“Is this terrorism?” The Italian media and the Macerata shooting

References

• Al Nashmi, E. 2018. “From Selfies to Media Events.” Digital Journalism 6 (1): 98–117. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1306787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. 2006. “Terrorism and the Politics of Fear.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 6 (4): 415–439. doi:10.1177/1532708605285733.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. 2015. “Up and Out: Journalism, Social Media, and Historical Sensibility”.” Social Media + Society 1 (1): 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. 2020. “Practice, Interpretation, and Meaning in Today’s Digital Media Ecosystem.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97 (2): 342–359. doi:10.1177/1077699020916807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi, G., M. Maneri, F. Quassoli. “The Macerata Shooting: Digital Movements of Opinion in the Hybrid Media System.” Participation and Conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. 2007. On Suicide Bombing. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barisione, M., A. Michailidou, and M. Airoldi. 2019. “Understanding a Digital Movement of Opinion: The Case of #refugeeswelcome.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (8): 1145–1164. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1410204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, R., and C. L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1): 59–88. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benigno, F. 2018. Terrore e terrorismo: Saggio storico sulla violenza politica. Terror and Terrorism: Historical Essay on Political Violence. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1995. “Rhetorical Psychology, Ideological Thinking, and Imagining Nationhood.” Social Movements and Culture 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• Binotto, M., S. Nobile, and R. Rega. 2020. “Effetto Macerata. Dinamiche intermediali e agenda delle Politiche 2018 tra social e legacy media.” Problemi dell’Informazione 1: 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Boccia Artieri, S., and G. Bentivegna. 2019. Le teorie delle comunicazioni di massa e la sfida digitale. Mass Communication Theories and the Digital Challenge. Laterza: Roma–Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Bonerba, G., et al. 2018. “Dalla Cronaca Nera Alle Issues Politiche: Il “Caso Macerata” Nella Campagna Elettorale Del 2018” [From Crime News to Political Issues: The “Macerata Affair” in the 2018 Electoral Campaign.” In Le elezioni del 2018: Partiti, candidati, regole e risultati, edited by M. M. Fruncillo and F. Addeo, 201. Vol. 181. Società Italiana di Studi Elettorali.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., and T. Graham. 2012. “Social Media as Beat: Tweets as a News Source during the 2010 British and Dutch Elections.” Journalism Practice 6 (3): 403–419. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.663626.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., and T. Graham. 2013. “Twitter as a News Source. How Dutch and British Newspapers Used Tweets in Their News Coverage, 2007#2011.” Journalism Practice 7 (4): 446–464. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.802481.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, W. 2015. “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta–communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by J. Arendholz, et al., 1–28. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & .
   Google Scholar
• Caffi, C. 1999. “On Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 881–909. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00098-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas–Coulthard, C. R. 2003. “Cross–cultural Representation of ‘Otherness’ in Media Discourse.” In . In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by G. Weiss and R. Wodak, 272–296. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, A. 2005. Lineamenti di diritto internazionale penale. Outlines of International Criminal Law. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Catenaccio, P. 2018. “Web–mediated Stakeholder Communication in the Biotech Industry: The Discursive Construction of Dialogic Illusion.” Altre Modernità 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Catenaccio, P., C. Cotter, M. De Smedt, G. Garzone, G. Jacobs, F. Macgilchrist, L. Lams, et al. 2011. “Towards a Linguistics of News Production.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (7): 1843–1852. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Media Transition. 2018. “The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Contents.” Available on: https://www.accc.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. 1999. “Media Discourse and National Identity: Death and Myth in a News Broadcast.” In Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and C. Ludwig, 37–62. Wien: Passagen Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., and D. Freelon, eds. 2015. Handbook of Digital Politics. Cheltenham UK/Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, S. 2006. “Mediatized Rituals: Beyond Manufacturing Consent.” Media, Culture & Society 28 (3): 411–432. doi:10.1177/0163443706062910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, M. 2006. “Interviewing, Quoting, and the Development of Modern News Journalism. A Study of the Swedish Press 1915–1995.” In News from the Interview Society, edited by M. Ekström, et al., 21–48. Göteborg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge, S., L. García-Carretero, and M. Broersma. 2019. “Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter.” Media and Communication 7 (1): 271–285. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i1.1825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, G. 2011. “Adversarial Moments: A Study of Short-form Interviews in the News.” Journalism 12 (1): 51–69. doi:10.1177/1464884910367588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farhi, P. 2009. “The Twitter Explosion.” American Journalism Review 31 (3): 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. 2016. “Global Perspective on Media Events in Contemporary Society”. London: Ici Global.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., D. Jackson, M. Broersma, et al. 2016. “New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns.” New Media and Society 18 (5): 765–783. DOI:10.1177/1461444814546728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. “The Rediscovery of “Ideology”: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies.” In Approaches to Media, edited by O. Boyd–Barrett and C. Newbold, 354–364. London: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C. 1992. “Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968–1988.” Journal of Communication 42 (2): 5–24. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, U., and M. Djerf-Pierre. 2013. “The Social Journalist: Embracing the Social Media Life or Creating a New Digital Divide?” Digital Journalism 1 (3): 368–385. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.776804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2001. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. 2013. “Remixing Opinions: Video Quotations and Stances in Video Press Reviews.” Recherches en Communication 39: 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. 2019. “Digital and Written Quotations in a News Text: The Hybrid Genre of Political Opinion Review.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse. New Insights and Future Directions, edited by P. Bou–Franch and P. G. Blitvich, 133–162. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• KhosraviNik, M. 2010. “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions, and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups 1.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72. doi:10.1080/17405900903453948.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S., et al. 2011. “Congressional Agenda–building: Examining the Influence of Congressional Communications from the Speaker of the House.” Public Relations Journal 5 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S., S.-Y. Kim, M. McDevitt, A. Ostrowski, et al. 2009. “Competing for Attention: Information Subsidy Influence in Agenda Building during Election Campaigns.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 86 (3): 545–562. DOI:10.1177/107769900908600306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2016a. “Seizing the Moment: The Presidential Campaigns’ Use of Twitter during the 2012 Electoral Cycle.” New Media and Society 18 (8): 1473–1490. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2016b. Prototype Politics: Technology–intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyzanowski, M., and J. A. Tucker. 2018. “Re/constructing Politics through Social & Online Media.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. doi:10.1075/jlp.18007.krz.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., and H. Moe. 2012. “Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign”. New media & society, 14 (5), 729–747.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. 2015. “The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 12 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.994158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., S. C. Lewis, A. E. Holton, et al. 2012. “Normalizing Twitter: Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space.” Journalism Studies 13 (1): 19–36. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo Rodriguez, J., and A. Garmendia Madariaga. 2016. “Going public against institutional constraints? Analyzing the online presence intensity of 2014 European Parliament election candidates”. European Union Politics, 17 (2), 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P., and M. Gerli 2019. “Italy – Media Landscape”. In Media Landscapes, https://medialandscapes.org/country/italy
   Google Scholar
• Maneri, M. 2009. “I media e la guerra alle migrazioni.” In Razzismo democratico. La persecuzione degli stranieri in Europa, edited by S. Palidda, 66–85. Milano: Agenzia X.
   Google Scholar
• Maneri, M. and F.Quassoli, eds. 2020. Un attentato “quasi terroristico”: Macerata 2018, il razzismo e la sfera pubblica al tempo dei social media. Carocci: Roma .
   Google Scholar
• Marland, A. 2012. “Political Photography, Journalism, and Framing in the Digital Age: The Management of Visual Media by the Prime Minister of Canada.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (2): 214–233. doi:10.1177/1940161211433838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., and D. Boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media and Society 13 (1): 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, D., and K. Chen. 1996. Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nossek, H. 2008. “‘News Media’-media Events: Terrorist Acts as Media Events.” Communications 33 (3): 313–330. doi:10.1515/COMM.2008.020.
   Google Scholar
• Oelsner, K., and L. Heimrich. 2015. “Social Media Use of German Politicians: Towards Dialogic Voter Relations?” German Politics 24 (4): 451–468. doi:10.1080/09644008.2015.1021790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., and S. L. Bichard. 2012. Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, D. 2012. “Stancing: Strategies of Entextualizing Stance in Newswriting.” Discourse, Context and Media 1 (2–3): 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quassoli, F. 2013. ‘Clandestino’: Institutional Practices and Discourse Devices for the Control and Exclusion of Migrants in Contemporary Italy Journal of Language & Politics. 12 (2): 203-225
   Google Scholar
• Robles-Morales, J. M. and A.M. Córdoba-Hernández. 2019. “The Political Potential of Social Networks”. In Digital Political Participation, Social Networks and Big Data, edited by J.M. Robles Morales and A.M.Córdoba-Hernández. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. and D. Urban, eds. 1996. Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solis, B., and D.K. Breackenridge. 2009. Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Ft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., A. Valeriani, P. Barberá, R. Bonneau, J. T. Jost, J. Nagler, and J. Tucker. 2013. “Social Media and Political Communication. A Survey of Twitter Users during the 2013 Italian General Election.” Rivista italiana di scienza politica 43 (3): 381–410.
   Google Scholar
• Weimann, G. 1987. “Media Events: The Case of International Terrorism.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 31 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1080/08838158709386643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zolo, D. 2005. “Le ragioni del” terrorismo globale.” Iride 18 (3): 483–494.
   Google Scholar