Understanding information sharing about rare diseases: an evaluation of the NIH's website on AATD

References

• Valdez R, Ouyang L, Bolen J. Public health and rare diseases: oxymoron no more. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E05. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Genes Project. (2013). Rare disease impact report: insights from patients and the medical community. Available from: https://globalgenes.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ShireReport-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engel PA, Bagal S, Broback M, et al. Physician and patient perceptions regarding physician training in rare diseases: the need for stronger educational initiatives for physicians. J Rare Dis. 2013;1:1–15. Available from: http://www.journalofraredisorders.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ramalle-Gómara E, Ruiz E, Quiñones C, et al. General knowledge and opinion of future health care and non-health care professionals on rare diseases. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:198–201. doi: 10.1111/jep.12281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieppati A, Henter J, Daina E, et al. Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008;371:2039–2041. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouiller P, Olliaro P, Torreele E, et al. Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure. Lancet. 2002;359:2188–2194. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09096-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. (2010). About GARD. Available from: https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/about-gard/pages/23/about-gard
   Google Scholar
• Blumler JG, Katz E. The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell BG. Social networks and popular understanding of science and health: sharing disparities. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller J, Aboussouan L. A review of alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:246–259. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1428CI
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland JS, Williams J. Toward a biospychosocial model for 21st-century genetics. Fam Process. 2005;44:3–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00039.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitzman R. The impacts of social contexts in testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: the roles of physicians and others. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009;13:269–276. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2008.0106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitzman R. Views of discrimination among individuals confronting genetic disease. J Genet Couns. 2010;19:68–83. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9262-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Smith RA, Parrott RL. Living with a rare health condition: the influence of a support community and public stigma on communication, stress, and available support. J Appl Commun Res. 2017;45:179–198. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2017.1288292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz E, Blumer JG, Gurevich M. The uses and gratifications approach to mass communication. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi Z, Rubin AM. Predictors of internet use. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2000;44:175–196. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So J. Uses, gratifications, and beyond: toward a model of motivated media exposure and its effects on risk perception. Commun Theory. 2012;22:116–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride CM, Bowen D, Brody LC, et al. Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:556–565. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit CM. How geneticists can help reporters to get their story right. Nature Rev Genet. 2007;8:815–820. doi: 10.1038/nrg2201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman MJ. Primary sources of health information: comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Commun. 2004;16:273–288. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1603_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostelis B. Innovations online. Health Info Libr J. 2002;19:214–225. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00374_1.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tustin N. The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. J Health Commun. 2010;15:3–17. doi: 10.1080/10810730903465491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller JK, Sandhaus RA, Turino G, et al. Delay in diagnosis of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: a continuing problem. Chest. 2005;128:1989–1994. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.1989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691–2700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin AM. Uses and gratifications: an evolving perspective of media effects. In: Nabi R, Oliver MB, editors. Sage handbook of media processes and effects. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2009. p. 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Robins D, Holmes J, Stansbury M. Consumer health information on the web: the relationship of visual design and perceptions of credibility. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;61:13–29. doi: 10.1002/asi.21224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman P, Schwarz N, Fazendeiro T, et al. The hedonic marking of processing fluency: implications for evaluative judgment. In: Musch J, Klauer KC, editors. The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2003. p. 189–217.
   Google Scholar
• Berger J. Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J Consumer Psychol. 2014;24:586–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin AM, Perse EM. Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Hum Commun Res. 1987;14:246–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudukovic NM, Marsh EJ, Tversky B. Telling a story or telling it straight: the effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2004;18:125–143. doi: 10.1002/acp.953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott RL, Worthington AK, Smith RA, et al. Communicating about genes, health, and risk. In: Nussbaum JF, editor. Communication: Oxford research encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 1–31 . doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.8
   Google Scholar
• Braddy PW, Meade AW, Kroustalis CM. Online recruiting: the effects of organizational familiarity, website usability, and website attractiveness on viewers’ impressions of organizations. Comput Human Behav. 2008;24:2992–3001. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport GW. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella JN, Kim HS, Albarracín D. Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychol. 2015;18:396–424. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2014.941112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Berger J. The science of sharing and the sharing of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:13642–13649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317511111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS. Attracting views and going viral: how message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. J Commun. 2015;65:512–534. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit CM. How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor. Public Underst Sci. 1999;8:169–180. Available from: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/8/3/169.full.pdf doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/3/302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott RL, Smith RA, Hong SJ, et al. Congruence-incongruence patterns in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency couples’ genetic determinist beliefs and perceived control over genes: implications for clinical and public health genomic communication. J Genet Couns. 2015;24:532–540. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9786-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott R, Kahl ML, Ndiaye K, et al. Health communication, genetic determinism, and perceived control: the roles of beliefs about susceptibility and severity versus disease essentialism. J Health Commun. 2012;17:762–778. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.677301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris TM, Parrott R, Dorgan KA. Talking about human genetics within religious frameworks. Health Commun. 2004;16:105–116. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1601_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, McCorkle B, Schell B, et al. Religion and spirituality in the lives of people with serious mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2003;39:487–499. doi: 10.1023/b:comh.0000003010.44413.37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert N, Mickley J, Coeling H. A review and application of social scientific measures of religiosity and spirituality: assessing a missing component in health communication research. Health Commun. 2004;16:7–27. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1601_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeman TE, Dubin LF, Seeman M. Religiosity/spirituality and health: a critical review of the evidence for biological pathways. Am Psychol. 2003;58:53–63. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington AK, Parrott RL, Smith RA. Spirituality, illness unpredictability, and math anxiety effects on negative affect and affect-management coping for individuals diagnosed with Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Health Commun. 2018;33:363–371. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1266576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Thoresen CE. Spirituality, religion, and health: an emerging research field. Am Psychol. 2003;58:24–35. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharts-Hopko NC. Spirituality and health care. In: Catalano JT, editor. Nursing now: today’s issues, tomorrow’s trends. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 2003. p. 347–371.
   Google Scholar
• Wills M. Communicating spirituality in health care. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold R, Avants SK, Margolin A, et al. Patient attitudes concerning the inclusion of spirituality into addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23:319–326. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00282-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott R. Religious faith and spirituality in drawing the line: “I believe in angels … .”. In: Wills M, editor. Communicating spirituality in health care. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 2009. p. 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Yun GW, Trumbo CW. Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, and web form. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2000;6. Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html
   Google Scholar
• de Serres FJ, Blanco I, Fernandez-Bustillo E. Ethnic differences in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in the United States of America. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4:63–70. doi: 10.1177/1753465810365158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, et al. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:49–58. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2401_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman MJ. Health communication on the web: the roles of web use motivation and information completeness. Commun Monogr. 2003;70:264–274. doi: 10.1080/0363775032000167433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller JK, Aboussouan LS. Myths and misconceptions about α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:546–550. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baur C, Prue C. The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15:629–637. doi: 10.1177/1524839914538969
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, June 8). The CDC Clear Communication Index. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ccindex/
   Google Scholar
• Condit C, Parrott R, O’Grady B. Principles and practice of communication processess for genetics in public health. In: Burke W, editor. Genetics and public health: translating human genetics into public health action. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 549–567.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh JW. The alpha-1 constellation of voluntary health organizations as a paradigm for confronting rare diseases. In: Wanner A, Sandhaus RA, editors. Alpha-1 antitrypsin: role in health and disease. New York: Humana Press; 2016. p. 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar