References
- Maguire M. Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Human-Computer Studies. 2001;55:587–634. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503.
- Qin Y, Zhou R, Wu Q, Huang X, Chen X, Wang W, Wang X, Xu H, Zheng J, Qian S, et al. The effect of nursing participation in the design of a critical care information system: a case study in a Chinese hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212480
- Subramanyam R, Weisstein F, Krishnan M. User participation in software development projects. Commun ACM. 2010;53(3):137–41. doi:10.1145/1666420.1666455.
- Damodaran L. User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users. Behav Inf Technol. 1996;15(6):363–77. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014492996120049
- Mckeen JD, Guimaraes T. Successful strategies for user participation in systems development. J Manag Inf Syst. 1997;14(2):133–50. doi:10.1080/07421222.1997.11518168.
- Barki H, Hartwick J. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly. 1994;18(1):59–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249610
- Gould John D, Clayton L. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM. 1985;28(3):300–11. doi:10.1145/3166.3170.
- Lagsten J, Andersson A. Use of information systems in social work - challenges and an agenda for future research. Eur J Soc Work. 2018;21(6):850–62. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423554
- Zuber CD, Moody L. Creativity and Innovation in Health Care. Nurs Adm Q. 2018;42(1):62–75. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000267.
- Ellsworth MA, Dziadzko M, O’Horo JC, Farrell AM, Zhang J, Herasevich V. An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(1):218–26. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw046.
- Shah SGS, Robinson I. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(6–7):500–15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17100220
- Niès J, Pelayo S. From users involvement to users’ needs understanding: a case study. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2009;79(4):e76–e82. https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S138650560900104X
- Bruseberg A, McDonagh-Philp D. Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers’ feedback. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(1):27–38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687001000539
- Fabijan A, Olsson HH, Bosch J, Customer feedback and data collection techniques in software R&D: a literature review. In: software business. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015:139–53. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-19593-3_12
- Hess J, Randall D, Pipek V, Wulf V. Involving users in the wild—Participatory product development in and with online communities. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2013;71(5):570–89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581913000074
- AMIA, American Medical Informatics Association. History of the clinical informatics subspecialty. https://www.amia.org/clinical-informatics-board-review-course/history. Accessed May 1st, 2021.
- Singer JS, Cheng EM, Baldwin K, Pfeffer MA. The UCLA health resident informaticist program – a novel clinical informatics training program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 [Accessed May 1, 2021];24(4):832–40. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw174.
- Sieja A, Markley K, Pell J, Gonzalez C, Redig B, Kneeland P, Lin C-T. Optimization sprints: improving clinician satisfaction and teamwork by rapidly reducing electronic health record burden. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019;94(5):793–802. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.036.
- Lehmann CU, Gundlapalli AV, Williamson JJ, Fridsma D, Hersh W, Krousel-Wood M, Ondrula C, Munger B. Five years of clinical informatics board certification for physicians in the United States of america. Yearb Med Inform. 2018;27(1):237–42. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1641198.
- Cummins MR, Gundlapalli AV, Gundlapalli AV, Murray P, Park H, Lehmann CU. Nursing informatics certification worldwide: history, pathway, roles, and motivation. Yearb Med Inform. 2016;25(1):264–71. http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.15265/IY-2016-039
- Gillingham P. Electronic information systems and social work: principles of participatory design for social workers. Adv Soc Work. 2015;16(1):31–42. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1821169018
- Naccarato T. Child welfare informatics: a proposed subspecialty for social work. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32(12):1729–34. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.07.016.
- Nguyen LH. Child welfare informatics: a new definition for an established practice. Soc Work. 2007;52(4):361–63. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nasw/sw/2007/00000052/00000004/art00008
- E-health and e-welfare of Finland. In: Vehko T, Ruotsalainen S, Hypponen H, editors Check Point 2018. Helsinki (Finland): The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); 2019.
- Kanta. kanta - patient data repository, https://www.kanta.fi/en/professionals/patient-data-repository. Updated 2019.
- Jormanainen V. Large-scale implementation and adoption of the finnish national kanta services in 2010–2017: a prospective, longitudinal, indicator-based study. Fin J eH eW. 2018;10(4):381–95. https://doaj.org/article/e011e63af3704a06ac252375c37f8682
- Kaipio J, Kuusisto A, Hyppönen H, Heponiemi T, Lääveri T. 2020 . Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences on EHR usability: comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand. Int J Med Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018.
- Kaipio J, Lääveri T, Hyppönen H, Vainiomäki S, Reponen J, Kushniruk A, Borycki E, Vänskä J. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: national survey on physicians’ experiences with EHRs in Finland. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2016;97:266–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010.
- Viitanen J, Hyppönen H, Lääveri T, Vänskä J, Reponen J, Winblad I. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(10):708–25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505611001481
- Martikainen S, Salovaara S, Ylönen K, Tynkkynen E, Kaipio J, Lääveri T, Lääveri T. Sosiaalialan ammattilaiset halukkaita osallistumaan asiakastietojärjestelmien kehittämiseen: osallistumistavoissa kehitettävää. Fin J eH eW. 2020;12(3):270–85. https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.96084
- Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Information to support well-being and service renewal. eHealth and eSocial strategy 2020. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/74459. Updated 2015.
- Kaipio J, Lääveri T, Tyllinen M. Menettelyprosessi käytettävyys- ja loppukäyttäjänäkökulman integroimiseksi tietojärjestelmähankintaan: tapaus apotti. [procedural process for integrating the usability and end-user perspective into information system acquisition: the apotti case.]. Fin J eH eW. 2015; 7(2–3): 104–21. https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/50897
- Ab OA. Apotti. https://www.apotti.fi/. Accessed 26.June.2021.
- Aster. https://www.asteraptj.fi/. Accessed 26.June.2021.
- Gillingham P. Technology configuring the user: implications for the redesign of electronic information systems in social work. Br J Soc Work. 2014;46:1–12. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu141.
- Gillingham P, Graham T. Designing electronic information systems for the future: social workers and the challenge of new public management. Critical Social Policy. 2016;36(2):187–204. doi:10.1177/0261018315620867.
- Huuskonen S, Vakkari P. “I did it my way”: social workers as secondary designers of a client information system. Inf Process Manag. 2013;49(1):380–91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457312000684.
- Devlieghere J, Roose R. Documenting practices in human service organisations through information systems: when the quest for visibility ends in darkness. Social Inclusion. 2019;7(1):207–17. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2300630936
- Ylönen K, Salovaara S, Kaipio J, Tyllinen M, Tynkkynen E, Hautala S, Lääveri T. Sosiaalialan asiakastietojärjestelmissä paljon parannettavaa: käyttäjäkokemukset 2019. Fin J eH eW. 2020;12(1):30–43. https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/88583
- Gillingham P. Electronic information systems and social work: who are we designing for? Practice. 2014;26(5):313–26. doi:10.1080/09503153.2014.958454.
- Gillingham P. Electronic information systems and human service organizations: the needs of managers. M Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2016;40(1):51–61. doi:10.1080/23303131.2015.1069232.
- Gillingham P. Electronic information systems to guide social work practice: the perspectives of practitioners as end users. Practice. 2016;28(5):357–72. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1135895.
- Martikainen S, Kaipio J, Lääveri T. End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: physicians’ and nurses’ experiences. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2020;137:104117. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104117.
- Jeddi FR, Nabovati E, Bigham R, Khajouei R. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users’ characteristics. Int J Med Inform. 2020;133:104026. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104026.
- Raglan GB, Margolis B, Paulus RA, Schulkin J. Electronic health record adoption among obstetrician/gynecologists in the United States: physician practices and satisfaction. J. Healthc. Qual. 2014.
- ISO. ISO 9241-210 ergonomics of human-system interaction — part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. 2009.
- Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Social and health services. https://stm.fi/en/social-and-health-services. Accessed 18.May.2021.
- Vuorijärvi P, Raappana M, Kinnunen P, Kostamo-Pääkkö K Sosiaalihuollon ammattihenkilöstö- ja tehtävärakenneselvitys 2018. http://www.sosiaalikollega.fi/poske/tapahtumat/kkp_soshuollonammattihlosto_tehtavarakenneselvitys2018. Updated 2019.
- Hyppönen H, Kaipio J, Heponiemi T, Lääveri T, Aalto A-M, Vänskä J, Elovainio M. Developing the national usability-focused health information system scale for physicians: validation study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e12875. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099336
- Viitanen J, Hyppönen H, Lääveri T, Vänskä J, Reponen J, Winblad I. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2011;80(10):708–25. https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1386505611001481
- Kaipio J, Kuusisto A, Hyppönen H, Heponiemi T, Lääveri T. Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences on EHR usability: comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2020;134:104018. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018.
- Martikainen S, Viitanen J, Korpela M, Lääveri T. Physicians’ experiences of participation in healthcare IT development in Finland: willing but not able. Int J Med Inform (Shannon, Ireland). 2011;81(2):98–113. https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S138650561100178X
- Kujala S. Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behav Inf Technol. 2008;27(6):457–73. doi:10.1080/01449290601111051.
- Lyneborg AO, Damgaard MB. Knowledge lost – or gained? The changing knowledge base of Danish social work. Nord Soc Work Res. 2019;9:3,206–219. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1494031.
- Wastell D, White S. Beyond bureaucracy: emerging trends in social care informatics. Health Informatics J. 2014;20(3):213–19. doi:10.1177/1460458213487535.
- Martikainen S, Korpela M, Tiihonen T. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers’ viewpoint in Finland. Int J Med Inform. 2013;83:189–200. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.003.
- Rytkönen J, Kinnunen U-M MS Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tietojärjestelmäkehittäjien kokemuksia ja näkemyksiä yhteistyöstä käyttäjien kanssa. Submitted 5/2021.
- Gillingham P. Implementing electronic information systems in human service organisations: the challenge of categorisation. Practice (Birmingham, England). 2015;27(3):163–75. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09503153.2015.1014334
- Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
- Salovaara S. Considering the informational needs of social work in the information system Apotti. Fin J eH eW. 2021;13(2):133–46. doi:10.23996/fjhw.100692.
- Otokiti A, Craven C, Shetreat-Klein A, Cohen S, Darrow B. Beyond getting rid of stupid stuff in the electronic health record (Beyond-GROSS): protocol for a user-centered, mixed-method intervention to improve the electronic health record system. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(3):e25148. URL: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/3/e25148.
- Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tietojärjestelmä-palveluiden seuranta ja arviointi (STePS 3.0). https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/sosiaali-ja-terveydenhuollon-tietojarjestelmapalveluiden-seuranta-ja-arviointi-steps-3.0. Accessed 13.July.2021.