How WhatsApp is transforming health communication among frontline health workers: a mixed-method study among midwives in India

References

• Pyone T, Karvande S, Gopalakrishnan S, Purohit V, Nelson S, Balakrishnan SS, et al. Factors governing the performance of auxiliary nurse midwives in India: a study in Pune district. PloS one. 2019;14(12):e0226831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRHM. Rural Health Statistics 2019. 2020. Available from: https://nrhm-mis.nic.in/Pages/RHS2019.aspx?RootFolder = %2FRURAL%20HEALTH%20STATISTICS%2F%28A%29%20RHS%20%2D%202019&FolderCTID = 0 (01200057278FD1EC909F429B03E86C7A7C3F31&View = {473F70C6-7A85-47C5-AB5C-B2AD255F29B2}.
   Google Scholar
• Mavalankar D, Vora KS. The changing role of auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) in India: implications for maternal and child health (MCH). Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Singh ADSKA, Saini SK. Client satisfaction regarding health care services provided by Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in North India. Commun Famil Med. 2017;3(02):20.
   Google Scholar
• Hazarika I. Health workforce in India: assessment of availability, production and distribution. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2013;2(2):106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karan A, Negandhi H, Hussain S, Zapata T, Mairembam D, De Graeve H, et al. Size, composition and distribution of health workforce in India: why, and where to invest? Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00575-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo J, Madziyire G. Use of telemedicine in obstetrics and gynaecology in Zimbabwe during a lockdown period. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35(Suppl 2):89. doi:10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.23675.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandey N, Srivastava RM, Kumar G, Katiyar V, Agrawal S. Teleconsultation at a tertiary care government medical university during COVID-19 lockdown in India – a pilot study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(7):1381–4. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1658_20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav SK, Para S, Singh G, Gupta R, Sarin N, Singh S. Comparison of asynchronous and synchronous methods of online teaching for students of medical laboratory technology course: a cross-sectional analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:232, doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1022_20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JV, Winters N, Lakati A, Oliver M, Geniets A, Mbae SM, et al. Enhancing the supervision of community health workers with WhatsApp mobile messaging: qualitative findings from 2 low-resource settings in Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):311–25. doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris C, Scott RE, Mars M. Whatsapp in clinical practice – the challenges of record keeping and storage. A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):13426. doi:10.3390/ijerph182413426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat I, Hafeez I, Zargar M, Shamas N, Jalali A. Managing STEMI & other time sensitive cardiac emergencies by using smart phones – a study utilizing social media as tool to integrate local health network in remote areas of India-save Heart initiative. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(Supplement_2):ehaa946–ehaa3475.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmukh S, Ambad R, Gawande U, Bankar N. Evaluation of telemedicine consultation in obstetrics and gynaecology – a cross sectional observational study. NVEO-NATUR VOLATIL ESSENT OIL J. NVEO. 2021: 1209–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar A, Gupta R, Vaish M, Nizami F, Marda M. To study the utility of WhatsApp application on smart phone in the Department of Neurosurgery. J Neurol Stroke. 2014;1(2):00010.
   Google Scholar
• Kodali PB, Das S. Digital health technologies for universal health coverage: a promising change. Curr Sci. 2021b;120(4):637–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie H, Roser M. Technology adoption. 2017. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/technology-adoption.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Number of WhatsApp users in selected countries worldwide as of June 2021. 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/289778/countries-with-the-most-facebook-users/#statisticContainer.
   Google Scholar
• Kodali PB, Das S. Acceptance of mHealth technologies among Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in Andhra Pradesh, India: a mixed method study. Med Sci. 2021a;25(111):1052–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):3–20. doi:10.1177/1525822X05282260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NITI-AYOG. Healthy States, Progressive India: Report on the Ranks of States and Union Territories. 2019. Available from: New Delhi: https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Healthy-States-Progressive-India-Report_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GOAP. Health-Medical & Health Department. 2020a. Available from: https://visakhapatnam.ap.gov.in/health/.
   Google Scholar
• GoAP. ANM Bank details: list. 2020b. Available from: http://hmfw.ap.gov.in/DH/RCH_ANMDetailsList.aspx?dc = 2803.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford university press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:3. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-6-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tung FC, Chang SC. A new hybrid model for exploring the adoption of online nursing courses. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(3):293–300. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2007.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. J Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Understanding clinicians’ adoption of mobile health tools: a qualitative review of the most used frameworks. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7):e18072. doi:10.2196/18072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal S, Chawla S. Effects of WhatsApp and Facebook on academic, professional and social lives of medical students and resident doctors of North India. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2019;6(8):3570–3577.
   Google Scholar
• Chan WSY, Leung AYM. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117. doi:10.2196/jmir.8382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MA, Moore JL, Steege LM, Koopman RJ, Belden JL, Canfield SM, et al. Health information needs, sources, and barriers of primary care patients to achieve patient-centered care: a literature review. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(4):992–1016. doi:10.1177/1460458215602939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dida S, Hafiar H, Kadiyono AL, Lukman S. Gender, education, and digital generations as determinants of attitudes toward health information for health workers in West Java, Indonesia. Heliyon. 2021;7(1):e05916. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaphle S, Chaturvedi S, Chaudhuri I, Krishnan R, Lesh N. Adoption and usage of mHealth technology on quality and experience of care provided by frontline workers: observations from rural India. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(2):e61. doi:10.2196/mhealth.4047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail A, Kumar N. Empowerment on the margins: the online experiences of community health workers. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2019, May. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker L, Van Zyl J, Soicher AS. What is the point of the point-of-care? A case study of user resistance to an e-health system. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(1):55–61. doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konttila J, Siira H, Kyngäs H, Lahtinen M, Elo S, Kääriäinen M. Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(5–6):745–61. doi:10.1111/jocn.14710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik G. Role of auxiliary nurse midwives in National Rural Health Mission. Nurs J India. 2009;100(4):88–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church K, De Oliveira R. What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services; 2013. p. 352–61.
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal P, Singhal AK, Gadpayle AK, Sachdeva S, Padaria R. Level of motivation amongst health personnel working in a tertiary care government hospital of New Delhi, India. Ind J Comm Med: Offic Publ Indian Associat Prevent Soc Med. 2014;39(4):235–40. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.143027.
   Google Scholar
• Peters DH, Chakraborty S, Mahapatra P, Steinhardt L. Job satisfaction and motivation of health workers in public and private sectors: cross-sectional analysis from two Indian states. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8:27–27. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-8-27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez R, Rogers AD, Numanoglu A, Rode H. The value of WhatsApp communication in paediatric burn care. Burns. 2018;44(4):947–55. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar