New product development (NPD) of ‘family business’ dealing in the luxury industry: evaluating maturity stage for implementing a PLM solution

References

• Achille, A. (2014). True luxury: Global consumer insight.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y., & Mazur, G. (2003). The leading edge in QFD: Past, present and future. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 20–35. doi: 10.1108/02656710310453791
   Google Scholar
• Alemanni, M., Alessia, G., Tornincasa, S., & Vezzetti, E. (2008). Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation: The Alcatel Alenia Space case study. Computers in Industry, 59(8), 833–841. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemanni, M., Destefanis, F., & Vezzetti, E. (2011). Model-based definition design in the product lifecycle management scenario. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(1–4), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2699-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandinelli, R., Rinaldi, R., Rossi, M., Terzi, S. (2013). New product development in the fashion industry: An empirical investigation of Italian firms. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5. doi: 10.5772/56841
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., Suleski, J., Burkett, M. (2007). PLM for Apparl, footwear and soft goods: Meeting the demands of new product introduction. AMR Research. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/id=1340490
   Google Scholar
• Batenburg, R., Helms, R. W., & Versendaal, J. (2006). PLM roadmap: Stepwise PLM implementation based on the concepts of maturity and alignment. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 1(4), 333–351. doi: 10.1504/IJPLM.2006.011053
   Google Scholar
• Brusoni, G., & Lazzaretti, L. (2003). Ricerca empirica e management : Il contributo delle metodologie statistiche. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centric. (2013). Centric 8 PLM software. Retrieved from http://www.centricsoftware.com
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L., & Wu, M. (2002). Quality function deployment: A comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Quality Engineering, 15(1), 23–35. doi: 10.1081/QEN-120006708
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, G. J., Baines, R. W., & Crossley, R. (1993). A state of the art review of IDEF 0. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6(4), 252–264. doi: 10.1080/09511929308944576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M., & Bythe, J. (1994). Textile: A new paradigm of consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 18(3), 229–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.1994.tb00696.x
   Google Scholar
• Génova, G., Fuentes, J. M., Llorens, J., Hurtado, O., Moreno, V. (2013). A framework to measure and improve the quality of textual requirements. Requirements Engineering, 18(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s00766-011-0134-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacosa, E. (2014). Innovation in luxury fashion family business: Processes and products innovation as a means of growth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2009). Integrated design-to-delivery for fast fashion: On-time, on-trend and on-profit. Aberdeen Group. Retrieved from http://aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/5995/RA-design-delivery-textile.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, H., Myllärniemi, J., Okkonen, J., Silventoinen, A. (2009). Assessing maturity requirements for implementing and using product lifecycle management. The 9th international conference on electronic business, Macau. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Suh, E., & Hwang, H. (2003). A model for evaluating the effectiveness of CRM using the balanced scorecard. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(2), 5–19. doi: 10.1002/dir.10051
   Google Scholar
• Lectra. (2013). Design to cost: A holistic approach to controlling development cost. Retrieved from http://www.lectra.com
   Google Scholar
• MacCarthy, B., & Jayarathne, P. (2010). Fast fashion: Achieving global quick response (GQR) in the internationally dispersed clothing industry. In T. C. Edwin Cheng & T.-M. Choi (Eds.), Innovative quick response programs in logistics and supply chain management international handbooks on information systems (pp. 37–60). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martakis, A. (2013). Handling requirements dependencies in agile projects: A focus group with agile software development practitioners, Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). 2013 IEEE seventh international conference on, 29–31 May 2013, Paris, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Management insights from great and struggling family businesses. Long Range Planning, 38(6), 517–530. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okonkwo, U. (2007). Luxury fashion branding: Trends, tactics, techniques. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pels, H. J., & Simons, K. (2008). PLM maturity assessment. The 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising; Concurrent Innovation: A New Wave of Innovation in Collaborative Networks, Lisbon, Portugal, June 2008
   Google Scholar
• Presley, A., & Liles, D. (1995). The use of IDEF0 for the Design and Specification of Methodologies. 4th industrial engineering research conference, Nashville, pp. 442–448.
   Google Scholar
• Rubman, J. (2011). The three stages of Retail PLM adoption. Kurt Salomon Associates. Retrieved from http://www.kurtsalmon.com/
   Google Scholar
• SAP. (2012). Business All.in-One – Textile for AFS. Retrieved from http://www.global.sap.com
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber, C., & Sterpe, P. (2007). Selecting the right requirements management tool – or maybe none whatsoever. Aligarh: Forrester Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, J. (2015). Product lifecycle management: Paradigm for 21st century product realization. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• TXT, TXTe-solutions Demand & Supply Chain Management – TXTPerform. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.txtgroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Vaidyaa, O. S., & Kumarb, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzetti, E. (2009). Product lifecycle data sharing and visualisation: Web-based approaches. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(5–6), 613–630. doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1503-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzetti, E. (2012). A knowledge reusing methodology in the product’s lifecycle scenario: A semantic approach. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 26(1–4), 149–160. doi: 10.1504/IJMTM.2012.051446
   Google Scholar
• Vezzetti, E., Alemanni, M., & Macheda, J. (2015). Supporting product development in the textile industry through the use of a product lifecycle management approach: A preliminary set of guidelines. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79(9–12), 1493–1504. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-6926-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzetti, E., Grazia Violante, M., & Marcolin, F. (2014). A benchmarking framework for product lifecycle management (PLM) maturity models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(5–8), 899–918. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5529-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzetti, E., Moos, S., & Kretly, S. (2011). A product lifecycle management methodology for supporting knowledge reuse in the consumer packaged goods domain. Computer-Aided Design, 43(12), 1902–1911. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2014). A methodology for supporting requirement management tools (RMt) design in the PLM scenario: An user-based strategy. Computers in Industry, 65(7), 1065–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G, Vezzetti, E., & Alemanni, M. (2015). An integrated approach to support the requirement management (RM) tool customization for a collaborative scenario. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) (2015), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12008-015-0266-3
   Google Scholar