208
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Design guidelines and usability for cognitive stimulation through technology in Mexican older adults

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Tardif S, Simard M. Cognitive stimulation programs in healthy elderly: a review. International Journal of Alzheimer´s Disease. 2011;Vol 3, 1–13.
  • WHO. Active ageing: a policy framework. Madrid (Spain): World Health Organization. 2002.
  • Rowe J, Kahn R. Successful aging. The Gerontologist. 1997;37(4):433–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433.
  • Campos W, Martinez A, Sanchez W, Estrada H, Castro-Sánchez NA, Mujica D. A systematic review of proposals for the social integration of elderly people using ambient intelligence and social networking sites. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(3):529–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9382-z.
  • Valenzuela M, Sachdev P. Can cognitive exercise prevent the onset of dementia? Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatric. 2009;17(1):179–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181953b57.
  • Tong AY, Man DW. The validation of the hong kong chinese version of the lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale for institutionalized elderly persons. OTJR. 2002;22:132.
  • Rute-Pérez S, Santiago-Ramajo S, Hurtado M, Rodríguez-Fórtiz M, Caracuel A. Challenges in software applications for the cognitive evaluation and stimulation of the elderly. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-88.
  • Kueider A, Parisi J, Gross A, Rebok G. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. Plos One. 2012;7(7):1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588.
  • Fisk A, Rogers W, Chamess N, Czaja S, Sharti J. Designing for older adults: principles and creative human factors a roaches. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 2004.
  • Erdinc O, Lewis J. Psychometric evaluation of the t-csuq: the turkish version of the computer system usability questionnaire. Internatiomal Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2013;29(5):319–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.711702.
  • Lewis JR. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 1995;7(1):57–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110.
  • Sengpiel M. Teach or design? How older adults’ use of ticket vending machines could be more effective. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2016 Article 2;9(1):1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2935619.
  • Franz R, Baecker R, Truong K. “I knew that, i was just testing you”: understanding older adults’ impression management tactics during usability studies. In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. 2018; Vol. 11. 1–23.
  • Coyne K, Nielsen J. Beyond alt text: making the web easy to use for users with disabilities. In: Beyond alt text: making the web easy to use for users with disabilities. 2001; 148.  Fremont (CA): Nielsen Norman Group.
  • Coyne P Web usability for senior citizens: design guidelines based on usability studies with people age 65 and older. Nielsen Normal Group Report 2003.
  • Usability for senior: Challenges and changes
  • Rodríguez AC, Roda C, Montero F, González P, Navarro E. An interactive fuzzy inference system for teletherapy of older people. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(2):318–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-015-9356-6.
  • Marzano G, Lubkina V. Usability in social telerehabilitation systems for elderly users. In: Public Health. 2017; Vol. 144. 1–3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0033350616303936?via%3Dihub.
  • Holzinger A, Searle G, Kleinberger T, Seffah A, Javahery H Investigating usability metrics for the design and development of applications for the elderly.
  • Aguirre D, Abadía I. Review of accessibility and usability guidelines for website design for the elderly people. Sistemas Y Telemática. 2017;15(42):9–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.18046/syt.v15i42.2537.
  • Wildenbos GA, Jaspers MWM, Schijven MP, Dusseljee- Peute LW. Mobile health for older adult patients: using an aging barriers framework to classify usability problems. Int J Med Inform. 2019;124:68–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.006.
  • Caboral-Stevens M, Whetsell M, Evangelista L, Cypress B, Nickitas D. U.S.A.B.I.L.I.T.Y. Framework for older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2015;8(6):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20150522-02.
  • Al-Razgan M, Al-Khalifa H, d M. Heuristics for evaluating the usability of mobile launchers for elderly people.
  • Ray P, Li J, Ariani A, Kapadia V. Tablet-based well-being check for the elderly: development and evaluation of usability and acceptability. JMIR Human Factors. 2017;4(2):e12–e12. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.7240.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. In: MIS Quarterly. 2003; Vol. 27. 425–78. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota.
  • Wüest S, Borghese A, Pirovano M, Mainetti R, Langenberg V, De Bruin E. Usability and effects of an exergame-based balance training program. Games for Health Journal. 2014;3(2):106–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2013.0093.
  • Matías-Guiu JA, Pérez-Martínez DA, Matías-Guiu J. A pilot study of a new method of cognitive stimulation using abacus arithmetic in healthy and cognitively impaired elderly subjects. Neurología (English Edition). 2016;31(5):326–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.02.003.
  • Rocha Á, Correia AM, Adeli H, Reis LP, Mendonça TM, editors. A web platform of serious games for cognitive rehabilitation: architecture and usability study. In: New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. 2016; Cham: Springer International Publishing. date. 1085–95.
  • Peres S, Pham T, Phillips R Validation of the system usability scale (sus). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2013:57(192–19). San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Cruz V, Pais J, Bento V, Mateus C, Colunas M, Alves I, Coutinho P, Rocha N. A rehabilitation tool designed for intensive web-based cognitive training: description and usability study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(2):e59. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.2899.
  • Lee T, Goh S, Quek S, Phillips R, Guan C, Cheung Y, Feng L, Sze S, Wang C, Chin Z, et al. A brain-computer interface based cognitive training system for healthy elderly: a randomized control pilot study for usability and preliminary efficacy. Plos One. 2013;8(11):1–8.
  • Norman DA, Draper SW. User centered system design; new perspectives on human-computer interaction. L.Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1987.
  • Montorio I, Izal M. La eficacia de la gerontología conductual. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología. 2001;36(4):183–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0211-139X(01)74717-8.
  • Izal M, Montorio I. La eficacia de la gerontología conductual. In. La eficacia de la gerontología conductual. In: Bases para la intervención y ámbitos de aplicación. 1999; Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.
  • Neils J, Newman C, Hill M, Weiler E. The effects of rate, sequencing and memory on auditory processing in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 1991;46(2):71–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.2.P71.
  • McArdle W, Katch F, Kach V. Exercise phisiology: energy, nutrition and human performance. Philadelphia: Lea & Fernbinger 2014; 183-186.
  • Salthouse T. Cognitive and information-proccessing perspective on aging. In: Nordhus I, Berg GV,S, Fromholt P, editors. Cognitive and information-proccessing perspective on aging. Clinical geropsychology: American Psychological Press. 1998.
  • Bayles K, Tomoeda C. The abcis of dementia. Tucson (Arizona): Canyonlands Publishing.
  • Baltes M, Neumann E, Zank S. Maintenance and rehabilitation of independence in old age: an intervention program for staff. Psychol Aging. 1994;9(2):179–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.179.
  • Lewis JR. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 1995;7(1):57–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.