Governing diversity in socially fragmented urban settings: ‘Skopje 2014’ and the ethnocratic homogenization of public spaces

References

• Allport, G. W. 1979. The Nature of Prejudice. 25th ed. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2008. “Collective Culture and Urban Public Space.” City 12 (1): 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Amygdalou, K. 2019. GIS Map of project ‘Skopje 2014ʹ (Version 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. Accessed 17 December 2019. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3581503.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. 1992. “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 73–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, T., and J. Nast. 2014. “From Public Familiarity to Comfort Zone: The Relevance of Absent Ties for Belonging in Berlin’s Mixed Neighbourhoods.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (4): 1142–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S., M. Francis, L. Rivlin, and A. Stone. 1993. Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chausidis, N. 2013. Proektot Skopje 2014 – skici za edno naredno istrazhuvanje (Project Skopje 2014: An Outline for Future Research) [online]. Skopje: Nikos Chausidis. Accessed 17 December 2019. https://www.academia.edu/3081412
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, E. 2005. “Public Parks in Ghent’s City Life: From Expression to Emancipation?” European Planning Studies 13 (7): 1035–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 109–142. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, N. 1983. Ethnic Dilemmas, 1964-1982. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graan, A. 2013. “Counterfeiting the Nation? Skopje 2014 and the Politics of Nation Branding in Macedonia.” Cultural Anthropology 28 (1): 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graan, A., and A. Takovski. 2017. “Learning from Skopje 2014: Architectural Spectacle in the 21st Century.” LA+ Interdisciplinary Journal of Landscape Architecture 5: 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, C. 2005. “Planning and Place Identity.” In Place Identity, Participation and Planning, edited by C. Hague and P. Jenkins, 2–14. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M. 2003. “Intergroup Contact Panacea for Prejudice?” The Psychologist 16 (7): 352–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. 1992. “Citizens and Peoples.” Australian Left Review 1 (140): 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J. 1998. ‘Spaces of Insurgent Citizenship’, in Sandercock, L. (ed.). Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mijalkovic, M., and K. Urbanek. 2011. Skopje-Svetskoto Kopile: Arhitektura Na Podelen Grad (Skopje – The World`s Bastard, Architecture of a Divided City). Skopje: Goten.
   Google Scholar
• Mojanchevska, K. 2018. Accommodation of cultural diversity in public spaces: the case of Skopje (Macedonia). The Hague: ISS (PhD thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. 2008. A New Politics of Identity: Political Principles for an Interdependent World. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pechijarev, M. 2011. “The Role of Inter-ethnic Conflicts on the Integration of the Macedonian Society.” In One Decade after the Ohrid Framework Agreement: Lessons (To Be) Learned from the Macedonian Experience, edited by M. Risteska and Z. Daskaloski, 139–169. Skopje: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and Center for Research and Policy Making.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootman, M., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2015. “Feeling Dutch: The Culturalization and Emotionalization of Citizenship and Second-generation Belonging in the Netherlands.” In Fear, Anxiety, and National Identity: Immigration and Belonging in North America and Western Europe, edited by N. Foner and P. Simon, 147–168. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, P. 2004. ‘Affordable housing for different income groups in working-class neighbourhoods in Amsterdam: Social mix or segregation?.’, Adequate & Affordable Housing for All: Research, Policy, Practice, Toronto, 24-27 June.
   Google Scholar
• State Statistical Office of The Republic of Macedonia. 2004. Popis na naselenieto, domakjinstvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 - Kniga IX (Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 – Book IX). Accessed 17 December 2019. http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziPublikacija.aspx?id=54&rbr=221
   Google Scholar
• State Statistical Office of The Republic of Macedonia. 2005. Popis Na Naselenieto, Domakjinstvata I Stanovite Vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 - Kniga XIII (Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 - Book XVIII). Accessed 17 December 2019. http://www.stat.gov.mk/Publikacii/knigaXIII.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Takovski, A., and M. Muhic. 2014. “Redefining National Identity in Macedonia: Analyzing Competing Origin Myths and Interpretations through Hegemonic Representations.” Etnoloshka Tribina 37 (44): 138–152.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by A. Gutmann, 25–74. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Laan Bouma-Doff, W. 2007. “Confined Contact: Residential Segregation and Ethnic Bridges in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 44 (5): 997–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangeli, A. 2011. “Nation-building Ancient Macedonian Style: The Origins and the Effects of the So-called Antiquization in Macedonia.” Nationalities Papers 39 (1): 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. 2004. “Everyday Ways of Thinking about Multiculturalism.” Ethnicities 4 (1): 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vilic, N. 2009. ‘Siluvajte go Skopje!’ (Rape Skopje!). Skopje: 359°. [online] Accessed 17 December 2019. https://www.scribd.com/document/44902835/04-Siluvajte-Go-Skopje
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O., and M. Huxley. 2000. “Debating Dominance and Relevance: Notes on the ‘Communicative Turn’ in Planning Theory.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 907–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. 2003. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar