Examining multiple behavioral effects of third-person perception: Evidence from the news about Fukushima nuclear crisis in Taiwan

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood, L. E. (1994). Illusions of media power: The third person effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banning, S. A. (2006). Third-person effects on political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 785–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Roser, C. (1986). Involvement and the consistency of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Communication Research, 13, 373–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, J. (2002). Third-person perception and school violence. Communication Research Reports, 19, 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Tsfati, Y. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting. Communication Research, 36, 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Weimann, G. (2008). Who's afraid of reality shows? Exploring the effects of perceived influence of reality shows and the concern over their social effects on willingness to censor. Communication Research, 35, 382–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conners, J. (2005). Understanding third-person effect. Communication Research Trends, 24, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, P. D., & Salwen, M. B. (1997). Self-perceived knowledge of the O. J. Simpson Trial: Third-person perception and perceptions of guilt. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (2012). Risk intelligence: How to live with uncertainty. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., Banning, S. A., & Lundy, L. (2008). Likelihood to vote, candidate choice, and the third-person effect: Behavioral implications of political advertising in the 2004 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huge, M., Glynn, C. J., & Jeong, I. (2006). A relationship-based approach to understanding third-person perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 530–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L. (1989). Real and perceived effects of Amerika. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V. H. (1994). Media use, involvement, and knowledge of the Gulf War. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (2011). Anti-nuclear sentiments continue to rise in Taiwan with PCT leading the pack. Retrieved September 15, 2011, from http://english.pct.org.tw/enNews_tcn.aspx?strBlockID = B00177&strContentid = C2011091500037&strCTID = &strDesc = Y&strPub = &strASP = enNews_tcn.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P.Jr. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., Eveland, W. P.Jr., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2008). Targeted audiences in anti-drug ads: Message cues, perceived exposure, perceived effects, and support for funding. Media Psychology, 11, 283–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research, 29, 320–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, H. J., Pan, Z. D., Sun, Y., Abisaid, J., & Houden, D. (2005). The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Communication Research, 32, 143–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 57–85.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Storey, J. D. (1987). Communication campaigns. In C. R.Berger & S. H.Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 817–846). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). Corrective actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, C. (1990). Involvement, attention, and perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Communication Research, 17, 571–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., & Driscoll, P. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47, 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3, 211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Shen, L. J., & Pan, Z. D. (2008). On the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 35, 257–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R. L.Nabi & M. B.Oliver (Eds.), The handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the third-person effect: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Moy, P., & Weis, D. S. (2004). Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 138–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., & Lo, V. H. (2007). The third-person effects of political attack ads in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Media Psychology, 9, 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V. H., & Lu, H. Y. (2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V. H., & Lu, H. Y. (2010). The third-person effect of tainted food product recall news: Examining the role of credibility, attention, and elaboration for college students in Taiwan. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 598–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar