Publication Cover
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Strategies, Media and Engagement in Global Health
Volume 12, 2019 - Issue 1
62
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Changes in communication tensions for men facing prostate cancer: a longitudinal study

ORCID Icon

References

  • Baxter L, Braithwaite DO. Relational dialectics theory, applied. In: Smith SW, Wilson SR, editors. New directions in interpersonal communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010. p. 48–66.
  • Baxter L. A tale of two voices: relational dialectics theory. J Fam Commun. 2004;4( 3–4):181–192.
  • Checton MG, Greene K. Beyond initial disclosure: the role of prognosis and symptom uncertainty in patterns of disclosure in relationships. Health Commun. 2012;27 (2):145–157. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.571755
  • Zeliadt SB, Hannon PA, Trivedi RB, et al. A preliminary exploration of the feasibility of offering men information about potential prostate cancer treatment options before they know their biopsy results. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13 (1):19–28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-19
  • Edwards B, Clarke V. The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: the influence of family functioning and patients’ illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13 (8):562–576. doi: 10.1002/pon.773
  • Step MM, Ray EB. Patient perceptions of oncologist–patient communication about prognosis: changes from initial diagnosis to cancer recurrence. Health Commun. 2011;26 (1):48–58. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.527621
  • Furber L, Cox K, Murphy R, et al. Investigating communication in cancer consultations: what can be learned from doctor and patient accounts of their experience? Eur J Cancer Care. 2013;22 (5):653–662. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12074
  • Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 2011;61 (2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107
  • Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eu Urol. 2012;61 (6):1079–92.
  • Cabrera G, Schub T. Prostate cancer. Cinahl Information Systems; 2016.
  • Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136 (5):E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210
  • Lao C, Brown C, Obertová Z, et al. The costs of identifying undiagnosed prostate cancer in asymptomatic men in New Zealand general practice. Fam Pract. 2013;30 (6):641–647. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt049
  • Egan R, McKechnie R, Jobson J, et al. Perspectives on psychosocial and spiritual cancer support services in New Zealand. J Psycho Oncol. 2013;31 (6):659–674. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2013.835017
  • Egan R, Llewellyn R, Wood S. The cancer stories project: narratives of encounters with cancer in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Psycho-Oncology. 2015;25(3):300–307. doi: 10.1002/pon.3914
  • Walton LM, Reeve J, Brown PM, et al. Gynaecologic cancer patients’ needs and experiences of supportive health services in New Zealand. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19 (2):201–208. doi: 10.1002/pon.1553
  • Holquist M. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge; 1990.
  • Carr K, Wang TR. “Forgiveness isn't a simple process: it's a vast undertaking”: negotiating and communicating forgiveness in nonvoluntary family relationships. J Fam Commun. 2012;12 (1):40–56.
  • Putnam LL, Myers KK, Gailliard BM. Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Hum Relat. 2014;67 (4):413–440. doi: 10.1177/0018726713495704
  • Baxter L, Braithwaite D. Social dialectics: the contradictions of relating. In: Whaley B, Samter W, editors. Explaining communication: contemporary theories and exemplars. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 275–292.
  • Baxter L, Montgomery BM. Relating: dialogues and dialectics. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 1996.
  • Baxter L. Relational dialectics theory: multivocal dialogues of family communication. In: Braithwaite DO, Baxter LA, editors. Engaging theories in family communication: multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006. p. 130–145.
  • Dean M, Oetzel JG. Physicians’ perspectives of managing tensions around dimensions of effective communication in the Emergency Department. Health Commun. 2014;29 (3):257–266. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.743869
  • Baxter L. Voicing relationships: a dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2011.
  • Harrigan MM, Braithwaite DO. Discursive struggles in families formed through visible adoption: an exploration of dialectical unity. J Appl Commun Res. 2010;38 (2):127–144. doi: 10.1080/00909881003639536
  • Baxter L, Norwood K. Relational dialectics theory: navigating meaning from competing discourses. In: Braithwaite DO, Schrodt P, editors. Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: multiple perspectives. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2015. p. 279–291.
  • Baxter L, Erbert LA. Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in turning points of development in heterosexual romantic relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 1999;16 (5):547–569.
  • Halbert C, Wrenn G, Weathers B, et al. Sociocultural determinants of men's reactions to prostate cancer diagnosis. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19 (5):553–560.
  • Bloch S, Love A, Macvean M, et al. Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. BioPsycho Med. 2007;1 (2):1–14. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-1-2
  • Clarke JN. Prostate cancer's hegemonic masculinity in select print mass media depictions [1974-1995]. Health Commun. 1999;11 (1):59–74. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1101_4
  • Brown D. Men’s use of networks to manage communication tensions related to a potential diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015;20:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.06.006
  • Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284 (3):357–362.
  • Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995;5 (2):147–149.
  • Aronson J. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report [internet]. 1994;2(1). Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Gee J. Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2015.
  • Foucault M. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York (NY): Vintage Books; 1970.
  • Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Holistic Med. 1989;4 (1):37–53. doi: 10.3109/13561828909043606
  • Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster; 2011.
  • Sztompka P. Society as social becoming: beyond individualism and collectivism. In: Sztompka P, editor. Agency and structure [RLE social theory]: reorienting social theory. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 251–282.
  • DiAngelo RJ. Why can’t we all just be individuals?: countering the discourse of individualism in anti-racist education. InterActions: UCLA J Educ Inform Stud [Internet]. 2010;6(1). Available from: https://escholarship.org/content/qt5fm4h8wm/qt5fm4h8wm.pdf
  • Ambrosio L, Garcia J, Fernandez M, et al. Living with chronic illness: a concept analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:2357–2367. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12827
  • Considine J, Miller K. The dialectics of care: communicative choices at the end of life. Health Commun. 2010;25 (2):165–174. doi: 10.1080/10410230903544951
  • Gray R, Fitch M, Phillips C, et al. Managing the impact of illness: the experiences of men with prostate cancer and their spouses. J Health Psychol. 2000;5(4):531–548. doi: 10.1177/135910530000500410

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.