Exploring the use of a comic for education about expanded carrier screening among a diverse group of mothers

References

• Lazarin GA, Goldberg JD. Current controversies in traditional and expanded carrier screening. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(2):136–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose NC, Wick M. Carrier screening for single gene disorders. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23(2):78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Carrier screening in the age of genomic medicine. Committee Opinion No. 690. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017. 129:e35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bell JT, Pai AA, Pickrell JK, Gaffney DJ, Pigue-Regi R, Degner JF, et al. DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines. Genome Biol. 2011;12(1):R10–R10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore MJ, Schneider J, Davis JV, Kauffman TL, Leo MC, Bergen K, et al. Reasons for declining preconception expanded carrier screening using genome sequencing. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(5):971–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J, Gregg AR, Norton ME, Rose NC, et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):653–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft SA, Duenas D, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities. Genet Med. 2019;21(4):790–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakih A, Spector-Bagdady K. Should clinicians leave ‘expanded’ carrier screening decisions to patients? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(10):E858–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo MH, Gregg AR. Estimating yields of prenatal carrier screening and implications for design of expanded carrier screening panels. Genet Med. 2019;21(9):1940–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gynecologists, A.C.o.O.a. Committee opinion: carrier screening for genetic conditions. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017. Number 691.
   Google Scholar
• Punj S, Akkari Y, Huang J, Yang F, Creason A, Pak C, et al. Preconception carrier screening by genome sequencing: results from the clinical laboratory. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(6):1078–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman L, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, Cornel MC, van El CG, Forzano F, et al. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG. 2016;24(6):e1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell E, Johnson E, Mathiesen A, Golden K, Metcalf A, Rose NC, et al. Experiences among women with positive prenatal expanded carrier screening results. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(4):690–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green MJ. Comics and medicine: peering into the process of professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):774–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerwiec M, Williams I, Squier SM, Green MJ, Myers KR, Smith ST. Graphic medicine manifesto. University Park: Penn State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner MJ, Trussel J, Mehta N, Condon S, Subramaniam S, Bourne D. Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: a randomized controlled trial to inform a world health organization family planning handbook. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(1):85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzumdar JM, Pantaleo NL. Comics as a medium for providing information on adult immunizations. J Health Commun. 2017;22(10):783–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrand I, Verneau A, Silvain C, Beauchant M, Poitou-Charentes Hepatitis C Network. Prevention of viral hepatitis C: assessment of a comic strip-based information campaign targeting adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14(2):147–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green MC, Brock TC. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(5):701–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater MD, Rouner D. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun Theory. 2006;12(2):173–91.
   Google Scholar
• Frank LB, Murphy ST, Chatterjee JS, Moran MB, Baezconde-Garbanati L. Telling stories, saving lives: creating narrative health messages. Health Commun. 2015;30(2):154–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp DN. Comic books’ latest plot twist: enhancing literacy instruction. Phi Delta Kappan. 2011;93(4):64–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell E, Anderson R, Botkin JR. Deliberative discussion focus groups. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(6):734–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier LM, Miller VA, Horbelt DV, Delmore JE, Miller BE, Paschal AM. Comparison of focus groups on cancer and employment conducted face to face or by telephone. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(5):617–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 8.0.35, D.V. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles (CA): SocioCultural Research Consultants; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Clin Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rost C, Dent KM, Botkin JR, Rothwell E. Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients. J Genet Couns. 2020;29:1234–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé E, Nabi RL. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: overcoming resistance to persuasion. Hum Commun Res. 2010;36(1):26–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese L. Storytelling in Mexican homes: connections between oral and literacy practices. Biling Res J. 2012;35(3):277–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar