Critical terrorism studies and numbers: engagements, openings, and future research

References

• Ali, N. 2014. “Mapping the Muslim Community: The Politics of Counter-Radicalisation in Britain.” In Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives, edited by C. Baker-Beall, C. Heath-Kelly, and L. Jarvis, 139–155. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, W. L. 2021. “The Conventions and Politics of Migration Data Visualizations.” New Media & Society 25 (6): 1313–1334. https://doi.org/10.1461/4448211019300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, G., M. Burton, and A. Pratt 2022. “Terrorism in Great Britain: The Statistics.” Accessed December 16, 2022. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7613/CBP-7613.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andone, C. 2022. “On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking.” Informal Logic 42 (4): 685–704. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i4.7175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchter, J. 2016. “Paying Attention to Dead Bodies: The Future of Security Studies?” Journal of Global Security Studies 1 (1): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogv005.
   Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., T. Balzacq, and P. Bourbeau. 2018. “Numbers in Global Security Governance.” European Journal of International Security 3 (1): 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., T. G. Coan, and O. C. Sterck. 2018. “Security Through Numbers? Experimentally Assessing the Impact of Numerical Arguments in Security Communication.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20 (2): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117734791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J., and C. P. Thomson. 2017. “An Experimental Agenda for Securitization Theory.” International Studies Review 19 (4): 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Beall, C. 2009. “The Discursive Construction of EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: Writing the ‘Migrant other’, Securitisation and Control.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 5 (2): 188–206. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v5i2.161.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, J. S., and L. Sjoberg. 2015. “Calculating Critique: Thinking Outside the Methods Matching Game.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (3): 852–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, J., L. Sjoberg. J. S. Barkin, & L. Sjoberg, Eds. 2017. Interpretive Quantification: Methodological Explorations for Critical and Constructivist IR. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7361329.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, V. 2010. “Analysing Elite Discourse on Terrorism and Its Implications: The Case of Morocco.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (1): 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539151003594269.
   Google Scholar
• BBC 2013. “The Maths of Spies and Terrorists.” BBC Online, June 2, 2013. Accessed September 8, 2014. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01snyk3.
   Google Scholar
• BBC 2014. “Can Maths Combat Terrorism?” BBC Online, December 17, 2014. Accessed September 8, 2023. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04v4sxd.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. P., and D. Hirschman. 2018. “The Sociology of Quantification: Where are We Now?” Contemporary Sociology 47 (3): 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118767649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 2021. “Rhetorical Uses of Precise Numbers and Semi-Magical Round Numbers in Political Discourse About COVID-19: Examples from the Government of the United Kingdom.” Discourse & Society 32 (5): 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211013115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeley, R. 2007. “Bringing the State Back into Terrorism Studies.” European Political Science 6 (3): 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210139.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeley, R. 2009. State Terrorism and Neoliberalism: The North in the South. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, N. G. 2021. “40 Terrorism Databases and Data Sets.” Perspectives on Terrorism 15 (2): 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Breen Smyth, M., J. Gunning, R. Jackson, G. Kassimeris, and P. Robinson. 2008. “Critical Terrorism Studies – an Introduction.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539150701868538.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, J. 2015. “The Biopolitics of Statistics and Census in Palestine.” International Political Sociology 9 (1): 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., and L. Hansen. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapekis, A., and S. M. Moore. 2019. “The Prosecution of “Others”: Presidential Rhetoric and the Interrelation of Framing, Legal Prosecutions, and the Global War on Terror.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (3): 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1599164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counter-Terrorism Policing. 2021. “Latest Home Office Statistics Reveal 7 Late-Stage Plots Foiled Since March 2020”. Accessed December 16, 2022. https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/latest-home-office-statistics-reveal-7-late-stage-plots-foiled-since-march-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Dronewars. n.d. “Dronewars: Shining a Spotlight on Military Drones.” Accessed January 20, 2023. https://dronewars.net.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., and M. L. Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49 (3): 401–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 3 (2): 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2002. ““Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, A., L. Jarvis, and M. Lister. 2023. “COVID-19 and ‘The public’: UK Government, Discourse and the British Political Tradition.” Contemporary Politics 29 (3): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2022.2162206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioramonti, L. 2014. How Numbers Rule the World: The Use and Abuse of Statistics in Global Politics. London: Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350220645.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. 2015. “Why Me? An Autoethnographic Account of the Bizarre Logic of Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8 (1): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.1005934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, K. 2019. “This Violence Good, That Violence Bad: Normative and State-Centric Discourses in British School Textbooks.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (4): 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1618643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freistein, K. 2016. “Effects of Indicator Use: A Comparison of Poverty Measuring Instruments at the World Bank.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18 (4): 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1023053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks, M. 2020. “The Security-Prejudice Nexus: “Islamist” Terrorism and the Structural Logics of Islamophobia in the UK.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 13 (1): 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1650874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1982. “Biopower and the Avalanche of Printed Numbers.” Humanities in Society 5 (3–4): 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1986. “Making Up People.” In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought, edited by T. Heller and C. Brooke-Rose, 222–236. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K. 2011. “The Moral Economy of Violence: Israel’s First Lebanon War, 1982.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (2): 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.586199.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. K., and T. Porter. 2012. “What Do Numbers Do in Transnational Governance?” International Political Sociology 6 (4): 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, K. 2011. “The Critical Terrorism Studies–Cultural Criminology Nexus: Some Thoughts on How to ‘Toughen up’ the Critical Studies Approach.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (1): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.553387.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2017. “The Geography of Pre-Criminal Space: Epidemiological Imaginations of Radicalisation Risk in the UK Prevent Strategy, 2007–2017.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 10 (2): 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2017.1327141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, E., and D. Stokes. 2011. “Critical Realism and Historical Materialism as Resources for Critical Terrorism Studies.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.553384.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R. L. 2017. “The Political Potential of Numbers: Data Visualisation in the Abortion Debate.” Women, Gender and Research 26 (1): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v26i1.109789.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2012. Selling the War on Terror: Foreign Policy Discourses After 9/11. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2016. “The Language of Counterterrorism.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by R. Jackson, 203–2013. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., and K. Braddock. 2012. “Introduction from the Editors.” In Terrorism Studies: A Reader, edited by J. Horgan and K. Braddock, viii–xii. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2007a. “The Core Commitments of Critical Terrorism Studies.” European Political Science 6 (3): 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210141.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2007b. “Language, Policy and the Construction of a Torture Culture in the War on Terrorism.” Review of International Studies 33 (3): 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2016. “To Be or Not to Be Policy Relevant? Power, Emancipation and Resistance in CTS Research.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2016.1147771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., M. Breen Smyth, and J. Gunning. 2009. “Critical Terrorism Studies: Framing a New Research Agenda.” In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, edited by R. Jackson, M. B. Smyth, and J. Gunning, 34–48. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., L. Jarvis, J. Gunning, and M. Breen-Smyth. 2011. Terrorism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., E. Murphy, and S. Poynting. 2010. “Introduction: Terrorism, the State and the Study of Political Terror.” In Contemporary State Terrorism: Theory and Practice, edited by R. Jackson, E. Murphy, and S. Poynting, 1–11. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2009a. “The Spaces and Faces of Critical Terrorism Studies.” Security Dialogue 40 (1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608100845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2009b. Times of Terror: Discourse, Temporality and the War on Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230243637.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2016. “Critical Terrorism Studies After 9/11.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by R. Jackson, 28–38. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2019. “Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, and Critique: Opportunities, Examples, and Implications.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (2): 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1575607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2022. “Counting Coronavirus: Mathematical Language in the UK Response to Covid-19.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy, edited by A. Musolff, R. Breeze, K. Kondo, and S. Vilar-Lluch, 79–94. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350232730.ch-005.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2023. “Counting Security in the Vernacular: Quantification Rhetoric in “Everyday” (In) Security Discourse.” International Political Sociology 17 (3): olad013. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olad013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L., and J. Holland. 2014. “‘We [For] Got him’: Remembering and Forgetting in the Narration of Bin Laden’s Death.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (2): 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813516527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L., and M. Lister. 2013. “Disconnected Citizenship? The Impacts of Anti-Terrorism Policy on Citizenship in the UK.” Political Studies 61 (3): 656–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00993.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L., and M. Lister. 2014. “State Terrorism Research and Critical Terrorism Studies: An assessment†.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 7 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2013.877669.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., and M. L. Smith. 2009. “We’re All Terrorists Now: Critical—Or Hypocritical—Studies “On” Terrorism?” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32 (4): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100902744128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. 2009. “Critical of What? Terrorism and Its Study.” International Relations 23 (1): 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117808100614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. 2011. “Terrorism as a Social Relation within Capitalism: Theoretical and Emancipatory Implications.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (1): 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.553385.
   Google Scholar
• Kattelman, K. 2021. “Pork, Risk, or Reaction? The Determinants of US Counterterrorist Funding.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 14 (4): 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2021.1996936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirisci, M. 2020. “Fighting for Survival: Responding to State Capacity and Terror Group End.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 13 (2): 312–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1708040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. 2019. “Proscribing the Past or de-Proscribing the Future: A Genealogy and Critical Discourse Analysis of Proscription in the North of Ireland, 1887–2017.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (2): 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1502235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K., and M. Williams, eds. 1997. Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, S. 1993. “The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 18 (3): 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549301800306.
   Google Scholar
• LaFree, G. 2010. “The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) Accomplishments and Challenges.” Perspectives on Terrorism 4 (1): 24–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, S. 2020. “Social Capital and the Enactment of Prevent Duty: An Empirical Case-Study of Schools and Colleges.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 13 (4): 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2020.1810989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, S., and N. James. 2021. ““Prevent duty”: Empirical Reflections on the Challenges of Addressing Far-Right Extremism within Secondary Schools and Colleges in the UK.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 14 (1): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2021.1876550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauretig, A. M., and B. F. Braumoeller. 2018. “Statistics and International Security.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Security, edited by A. Gheciu and W. C. Wholforth, 133–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberson, S. 1992. “Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some Thoughts About Evidence in Sociology: 1991 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 57 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 1998. “Relationships Between Media and Audiences: Prospects for Audience Reception Studies.” In Media, Ritual and Identity: Essays in Honor of Elihu Katz, edited by T. Liebes and J. Curran, 237–255. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lum, C., L. W. Kennedy, and A. Sherley. 2006. “Are Counter-Terrorism Strategies Effective? The Results of the Campbell Systematic Review on Counter-Terrorism Evaluation Research.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 2 (4): 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9020-y.
   Google Scholar
• Lyness, C. 2014. “Governing the Suicide Bomber: Reading Terrorism Studies as Governmentality.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 7 (1): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2014.881199.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. W. 2018. “More Data, New Problems: Audiences, Ahistoricity, and Selection Bias in Terrorism and Insurgency Research.” International Studies Review 20 (4): 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, A. 2018. “Making Women Terrorists into “Jihadi brides”: An Analysis of Media Narratives on Women Joining ISIS.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 11 (3): 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1448204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, A., R. da Silva. & R. da Silva, eds. 2023. Contemporary Reflections on Critical Terrorism Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266709
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, K. 2023. “Maths and MI5: The Calculations That Keep the Country Safe.” Accessed September 8, 2023. https://www.mi5.gov.uk/news/director-general-speech-at-university-of-glasgow#sthash.vAwqJKG4.dpuf.
   Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A., and W. N. Espeland. 2019. “What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification.” Annual Review of Sociology 45:223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343. 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A., and R. Salais, eds. 2022. “The New Politics of Numbers: An Introduction”. In The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, Evidence and Democracy, edited by Mennicken A & Salais R, 1–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, F. 2019. “Terrorist Violence and the Enrolment of Psychology in Predicting Muslim Extremism: Critical Terrorism Studies Meets Critical Algorithm Studies.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (2): 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1522944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, R. 2012. “The Famine in British India: Quantification Rhetoric and Colonial Disaster Management.” Journal of Creative Communications 7 (1–2): 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258613501066.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. E. 2006. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2011. Terror, Security, and Money: Balancing the Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2014. “Evaluating Counterterrorism Spending.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2021. “Terrorism and Bathtubs: Comparing and Assessing the Risks.” Terrorism and Political Violence 33 (1): 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1530662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natow, R. S. 2022. “Policy actors’ Perceptions of Qualitative Research in Policymaking: The Case of Higher Education Rulemaking in the United States.” Evidence & Policy 18 (1): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X16047229138089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichelstorfer, A., and K. T. Paul. 2022. “Unpacking the Role of Metrics in Global Vaccination Governance.” International Political Sociology 16 (2): olab031. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, M. 2017. “Reporting Beyond the Pale: UK News Discourse on Drones in Pakistan.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 10 (1): 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2016.1178486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V. 2011. “Critical Terrorism Studies: A Political Economic Approach Grounded in Critical Realism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 4 (1): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.553386.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V. 2016. “The Historical Materialist Approach to Critical Terrorism Studies.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by R. Jackson, 28–38. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., M. Wetherell, and A. Chitty. 1991. “Quantification Rhetoric — Cancer on Television.” Discourse & Society 2 (3): 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002003005.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, M. 2014. “Sticks and Stones: The Relationship Between Drone Strikes and Al-Qaeda’s Portrayal of the United States.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 7 (3): 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2014.954822.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. 2015. “PREVENT: Creating “Radicals” to Strengthen Anti-Muslim Narratives.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8 (1): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.1005938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha de Siqueira, I. 2017. “Development by Trial and Error: The Authority of Good Enough Numbers.” International Political Sociology 11 (2): 166–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeh, I., and S. Feldman. 1984. “The Rhetoric of Numbers in Front-Page Journalism: How Numbers Contribute to the Melodramatic in the Popular Press.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 4 (4): 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1984.4.4.347.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1991. “Governing by Numbers: Figuring Out Democracy.” Accounting, Organizations & Society 16 (7): 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B.
   Google Scholar
• Sageman, M. 2014. “The Stagnation in Terrorism Research.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26 (4): 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2014.895649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. 2008. “Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security.” Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608088777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, B. 2020. “Research on Terrorism, 2007–2016: A Review of Data, Methods, and Authorship.” Terrorism and Political Violence 32 (5): 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1439023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, B., and Q. Eijkman. 2013. Moving Terrorism Research Forward: The Crucial Role of Primary Sources. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism Background Note. Accessed October 13, 2023. https://www.icct.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Shayan, F. 2020. “A Critical Perspective on Terrorism: Case Study of Jundallah and Jeish Ul-Adl in Iran.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 13 (3): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2020.1759956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silke, A. 2009. “Contemporary Terrorism Studies: Issues in Research.” In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, edited by R. Jackson, M. B. Smyth, and J. Gunning, 34–48. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L., and J. Horowitz. 2013. “Quantitative Methods.” In Critical Approaches to Security: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, edited by L. Shepherd, 116–130. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skoczylis, J., and S. Andrews. 2022. “Strain Theory, Resilience, and Far-Right Extremism: The Impact of Gender, Life Experiences and the Internet.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 15 (1): 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2022.2031137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. 1999. “The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years.” Contemporary Security Policy 20 (3): 72–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523269908404231.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, M. 2012. “Don’t Confuse Me with the Facts: Knowledge Claims and Terrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 5 (1): 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2012.659908.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. 2009. “Ideas and Avocados: Ontologising Critical Terrorism Studies.” International Relations 23 (1): 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117808100613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump, J. L., and P. Dixit. 2012. “Toward a Completely Constructivist Critical Terrorism Studies.” International Relations 26 (2): 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811404720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toom, V. 2020. “Ontologically Dirty Knots: The Production of Numbers After the Srebrenica Genocide.” Security Dialogue 51 (4): 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620902008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, H. 2016. “Dialogue, Praxis and the State: A Response to Richard Jackson.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (1): 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2016.1147775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Data Service. n.d. “Welcome to the UK Data Service”. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• UK Home Office. 2021. “Individuals Referred to and Supported Through the Prevent Programme.” England and Wales, April 2020 to March 2021. November 18, 2021. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-april-2020-to-march-2021/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-england-and-wales-april-2020-to-march-2021.
   Google Scholar
• UK Home Office. 2022. “National Statistics: Operation of Police Powers Under the Terrorism Act 2000 and Subsequent Legislation: Arrests, Outcomes, and Stop and Search, Great Britain, Quarterly Update to September 2022.” Accessed December 15, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/operation-of-police-powers-under-the-terrorism-act-2000-quarterly-update-to-september-2022/operation-of-police-powers-under-the-terrorism-act-2000-and-subsequent-legislation-arrests-outcomes-and-stop-and-search-great-britain-quarterly-u.
   Google Scholar
• UK Office for National Statistics. 2022. “Deaths Related to Terrorism from 1992 to 2022”, February 22, 2022. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsrelatedtoterrorismfrom1992to2022.
   Google Scholar
• US National Security Council. 2021. “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Extremism”, June 2021. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/National-Strategy-for-Countering-Domestic-Terrorism.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US State Department. 2021. “Annex of Statistical Information, Country Reports on Terrorism 2021.” Accessed August 11, 2023. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2021_Statistical_Annex_Final-508-compliant.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 1991. “The Renaissance of Security Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 211–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, T. 2020. “I’ve Been Expecting You, Master Bond: Maths and Tech Boffin Named as Mi5’s Youngest Ever Director General”. The Sun. Accessed September 8, 2023. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11291202/a-maths-and-tech-boffin-has-been-named-as-mi5s-youngest-ever-director-general/.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C., and K. Krause. 1997. “Preface: Toward Critical Security Studies.” In Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, edited by K. Krause and M. C. Williams, vii–xxi. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, J. 2007. “Terrorism, Security, and the Threat of Counterterrorism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30 (1): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100600791231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, J. 2016. “The Narrative of Terrorism as an Existential Threat.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by R. Jackson, 114–123. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov n.d. “Terrorism and Extremism”. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/explore/issue/Terrorism_Extremism.
   Google Scholar
• Zulaika, J., and W. A. Douglass. 2008. “The Terrorist Subject: Terrorism Studies and the Absent Subjectivity.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539150701844794.
   Google Scholar