“Islamic terrorism” in New Zealand? The John Key Government, Counterterrorism, and the “Islamic terrorism” Narrative

References

• Battersby, J. 2018. “Terrorism Where Terror Is Not: Australian and New Zealand Terrorism Compared.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 41 (1): 59–76. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2017.1287501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, K. 2007. Theory of World Security. Vol. 105. Aberystwyth, Wales: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlee, G. 2014. “Hansard Report.” Vol 701, Week 3, Thursday 6 November. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20141106/volume-701-week-3-thursday-6-november-2014
   Google Scholar
• “Countering Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill. 2014. Wellington, New Zealand: Published under the Authority of the House of Representatives. December 9.
   Google Scholar
• Dheeraj, P. C. 2020. “India’s PSYWAR Against Islamic Terrorism: A Trident Strategy.” Terrorism and Political Violence 32 (3): 558–581. doi:10.1080/09546553.2017.1388792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Awa, S., and B. Spalek. 2012. ““Religion, Theology and Counterterrorism.” Counterterrorism: Community-Based Approaches to Preventing Terror Crime 137-156.” Derby, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Frank, Michael. 2014. “Narrating Terror: The Cultural Imaginary of Terrorism in Public Discourse, Literature, and Film.” Habilitation Thesis. University of Constance.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, C. 2015. “Hansard Report.” Vol 703, Week 9, Tuesday, 24 February. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20150224/volume-703-week-9-tuesday-24-february-2015
   Google Scholar
• Greener-Barcham, B. K. 2002. “Before September: A History of Counter-terrorism in New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 509–524. doi:10.1080/1036114021000026382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, J., and R. Jackson . 2011. “What’s so “Religious” about “Religious Terrorism”?” Critical Studies on Terrorism. Abingdon, England: Taylor and Francis Group. 4 (3): 369–388. 10.1080/17539153.2011.623405.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, N., and J. Stephenson. 2017. Hit & Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the Meaning of Honour, Edited by J. Stephenson. Nelson, New Zealand: Potton & Burton.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. 1995. ““Holy Terror”: The Implications of Terrorism Motivated by a Religious Imperative.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 18 (4): 271–284. doi:10.1080/10576109508435985.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. 2006. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., and M. McDonald First edition. 2010. “Australian Identity, Interventionism and the War on Terror.” International Terrorism Post-9/11. Comparative Dynamics and Responses, no. : 184–206.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2007. “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse.” Government and Opposition 42 (3): 394–426. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00229.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R, Jarvis, L, Gunning, J, and Breen-Smyth, M. 2011. “Types of Terrorism.” Terrorism: A Critical Introduction, 150-170. Hampshire, England: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2015. “The Epistemological Crisis of Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8 (1): 33–54. doi:10.1080/17539153.2015.1009762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2016. “To Be or Not to Be Policy Relevant? Power, Emancipation and Resistance in CTS Research.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 120–125. doi:10.1080/17539153.2016.1147771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2021. “Responding to Christchurch – Lessons and Evidence from 20 Years of the War on Terror.” Presented at Hocken Talk Series 201, Dunedin, April 22.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2016. “Critical Terrorism Studies After 9/11.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, 44–54. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., and L. J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Juergensmeyer, M. 2005. “Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence.” Police Practice and Research 6 (2): 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Key, J. 2014. “Speech to NZ Institute of International Affairs.” Wellington, New Zealand, 6 November 2014. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/speech-nz-institute-international-affairs-0
   Google Scholar
• Key, J. 2015. “Hansard Report.” Vol 703, Week 9, Tuesday, 24 February. Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20150224/volume-703-week-9-tuesday-24-february-2015
   Google Scholar
• Khan, R. 2021. “The Gendered Coloniality of the Religious Terrorism Thesis: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Religious Labels and Their Selective Use in Terrorism Studies.” PhD diss, University of St Andrews, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Laqueur, W. 1999. The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. New York, United States: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, S. 2017. “A CTS Model of Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 10 (3): 523–541. doi:10.1080/17539153.2017.1336289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., N. Maravanyika, D. Nezri, E. Parry, and K. Thomas. 2018. “Online Jihadist Magazines and the “Religious Terrorism” Thesis.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 11 (3): 537–550. doi:10.1080/17539153.2018.1471098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, D. 2008. “The Origin of Terrorist Threats: Religious, Separatist, or Something Else?” Terrorism and Political Violence 20 (3): 396–414. doi:10.1080/09546550802073359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCully, M. 2015. “‘Ambassador for Counter Terrorism Announced,’ Beehive Press Releases.” Wellington, New Zealand. October 9. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/ambassador-counter-terrorism-announced
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. 2014. Hansard Report. Vol. 701. Week 3, Wednesday. 5 November. Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20141105/volume-701-week-3-wednesday-5-november-2014
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Security Intelligence Service. 2015. “Annual Report for the Year Ended June 2015.” Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.nzsis.govt.nz/assets/media/nzsis-ar15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P.-E. 2018. Open Source Jihad: Problematizing the Academic Discourse on Islamic Terrorism in Contemporary Europe. Elements in Religion and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norrlof, C., and A. W. C. Wohlforth. 2019. “Is US Grand Strategy Self-defeating? Deep Engagement, Military Spending and Sovereign Debt.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 36 (3): 227–247. doi:10.1177/0738894216674953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and N. Busst. 2006. “Anti-terror Laws and the Media after 9/11: Three Models in Australia, NZ and the Pacific.” Pacific Journalism Review 12 (2): 9–27. doi:10.24135/pjr.v12i2.859.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, W. 2015. Hansard Report. Vol. 703 (). Week 9, Tuesday. 24 February. Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20150224/volume-703-week-9-tuesday-24-february-2015
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, D. C. 1983. “Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious’ Traditions.” American Political Science Review 78 (3): 658–677. doi:10.2307/1961835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, D. C., A. Kurth Cronin, and J. Ludes. 2004. “The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism.“ In Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy, edited by Chermak, Steven M. and Freilich, Joshua D, 46–73. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, D. C. 2016. “It Is Waves, Not Strains.” Terrorism and Political Violence 28 (2): 217–224. doi:10.1080/09546553.2015.1112278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, D. C. 2017. “Terrorism as a Global Wave Phenomenon: Religious Wave.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Rifai, S. L. M. 2020. Christchurch Massacre in New Zealand. Some Reflections about Islamophobia. Islamic Books: Great Britain.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. Richard, Jackson, Pisoiu, Daniela 2nd Edition. 2018. “Are Counterterrorism Frameworks Based on Suppression and Military Force Effective in Responding to Terrorism?” Contemporary Debates on Terrorism 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, J. 2003. “Let’s Just Be Friends: New Zealand and the United States.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 30 (2): 122–130.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Commision of Inquiry. Ko Tō Atou Kāinga Tēnei. Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Terrorist Attack on Christchurch on 15 March 2019. 2020. Wellington, New Zealand: Royal Commission of Inquiry, .
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, M. 2004. “Al-Qaeda and the Nature of Religious Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 16 (4): 795–814. doi:10.1080/09546550590906098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, D. 2014. Hansard Report. Vol. 701. Week 3, Wednesday. 5 November. Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/document/51HansD_20141105/volume-701-week-3-wednesday-5-november-2014
   Google Scholar
• Shortt, R. 2015. “Raising New Zealand’s Terrorism Threat Level: Is Transparency Important in National Security?” Salus Journal 3 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Royal United Services Insitute. 2015. “Border Security and Counterterrorism – The New Zealand Experience.” In United Service, 24–26. South Wales: Royal United Services Institute of New.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J. 2003. Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. New York: Ec.
   Google Scholar
• Tellidis, I. 2016. “Religion and Terrorism.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by R. Jackson, 134–144. Abingdon, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Vicziany, M. 2003. “State Responses to Islamic Terrorism in Western China and Their Impact on South Asia.” Contemporary South Asia 12 (2): 243–262. doi:10.1080/095849302000147690.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, P. 2001. Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. D. 2016. “Why Is Contemporary Religious Terrorism Predominantly Linked to Islam? Four Possible Psychological Factors.” Perspectives on Terrorism 10 (1): 19–31.
   Google Scholar