Influences on physicians' adoption of electronic detailing (e-detailing)

References

• Davidson T, Sivadas E. Details drive success. Marketing Health Services 2004; 24: 20–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gleason M. Internet detailing opens the doctor's door. Medical Marketing and Media 2001; 36: 80–86
   Google Scholar
• Health Strategies Group. Access to high prescribers: the world of doorknob details. Health Strategies Group, Chicago 1999
   Google Scholar
• McKiline D. E-detailing gaining acceptance among physicians. Medical Marketing and Media 2002; 37: 10–12
   Google Scholar
• Verispan. Verispan's e-promotion annual study in 2006. Yardely 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wilke A. E-detailing: what physicians are saying. E-sales and marketing in pharma conference, Amesterdam 2001
   Google Scholar
• Bates A, Bailey E, Rajyaguru I. Navigating the e-detailing maze. International Journal of Medical Marketing 2002; 2: 255–262
   Google Scholar
• Heutschi R, Legner C, Schiesser A, Barak V, Österle H. Potential benefits and challenges of e-detailing in Europe. International Journal of Medical Marketing 2003; 3: 263–273
   Google Scholar
• Trucco M, Amirkhanova S. Transforming pharmaceutical marketing through e-detailing: case studies and recommendations. The 8th IEEE International Conference on and Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services, The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise computing. 2006, 25–32
   Google Scholar
• Reuters Business Insight Health Care. Physician – targeted internet promotion: online solutions to declining productivity in the sales process. London: Reuters Business Insight Health Care 2003
   Google Scholar
• Gleason M. Beyond edetailing: achieve true integration of emarketing with field sales to reach hard-to-see physicians effectively. Eyeforpharma: E-communication and online marketing conference. November, 12–132007. Philadelphia, PA
   Google Scholar
• Elling M E, Fogle H J, McKhann C S, Chris S. Making more of pharma's sale force. The McKinsey Quarters 2002; 3: 86–95
   Google Scholar
• Jupiter Research. Online detailing: understanding physician's behavior. Jupiter research executive survey. Jupiter Research, New York 2003
   Google Scholar
• Boehm E. Forrester Research. CBI's e-detailing conference proceedings. 2003. Philadelphia
   Google Scholar
• Rogers E M. Diffusion of innovations. The New Press, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Helitzer D, Heath D, Maltrud K, Sullivan E, Alverson D. Assessing or predicting adoption of telehealth using the diffusion of innovations theory: a practical example from a rural program in New Mexico. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2003; 9: 179–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menachemi N, Burke D, Ayers D. Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine – a multiple adopter perspective. Journal of Medical Systems 2004; 28: 617–632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ting Lee T. Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model. Applied Nursing Research 2004; 17: 231–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trelease R. Diffusion of innovations: anatomical informatics and iPods. Anatomical Record Part B, New Anatomist 2006; 289: 160–168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vieru D. A model for telemedicine adoption: a survey of physicians in the provinces of Quebec and Nova Scotta thesis. Concordia University at Canada, Montreal 2000
   Google Scholar
• Casebeer L, Bennett N, Kristofco. Physician internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2002; 22: 33–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford L, Kaluzny A D, Sondik E. Diffusion and adoption of state-of-of the art therapy. Seminars in Oncology 1990; 17: 485–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falas T, Papadopoulos G, Stafylopatis A. A review of decision support systems in telecare. Journal of Medical Systems 2003; 27: 347–356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pharma Marketing Website. Available from: http://www.pharma-mkting.com/glossary/keyopinionleader.htm (accessed 26 October 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Jordan H, Burke J F, Fineburg H, Hanley J A. Diffusion of innovations in burn care: selected findings. Burns Including Thermal Injury 1983; 9: 271–279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCormick B B, Tomlinson G, Brill-Edwards P, Detsky A S. Effect of restricting contact between pharmaceutical company representatives and internal medicine residents on post-training attitudes and behavior. Journal of American Medical Association 2001; 286: 1994–1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichstein P R. Impact of pharmaceutical company representatives on internal medicine residency programs. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992; 152: 1009–1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. Development of residency program guidelines for interaction with the pharmaceutical industry. Education Council, Residency Training Programme in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1993; 149: 405–408
   Google Scholar
• Brontzman G L, Mark D H. The effect of resident attitudes of regulatory policies regarding pharmaceutical representative activities. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1993; 8: 130–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper J A, Speece M W, Musial J L. Effects of an educational intervention on residents' knowledge and attitudes toward interactions with pharmaceutical representatives. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1997; 12: 639–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeant M D, Hodgetts P G, Godwin M, Walker D M, McHenry P. Interactions with the pharmaceutical industry: a survey of family medicine residents in Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1996; 155: 1243–1248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer S. Influences on physician recommendation for imatinib mesylate in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. University of Iowa, Iowa city 2003, Doctoral thesis
   Google Scholar
• Freiman M. The rate of adoption of new procedures among physicians. The impact of specialty and practice characteristics. Medical Care 1985; 23: 939–945
   Google Scholar
• IMS Health, 2004. IMS focus report on e-detailing. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com (accessed 12 October 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Smits H. Medical practice variations. Health Aff 1986; 5: 91–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connelly D P, Rich E C, Curley S P, Kelly J T. Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. The Journal of Family Practice 1990; 30: 353–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm E. The forrester wave™: eDetailing, Q4 2005. Doctors say e-detailing's influence increases, 2005. Available from: http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,36322,00.html (accessed 12 October 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Cullen R J. In search of evidence: family practitioners use of the internet for clinical information. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2002; 90: 370–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhateeb F M, Doucette W R. Electronic Detailing (E-detailing) Pharmaceuticals to physicians: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Marketing 2008; 2(3)235–245
   Google Scholar
• Alkhateeb F M, Clauson K, Khanfar N M, Latif D A. Legal and regulatory risk associated with Web 2.0 adoption by pharmaceutical companies. Journal of Medical Marketing 2008; 8(4)311–318
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitudes-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin (September) 1977; 888–918
   Google Scholar
• Alkhateeb F M, Khanfar N M, Clauson K. Characteristics of physicians who frequently see pharmaceutical sales representatives. Journal of Hosptial Marketing and Public Relation 2009; 19(1)2–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett L, Casebeer L, Kristofco R, Collins B. Family physicians' information seeking behavior: a survey comparison with other specialties. BMS Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2005; 5: 9–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santoro M, Gorrie T. Ethics and the pharmaceutical industry. Cambridge University Press, New York 2005
   Google Scholar