Dealing with uncertainty: the illusion of knowledge in the study of counterterrorism effectiveness

References

• Alexander, Y. 2006. Counterterrorism Strategies. Successes and Failures of Six Nations. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Araj, B. 2008. “Harsh State Repression as a Cause of Suicide Bombing: The Case of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31 (4): 284–303. doi:10.1080/10576100801925273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashour, O. 2008. “Islamist De-Radicalization in Algeria: Successes and Failures.” The Middle Eastern Institute Policy Brief 21: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P. 2003. “An Intervention Analysis of Terrorism: The Spanish ETA Case.” Defence and Peace Economics 14 (6): 401–412. doi:10.1080/1024269032000085170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. 2008. “The Impact of Counterterrorism and Strain on Palestinian Terrorism.” In Armed Forces and Conflict Resolution: Sociological Perspectives, edited by G. Caforio, G. Kummel, and B. Purkayastha, 331–348. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J., and S. Shane. 2012. “A Measure of Change. Secret “Kills List” Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will.” New York Times [online]. Accessed May 3, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?r=0
   Google Scholar
• Benmelech, E., C. Berrebi, and E. Klor. 2010. “Counter-Suicide-Terrorism: Evidence from House Demolitions.” NBER Working Paper no. 16493. Accessed July 10, 2013. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16493
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, D. 1992. “United Kingdom: The United Kingdom Response to Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 4 (4): 171–205. doi:10.1080/09546559208427180.
   Google Scholar
• Boucek, C. 2008. “Saudi Arabia’s ‘Soft’ Counterterrorism Strategy: Prevention, Rehabilitation and Aftercare.” Carnegie Papers, no. 97. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Brzoska, M. 2009. “Zur Wirksamkeit Von Finanzsanktionen Als Instrument Im Kampf Gegen Den Terrorismus.” Vierteljahreshefte Zur Wirtschaftsforschung 78 (4): 88–100. doi:10.3790/vjh.78.4.88.
   Google Scholar
• Brzoska, M. 2011. “The Role of Effectiveness and Efficiency in the European Union’s Counterterrorism Policy: The Case of Terrorist Financing.” Economics of Security Working Paper 51. Berlin: Economics of Security.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D. 2003. “Measuring the War on Terrorism: A First Appraisal.” Current History 102 (668): 411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byman, D. 2013. “Why Drones Work.” Foreign Affairs 29 (4): 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, J., S. Sonnenberg, and S. Knuckey. 2012. Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Stanford, CA: International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School); New York: Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. D. 2004. “Dissuading State Support of Terrorism: Strikes or Sanctions? (An Analysis of Dissuasion Measures Employed Against Libya).” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10576100490262115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, A. K. 2013. “Why Drones Fail.” Foreign Affairs 29 (4): 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• David, S. R. 2002. “Fatal Choices: Israel’s Policy of Targeted Killing.” Mideast Security and Policy Studies 51: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 1992. “Institutional Responses to Terrorism: The Italian Case.” Terrorism and Political Violence 4 (4): 151–170. doi:10.1080/09546559208427179.
   Google Scholar
• Drakos, K. 2011. “Security Economics: A Guide for Data Availability and Needs.” Defence and Peace Economics 22 (2): 147–159. doi:10.1080/10242694.2011.542336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakos, K., and N. Giannakopoulos. 2009. “An Econometric Analysis of Counterterrorism Effectiveness: The Impact on Life and Property Losses.” Public Choice 139 (1–2): 135–151. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9384-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, I. 2008. “Great Expectations: The Use of Armed Force to Combat Terrorism.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 19 (3): 328–351. doi:10.1080/09592310802228666.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, W., and T. Sandler. 1993. “The Effectiveness of Antiterrorism Policies: A Vector-Autoregression-Intervention Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 87 (4): 829–844. doi:10.2307/2938817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. S. 2005. “Introduction.” In Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful?, edited by L. S. Friedman, 5–8. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, H. 2006. “Motivation or Capabilities? Israeli Counterterrorism against Palestinian Suicide Bombings and Violence.” Journal of Strategic Studies 29 (5): 843–869. doi:10.1080/01402390600901026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, D. 2005. “The Costs of Terrorism and the Costs of Countering Terrorism.” International Affairs Working Paper 2005-03, March 2005. New York: New School University.
   Google Scholar
• Görzig, C. 2010. Talking to Terrorists: Concessions and the Renunciation of Violence. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hafez, M. M., and J. M. Hatfield. 2006. “Do Targeted Assassinations Work? A Multivariate Analysis of Israel’s Controversial Tactic during Al-Aqsa Uprising.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29 (4): 359–382. doi:10.1080/10576100600641972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. E. 2006. “Muslim Profiles Post 9/11: Is Racial Profiling an Effective Counterterrorist Measure and Does It Violate the Right to Be Free from Discrimination.” Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, no. 123. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, C. 1984. The Effectiveness of Anti-Terrorist Policies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., and K. Braddock. 2010. “Rehabilitating the Terrorists?: Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs.” Terrorism and Political Violence 22 (2): 267–291. doi:10.1080/09546551003594748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, L., C. S. Owens, and M. Flannes. 2011. “Drone Warfare: Blowback from the New American Way of War.” Middle East Policy 18 (3): 122–132. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00502.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, D. A., and D. Paserman. 2009. “The Shape of Things to Come? On the Dynamics of Suicide Attacks and Targeted Killings.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (4): 315–342.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, D. A., and Z. Siddique. 2011. “Are Drone Strike Effective in Afghanistan and Pakistan? On the Dynamics of Violence between the United States and the Taliban.” Discussion Paper, no. 6262. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor. Accessed March 3, 2013. http://ftp.iza.org/dp6262.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. B. 2012. “Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns.” International Security 36 (4): 47–79. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, J., and J. Harper. 2006. “Effective Counterterrorism and the Limited Role of Predictive Data Mining.” Policy Analysis 584: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. 2009. “When Heads Roll: Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation.” Security Studies 18 (4): 719–755. doi:10.1080/09636410903369068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. 2014. “Attacking the Leader, Missing the Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes.” International Security 38 (4): 7–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josiger, W. J. 2010. “Getting it Right: Understanding Effective Counter-Terrorism Strategies.” In Coping with Terrorism: Origins, Escalation, Counterstrategies, and Responses, edited by R. Reuveny and W. R. Thompson, 219–246. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. H., A. Mintz, S. Mishal, and C. Samban. 2005. “What Happened to Suicide Bombings in Israel? Insights from a Terror Stock Model.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28 (3): 225–235. doi:10.1080/10576100590928115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, D. 2005. “The EU and Counter-Terrorism.” Working Paper. London: Centre for European Reform (CER).
   Google Scholar
• Kober, A. 2007. “Targeted Killing during the Second Intifada: The Quest for Effectiveness.” Journal of Conflict Studies 27 (1): 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Laffiteau, C. 2010. “What Counter-Terrorism Strategies Characterize a Constructive and Cost Effective Response to Al Qaeda Inspired Terrorism?” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA, February 17.
   Google Scholar
• LaFree, G., L. Dugan, and R. Korte. 2009. “The Impact of British Counterterrorist Strategies on Political Violence in Northern Ireland: Comparing Deterrence and Backlash Models.” Criminology 47 (1): 17–45. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00138.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm, R. D. 2005. “Immigration Must Be Restricted to Reduce Terrorism.” In Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful?, edited by L. S. Friedman, 78–83. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, W. M. 1978. “An Economic Study of U.S. Aircraft Hijackings, 1961–1976.” Journal of Law and Economics 21 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1086/466909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, L., A. J. Sarapu, and M. Wells. 2004. “Targeting the Leadership of Terrorist and Insurgent Movements: Historical Lessons for Contemporary Policy Makers.” Journal of Public and International Affairs 15 (Spring): 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Long, A. 2010. “Assessing the Success of Leadership Targeting.” CTC Sentinel 3 (11/12): 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, R. 2005. “Racial Profiling Reduces Terrorism.” In Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful?, edited by L. S. Friedman, 64–69. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lum, C., L. W. Kennedy, and A. Sherley. 2006. “Are Counter-Terrorism Strategies Effective? the Results of the Campbell Systematic Review on Counter-Terrorism Evaluation Research.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 2 (4): 489–516. doi:10.1007/s11292-006-9020-y.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, T. 2008. “Restoring Moral Authority: Ending Torture, Secret Detention, and the Prison at Guantanamo Bay.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 618 (1): 148–159. doi:10.1177/0002716208317118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvesti, M. L. 2002. “Bombing bin Laden: Assessing the Effectiveness of Air Strikes as a Counter-Terrorism Strategy.” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 26 (1): 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mannes, A. 2008. “Testing the Snake Head Strategy: Does Killing or Capturing its Leaders Reduce a Terrorist Group’s Activity.” The Journal of International Policy Solutions 9 (40): 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. D. 2007. “Confronting Terrorisms: Group Motivation and Successful State Policies.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19 (3): 331–350. doi:10.1080/09546550701424059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morag, N. 2005. “Measuring Success in Coping with Terrorism: The Israeli Case.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28 (4): 307–320. doi:10.1080/10576100590950156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2009. Cost-Benefit Assessment of United States Homeland Security Spending. Research Report no. 273.01.2009, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability. Accessed August 7, 2013. http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/uon:3125/ATTACHMENT01?view=true
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2012. “The Terrorism Delusion: America’s Overwrought Response to September 11.” International Security 37 (1): 81–110. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. (Philip Zelikow, Executive Director; Bonnie D. Jenkins, Counsel; Ernest R. May, Senior Advisor). 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Noricks, D. 2009. “Disengagement and Deradicalization: Processes and Programs.” In Social Science for Counterterrorism: Putting the Pieces Together, edited by P. K. Davis and K. Cragin, 11–70. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, R. 2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 343–361. doi:10.1017/S000305540300073X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedahzur, A., and A. Perliger. 2010. “The Consequences of Counterterrorist Policies in Israel.” In The Consequences of Counterterrorism, edited by M. Crenshaw, 335–366. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Perl, R. 2007. Combating Terrorism: The Challenge of Measuring Effectiveness. CRS Report for Congress, March 2007. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., A. B. Fox, E. Pitpitan, J. Tan, A. Huntington, E. Santos Jr., N. Ravishanker, and A. R. Pearson. 2009. “The Efficacy of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism in the Second Intifada: An Intergroup Approach.” Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology. Dublin, July.
   Google Scholar
• Price, B. C. 2012. “Targeting Top Terrorists: How Leadership Decapitation Contributes to Counterterrorism.” International Security 36 (4): 9–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2011. “Estimated Costs of EU Counterterrorism Measures.” Note requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Completed in May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, P. 2005. “Measuring Success in Countering Terrorism: Problems and Pitfalls.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3495: 316–321. doi:10.1007/11427995_26.
   Google Scholar
• Prunckun, H. W., Jr., and P. B. Mohr. 1997. “Military Deterrence of International Terrorism: An Evaluation of Operation El Dorado Canyon.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 20 (3): 267–280. doi:10.1080/10576109708436039.
   Google Scholar
• Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA). 2007. Effective Counter-Terrorism. A Critical Assessment of European Union Responses. Technical Report, published February 2007. Accessed August 10, 2013. http://www.qcea.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rprt-counterterrorism-en-feb-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., D. G. Arce, and W. Enders. 2009. “Transnational Terrorism.” In Global Crises, Global Solutions, 2nd ed., edited by B. Lomborg, 516–562. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., D. G. Arce, and W. Enders. 2011. “An Evaluation of INTERPOL’s Cooperative-based Counterterrorism Linkages.” Journal of Law and Economics 54 (1): 79–110. doi:10.1086/652422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, A., and R. Sing. 2009. “Measuring Success and Failure in Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism. US Government Metrics of the Global War on Terror.” In After the War on Terror: Regional and Multilateral Perspectives on Counter-Terrorism Strategy, edited by A. Schmid and G. Hindle, 33–61. London: RUSI.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and J. I. Walsh. 2013. “Do Drone Strikes Degrade Al Qaeda? Evidence From Propaganda Output.” Terrorism and Political Violence 25 (2): 311–327. doi:10.1080/09546553.2012.664011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, A. 2006. “The Problems of Evaluating Counter-Terrorism.” UNISCI Discussion Paper, no. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, M. 2006. “Winners and Losers in the War on Terror: The Problem of Metrics.” In Coping with Contemporary Terrorism: Origins, Escalation, Counter Strategies and Responses, edited by R. Reuveny and W. R. Thompson, 349–367. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzer, A., and M. Zehnder. 2010. “Camera Surveillance as a Measure of Counterterrorism?” Economics of Security Working Paper 34. Berlin: Economics of Security.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2003. “Terrorism and Probability Neglect.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26 (2–3): 121–136. doi:10.1023/A:1024111006336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TTSRL. 2007. Theoretical Treatise on Counter-Terrorism Approaches. Report prepared for the project “Transnational Terrorism, Security, and the Rule of Law” (TTSRL), financed by the European Commission. Accessed March 4, 2013. http://www.transnationalterrorism.eu/tekst/publications/WP6%20Del%2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tudge, C. 2004. “When Men Have Lost Their Reason.” New Statesman, April 12, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dongen, T. 2009. “Break it Down: An Alternative Approach to Measuring Effectiveness in Counterterrorism.” Economics of Security Working Paper 23. Berlin: Economics of Security.
   Google Scholar
• Van Um, E., and D. Pisoiu. 2013. “Assessing Effectiveness in Counterterrorism Policy.” In Studying ‘Effectiveness’ in International Relations: A Guide for Students and Scholars, edited by H. Hegemann, R. Heller, and M. Kahl, 255–279. Berlin: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, W. L. 1982. International Terrorism: How Nations Respond to Terrorists – A Comparative Policy Analysis. Salisbury, NC: Documentary Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilner, A. 2010. “Targeted Killings in Afghanistan: Measuring Coercion and Deterrence in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 33 (4): 307–329. doi:10.1080/10576100903582543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 2001. “Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” Global Environmental Politics 1 (1): 99–121. doi:10.1162/152638001570651.
   Google Scholar
• Zussman, A., and N. Zussman. 2006. “Assassinations: Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Israeli Counterterrorism Policy Using Stock Market Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 193–206. doi:10.1257/jep.20.2.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zycher, B. 2003. A Preliminary Benefit/Cost Framework for Counterterrorism Public Expenditures. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar