References
- ONS. Overview of the UK population: November 2018; 2018. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/pop-estimate/population-estimates-for-uk–england-and-wales–scotland-and-northern-ireland/mid-2014/sty—overview-of-the-uk-population.html
- Shahrestani S. (2017) Aging, Disability, and Assistive Internet of Things. In: Internet of Things and Smart Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60164-9_1
- Organisation WH. Global health and aging; 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf
- Ritchie R, Data: Hannah. Mortality risk of COVID-19 - Statistics and research;. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid
- org uk A. Dementia UK; 2014. Available from: https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/migrate/downloads/dementia_uk_update.pdf
- Caul S Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 25 September 2020. Office for National Statistics; 2020. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/latest#deaths-registered-by-age-group
- Ho FK, Petermann-Rocha F, Gray SR, Jani BD, Katikireddi SV, Niedzwiedz CL, Foster H, Hastie CE, Mackay DF, Gill JMR, et al. Is older age associated with COVID-19 mortality in the absence of other risk factors? General population cohort study of 470,034 participants. PloS One. 2020;15(11):e0241824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241824.
- Rashidi P, Mihailidis A. A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2013;17(3):579–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2012.2234129.
- P. Bruegger, A. Wilde and L. Guibert, “On the Development of a Resident Monitoring System: Usability, Privacy and Security aspects,” 2020 International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics), 2020, pp. 288–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData-Cybermatics50389.2020.00062
- Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Fracasso F, Orlandini A, Turno M User needs and preferences on AAL systems that support older adults and their carers. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2018 Jan;10(1):49–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-170471.
- P. Pirzada, N. White and A. Wilde, “Sensors in Smart Homes for Independent Living of the Elderly,“ 2018 5th International Multi-Topic ICT Conference (IMTIC), 2018, pp. 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTIC.2018.8467234
- Almeida A, Mulero R, Rametta P, Uroˇsevi´c V, Andri´c M, Patrono L. A critical analysis of an IoT—aware AAL system for elderly monitoring. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2019;97:598–619. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X18321769
- H. Ghayvat, S. Mukhopadhyay, B. Shenjie, A. Chouhan and W. Chen, “Smart home based ambient assisted living: Recognition of anomaly in the activity of daily living for an elderly living alone,” 2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2018, pp. 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2018.8409885
- M. Ziefle and C. Röcker, “Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts,” 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2010, pp. 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8915
- Arthanat S, Wilcox J, Macuch M. Profiles and predictors of smart home technology adoption by older adults. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2019;39(4):247–56. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449218813906. PMID: 30477397.
- Lau J Building a national technology and innovation infrastructure for an aging society; 2005. Available from: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/38566
- Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Cruz A, R´ıos-rinc´on AM. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;91:44–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.007.
- Kavandi H, Jaana M. Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: a systematic review. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(6):1827–42. Available from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hsc.13011
- Ienca M, Wangmo T, Jotterand F, Kressig R, Elger B Ethical design of intelligent assistive technologies for dementia: a descriptive review; 2017. Available from: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/38566
- A. V. Dhukaram, C. Baber, L. Elloumi, B. van Beijnum and P. De Stefanis, “End-User perception towards pervasive cardiac healthcare services: Benefits, acceptance, adoption, risks, security, privacy and trust,” 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, 2011, pp. 478–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246116
- Fischer AJ, Dart EH, Leblanc H, Hartman KL, Steeves RO, Gresham FM. An investigation of the acceptability of videoconferencing within a School-based behavioral consultation framework. Psychol Sch. 2016;53(3):240–52. Available from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pits.21900
- Ownsworth T, Theodoros D, Cahill L, Vaezipour A, Quinn R, Kendall M, Moyle W, Lucas K. Perceived usability and acceptability of videoconferencing for delivering community-based rehabilitation to individuals with acquired brain injury: a qualitative investigation. J Int Neuropsycholl Society. 2020;26(1):47–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561771900078X.
- Stahl JE, Dixon RF. Acceptability and willingness to pay for primary care videoconferencing: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):147–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090502.
- Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
- Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
- Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
- Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addisson-Wesley; 1977. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
- Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22(14):1111–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.
- Ajzen I, et al. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
- University of Western Ontario National Centre for Management Research, Development. Personal computing: towards a conceptual model of utilization. London (Ont.): National Centre for Management Research and Development; 1989.
- Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. Marketing/Social science / The Free Press. Free Press; 1995. Available from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=LpkPAQAAMAAJ
- Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1986;1986:23–28.
- Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):157–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.
- Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):213–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249689.
- Brown SA, Venkatesh V. Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q. 2005;29(3):399–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148690.
- Venkatesh V, Brown SA. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Q. 2001;25(1):71–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959.
- Golant SM. A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt). J Aging Stud. 2017;42:56–73. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406517302517
- Mashal I, Shuhaiber A, Daoud M. Factors influencing the acceptance of smart homes in Jordan. Int J Electron Marketing Retailing. 2020;11(2):113–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2020.106842.
- Angioni M, Musso F. New perspectives from technology adoption in senior cohousing facilities. TQM J. 2020;32(4):761–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0250.
- Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M Useful, social and enjoyable: mobile phone adoption by older people. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer; 2009. p. 63–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7
- McCloskey DW. The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to online consumers: an examina- tion of the technology acceptance model with older customers. JOEUC. 2006;18(3):47–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2006070103.
- Guhr N, Werth O, Blacha PPH, Breitner MH. Privacy concerns in the smart home context. SN Appl Sci. 2020;2(2):247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2025-8.
- Pal D, Arpnikanondt C, Funilkul S, Razzaque MA Analyzing the adoption and diffusion of voice-enabled smart-home systems: empirical evidence from Thailand. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2020:1–19.
- Hong A, Nam C, Kim S. What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services? Telecomm Policy. 2020;44(2):101867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101867.
- Shareef MA, Kumar V, Dwivedi YK, Kumar U, Akram MS, Raman R. A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence: elderly people’s trust or losing self control. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;162:120334. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120334.
- Zhou J, Zhang B, Tan R, Tseng ML, Zhang Y. Exploring the systematic attributes influencing gerontechnology adoption for elderly users using a meta-analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12(7):2864. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072864.
- Shuhaiber A, Mashal I, Alsaryrah O The role of smart homes’ attributes on users’ acceptance. In: 2019 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA); 2019. p. 1–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECTA48151.2019.8959592
- Pal D, Funilkul S, Charoenkitkarn N, Kanthamanon P. Internet-of-things and smart homes for elderly healthcare: an end user perspective. IEEE Access. 2018;6:10483–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808472.
- A. Shuhaiber, I. Mashal and O. Alsaryrah, “Smart Homes as an IoT Application: Predicting Attitudes and Behaviours,” 2019 IEEE/ACS 16th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), 2019, pp. 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA47632.2019.9035295
- Pal D, Papasratorn B, Chutimaskul W, Funilkul S. Embracing the smart-home revolution in Asia by the elderly: an end-user negative perception modeling. IEEE Access. 2019;7:38535–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906346.
- Sen A. Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press; 1992. Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=LOLnCwAAQBAJ
- Nikou S, Agahari W, Keijzer-Broers W, De Reuver M. Digital healthcare technology adoption by elderly people: a capability approach model. Telematics Inf. 2020;53:101315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101315.
- Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S, Alamanos E. Cognitive dissonance in technology adoption: a study of smart home users. Inf Syst Fronta J Res Innovation. 2020;1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10042-3.
- Pal D, Triyason T, Funilkul S, Chutimaskul W. Smart homes and quality of life for the elderly: perspective of competing models. IEEE Access. 2018;6:8109–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2798614.
- Miskelly FG. Assistive technology in elderly care. Age Ageing. 2001;30(6):455–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/30.6.455.
- Van Hoof J, Kort HSM, Rutten PGS, Duijnstee MSH Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform. 2011 May;80(5):310–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.010.
- Bailey C, Foran TG, Ni Scanaill C, Dromey B. Older adults, falls and technologies for independent living: a life space approach. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(5):829–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001170.
- Chou HK, Yan SH, Lin IC, Tsai MT, Chen CC, Woung LC, et al. A pilot study of the telecare medical support system as an intervention in dementia care: the views and experiences of primary caregivers. J Nurs Res. 2012;20(3):169–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e318263d916.
- Doyle J, Bailey C, Dromey B, Scanaill CN. BASE - An interactive technology solution to deliver balance and strength exercises to older adults. In: 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2010. p. 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8881
- Uzor S, Baillie L, Skelton D. Senior designers: empowering seniors to design enjoyable falls rehabilitation tools. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2012. p. 1179–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208568.
- Al-Shaqi R, Mourshed M, Rezgui Y. Progress in ambient assisted systems for independent living by the elderly. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2272-8.
- Vassli LT, Farshchian BA. Acceptance of health-related ICT among elderly people living in the community: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018;34(2):99–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1328024.
- Coughlin JF, D’Ambrosio LA, Reimer B, Pratt MR Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare. In: 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE; 2007. p. 1810–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352665
- George Demiris and Marjorie Skubic and Marilyn Rantz and James Keller and Myra Aud and Brian Hensel and Zhihai He. Smart Home Sensors for the Elderly: A Model for Participatory Formative Evaluation. Human-Computer Interaction. 2006 01;6. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.118.8266
- Robinson EL, Park G, Lane K, Skubic M, Rantz M. Technology for healthy independent living: creating a tailored in-home sensor system for older adults and family caregivers. J Gerontol Nurs. 2020;46(7):35–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20200605-06.
- Lee C, Coughlin JF. Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innovation Manage. 2015;32(5):747–59. Available from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpim.12176
- Panico F, Cordasco G, Vogel C, Trojano L, Esposito A Ethical issues in assistive ambient living technologies for ageing well. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2020 Jul. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09313-7.
- Burrows A, Coyle D, Gooberman-Hill R. Privacy, boundaries and smart homes for health: an ethnographic study. Health Place. 2018;50:112–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.01.006.
- Maan C, Gunawardana U Barriers in acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies among older Australians. In: 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC); 2017. p. 222–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LSC.2017.8268183.
- Kaasinen E, Kymäläinen T, Niemela¨ M, Olsson T, Kanerva M, Ikonen V. A user-centric view of intelligent environments: user expectations, user experience and user role in building intelligent environments. Computers. 2012 Dec;2(1):1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/computers2010001.
- Sovacool BK, Del Rio DDF. Smart home technologies in Europe: a critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2020;120:109663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109663.
- Cannizzaro S, Procter R, Ma S, Maple C, Triberti S. Trust in the smart home: findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0231615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231615.
- Guo X, Zhang X, Sun Y The privacy-personalization paradox in MHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electron Commer Rec Appl. 2016 Mar;16(C):55–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001.
- Demiris G, Oliver DP, Dickey G, Skubic M, Rantz M Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technol Health Care. 2008 May;16(2):111–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2008-16205.
- Rahimpour M, Lovell NH, Celler BG, McCormick J. Patients’ perceptions of a home telecare system. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(7):486–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.006.
- Courtney K. Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities. Methods Inf Med. 2008 Feb;47(1):76–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.3414/ME9104.
- Chernbumroong S, Atkins A, Yu H. Perception of smart home technologies to assist elderly people. In: 4th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications; 2010. p. 90–97. Available at: http://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1163
- Wilkowska W, Ziefle M Perception of privacy and security for acceptance of E-health technologies: ex- ploratory analysis for diverse user groups. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. IEEE; 2011. p. 593–600. doi: https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246027.
- Wilkowska W, Ziefle M. Privacy and data security in E-health: requirements from the user’s perspective. Health Informatics J. 2012 Sep;18(3):191–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458212442933.
- Demiris G, Thompson H, Boquet J, Le T, Chaudhuri S, Chung J. Older adults’ acceptance of a community- based telehealth wellness system. Inform Health Soc Care. 2013;38(1):27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2011.647938.
- Reeder B, Chung J, Lazar A, Joe J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Testing a theory-based mobility monitoring protocol using in-home sensors: a feasibility study. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2013;6(4):253–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20130729-02.
- Joe J, Chaudhuri S, Chung J, Thompson H, Demiris G. Older adults’ attitudes and preferences regarding a multifunctional wellness tool: a pilot study. Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(2):143–58. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2014.965305. PMID: 25325513.
- Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2017;101:75–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002.
- Chung J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ, Chen KY, Burr R, Patel S, Fogarty J. Feasibility testing of a home-based sensor system to monitor mobility and daily activities in Korean American older adults. Int J Older People Nurs. 2017;12(1):e12127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12127.
- Chung J, Thompson HJ, Joe J, Hall A, Demiris G. Examining Korean and Korean American older adults’ perceived acceptability of home-based monitoring technologies in the context of culture. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42(1):61–76. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2016.1160244. PMID: 27100664.
- Etemad-Sajadi R, Santos GGD Senior citizens’ acceptance of connected health technologies in their homes. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Oct;32(8):1162–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-10-2018-0240.
- Reeder B, Chung J, Lyden K, Winters J, Jankowski CM. Older women’s perceptions of wearable and smart home activity sensors. Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(1):96–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2019.1582054.
- Ashraf A, Liu JH, Rauf Q Aging population perception and post adoption behavior about the usability of smart home technology of Pakistani culture. In: Proceedings of 2020 the 6th International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering; 2020. p. 179–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3379247.3379248
- Shirani F, Groves C, Henwood K, Pidgeon N, Roberts E. ‘I’m the smart meter’: perceptions of smart technology amongst vulnerable consumers. Energy Policy. 2020;144:111637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111637.
- Schlomann A, Seifert A, Zank S, Rietz C. Assistive technology and mobile ICT usage among oldest-old cohorts: comparison of the oldest-old in private homes and in long-term care facilities. Res Aging. 2020;42(5–6):163–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520911286.
- Kadylak T, Cotten S. United States older adults’ willingness to use emerging technologies. Inf Commun Soc. 2020 Jan;23(5):1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713848.
- Weck M, Afanassieva M Ageing people’s trust in digital assistive technology: ini- tial trust formation; 2020.
- Zou P, Stinson J, Parry M, Dennis CL, Yang Y, Lu Z A smartphone App (mDASHNa-CC) to support healthy diet and hypertension control for Chinese Canadian seniors: protocol for design, usability and feasibility testing. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr;9(4):e15545. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/15545.
- Lin TTC, Bautista JR, Core R. Seniors and mobiles: a qualitative inquiry of mHealth adoption among Singapore seniors. Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(4):360–73. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1755974. PMID: 32484720.
- Remmers H. Environments for ageing, assistive technology and self-determination: ethical perspectives. Inform Health Soc Care. 2010;35(3–4):200–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2010.528649.
- Chung J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Ethical considerations regarding the use of smart home technologies for older adults: an integrative review. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2016;34(1):155–81. Available from https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrarnr/34/1/155
- Jo TH, Ma JH, Cha SH. Elderly perception on the internet of things-based integrated smart-home system. Sensors. 2021;21(4):1284. Available from https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/4/1284.
- Courtney KL, Demeris G, Rantz M, Skubic M. Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):195–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v16i3.694.
- Demiris G Privacy and social implications of distinct sensing approaches to implementing smart homes for older adults. In: 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2009. p. 4311–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333800
- Offermann-van Heek J, Schomakers EM, Ziefle M. Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies. Int J Med Inform. 2019;127:147–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.025.
- Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(12):788–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001.
- Mulvenna M, Boger J, Bond R Ethical by design: a Manifesto. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017. ECCE 2017. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 51–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121300.
- Portet F, Vacher M, Golanski C, Roux C, Meillon B. Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly — Acceptability and objection aspects. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2012 Jan;17:1–18.
- Birchley G, Huxtable R, Murtagh M, Meulen R, Flach P, Gooberman-Hill R. Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers’ perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;18(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z
- Sánchez VG, Taylor I, Bing-Jonsson PC. Ethics of smart house welfare technology for older adults: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(6):691–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462317000964.
- Vastenburg MH, Visser T, Vermaas M, Keyson DV. Designing acceptable assisted living services for elderly users. In: Aarts E, Crowley JL, De Ruyter B, Gerh¨auser H, Pflaum A, Schmidt J, et al., editors. Ambient intelligence. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_1
- Peek ST, Wouters EJ, Van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004.
- Calvaresi D, Cesarini D, Sernani P, Marinoni M, Dragoni AF, Sturm A Exploring the ambient assisted living domain: a systematic review. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2016 May;8(2):239–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0374-3.
- Sun N, Rau PLP. The acceptance of personal health devices among patients with chronic conditions. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(4):288–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.002.
- Ma J, Wpa H. Health smart homes: new challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245(MEDINFO 2017: Precision Healthcare through Informatics):166–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-166.
- Perry J, Beyer S, Holm S. Assistive technology, telecare and people with intellectual disabilities: ethical considerations. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(2):81–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024588.
- Zaad L, Allouch SB The influence of control on the acceptance of ambient intelligence by elderly people: an explorative study. In: European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 58–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_5
- Tetteh N, Amponsah O. Sustainable adoption of smart homes from the Sub-Saharan African perspective. Sustainable Cities and Soc. 2020;63:102434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102434.
- Baraka K, Ghobril M, Malek S, Kanj R, Kayssi A Low cost Arduino/Android-based energy-efficient home automation system with smart task scheduling. In: 2013 Fifth International Conference on Com- putational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks; 2013. p. 296–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSYN.2013.47
- Andersson L. Loneliness and perceived responsibility and control in elderly community residents. J Soc Behav Pers. 1992;7:431.
- Holmén K, Ericsson K, Andersson L, Winblad B. Loneliness among elderly people living in Stockholm: a population study. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17(1):43–51. Available from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01817.x
- Embarak F, Ismail NA, Othman S. A systematic literature review: the role of assistive technology in supporting elderly social interaction with their online community. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2020;1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02420-1
- Lindberg RS, De Troyer O Towards a reference model of guidelines for the elderly based on technol- ogy adoption factors. In: Proceedings of the 6th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good; 2020. p. 30–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3411170.3411240
- Yeh SC, Lo S. Living alone, social support, and feeling lonely among the elderly. Social Behav Personality Int J. 2004 Jan;32(2):129–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.129.
- Chen K, Chan AH A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011.
- McLean A Ethical frontiers of ICT and older users: cultural, pragmatic and ethical issues. Ethics Inf Technol. 2011 Jun;13(4):313–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9276-4.
- Rubeis G. The disruptive power of Artificial Intelligence. Ethical aspects of gerontechnology in elderly care. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;91:104186. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494320301801
- Upchurch M 7. In: Gender Bias in Research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2020. p. 139–54. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119315063.ch7
- Ameen N, Willis R, Hussain Shah M. An examination of the gender gap in smartphone adoption and use in Arab countries: a cross-national study. Comput Human Behav. 2018;89:148–62. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218303753
- Chiu CJ, Liu CW. Understanding older adult’s technology adoption and withdrawal for elderly care and education: mixed method analysis from national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov;19(11):e374. Available from http://www.jmir.org/2017/11/e374/
- Strengers Y, Kennedy J, Arcari P, Nicholls L, Gregg M. Protection, productivity and pleasure in the smart home: emerging expectations and gendered insights from Australian early adopters. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300875.
- Bardzell S, Bardzell J Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011. p. 675–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041.
- Bell G. Making life: a brief history of human-robot interaction. Consumption Markets Cult. 2018;21(1):22–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2017.1298555.
- Rode JA. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interact Comput. 2011;23(5):393–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005.
- Kneale L, Demiris G. Lack of diversity in personal health record evaluations with older adult participants: a systematic review of literature. BMJ Health Care Inf. 2016;23(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i4.881
- Eisma R, Dickinson A, Goodman J, Syme A, Tiwari L, Newell AF. Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Universal Access Inf Soc. 2004;3(2):131–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0092-z.
- Peek STM, Wouters EJ, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJ What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: focus groups with stakeholders. J Med Internet Res. 2016 May;18(5):e98. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5253.
- Foster MV, Sethares KA. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of telehealth in older adults: an integrative review. CIN: Comput Inf Nurs. 2014;32:523–33.
- Brown A, O’Connor S. Mobile health applications for people with dementia: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(4):343–59. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1728536. PMID: 32237937.
- Gamberini L, Alcan˜iz Raya M, Barresi G, Fabregat M, Ibanez F, Gon¸calves F, et al. Cognition, technology and games for the elderly: an introduction to eldergames project. Psychol J. 2006 Jan;4:285. http://www.psychnology.org/File/PNJ4(3)/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_4_3_GAMBERINI.pdf
- Leikas J. Aesthetic well-being and ethical design of technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. 155–66. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53483-7_10
- Blumendorf M, Feuerstack S, Albayrak S Multimodal user interfaces for smart environments; 2008.
- Wan Q, Li Y, Li C, Pal R Gesture recognition for smart home applications using portable radar sensors. In: 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2014. p. 6414–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945096.
- Zuo F, De With PHN Real-time face recognition for smart home applications. In: 2005 Digest of Technical Papers. International Conference on Consumer Electronics, 2005. ICCE; 2005. p. 35–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2005.1429704.
- Farivar S, Abouzahra M, Ghasemaghaei M. Wearable device adoption among older adults: a mixed-methods study. Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102209. Available from doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102209.
- Lloyd K Bias amplification in artificial intelligence systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:180907842. 2018.
- Buolamwini J, Gebru T Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classifi- cation. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency; 2018. p. 77–91.
- Wang L, Wong A Implications of computer vision driven assistive technologies towards individuals with visual impairment. arXiv preprint arXiv:190507844. 2019.
- Klare BF, Burge MJ, Klontz JC, Bruegge RWV, Jain AK. Face recognition performance: role of demo- graphic information. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2012;7(6):1789–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2012.2214212.
- Wright D, Shank DB. Smart home technology diffusion in a living laboratory. J Tech Writing Commun. 2020;50(1):56–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281619847205.
- Astell AJ, McGrath C, Dove E. ‘That’s for old so and so’s!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions? Ageing Soc. 2020;40(7):1550–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000230.