Legends of the dashboard: an empirical evaluation of split and joint layout designs for geovisual analytics interfaces

References

• Andrienko, N., G. Andrienko, G. Fuchs, A. Slingsby, C. Turkay, and S. Wrobel. 2020. Visual Analytics for Data Scientists. Cham: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Badard, T., and E. Dubé. 2009. “Enabling Geospatial Business Intelligence.” Open Source Business Resource 9: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Baldonado, M. Q. W., A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky. 2000. “Guidelines for Using Multiple Views in Information Visualization.” In AVI ‘00 Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 110–119. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24 (6): 574–594. doi:10.1080/10447310802205776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernasocchi, M., A. Çöltekin, and S. Gruber. 2012. “An Open Source Geovisual Analytics Toolbox for Multivariate Spatio-Temporal Data in Environmental Change Modelling.” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences I-2: 123–128. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-I-2-123-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Björkbom, M., J. Timonen, H. Yigitler, O. Kaltiokallio, J. M. Vallet, M. Myrsky, J. Saarinen, et al. 2013. “Localization Services for Online Common Operational Picture and Situation Awareness.” IEEE Access 1: 742–757. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2287302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojko, A. 2006. “Using Eye Tracking to Compare Web Page Designs: A Case Study.” Journal of Usability Studies 3 (1): 112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowska, A., and K. Jach. 2017. “Pre-Testing of Polish Translation of System Usability Scale (SUS).” In Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 37th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2016 – Part I, edited by L. Borzemski, A. Grzech, J. Świątek, and Z. Wilimowska, 143–153. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bragger, L., L. Baumgartner, K. Koebel, J. Scheidegger, and A. Çöltekin. 2022. “Interaction and Visualization Design Considerations for Gaze-Guided Communication in Collaborative Extended Reality.” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-205-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. 1996. “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale.” In Usability Evaluation in Industry, edited by P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, 189–194. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brügger, A., S. I. Fabrikant, and A. Çöltekin. 2017. “An Empirical Evaluation of Three Elevation Change Symbolization Methods Along Routes in Bicycle Maps.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 44 (5): 436–451. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1193766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., A. Brychtová, A. L. Griffin, A. C. Robinson, M. Imhof, and C. Pettit. 2017. “Perceptual Complexity of Soil-Landscape Maps: A User Evaluation of Color Organization in Legend Designs Using Eye Tracking.” International Journal of Digital Earth 10 (6): 560–581. doi:10.1080/17538947.2016.1234007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., S. Christophe, A. Robinson, and U. Demšar. 2019. “Designing Geovisual Analytics Environments and Displays with Humans in Mind.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (12): 572. doi:10.3390/ijgi8120572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., B. Heil, S. Garlandini, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2009. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive Map Interface Designs: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with Eye-Movement Analysis.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 36 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1559/152304009787340197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., C. Pettit, and B. Wu. 2015. “Geovisual Analytics: Human Factors.” International Journal of Digital Earth 8 (8): 595–598. doi:10.1080/17538947.2015.1047173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, E., H. Du, and L. Gardner. 2020. “An Interactive Web-Based Dashboard to Track COVID-19 in Real Time.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20 (5): 533–534. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. 2017. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dykes, J., J. Wood, and A. Slingsby. 2010. “Rethinking Map Legends with Visualization.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16 (6): 890–899. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2010.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, D., J. Keil, M.-C. Tuller, A.-K. Bestgen, and F. Dickmann. 2020. “Searching for the ‘Right’ Legend: The Impact of Legend Position on Legend Decoding in a Cartographic Memory Task.” The Cartographic Journal 57 (1): 6–17. doi:10.1080/00087041.2018.1533293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edsall, R. M. 2003. “Design and Usability of an Enhanced Geographic Information System for Exploration of Multivariate Health Statistics.” The Professional Geographer 55 (2): 146–160. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, S. 2006. Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Display of Data. Edited by C. Wheele. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Figgemeier, H., C. Henzen, and A. Rümmler. 2021. “A Geo-Dashboard Concept for the Interactively Linked Visualization of Provenance and Data Quality for Geospatial Datasets.” AGILE: GIScience Series 2: 1–8. doi:10.5194/agile-giss-2-25-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gołębiowska, I. 2015. “Legend Layouts for Thematic Maps: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with the Thinking Aloud Method.” The Cartographic Journal 52 (1): 28–40. doi:10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golebiowska, I., T. Opach, and J. K. Rød. 2017. “For Your Eyes Only? Evaluating a Coordinated and Multiple Views Tool with a Map, a Parallel Coordinated Plot and a Table Using an Eye-Tracking Approach.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (2): 237–252. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1191636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golebiowska, I., T. Opach, and J. K. Rød. 2020. “Breaking the Eyes: How Do Users Get Started with a Coordinated and Multiple View Geovisualization Tool?” The Cartographic Journal 57 (3): 235–248. doi:10.1080/00087041.2019.1660513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., and A. C. Robinson. 2015. “Comparing Color and Leader Line Highlighting Strategies in Coordinated View Geovisualizations.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21 (3): 339–349. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2371858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, M. 2007. “The Cognitive Limits of Animated Maps.” Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 42 (4): 349–357. doi:10.3138/carto.42.4.349.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., N. Nyström, R. Andersson, R. Dewhurst, H. Jarodzka, and J. Van de Weijer. 2011. Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. J., and K. S. Karn. 2003. “Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises.” In The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, edited by H. Deubel and J. R. Hyönä, 573–605. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Jing, C., M. Du, S. Li, and S. Liu. 2019. “Geospatial Dashboards for Monitoring Smart City Performance.” Sustainability 11 (20): 5648. doi:10.3390/su11205648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1976. “Eye Fixations and Cognitive Processes.” Cognitive Psychology 8 (4): 441–480. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 1999. “Managing Split-Attention and Redundancy in Multimedia Instruction.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 (4): 351–371. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, L. 1995. “A Task Analysis Approach to the Visualization of Geographic Data.” In Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems, 355–371. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_25.
   Google Scholar
• Koua, E. L., A. MacEachren, and M. J. Kraak. 2006. “Evaluating the Usability of Visualization Methods in an Exploratory Geovisualization Environment.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 (4): 425–448. doi:10.1080/13658810600607550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraak, M.-J., R. E. Roth, B. Ricker, A. Kagawa, and Le G. Sourd. 2020. Mapping for a Sustainable World. New York: United Nations, International Cartographic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krzywinski, M., J. Schein, İ Birol, J. Connors, R. Gascoyne, D. Horsman, S. J. Jones, and M. A. Marra. 2009. “Circos: An Information Aesthetic for Comparative Genomics.” Genome Research 19 (9): 1639–1645. doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchinke, L., F. Dickmann, D. Edler, M. Bordewieck, and A.-K. Bestgen. 2016. “The Processing and Integration of Map Elements During a Recognition Memory Task Is Mirrored in Eye-Movement Patterns.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 47 (9): 213–222. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. Y., and M. Honson. 2003. “Chromatic Variation of Ishihara Diagnostic Plates.” Color Research & Application 28 (4): 267–276. doi:10.1002/col.10161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., S. Haroz, and K.-L. Ma. 2006. “Layout of Multiple Views for Volume Visualization: A User Study.” In ISVC 2006, LNCS 4292, edited by G. Bebis, 215–226. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/11919629_23.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and Z. Qin. 2014. “Spacing and Alignment Rules for Effective Legend Design.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41 (4): 348–362. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.933085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63 (2): 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P., and C. Fitz. 1993. “Gestalt Theory and Instructional Design.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 23 (2): 137–157. doi:10.2190/G748-BY68-L83T-X02J.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., and R. E. Mayer. 1999. “Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (2): 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts.” n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Opach, T., I. Gołębiowska, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2014. “How Do People View Multi-Component Animated Maps?” The Cartographic Journal 51 (4): 330–342. doi:10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opach, T., and J. K. Rød. 2014. “Do Choropleth Maps Linked with Parallel Coordinates Facilitate an Understanding of Multivariate Spatial Characteristics?” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41 (5): 413–429. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.953585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opach, T., and J. K. Rød. 2018. “Developing a Dashboard Visualizing Compensation Data on Damages Caused by Extreme Events.” Kart Og Plan 78 (3): 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, L., and L. Whitman. 2011. “Riding the Technology Wave: Effective Dashboard Data Visualization.” In Symposium on Human Interface, 249–258. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21793-7_29.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J. 1994. “It’s About Time: A Conceptual Framework for the Representation of Temporal Dynamics in Geographic Information Systems.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 (3): 441–461. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01869.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka, S., L. Herman, T. Řezník, M. Pařilová, K. Jedlička, J. Bouchal, M. Kepka, and K. Charvát. 2019. “User Evaluation of Map-Based Visual Analytic Tools.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (8): 363. doi:10.3390/ijgi8080363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. 2017. Designing Dashboards as Geo-Visualization Tool for Origin-Destination Data. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 2009. “The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (8): 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensink, R. A. 2002. “Internal vs. External Information in Visual Perception.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Smart Graphics – SMARTGRAPH ‘02, 63–70. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/569005.569015.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. C. 2007. “State of the Art: Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, 61–71. Los Alamitos: CPS.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H., J. L. Morrison, P. C. Muehrcke, A. J. Kimerling, and S. C. Guptill. 1995. Elements of Cartograhy. 6th ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. 2021. “Cartographic Design as Visual Storytelling: Synthesis and Review of Map-Based Narratives, Genres, and Tropes.” The Cartographic Journal 58 (1): 83–114. doi:10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnürer, R., M. Ritzi, A. Çöltekin, and R. Sieber. 2020. “An Empirical Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Pie Charts with Individually Extruded Sectors in a Geovisualization Context.” Information Visualization 19 (3): 183–206. doi:10.1177/1473871619896103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnürer, R., R. Sieber, and A. Çöltekin. 2015. “The Next Generation of Atlas User Interfaces: A User Study with ‘Digital Natives’.” In Modern Trends in Cartography – Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 23–36. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-0w7926-4_3.
   Google Scholar
• Shortridge, B. G., and R. B. Welch. 1982. “The Effect of Stimulus Redundancy on the Discrimination of Town Size on Maps.” The American Cartographer 9 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1559/152304082783948277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum, Terry A., Robert B. McMaster, Fritz C. Kessler, and Hugh H. Howard. 2022. Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization. 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soegaard, M. 2016. “Gestalt Principles of Form Perception.” In The Glossary of Human-Computer Interaction. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-glossary-of-human-computer-interaction/gestalt-principles-of-form-perception.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Z., R. E. Roth, L. Houtman, T. Prestby, A. Iverson, and S. Gao. 2022. “Visual Storytelling with Maps: Maps: An Empirical Study on Story Map Themes and Narrative Elements, Visual Storytelling Genres and Tropes, and Individual Audience Differences.” Cartographic Perspectives 100: 10–44. doi:10.14714/CP100.1759.
   Google Scholar
• Stehle, S., and R. Kitchin. 2020. “Real-Time and Archival Data Visualisation Techniques in City Dashboards.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34 (2): 344–366. doi:10.1080/13658816.2019.1594823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii Studio User’s Manual. 2016. Accessed January 23, 2023. https://connect.tobii.com/s/studio-downloads?language=en_US.
   Google Scholar
• Yarbus, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Z., C. Xue, and Y. Lin. 2021. “Visual Perception Based on Gestalt Theory.” In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, IHSI 2021, edited by D. Russo, T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, G. di Bucchianico, and R. Taiar, 792–797. Cham: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68017-6_118.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitbasioglu, O. M., and O. Velcu. 2012. “A Review of Dashboards in Performance Management: Implications for Design and Research.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (1): 41–59. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2011.08.002.
   Google Scholar