1,105
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Uses and consequences of permanent connectivity

Linking government social media usage to public perceptions of government performance: an empirical study from China

, &
Pages 84-101 | Received 02 Jan 2018, Accepted 18 Aug 2018, Published online: 30 Dec 2018

References

  • Almond, G. A., &Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J.M. (2010).Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.
  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.
  • Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2001). Government performance and trust in government. Paper presented to the European Group of Public Administration Annual Conference, Vaasa, Finland.
  • Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of E-democracy in an era of information exuberance. A Journal of Law and Policy for Information Society, 5(1), 9–41.
  • Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: E-government in the United States, Britain, and European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300.
  • Chun, S.A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010).Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(12), 1–9.
  • Chun,S.A., & Luna Reyes, L.F. (2012). Social media in government. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 441–445.
  • Cohen, J. E. (2006). Citizen satisfaction with contacting government on the Internet. Information Polity, 11(1), 51–65.
  • Cyberspace Administration Office of China. (2015). Unprecedented development of government social media[in Chinese]. Retrieved from http://www.cac.gov.cn/2015-02/07/c_1114291869.htm
  • Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  • Davis, J. (1998). Access to and transmission of information: Position of the media. In V. Deckmyn & I. Thomson (Eds.), Openness and transparency in the European Union (pp. 121–126). Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
  • Donovan, T., & Bowler, S. (2004). Reforming the republic: Democratic institutions for the new America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Dwivedi, Y.K., &Williams, M.D.(2008) Demographic influence on UK citizens' e-government adoption. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 5(3), 261–274.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung.N., & Valenzuela. S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3),319–336.
  • Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huang, A. (2002). Network dissemination aggravates knowledge gap diffusion. Modern Communication,4, 54–55 [in Chinese].
  • Jaeger, P.T., & Bertot, J.C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371–376.
  • Kampen, J. K., De Walle, S. V., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government: The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward government on evaluations of its performance. Public Performance& Management Review, 29(4),387–404.
  • Livingstone, S.,& Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media& Society, 9(4), 671–696.
  • Lu, C., & Quan, X. (2015). Media use and trust in government: Based on the analysis of CGSS2010 data. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 5, 66–80 [in Chinese].
  • Ma, L. (2013). The diffusion of government microblogging: Evidence from Chinese municipal police bureaus. Public Management Review, 13(2), 288–309.
  • Magro, M.J. (2012). A review of social media use in E-government. Administrative Sciences,2(2), 148–161.
  • McAfee, A. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 21–28.
  • Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency.International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269.
  • Meng, T., & Li, F. (2015). Political interaction in cyberspace: Citizen appeal and government responsiveness –big data analysis based on the nationwide network political and political platform. Journal of Tsinghua University, 3, 17–29 [in Chinese].
  • Meng, T., &Zheng, S. (2017). Information, communication and influence: Government social media in internet governance: An exploratory study through combining big data and small data analysis. Public Administration Review, 1, 29–52[in Chinese].
  • Mergel, I. (2012). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley& Sons.
  • Mergel, I. (2013).Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.
  • Oliver, R. W. (2004). What is transparency? New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Piotrowski, S. J. (2007).Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Porumbescu, G. (2015). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537
  • Porumbescu, G., & Im, T.(2015). Does transparency improve citizens’ perceptions of government performance? Evidence from Seoul, South Korea, Administration & Society, 49(3), 443–468.
  • Roberts, A. & Kim, B. Y. (2011). Policy responsiveness in post-communist Europe: Public preferences and economic reforms. British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 819–839.
  • Schlaeger, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information, 28(2), 189–213.
  • Staiou, E.R., & Gouscos, D. (2010). Socializing E-governance: A parallel study of participatory E-governance and emerging social media. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6536-3_28
  • Taipale,S.(2013). The use of E-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4–5), 413–422.
  • Tencent.(2015). "Internet +" WeChat government report[in Chinese]. Retrieved from http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2015-04-26/120631762462.shtml
  • Thomas, J.C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3),259–280.
  • US Census Bureau. (2007). Home computers and Internet use in the United States current population reports Special Studies. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf.2007.06.20
  • Van Dijk, J.,& Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon.The Information Society, 19, 315–326.
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004).Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448
  • Van Ryzin, G. G., & Immerwahr, S. (2007). Importance‐performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration, 85(1), 215–226.
  • Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T.A., &Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding E-government portal use in rural India: Role of demographic and personality characteristics. Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269.
  • Venkatesh,V., & Bala, H. (2010). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315.
  • Wang, F., & Zhang, L. (2014).A study on the government WeChat functions and the public usage in China.Journal of E-government, 10, 58–69 [in Chinese].
  • Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C., & Moon, M.J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with E-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.
  • Wittendorp, R. (2017). Modeling the use of e-government services: The role of Internet skills, support sources, gender, age, education, Internet experience, employment rate and income. Communication Studies University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  • Xinhua Net. (2015). Chinese government weibo accounts and subscriptions [in Chinese]. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-09/28/c_128276413.htm
  • Xinhua Net. (2017). Mobile government in China [in Chinese]. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/2017-11/28/c_1122025480.htm
  • Zhang, M. (2011). Political participation in the age of the Internet in China: Examining the role of the political knowledge. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 11(6), 49–57 [in Chinese].
  • Zheng, L. (2013). Social media in Chinese government: Drivers, challenges and capabilities. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 369–376.
  • Zhou, P., Ma, J.,& Xu. X. (2012). Empirical study on factors influencing the public adoption of mobile E-government. Library and Information Service, 56(5), 134–138 [in Chinese].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.