need to Risk Community, Science and Practice Involvement in Planning Programmes and Curricula.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (5): 473–485. doi:10.1080/02697459.2016.1222120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, M. L. 2011. Microplanning: Urban Creative Practices. São Paulo. São Paulo: Editora de Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2010. Governing for Sustainable Urban Development. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2011. The Purpose of Planning. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saija, L., D. De Leo, J. Forester, G. Pappalardo, I. Rocha, B. Sletto, … A. Magnaghi. 2017. “Learning from Practice: Environmental and Community Mapping as Participatory Action Research in Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 18 (1): 127–153. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1262982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., and D. N. Perkins. 1998. “Chapter 1: Individual and Social Aspects of Learning.” Review of Research in Education 23 (1): 1–24. doi:10.3102/0091732X023001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. C. 2009. “Aprendizaje social e intenciones emprendedoras: Un estudio comparativo entre México, España y Portugal.” Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 41 (1): 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2003. “Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 4 (1): 11–28. doi:10.1080/1464935032000057209.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. 2018. “Responsibility, Polity, Value: The (Un)Changing Norms of Planning Practices.” Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095218770474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., W. R. Boterman, W. P. C. van Gent, and S. Majoor. 2016. “Amsterdam in the 21st Century: Geography, Housing, Spatial Development and Politics.” Cities 52: 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, S. W., and S. Majoor. 2014. “Dilemmas of Planning: Intervention, Regulation and Investment.” Planning Theory 1–20. doi:10.1177/1473095214531430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, G., A. Dewulf, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2014. “An Analytical Framework of Social Learning Facilitated by Participatory Methods.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 27 (6): 575–591. doi:10.1007/s11213-013-9310-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1982. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SLIM. 2004. Social Learning : A New Policy Option for Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water - Based on Concerted Action. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J., D. Stead, M. Zeibots, C. Baumann, and K. Bell. 2014. Understanding “Best-Practice” in Transit Planning: The Importance of Tacit Knowledge and Policy Learning. Utrecht/Delft: AESOP Annual Congress 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-The-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E., and C. Ellis. 2002. “Beyond Relativism: Reclaiming the Search for Good City Form.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (1): 36–49. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. 2002a. “Personal Dynamics, Distinctive Frames and Communicative Planning.” In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, edited by P. Allmendiger and M. Tewdwr-Jones, 65–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. 2002b. The Planning Polity: Planning, Government and the Policy Process. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2010. UN-HABITAT Knowledge Strategy: Building Knowledge Based Organization. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• URBAN NEXUS. 2015. Engaging Society for a Sustainable City: URBAN NEXUS Research Findings. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, M. 2013. Stedelingen veranderen de stad: Over nieuwe collectieven, publiek domein en transitie. Amstelveen: trancity*valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhoven, D. 2016. “Encountering the Subjective in Participation.” In The Participatory City, edited by Y. Beebeejaun, 191. Berlin: jovis Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaev, I., and P. Dolan. 2015. “Action Change Theory : A Reinforcement Learning Perspective on Behavior Change.” Review of General Psychology 19 (1): 69–95. doi:10.1037/gpr0000029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J., Ed. 2009. Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World, 2nd ed. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. doi:10.1515/9781400846504.
   Google Scholar
• Westerink, J., A. Kempenaar, M. van Lierop, S. Groot, A. van der Valk, and A. van den Brink. 2016. “The Participating Government: Shifting Boundaries in Collaborative Spatial Planning of Urban Regions.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. doi:10.1177/0263774X16646770.
   Google Scholar
• Wiekens, C. J. 2012. Beïnvloeden en Veranderen van Gedrag. Amsterdam: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1977. “Experimental Comparisons of Face-To-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review.” Psychological Bulletin 84 (5): 963–976. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., and E. Page. 2002. “Policy Transfer among Local Governments: An Information-Theory Approach.” Governance 15 (4): 477–501. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, H. P. 2009. “Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning.” American Economie Review 99 (5): 1899–1924. doi:10.1257/aer.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandbergen, D., and R. Jaffe. 2014. “Participation: Citizenship, Democracy and Responsibilization.” Etnofoor 26 (2): 7–10.
   Google Scholar