Detecting fake news during COVID-19 in Indonesia: the role of trust level

References

• Johnson TJ, Kaye BK. Reasons to believe: influence of credibility on motivations for using social networks. Comput Human Behav. 2015;50; doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besalú R, Pont-Sorribes C. Credibility of digital political news in Spain: comparison between traditional media and social media. Soc Sci. 2021;10(5). doi:10.3390/socsci10050170.
   Google Scholar
• Alnazzawi N, Alsaedi N, Alharbi F, Alaswad N. Using social media to detect fake news information related to product marketing: the FakeAds corpus. Data. 2022;7(4). doi:10.3390/data7040044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359(March):1146–1151. doi:10.1126/science.aap9559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nsoesie E, Cesare N, Martin M, Ozonoff A. COVID-19 misinformation spread in eight countries: exponential growth modeling study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12). doi:10.2196/24425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ahmad B, Al-Zoubi A, Khurma R, Aljarah I. An evolutionary fake news detection method for COVID-19 pandemic information. Symmetry (Basel). 2021;13(6):1091. doi:10.3390/sym13061091.
   Google Scholar
• Kish-Doto J. Shifting the misinformation perspective: from combatting, challenging, and fighting to acknowledging, advocating, and communicating. J Commun Healthc. 2022;15(3):200–203. doi:10.1080/17538068.2022.2121200.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SL, Ames K, Lawson C. Preferences and trust in traditional and non-traditional sources of health information – a study of middle to older aged Australian adults. J Commun Healthc. 2019;12(2):134–142. doi:10.1080/17538068.2019.1642050.
   Google Scholar
• Muzykant V, Muqsith M, Pratomo R. Fake news on COVID-19 in Indonesia. In: Pandemic communication and resilience. Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Share of adults who use social media as a source of news in selected countries worldwide as of February 2023. Accessed: October 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/718019/social-media-news-source/.
   Google Scholar
• Alnazzawi N, Alsaedi N, Alharbi F, Alaswad N. Using social media to detect fake news information related to product marketing: the FakeAds corpus. Data. 2022;7(4):44. doi:10.3390/data7040044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin V, Chen Y, Conroy N. Deception detection for news: three types of fakes. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;52(1):1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010083.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgonagle T. ‘Fake news’: false fears or real concerns? Neth Q Hum Rights. 2017;35(4):203–209. doi:10.1177/0924051917738685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecho-ninapaytan A, Zambrano-zuta S, Vargas-Bianchi L. No, auntie, that’s false”: female baby boomers develop critical skills to confront fake news with guidance from relatives. Comput Soc. 2021: 12312. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2107.12312.
   Google Scholar
• Shu K, Sliva A, Wang S, Tang J, Liu H. Fake news detection on social media : a data mining perspective. SIGKDD Explor. 2016;19(1):22–36. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1708.01967.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Fisher C, Flew T, Dulleck U. Global mistrust in news: the impact of social media on trust. Int J Media Manag. 2020;22(2):83–96. doi:10.1080/14241277.2020.1799794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D. Health care consumer’s use and trust of health information sources. J Commun Healthc. 2011;4(3):200–210. doi:10.1179/1753807611Y.0000000010.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch R, Baxter J. Context, cultural bias, and health risk perception: The “everyday” nature of pesticide policy preferences in London, Calgary, and Halifax. Risk Anal. 2011;31(5):847–865. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01560.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas M. Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Psychology Press; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Hood C. The art of the state: culture, rhetoric, and public management. Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural theory. Westview Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Adams J. Risk. UCL Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker D. Who do you trust? The digital destruction of shared situational awareness and the COVID-19 infodemic. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;55(July):102201. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Limaye RJ, Sauer M, Ali J, et al. Building trust while influencing online COVID-19 content in the social media world. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(6):e277–e278. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30084-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher C. The trouble with ‘trust’ in news media. Commun Res Pract. 2016;2(4):451–465. doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1261251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman N, Fletcher R, Schulz A, Andi S, Robertson C. Reuters institute digital news report 2021, 10th ed. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Green D, Swets J. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Wixted J, Stretch V. In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004;11(4):616–641. doi:10.3758/BF03196616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey C, Eckstein M, Boone J. An equivalent relative utility metric for evaluating screening mammography. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(1):113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark S. Costs and benefits of eyewitness identification reform. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(3):238–259. doi:10.1177/1745691612439584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edgar G, Catherwood, D, Baker, S, et al. Quantitative analysis of situation awareness (QASA): modelling and measuring situation awareness using signal detection theory. Ergonomics. 2018;61(1):762–777. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1420238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mladenova T, Valova I. Research on the Ability to Detect Fake News in Users of Social Networks. International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, 2022, 01–04. doi:10.1109/HORA55278.2022.9799905.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar S, Dhir A, Kaur P, Zafar N, Alrasheedy M. Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. J Retail Consum Serv. 2019;51:72–82. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbous A, Barakat K, de Quero Navarro B. Fake news detection and social media trust: a cross-cultural perspective. Behav Inf Technol. 2022;41(14):2953–2972. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2021.1963475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Chan D. Situational judgment tests: method or construct. In: JA Week, editor. Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006. p. 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan J. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51(4):327–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw H, Todorov N. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Beh Res Meth Instr Comp. 1999;31(1):137–149. doi:10.3758/BF03207704.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams K, Page R, Petrosky A, Hernandez E. Multi-generational marketing: descriptions, characteristics, lifestyles, and attitudes. J Appl Bus Econ. 2010;11(2).
   Google Scholar
• Dupont S. Move over millennials, here comes generation Z: understanding the ‘new realists’ who are building the future. Tactics. 2015;19.
   Google Scholar
• Richards K. What brands need to know about Gen Z to reach the New generation of consumers. AdWeek.
   Google Scholar
• W. H. Organization, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 80, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Van Scoy LJ, Snyder B, Miller EL, et al. Public anxiety and distrust due to perceived politicization and media sensationalism during early COVID-19 media messaging. J Commun Healthc. 2021;14(3):193–205. doi:10.1080/17538068.2021.1953934.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch S, Taplin R, Gauld R. Trust in government increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand. Aust J Public Adm. 2021;80(1):3–11. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olagnier D, Mogensen T. The COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark: big lessons from a small country. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:10–12. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger M, Wang M. Trust in government actions during the COVID–19 crisis. Soc Indic Res. 2022;159(3):967–989. doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02772-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigute Z, Mebratie A, Alemu G, Bedi A. Containing the spread of COVID-19 in Ethiopia. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):1–4. doi:10.7189/jogh.10.010369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck S, Campos H, Barker I, et al. Resilient agri-food systems for nutrition amidst COVID-19: evidence and lessons from food-based approaches to overcome micronutrient deficiency and rebuild livelihoods after crises. Food Secur. 2020;12(4):823–830. doi:10.1007/s12571-020-01067-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiagarajan K. Covid-19 exposes the high cost of India’s reliance on private healthcare. Br Med J. 2020;10:m3506. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3506.
   Google Scholar
• Maykrantz S, Gong T, Petrolino A, Nobiling B, Houghton J. How trust in information sources influences preventative measures compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5867. doi:10.3390/ijerph18115867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe B, Jetten J, Hornsey M, Hogg M. Individualist and collectivist norms: When it’s ok to go your own way. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2003;33(1):57–70. doi:10.1002/ejsp.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis H. The analysis of subjective culture. New York: WIley; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Tutiasri R, Kusuma A. Millennial generation and family literacy within the dissemination of hoax in Whatsapp group. Informasi. 2020;50(2):153–164. doi:10.21831/informasi.v50i2.28463.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Cheng Y. Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: the effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust. J Prod Brand Manag. 2019;29(2):188–198. doi:10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays KK, Paik S, Trifiro B, Katz JE. Coping during COVID-19: how attitudinal, efficacy, and personality differences drive adherence to protective measures. J Commun Healthc. 2023. doi:10.1080/17538068.2023.2202009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar