Modeling message preferences: An adaptive conjoint analysis of persuasive messaging to increase fruit and vegetable consumption

References

• National Institutes of Health. Strategic plan for NIH obesity research: a report of the NIH obesity task force [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011 [cited 2016 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.obesityresearch.nih.gov/about/StrategicPlanforNIH_Obesity_Research_Full-Report_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adler N, Rehkopf D. U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Publ Health 2008;29:235–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyler AA, Haire-Joshu D, Brownson RC, Nanney MS. Correlates of fat intake among urban, low income African Americans. Am J Health Behav 2004;28:410–7. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.28.5.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake A, Hyland R, Rugg-Gunn A, Wood C, Mathers J, Adamson A. Healthy eating: perceptions and practice (the ASH30 study). Appetite 2007;48:176–82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.08.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayor's Healthy Hometown Movement Food in Neighborhoods Committee. The state of food: a snapshot of food access in Louisville [Internet]. Louisville, KY: Healthy Kids Healthy Communities; 2010 [cited 2016 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.healthykidshealthycommunities.org/sites/default/files/Louisivlle_State%20of%20Food%20Report%202010%20Louisiville.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mari Gallagher Research & Consulting Group [Internet]. Key sections of central Louisville are “food imbalanced”; [updated 2007; cited 2010 Nov 25]. Available from: http://www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/CourJourLouvl_FdAcBrf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis E, Clark J, Carrese J, Gary T, Cooper L. Racial and socioeconomic differences in the weight-loss experiences of obese women. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1539–43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnicow K, Davis R, Zhang N, Tolsma D, Alexander G, Wiese C, et al. Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on ethnic identity: results of a randomized study. Health Psychol 2009;28:394–403. doi: 10.1037/a0015217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong A, Tussing-Humphreys L, Odoms-Young AM, Stolley M, Fitsgibbon M. Systematic review of behavioural interventions with culturally adapted strategies to improve diet and weight outcomes in African American women. Obes Rev 2014;15:62–92. doi: 10.1111/obr.12203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whit W. Soul food as cultural creation. In: Bower A, (ed.) African American foodways: explorations of history and culture. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2007. p. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Research Publishers, Inc; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Walker J, Eastwood J, Westra H, Rimas H, Chen Y, et al. Modeling mental health information preferences during the early adult years: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Health Commun 2014;18:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett R, Barkensjo A. Determining the design of child-specific adoption advertisements: a conjoint analysis. Int J Market Res 2005;47:276–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Ferrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000;320:1530–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domosh J, Neumann RP, Price PL, Jordan-Bychkov TG. The human mosaic: a thematic introduction to cultural geography. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Smith SE, Della LJ, Rajack-Talley TA, D'Silva MU, Potter DA, Markowitz LB, et al. Exploring media's impact on African-American women's healthy food habits in Kentucky. J Intercult Commun Res 2013;42:228–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman HC. Processes of opinion change. Public Opin Q 1961;25:57–78. doi: 10.1086/266996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternthal B, Phillips LW, Dholakia R. The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. Public Opin Q 1978;42:285–314. doi: 10.1086/268454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersheid E, Walster E. Physical attractiveness. In: Berkowitz L (ed), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974. 157 p.
   Google Scholar
• Simons HW, Berkowitz NN, Moyer RJ. Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: a review and a theory. Psychol Bull 1970;73:1–16. doi: 10.1037/h0028429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey J. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Q J Speech 1969;55:169–76. doi: 10.1080/00335636909382942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organisation of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984;39:341–50. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993;43:51–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona CE, Russell DW, Hessling RM, Brown PA, Murry V. Direct and moderating effects of community context on the psychological well-being of African American women. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;79:1088–101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford R. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. Int J Health Serv 1980;10:365–88. doi: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. American fact finder [Internet]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 2010 [cited 2016 April 14]. Available from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml###
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Vigdor J. Racial segregation in the 2000 census: promising news. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Coker A. Examining issues affecting African American participation in research studies. J Black Stud 2010;40:619–36. doi: 10.1177/0021934708317749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammerman A, Corbie-Smith G, St. George DM, Washington C, Weathers B, Jackson-Christian B. Research expectations among African American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: a randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1720–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.10.1720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WC, Hill A, Orme B. The “Importance” question in ACA: can it be omitted? [Internet]. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software; 2005 [cited 2016 Apr 14]. Available from https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/omitimp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software, Inc. The ACA/Hierarchical Bayes v3.0 technical paper. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software, Inc. SSI Web [Internet download]. 8.2.2 version. Northbrook, IL: Sawtooth Software Inc.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Crowne D, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 1960;24:349–54. doi: 10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services. Cardiovascular disease fact sheet 2012 [Internet]. Frankfort, KY; 2010 [cited 2014 Apr 3]. Available from http://chfs.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/738a1fcb-4f89-4c25-a6e1-548d3e36be29/0/kentuckycardiovascularfactsheet2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baruth M, Wilcox S. Multiple behavior change among church members taking part in the faith, activity and nutrition program. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:428–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Denmark-Wahnfried W, Symons M, Kalsbeek W, Dodds J, Cowan A, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and prevention of cancer: the Black Churches United for Better Health project. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1390–6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh A, Vinokur A, Yaroch A, Williams G, Resnicow K. Direct and mediated effects of two theoretically based interventions to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables in the healthy body healthy spirit trial. Health Educ Behav 2011;38:492–501. doi: 10.1177/1090198110384468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EJ, Sherrell DL. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: a meta-analysis of effect size. J Acad Market Sci 1993;21:101–12. doi: 10.1007/BF02894421
   Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Miller ST, Marolen K. Physical activity-related experiences, counseling expectations, personal responsibility, and altruism among urban African American women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2012;38:229–35. doi: 10.1177/0145721712437558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute. Food Attitudes and Behaviors (FAB) survey. [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; [2009] – [cited 2014 May 15]. Available from http://www.asphn.org/resource_files/120/120_resource_file1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. Choose my plate [Internet]. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 7]. Available from http://www.choosemyplate.gov/fruit
   Google Scholar
• Vriens M, Loosschilder GH, Rosbergen E, Wittink DR. Verbal versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design attributes. J Prod Innov Manag 1998;15:455–67. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps G, Neuhauser L. New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:329–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar