Understanding attitudes toward information and communication technology in home-care: Information and communication technology as a market good within Norwegian welfare services

References

• Salerno D. Development of e-health services and integrated/coordinated cares. International Journal of Integrated Care 2015;15(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haux R, Hein A, Kolb G, Kunemund H, Eichelberg M, Appell JE, et al. Information and communication technologies for promoting and sustaining quality of life, health and self-sufficiency in ageing societies: outcomes of the Lower Saxony Research Network Design of Environments for Ageing (GAL). Informatics for Health & Social Care 2014; 39 (3–4): 166–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. The Coordination Reform: Proper treatment - at the right place and right time. Report No. 47 to the Storting (2008–2009). (White paper) Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. Future Care. Report No. 29 to the Storting (2012-2013). (White paper). Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Service; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig S, Guise V, Anderson J, Storm M, Husebo AML, Testad I, et al. Safer@home-Simulation and training: the study protocol of a qualitative action research design. Bmj Open. 2014;4(7).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Aikman S. Attitudes in ICT acceptance and use. In: Jacko JA, edHuman-Computer Interaction Interaction Design and Usability. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 1021–30.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003:425–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1993;38(3):475–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2006;6(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010;43(1):159–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rchaidia L, Schoofs G. State of the art Digitale literacy and mobile learning among health care workers. http://equitytools.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/State_of_the_art_full_text-BE.pdf 2012 [ cited 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Browning SV, Tullai-McGuinness S, Madigan E, Struk C. Telehealth: Is your staff ready to implement? A descriptive exploratory study of readiness for this technology in home health care. Home Healthcare Nurse 2009;27(4):242–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J. The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2008;25(2):81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. Journal of Medical Systems 2012;36(1):241–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon M, Légaré F, Labrecque M, Frémont P, Pluye P, Gagnon J, et al. Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivunen M, Välimäki M, Jakobsson T, Pitkänen A. Developing an evidence-based curriculum designed to help psychiatric nurses learn to use computers and the Internet. Journal of Professional Nursing 2008;24(5):302–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Gunn L, Lowe P, Sheehan B, Griffiths F, Clarke A. New networked technologies and carers of people with dementia: an interview study. Ageing and Society 2010;30(06):1073–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starren J, Tsai C, Bakken S, Aidala A, Morin PC, Hilliman C, et al. The role of nurses in installing telehealth technology in the home. Computers Informatics Nursing 2005;23(4):181–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Veer AJ, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47(7):846–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh P-K, Flicker L, Horner B. Attitudes toward information and communication technology (ICT) in residential aged care in Western Australia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2009;10(6):408–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricklin M, Struk C. Point of care technology: a sociotechnical approach to home health implementation. Methods Archive 2003;42(4):463–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GM, Philip L, Wong IO, Johnston JM, Tin KY. Incentives and barriers that influence clinical computerization in Hong Kong: a population-based physician survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10(2):201–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, Gadd CS, Unertl KM. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008;15(3):290–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sävenstedt S, Sandman P-O, Zingmark K. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006;56(1):17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A. Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research 2000;2(4):307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen A, Van Dijk J. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society2011;13(6):893–911.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony D, Wright G, Yogeswaran P, Govere F. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses in community health centres about electronic medical records. Curationis 2014;37(1):01–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Skär L, Söderberg S. Swedish district nurses’ attitudes to implement information and communication technology in home nursing. The Open Nursing Journal 2008;2:68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mair FS, May C, O’Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2012;90(5):357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Woosley JM. Comparison of contemporary technology acceptance models and evaluation of the best fit for health industry organizations. IJCSET 2011;1(11):709–17.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell CJ, McDowell DE. Computer literacy of nurses in a community hospital: where are we today? The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2011;42(8):365–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers H, Pratt S, Brown P, Gambling T. Confidence in the use of information management and technology (IM&T) in radiography: Is age a barrier? Radiography 2010;16(3):230–7.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly 2009;26(2):333–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torp S, Bing-Jonsson PC, Hanson E. Experiences with using information and communication technology to build a multi-municipal support network for informal carers. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2013;38(3):265–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofflander M, Nilsson L, Eriksen S, Borg C. Framing the implementation process of video conferencing in discharge planning: according to staff experience. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2016;41(2):192–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoen H, Tangen U. Velferdsteknologiundersøkelse. KS Innovasjon og utvikling Oslo. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Duyck P, Pynoo B, Devolder P, Voet T, Adang L, Vercruysse J. User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system-applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods of Information in Medicine 2008;47(2):149–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devik SA, Hellzen O. Velferdsteknologi og hjemmeboende eldre: hvilke gevinster er oppnådd med velferdsteknologi som kommunikasjonsstøtte for hjemmeboende eldre i kommunehelsetjenesten?-Og hva kan påvirke utbyttet? En systematisk litteraturstudie. Høgskolen i Nord-Trøndelag. 2012: Report No. 79. ISSN 1504–7172.
   Google Scholar
• Ytrehus S. Housing procurement for the frail wlderly: public or private responsibility? The view of the elderly in Norway. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 2011;25(1):89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks LL, Fleming DA, Desaulnier A. The application of remote monitoring to improve health outcomes to a rural area. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2009;15(7):664–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Skär L, Söderberg S. Swedish District nurses attitudes to implement information and communication technology in home nursing. The Open Nursing Journal 2008;2008(2):68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Skär L, Söderberg S. Swedish District Nurses’ experiences on the use of information and communication technology for supporting people with serious chronic illness living at home: a case study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2010;24(2):259–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar