Integrated geoscience databanks for interactive analysis and visualization

References

• Chen, J. and Wu, L., 2003. Geospatial fundamental framework of digital China. Beijing: China Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C.F., 1983. SIMSAG: integrated computer system for use in evaluation of mineral and energy resources. Mathematical Geosciences, 15 (1), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, M., 2008. Geoinformatics and digital earth initiatives: a German perspective. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/17538940701781975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, T.G., et al. 2007. The shuttle radar topography mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45: RG2004. doi:10.1029/2005RG000183
   Google Scholar
• Foresman, T.W., 2004. Digital earth visualization and web-interface capabilities utilizing 3-D geobrowser technology. Proceedings of the 20th ISPRS Congress, 12–23 July 2004, Istanbul, Turkey, 885–888.
   Google Scholar
• Foresman, T.W., 2008. Evolution and implementation of the Digital Earth vision, technology and society. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 4–16. doi:10.1080/17538940701782502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S.B., Bolivar, S.L., and Weaver, T.A., 1983. Display techniques for integrated data sets. Computers & Geosciences, 9 (1), 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLOBE Task Team and others [Hastings, David A., Paula K. Dunbar, Gerald M. Elphingstone, Mark Bootz, Hiroshi Murakami, Hiroshi Maruyama, Hiroshi Masaharu, Peter Holland, John Payne, Nevin A. Bryant, Thomas L. Logan, J.P. Muller, Gunter Schreier, and John S. MacDonald, eds., 1999. The Global Land One-kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) Digital Elevation Model, Version 1.0. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Center, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305-3328, USA. Available from: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/topo/globe.html [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 2008. The use cases of digital earth. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 31–42. doi:10.1080/17538940701782528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H.D., 1999. Earth observation and Digital Earth. Beijing: Chinese Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H.D., Liu, Z., and Zhu, L.W., 2010. Digital Earth: decadal experiences and some thoughts. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (1), 31–46. doi:10.1080/17538941003622602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, K.A., 2000. Integrated geo systems – a computational environment for integrated management, analysis and presentation of petroleum industry data. In: T.C. Coburn and J.M. Yarus, eds. Geographic information systems in petroleum exploration and development. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. AAPG Book on Computers in Geology, 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K.A., et al., 2008. Development of a projection independent multi-resolution imagery tiles architecture for compiling an image database of Pakistan. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Advances in Space Technologies, 29–30 November 2008, Islamabad, Pakistan, 164–170. doi:10.1109/ICAST.2008.4747706
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K.A., Akhter, G., and Ahmad, Z., 2009. The real meaning of geoscience data and process integration. Proceedings of IAMG International Conference, Computational Methods for Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences, 23–29 August 2009. Stanford University, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K.A., Akhter, G., and Ahmad, Z., 2010. OIL – Output input language for data connectivity between geoscientific software applications. Computers & Geosciences, 36 (5), 687–697. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine, F.G., et al., 1998. The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA Geopotential Model EGM96, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA. Available from: http://cddis.nasa.gov/926/egm96/egm96.html [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Gong, J., and Wang, F., 1999. Web-based three-dimensional geo-referenced visualization. Computers & Geosciences, 25 (10), 1177–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloret, J.R., et al., 2008. 3D visualizations in simulations of future land use: exploring the possibilities of new, standard visualization tools. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 148–154. doi:10.1080/17538940701782718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.D. and Graniero, P.A., 2006. A GIS-based borehole data management and 3D visualization system. Computers & Geosciences, 32 (10), 1699–1708. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA, 1999 and 2002. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument aboard Terra (EOS AM) and Aqua (EOS PM) satellites, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA. Available from: http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/ [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• NASA, 2000. GeoCover circa 2000 Coverage by Landsat-7 – a Landsat series satellite, John C. Stennis Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA. Available from: http://zulu.ssc.nasa.gov/mrsid/ [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Nativi, S. and Domenico, B., 2009. Enabling interoperability for Digital Earth: earth Science coverage access services. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2 (Suppl. 1), 79–104. doi:10.1080/17538940902866179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEIC, 1966. Global Earthquake Catalog, National Earthquake Information Center, US Geological Survey, USA. Available from: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/neic/ [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Percivall, G., 2010. The application of open standards to enhance the interoperability of geoscience information. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (1), 14–30. doi:10.1080/17538941003792751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhyne, T.M., et al., 1994. Visualization and geographic information system integration: what are the needs and requirements, if any? IEEE Visualization 94 Proceedings, 17–21 October 1994, Washington, DC, USA, 400–403.
   Google Scholar
• Rhyne, T.M., 1997. Going virtual with geographic information and scientific visualization. Computers & Geosciences, 23 (4), 489–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shupeng, C. and van Genderen, J., 2008. Digital Earth in support of global change research. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 43–65. doi:10.1080/17538940701782510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., et al., 2008. Virtual Australia: its key elements – know, think, communicate. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (1), 66–87. doi:10.1080/17538940701782551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS, 1996a. GTOPO30 – Global digital elevation model (DEM), Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), US Geological Survey, USA. Available from: http://eros.usgs.gov/#/Find_Data/Products_and_Data_Available/gtopo30_info [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• USGS, 1996b. HYDRO1k – Elevation Derivative Hydrologic Database, Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), US Geological Survey, USA. Available from: http://eros.usgs.gov/#Find_Data/Products_and_Data_Available/gtopo30/hydro [Accessed 30 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2008. Distributed geospatial information processing: sharing distributed geospatial resources to support Digital Earth. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1 (3), 259–278. doi:10.1080/17538940802037954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2010. Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (4), 264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2011. Spatial computing-using spatial principles to optimize distributed computing for enabling physical science discoveries. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences, 108 (14), 5498–5503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar