Strategic exclusion, co-option and containment: towards an integrative theory of state-CSOs relations

References

• Agranoff, R. 2007. Managing Within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International 2016. “Russia: Four Years of Putin’s ‘Foreign Agents’ Law to Shackle and Silence Ngos.” Accessed 20 November 2020.https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EUR4651472016ENGLISH.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2019. “Laws Designed to Silence: The Global Crackdown on Civil Society Organizations.” Accessed 26 May 2021. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act30/9647/2019/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ariko, C. 2008. “The Government Told Not to Interfere in Cooperatives.” The New Vision. Accessed 26 Janaury 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Article 19. 2021. “Uganda: Shrinking Civic Space Marks the January 2021 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections.” Accessed 29 May 2021. https://www.article19.org/resources/uganda-shrinking-civic-space/
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. ed. 2011. ”A theory of securitisation: Origins, core assumptions and variants.” In Securitisation theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, 1–30. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bano, M. 2017. “Partnerships and the Good-Governance Agenda : Improving Service Delivery Through State – NGO Collaborations.” Voluntas 30 (6): 1270–1283. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9937-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydas Shannon Green, L. N., A.-H. Jadallah, L. Baydas, S. Chatterjee, S. Green, P. Krekó, L. Mooney, N. Julie, and A. N. Snyder. 2018. “Counter-Terrorism Measures and Civil Society Changing the Will, Finding the Way.” The International Consortium on Closing Civic Space. www.csis.org
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 2006. Parliament and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century, a Guide to Good Practice. Switzerland, Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
   Google Scholar
• Beijerman, M. 2018. “Practice What You Preach? Limitations to Imposing Democratic Norms on Ngos.” International Community Law Review 20 (1): 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, E. A., and J. Tremblay-Boire 2010. “NGO Responses to Counterterrorism Regulations After September 11th.” The International Journal of Not-For-Profit Law 12 (4): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, E. A., J. Tremblay-Boire, and A. Prakash 2014. “National Styles of NGO Regulation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (4): 716–736. doi:10.1177/0899764013481111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., and A. Gauja 2017. “Combating Terrorism by Constraining Charities? Charity and CT Legislation Before and After 9/11.” Public Administration 95 (3): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossa, S. B., and T. Mulindwa 2004. “The Anti-Terrorism Act, 2002 (Uganda): Human Rights Concerns and Implications.” Paper prepared for the Terrorism and Human Rights Network of The International Commission of Jurists, 15 September. Accessed 22 January 2020. http://www.icj.org/news.php3?idarticle=3517&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Brechenmacher, S. 2017. Civil Society Under Assault: Repression and Responses in Russia, Egypt, and Ethiopia. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Brechenmacher, S., and T. Carothers 2019. Defending Civic Space: Is the International Community Stuck? Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Weaver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., and S. Brechenmacher 2014. Accountability, Transparency, Participation, and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus? Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. 1995. “The State, Popular Participation, and the Voluntary Sector.” World Development 23 (4): 593–601. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)00147-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. 2011. “Civil Society in the Age of Crisis.“ Journal of Civil Society 7 (3): 241–263. doi:10.1080/17448689.2011.604986.
   Google Scholar
• Colas, A. 2010. “An Exceptional Response? Security, Development and Civil Society in Spanish Policy After 11-M.” Development & Change 41 (2): 313–333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01636.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, J., S. M. Hall, and S. Ljubownikow. 2014. “Post-Soviet Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation: The Impact of the NGO Law.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1253–1269. doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.941697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daucé, F. 2014. “The Government and Human Rights Groups in Russia : Civilized Oppression ?” Journal of Civil Society 10 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1080/17448689.2014.941087.
   Google Scholar
• Daucé, F. 2015. “The Duality of Coercion in Russia: Cracking Down on ‘‘Foreign Agent’’.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 23 (1): 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Devex. 2017. “In Australia, New Bill Has Charities Fearing a War on Advocacy.” Accessed 28 May 2021. https://www.devex.com/news/in-australia-new-bill-has-charities-fearing-a-war-on-advocacy-91716
   Google Scholar
• Devex. 2019. “USAID, US Ngos Leave Gaza, West Bank Over Terrorism Law.” Accessed 28 May 2021. https://www.devex.com/news/usaid-us-ngos-leave-gaza-west-bank-over-terrorism-law-94219
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Towards Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5: 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dicklitch, S. 1998. The Elusive Promise of NGOs in Africa: Lessons from Uganda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. 2010. ”UK Counter-terrorism Provision and Civil Society: Ensuring Responsibility, Ignoring Proportionality.” In Civil Society Under Strain: Counter-terrorism Policy, Civil Society and Aid Post-9/11, edited by J. Howell & J. Lind, 19–38. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, K., and A. Prakash. 2018. “Do Donors Reduce Bilateral Aid to Countries with Restrictive NGO Laws? a Panel Study, 1993-2012.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (1): 89–106. doi:10.1177/0899764017737384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy, K. E., J. Ron, and A. Prakash 2015. “Who Survived? Ethiopia’s Regulatory Crackdown on Foreign-Funded Ngos.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (2): 419–456. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.903854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., and D. Hulme. 1992. Making a Difference: NGOs and Development in a Changing World 240. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A. 1991. ”The Role of NGOs in Changing State-Society Relations : Perspectives from Eastern and Southern Africa.“ Development Policy Review 9 (1): 53–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.1991.tb00175.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A., and K. Sen 2010. “Embedding the War on Terror : State and Civil Society Relations.“ Development and Change 41 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.0162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2006. Factsheet: Russia’s NGO Laws. Accessed 28 July 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Fact%20Sheet_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Furneaux, C., and N. Ryan 2014. “Modelling NPO–government Relations: Australian Case Studies.” Public Management Review 16 (8): 1113–1140. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galunic, D. C., and K. M. Eisenhardt 2001. “Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (6): 1229–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. G. 2005. “Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource versus Routine Rigidity.” Academy of Management Journal 48 (5): 741–763. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2020. “Uganda Detains Leading Lawyer for LGBT Rights on Money-Laundering Charges.” Accessed 28 May 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/dec/23/uganda-detains-leading-lawyer-for-lgbt-rights-on-money-laundering-charges
   Google Scholar
• Guinane, K., and S. K. Sazawal 2010. “Counter-terrorism Measures and the NGO Section in the USA: A Hostile Environment.” In Civil Society Under Strain: Counter-terrorism Policy, Civil Society and Aid Post-9/11, edited by null, 53–75. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove, E. 1975. The Missing: The Study of the Implementation of Social Policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. 2017. The Impact of International Counter-Terrorism on Civil Society Organizations: Understanding the Role of the Financial Action Task Force. Berlin: Bread for the World Protestant Development Service Protestant Agency for Diakonie and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M. 2010. ”Civil Society and Democracy.” In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, edited by Helmut K. Anheier, Stefan Toepler, 186–192. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. 2014. “The Securitization of NGOs Post-9/11.” Conflict, Security and Development 14 (2): 151–179. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.903692.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J., O. Djurković-Djaković, S. Katić-Radivojević, and A. Nikolić 2006. “Policy Arena the Global War on Terror, Development and Civil Society.” Veterinary Parasitology 135: 121–135. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.08.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell, J., A. Ishkanian, E. Obadare, H. Seckinelgin, and M. Glasius 2008. “The Backlash Against Civil Society in the Wake of the Long War on Terror.” Development in Practice 18 (1): 82–93. doi:10.1080/09614520701778884.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J., and J. Lind 2009. “Manufacturing Civil Society and the Limits of Legitimacy: Aid, Security and Civil Society After 9/11 in Afghanistan.” European Journal of Development Research 21 (5): 718–736. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J., and J. Lind 2010. Civil Society Under Strain: CT Policy, Civil Society, and Aid Post-9/11. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, P. 2015. “Strategic Ambiguity About Military Capacity with Multiple Capacity with Multiple Adversaries.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (2): 288–300. doi:10.1177/0951629814531517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, B. 2003. The Strategically Ambiguous George W. Bush. 30 January 2020. http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030612.html
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, A. 2002. “Civil Society or the State?: Recent Approaches to the History of Voluntary Welfare.” Journal of Historical Sociology 15 (3): 328–342. doi:10.1111/1467-6443.00181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasnopolskaya, I., Y. Skokova, and U. Pape 2015. “Government-Nonprofit Relations in Russia’s Regime: An Exploratory Analysis.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (6): 2238–2266. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9654-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, J., and J. Howell 2010. “CT and the Politics of Aid: Civil Society Responses in Kenya.” Development and Change 41 (2): 335–353. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01637.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. 1993. “The History of Nonprofit Organizations in Australia as a Test of Some Recent Nonprofit Theory.” Voluntas 4 (3): 301–325. doi:10.1007/BF01398151.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, K., and P. Duplat 2013. “Study of the Impact of Donor CT Measures on Principled Humanitarian Action.” Independent Study Commissioned by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the Norwegian Refugee Council. Accessed 22 october 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Maclure, R., B. Kabore, and M. C. Mvonto, C. Mundy 2007. Civil Society and the Governance of Basic Education Partnership or Co-Optation? Burkina Faso Country Field Study. Toronto: Comparative and International Development Centre, OISE/UT and University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, P. S., and R. McNeil-Willson. 2021. ”Repressive Security and Civil Society in France, Post 9/11.” In Counter- Terrorism and Civil Society Post- 9/11 Progress and Challenges, edited by S.N Romaniuk and E.T. Njoku, 127–139. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcloughlin, C. 2011. “Factors Affecting State–nongovernmental Organization Relations in Service Provision: Key Themes from the Literature.” Public Administration and Development 31: 240–251. doi:10.1002/pad.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcsherry, B. 2005. “The Introduction of Terrorism-Related Offences in Australia : Comfort or Concern?“ Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 12 (2): 279–288. doi:10.1375/pplt.12.2.279.
   Google Scholar
• Muhumuza, W. 2010. “State-Civil Society Partnership in Poverty Reduction in Uganda.” Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review 26 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1353/eas.0.0015.
   Google Scholar
• Najam, A. 2000. “The Four-C’s of Third Sector– Government Relations.“ Nonprofit Management & Leadership 10 (4): 375–396.
   Google Scholar
• Nakweesi, D. 2007. “Bagaggawale Funds Hit with Procedural Hiccup.” Daily Monitor. Accessed 20 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Njoku, E.T. 2020a. “Investigating the Intersections Between CT and NGOs in Nigeria: Development Practice in Conflict-Affected Areas.” Development in Practice 30 (4): 501–551. doi:10.1080/09614524.2020.1714546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njoku, E.T. 2020b. “Politics of Conviviality? State-Civil Society Relations Within the Context of CT in Nigeria.” Voluntas 31 (6): 1063–1076. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9910-9.
   Google Scholar
• Njoku, E. T. 2020c. ”State-Oriented Service-Delivery Partnership with Civil Society Organizations in the Context of Counter-Terrorism in Nigeria.” Development Policy Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/dpr.12524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njoku, E.T. 2021. “Strategic Exclusion: The State and the Framing of a Service Delivery Role for Civil Society Organizations in the Context of Counterterrorism in Nigeria.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 44 (5): 410–443. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2018.1543131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njoku, E.T. 2022. “The State and the Securitization of Civil Society Organizations in Nigeria.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 1–26. doi:10.1177/08997640211003256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, T., T. Modood, N. Meer, D. N. Dehanas, and S. H. Jones 2016. “Governing Through Prevent? Regulation and Contested Practice in State–Muslim Engagement.” Sociology 50 (1): 160–177. doi:10.1177/0038038514564437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. J. 2012a. “Islamizing Aid: Transnational Muslim NGOs After 9.11.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (1): 126–155. doi:10.1007/s11266-011-9185-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. J. 2012b. “Trajectories of Transnational Muslim Ngos.” Development in Practice 22 (5–6): 763–778. doi:10.1080/09614524.2012.685876.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. M., A. Murdie, and V. Asal 2016. “Human Rights, NGO Shaming and the Exports of Abusive States.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 767–786. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppe, A. E., and J. Wolff 2017. “The Contested Spaces of Civil Society in a Plural World : Norm Contestation in the Debate About Restrictions on International Civil Society Support.“ Contemporary Politics 23 (4): 469–488. doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1343219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekkinen, M. 2013. “Russian Legal Practices of Citizens’ Involvement in Political Decision-Making: Legal Study of Their Genesis Under the Influence of International Law.” The International Journal of Human Rights 17 (1): 79–112. doi:10.1080/13642987.2012.700455.
   Google Scholar
• Romaniuk, S. N. 2022. Under Siege: Counter- Terrorism Policy and Civil Society Organizations in Post- Socialist Hungary. Maryland: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Romaniuk, S. N., and E.T. Njoku. 2021. Counter- Terrorism and Civil Society: Post- 9/11 Progress and Challenges. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosand, E. 2018. Where is Civil Society in the Un’s Counter-Terrorism Efforts?, 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/05/15/w
   Google Scholar
• Rubongoya, J. B. 2010. “The Politics of Uganda’s Anti-Terrorism Law and Its Impact on Civil Society.” In Civil Society Under Strain: CT Policy, Civil Society and Aid Post-9/11, edited by J. Howell & J. Lind. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutzen, D. 2015. “Authoritarianism Goes Global (II): Civil Society Under Assault.” Journal of Democracy 26 (4): 28–39. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 2012. The State of Nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., V. B. Benevolenski, and L. I. Jakobson 2015. “Penetrating the Dual Realities of Government-Nonprofit Relations in Russia.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (6): 2181–2198. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9652-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., and S. Toepler 2015. “Government–nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity?” Voluntas 26 (6): 2155–2177. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 1995. Some Reflections About the Concept of Civil Society (In General) and Its Role in the Liberalization and Democratization of Europe in the Nineteenth Century (In Particular)’, paper presented at the conference ‘Civil Society before Democracy.Princeton University, 6–7 October.
   Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. 2001. “Ten Years After the Soviet Breakup: Russia’s Hybrid Regime.” Journal of Democracy 12 (4): 65–70. doi:10.1353/jod.2001.0082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidel, M 2008 Counter-Terrorism and the Enabling Legal and Political Environment for Civil Society: A Comparative Analysis of “War on Terror” States The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 10 3 7–49
   Google Scholar
• Sidel, M. 2010. “Counterterrorism and the Regulation of Civil Society in the USA 41.“ Development and Change. 41 (2): 293–312. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01642.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoczylis, J., and S. Andrew. 2021. “The Spectacle of Ghost Security: Security Politics and British Civil Society.“ In Counter-terrorism and Civil Society Organisations: Post-9/11 Progress and Challenges, edited by S. N. Romaniuk, & E. T. Njoku. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skokova, Y., U. Pape, and I. Krasnopolskaya 2018. “The Nonprofit Sector in Today ’ S Russia : Between Confrontation and Co- Optation.” Europe-Asia Studies 70 (4): 531–563. doi:10.1080/09668136.2018.1447089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. 2010. “Osama or the Georges: Shifting Threats and State Policy Towards Civil Society in Uzbekistan.” Development and Change 41 (2): 355–374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburini, F. 2018. “Anti-Terrorism Laws in the Maghreb Countries : The Mirror of a Democratic Transition That Never Was.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 53 (8): 1235–1250. doi:10.1177/0021909618779613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Independent.2021. EU, US envoys urge gov’t to unfreeze CSO bank account. Accessed 20 September 2021. https://www.independent.co.ug/eu-us-envoys-urge-govt-to-unfreeze-cso-bank-accounts/.
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington: Public Affairs Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNOHCHR. 2016. “Australian Government Must Re-build Trust of Civil Society.” http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?News-%0DID=20693&LangID=E
   Google Scholar
• van der Borgh, C., and C. Terwindt 2014. NGOs Under Pressure in Partial Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, S., and R. Burles 2018. “Regulating NGO Funding: Securitizing the Political.” International Relations 32 (4): 430–448. doi:10.1177/0047117818782604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells-Dang, A. 2012. Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam: Informal Pathbreakers in Health and the Environment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, B. E. 2007. “Exporting the Patriot Act? Democracy and the “War on Terror” in the Third World.” Third World Quarterly 28 (5): 1017–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, B. E. 2010. “Compliance Among Weak States: Africa and the Counter-terrorism Regime.” Review of International Studies 36 (3): 639–662. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. 2005. The Global Governance Reader. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2013. “The Legal Legacy of the ‘War on Terror.” Macquarie Law Journal 3: 3–16.
   Google Scholar