Integration of hydrological observations into a Spatial Data Infrastructure under a Sensor Web environment

References

• Beaujardiere, J. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 06-042: OpenGIS Web Map Service Implementation Specification. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bermudez, L., and D. Arctur. 2011. OGC Engineering Report 11-013r6: Water Information Services Concept Development Study. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Botts, M. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 07-000: OpenGIS Sensor Model Language (SensorML). Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Botts, M., G. Percivall, C. Reed, and J. Davidson. 2008. “OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4540: 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., F. Bache, T. Bartoschek, and C. P. J. M. van Elzakker. 2011. “The SID Creator: A Visual Approach for Integrating Sensors with the Sensor Web.” The 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Utrecht, the Netherlands, April 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., and S. Below. 2010. OGC Discussion Paper 10-134: Sensor Interface Descriptors. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., J. Echterhoff, S. Jirka, I. Simonis, T. Everding, C. Stasch, S. Liang, and R. Lemmens. 2011. “New Generation Sensor Web Enablement.” Sensors 11: 2652–2699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., T. Foerster, S. Jirka, and C. Priess. 2010. “Sensor Bus: An Intermediary Layer for Linking Geosensor Networks and the Sensor Web.” In Proceedings of COM.Geo'10: the 1st International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application, Bethesda, MD, USA, June 2010, 1–8, New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., P. Maue, K. Janowicz, D. Nuest, and C. Malewski. 2011. “Semantically-Enabled Sensor Plug & Play for the Sensor Web.” Sensors 11(8), 7568–7605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröring, A., C. Stasch, and J. Echterhoff. 2012. OGC Implementation Standard 12-006: OGC Sensor Observation Service Interface Standard (Version 2.0). Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. 2006. “The Web-Wide World.” Nature 439: 776–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., Z. Chen, C. Hu, and L. Di. 2011. “A Capability Matching and Ontology Reasoning Method for High Precision OGC Web Service Discovery.” International Journal of Digital Earth 4(6), 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., L. Di, J. Gong, and G. Yu. 2010. “Automatic On-demand Data Feed Service for AutoChem Based on Reusable Geo-Processing Workflow.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 3: 418–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., L. Di, and G. Yu. 2009. “A Flexible Geospatial Sensor Observation Service for Diverse Sensor Data Based on Web Service.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64: 274–282.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N., L. Di, G. Yu, and J. Gong. 2010. “Geo-Processing Workflow Driven Wildfire Hot Pixel Detection Under Sensor Web Environment.” Computers & Geosciences 36: 362–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., L. Di, G. Yu, J. Gong, and Y. Wei. 2009. “Use of ebRIM-Based CSW with Sensor Observation Services for Registry and Discovery of Remote-Sensing Observations.” Computers & Geosciences 35: 360–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., D. Li, L. Di, and J. Gong. 2010. “An Automatic SWILC Classification and Extraction for the AntSDI Under a Sensor Web Environment.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 36: S1–S12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V. T., D. R. Maidment, and L. W. Mays. 1988. Applied Hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. 1999. XSL Transformations (XSLT). W3C. Accessed May 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. 2007a. OGC Implementation Specification 07-022r1: Observations and Measurements—Part 1—Observation schema. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. 2007b. OGC Implementation Specification 07-022r3: Observations and Measurements—Part 2—Sampling Features. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Craglia, M., M.F. Goodchild, A. Annoni, M. Camara, W. Kuhn, D.M. Mark, I. Masser, D. Maguire, S. Liang, and E. Parsons. 2008. “Next-Generation Digital Earth: A Position Paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science.” International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 3: 146–167.
   Google Scholar
• Doan, A. H., P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. 2001. “Reconciling Schemas of Disparate Data Sources: A Machine-Learning Approach.”” SIGMOD Record302: 509–520.10.1145/376284.375731
   Google Scholar
• Echterhoff, J. 2011. OGC Implementation Standard 09-001: OpenGIS SWE Service Model Implementation Standard. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Echterhoff, J., and T. Everding. 2008. OGC Discussion Paper 08-133: OpenGIS Sensor Event Service Interface Specification. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Everding, T., and J. Echterhoff. 2008. OGC Discussion Paper 08-132: Event Pattern Markup Language (EML). Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• GDI-DE. 2012. Spatial Data Infrastructure Germany. Accessed February 16. http://www.gdi-de.org
   Google Scholar
• Gore, A. 1998. The Digital Earth: Understanding Our Planet in the 21st Century. Accessed November 15. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=6210
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., X. Fan, and C. Wang. 2009. “A Digital Earth Prototype System: EPS/CAS.” International Journal of Digital Earth 2(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guru, S. M., P. Taylor, H. Neuhaus, Y. Shu, D. Smith, and A. Terhorst. 2008. “Hydrological Sensorweb for the South Esk Catchment in the Tasmanianstate of Australia.” In 4th IEEE International Conference eScience, 432–433. Indianapolis, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jirka, S., and A. Broering. 2009. OGC Discussion Paper 09-112: Sensor Observable Registry Discussion Paper. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Jirka, S., A Bröring, and C. Stasch. 2009a. “Applying OGC Sensor Web Enablement to Risk Monitoring and Disaster Management.” Workshop on “Sensorweb Enablement: Strengthening the SDI” at the GSDI 11 World Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands, June 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jirka, S., A. Bröring, and C. Stasch. 2009b. “Discovery Mechanisms for the Sensor Web.” Sensors 9: 2661–2681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirka, S., and D. Nüst. 2010. OGC Discussion Paper 10-171: Sensor Instance Registry Discussion Paper. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, S., A. Croitoru, and C. Tao. 2005. “A Distributed Geospatial Infrastructure for Sensor Web.” Computers & Geosciences 31: 221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, S., S. Chen, C. Huang, R. Li, Y. Chang, J Badger, and R. Rezel. 2010. “GeoCENS: Geospatial Cyberinfrastructure for Environmental Sensing.” In Proceedings of GIScience 2010—Sixth international conference on Geographic Information Science, Zurich, Switzerland, September 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Longueville, B. D., A. Annoni, S. Schade, N. Ostlaender, and O. Whitmore. 2010. “Digital Earth's Nervous System for Crisis Events: Real-Time Sensor Web Enablement of Volunteered Geographic Information.” International Journal of Digital Earth 3(3), 242–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, R. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 07-110r4: CSW-ebRIM Registry Service – Part 1: ebRIM Profile of CSW. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Nebert, D., A. Whiteside, and P. Vretanos. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 07-006r1: OGC Catalogue Services Specification (Version 2.0.2). Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Portele, C. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 07-036: OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML) Encoding Standard. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, A. 2011. OGC Encoding Standard 08-094r1: SWE Common Data Model Encoding Standard. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Simonis, I., and J. Echterhoff. 2011. OGC Implementation Specification 09-000: Sensor Planning Service Implementation Standard. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Song, E. Y., and K. B. Lee. 2008. “STWS: A Unified Web Service for IEEE 1451 Smart Transducers.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 8: 1749–1756.
   Google Scholar
• Song, E. Y., and K. B. Lee. 2009. “Integration of IEEE 1451 Smart Transducers and OGC-SWE Using STWS.” In IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, SAS 2009. New Orleans, LA, USA, February 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Voges, U., and K. Senkler. 2007. OGC Implementation Specification 07-045: OpenGIS Catalogue Services Specification 2.0.2-ISO Metadata Application Profile. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Vretanos, P. A. 2005. OGC Implementation Specification 04-094: Web Feature Service Implementation Specification. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and M. Xiong. 2009. Yangtze River hydrological forecast Automation Technology. Beijing: China Waterpower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, A., and J. D. Evans. 2008. OGC Implementation Specification 07-067r5: Web Coverage Service (WCS) Implementation Standard. Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium.
   Google Scholar