Gender, Technology, and the Designer’s Work: A Feminist Review

References

• Alvesson, Mats, and Yvonne Due Billing. 2009. Understanding Gender and Organizations. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446280133
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, Isabelle. 1984. A Woman’s Touch: Women in Design from 1860 to the Present Day. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Leah. 2012. “Portraits: Women Designers 2012.” http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/collections/design-archives/resources/women-designers
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judy. 1989. “Form/Female Follows Function/Male: Feminist Critiques of Design.” In Design History and the History of Design, edited by John A. Walker, 199–225. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judy. 1996. “Barbie and Action Man: Adult Toys for Girls and Boys, 1959–93.” In The Gendered Object, edited by Pat Kirkham, 80–89. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judy. 2003. “What Does History Have to Do With It? Feminism and Design History.” Journal of Design History 16 (1): 77–87. 10.1093/jdh/16.1.77
   Google Scholar
• Benston, Margaret Lowe. 1992. “Women’s Voices/Men’s Voices: Technology as Language.” In Inventing Women: Science, Technology and Gender, edited by Gill Kirkup and Laurie Smith Keller, 33–41. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Anne-Jorunn, and Merete Lie. 1995. “Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender?” Science, Technology and Human Values 20 (3): 332–351. 10.1177/016224399502000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, Sue, and Avner Offer. 1996. “The Technological Revolution That Never Was: Gender, Class and the Diffusion of Household Appliances in Interwar England.” In The Sex of Things: Gender and Consumption in Historical Perspective, edited by Victoria de Grazia, 244–274. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, Margaret. 1985. “A Missing Link: Women and Industrial Designer.” Design Studies 6 (3): 150–156. 10.1016/0142-694X(85)90005-5
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, Margaret, and Jenny Lewis. 1990. “Women Designers — Is There a Gender Trap?” Design Studies 11 (2): 114–120. 10.1016/0142-694X(90)90026-9
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1984. “Women Designers in the English Pottery Industry, 1919–1939.” Women’s Art Journal 5 (2): 11–15. 10.2307/1357960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1986. “Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design.” Design Issues 3: 3–14. 10.2307/1511480
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1989. “‘The Noblesse of the Banks’: Craft Hierarchies, Gender Divisions, and the Roles of Women Paintresses and Designers in the British Pottery Industry 1890–1939.” Journal of Design History 2 (4): 257–273. 10.1093/jdh/2.4.257
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1994. “Design, Femininity, and Modernism: Interpreting the Work of Susie Cooper.” Journal of Design History 7 (4): 277–293. 10.1093/jdh/7.4.277
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1999. “Made in Patriarchy: Theories of Women and Design – A Reworking.” In Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things, edited by Joan Rothschild, 109–118. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, Sue, and Wendy Mayfield. 1999. “Gendered by Design: How Women's Place in Design Is Still Defined by Gender.” Design Issues 15 (3): 3–16. 10.2307/1511881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, Sue, Wendy Mayfield, and Deborah Trayhurn. 1999. “Disciplinary Discourses: A Case Study of Gender in Information Technology and Design Courses.” Gender and Education 11 (1): 43–55. 10.1080/09540259920753
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia 1988. “The Gendering of Jobs: Workplace Relations and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation.” In Gender Segregation at Work, edited by Sylvia Walby, 29–42. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia 1997. “Domestic Technologies: Cinderella and the Engineers.” Women’s Studies International Forum 20 (3): 361–371. 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00020-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia, and Ruza Fürst-Dilic, eds. 1994. Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia, and Susan Ormrod. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 2009. “An Historian of Science and Technology Confronts Gender and Design.” In The Banham Lectures: Essays on Designing the Future, edited by Jeremy Aynsley and Harriet Atkinson, 217–228. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Demaiter, Erin I., and Tracey L. Adams. 2009. “‘I Really Didn’t Have Any Problems with the Male-Female Thing Until ...’: Successful Women’s Experiences in IT Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 34 (1): 31–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doering, Erika, Rachel Switzky, and Rebecca Welz. 1994. Goddess in the Details: Product Design by Women. New York: Association of Women Industrial Designers.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, Julia. 1998. “Managing the Technology but not the Organization: Women and Career in Engineering.” Women in Management Review 13 (8): 283–290. 10.1108/09649429810243144
   Google Scholar
• Fallan, Kjetil. 2010. Design History: Understanding Theory and Method. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2000a. “The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for ‘Making Gender Stick’ to Engineers.” Science, Technology and Human Values 25 (1): 87–119. 10.1177/016224390002500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2000b. “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30 (5): 759–792. 10.1177/030631200030005005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2001. “The Technology Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist Technology Studies.” Women’s Studies International Forum 24 (1): 79–95. 10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2007. “‘Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.” Science, Technology and Human Values 37 (3): 331–356.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. 2009. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. I. Observations from the Field.” Engineering Studies 1 (1): 3–18. 10.1080/19378620902721322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forty, Adrian. 1986. Objects of Desire: Design and Society since 1750. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind, and Keith Grint. 1995. “The Gender-Technology Relation: An Introduction.” In The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, edited by Keith Grint and Rosalind Gill, 1–28. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, Carma R. 2001. “Reshaping and Rethinking: Recent Feminist Scholarships on Design and Designers.” Design Issues 17 (4): 72–88. 10.1162/07479360152681100
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1987. Feminism and Methodology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendershot, Heather. 1996. “Dolls: Odour, Femininity and Toy Design.” In The Gendered Object, edited by Pat Kirkham, 90–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, Flis. 1993. “Establishing Gender Perspectives on Information Technology: Problems, Issues and Opportunities.” In Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems, edited by Eileen Green, 31–49. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, Flis. 2000. “From the Woman Question in Technology to the Technology Question in Feminism: Rethinking Gender Equality in IT Education.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 7: 209–227. 10.1177/135050680000700209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holth, Line, and Ulf Mellström. 2011. “Revisiting Engineering, Masculinity and Technology Studies: Old Structures with New Openings.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (2): 314–329.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Ella, and Eric Setliff. 2000. “In ‘A Man’s World’: Women Industrial Designers.” In Women Designers in the USA 1900–2000: Diversity and Difference, edited by Pat Kirkham, 269–290. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, Pınar. 2014a. “‘The Shop Floor is Not for Every Woman’: Narratives on Women Industrial Designers’ Relationships with Shop Floor Workers.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 6 (1): 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, Pınar. 2014b. “‘Arty’ versus ‘Real’ Work: Gendered Relations between Industrial Designers and Engineers in Interdisciplinary Work Settings.” The Design Journal 17 (1): 73–90. 10.2752/175630614X13787503069990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelan, Elisabeth K. 2008. “Emotions in a Rational Profession: The Gendering of Skills in ICT Work.” Gender, Work and Organization 15 (1): 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, Michael S. 2000. The Gendered Society, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, Pat. 1995. Charles and Ray Eames: Designers of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, Pat, ed. 1996. The Gendered Object. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, Pat, and Lynne Walker. 2000. “Women Designers in the USA 1900–2000: Diversity and Difference.” In Women Designers in the USA 1900–2000: Diversity and Difference, edited by Pat Kirkham, 49–84. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lagesen, Vivian Anette. 2007. “A Cyberfeminist Utopia? Perceptions of Gender and Computer Science among Malaysian Women Computer Science Students and Faculty.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (1): 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Maffei, Grace. 2003. “Studying Advice: Historiography, Methodology, Commentary, Bibliography.” Journal of Design History 16 (1): 1–14. 10.1093/jdh/16.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Lie, Merete. 1995. “Technology and Masculinity: The Case of the Computer.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 2: 379–394. 10.1177/135050689500200306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohan, Maria. 2000. “Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies.” Social Studies of Science 30 (6): 895–916. 10.1177/030631200030006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Donald, and Judy Wajcman, eds. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Judi. 1993. “Patterns of Cultural Awareness: Coping Strategies for Women Managers.” In Women, Work, and Coping, edited by Bonita Clarice Long and Sharon E. Kahn, 90–110. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, Javier Gimeno. 2007. “Women Only: Design Events Restricted to Female Designers During the 1990s.” Design Issues 23 (2): 17–30. 10.1162/desi.2007.23.2.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Susan A., Helene Cummins, and Rachelle Spender Beauchamp. 1988. “Mothers of Invention? Meshing the Roles of Inventor, Mother, and Worker.” Women’s Studies International Forum 11: 1–12. 10.1016/0277-5395(88)90002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaw, Judith A. 1997. “Inventors and Other Great Women: Toward a Feminist History of Technological Luminaries.” Technology and Culture 38: 214–231. 10.2307/3106789
   Google Scholar
• McGaw, Judith A. 2003. “Why Feminine Technologies Matter.” In Gender and Technology: A Reader, edited by Nina Lerman, Ruth Oldenziel and Arwen P. Mohun, 13–36. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKellar, Susie. 1996. “Guns: The ‘Last Frontier on the Road to Equality’.” In The Gendered Object, edited by Pat Kirkham, 70–79. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellström, Ulf. 2002. “Patriarchal Machines and Masculine Embodiment.” Science, Technology & Human Values 27 (4): 460–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellström, Ulf. 2004. “Machines and Masculine Subjectivity: Technology as an Integral Part of Men’s Life Experiences.” Men and Masculinities 6 (4): 368–382. 10.1177/1097184X03260960
   Google Scholar
• Mellström, Ulf. 2009. “The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women?” Social Studies of Science 39 (6): 885–907. 10.1177/0306312709334636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Gloria E. 2004. “Frontier Masculinity in the Oil Industry: The Experience of Women Engineers.” Gender, Work and Organization 11 (1): 47–73. 10.1111/gwao.2004.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, Harvey. 2003. Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers, and Many Other Things Come to be as They Are. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolosi, Ann Marie. 2002. “Doing Technology, Doing Gender: Teaching Gendered Technoculture.” Gender Issues 20 (4): 55–64. 10.1007/s12147-002-0023-3
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, Ann. 1974. Housewife. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oddy, Nicholas. 1996. “Bicycles.” In The Gendered Object, edited by Pat Kirkham, 60–69. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, Ruth. 1999. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.5117/9789053563816
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, Ruth. 2003. “Why Masculine Technologies Matter.” In Gender and Technology: A Reader, edited by Nina Lerman, Ruth Oldenziel and Arwen P. Mohun, 37–71. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly, Ann Rudinow Saetnan, and Merete Lie. 2002. “On Gender and Things: Reflections on an Exhibition on Gendered Artifacts.” Women’s Studies International Forum 25 (4): 471–483. 10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00284-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, Nancy. 1999. “Women Designers: Making Differences.” In Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things, edited by Joan Rothschild and Alethea Cheng, 120–124. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Helen. 2007. “Gendered Work Ideals in Swedish IT Firms: Valued and Not Valued Workers.” Gender, Work and Organization 14 (4): 333–348. 10.1111/gwao.2007.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilato, Denise. 2000. The Retrieval of a Legacy: Nineteenth-Century American Women Inventors. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Abigail, Barbara M. Bagilhole and Andrew Dainty 2009. “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality.” Gender, Work and Organization 16 (4): 411–428. 10.1111/gwao.2009.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pursell, Carroll W. 1981. “Women Inventors in America.” Technology and Culture 22 (3): 545–549. 10.2307/3104389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, Catharine. 2009. “Furniture, Feminism and the Feminine: Women Designers in Post-war Italy, 1945 to 1970.” Journal of Design History 22 (3): 243–257. 10.1093/jdh/epp022
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Joan, and Alethea Cheng, eds. 1999. Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Joan, and Victoria Rosner. 1999. “Feminisms and Design: Review Essay.” In Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things, edited by Joan Rothschild and Alethea Cheng, 7–34. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, Sheila. 2010. Dreamers of a New Day: Women Who Invented the Twentieth Century. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, Londa. 1999. “Gender Studies of STS: A Look Toward the Future.” Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 95–106. 10.1177/097172189900400107
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Hillel. 1996. “Hearing Aids: Sweet Nothings, or an Ear for an Ear.” In The Gendered Object, edited by Pat Kirkham, 43–59. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, Jill. 2000. “Mentioned but Denied Significance: Women Designers and the ‘Professionalisation’ of Design in Britain c. 1920–1951.” Gender & History 12 (2): 426–447.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, Penny. 1995. As Long as It’s Pink: Sexual Politics of Taste. London: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Autumn. 1992. “Once and Future Power: Women as Inventors.” Women’s Studies International Forum, 15: 193–203. 10.1016/0277-5395(92)90100-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volvo. 2004. “Volvo Your Concept Car (YCC) Press Release.” www.volvoclub.org.uk/press/pdf/presskits/YCCPressKit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. 2000. “Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art?” Social Studies of Science (30) 3: 447–464. 10.1177/030631200030003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. 2010. “Feminist Theories of Technology.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 143–152. 10.1093/cje/ben057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy, and Le Anh Pham Lobb. 2007. “The Gender Relations of Software Work in Vietnam.” Gender, Technology and Development 11 (1): 1–26. 10.1177/097185240601100101
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Melanie. 2001. “Engineering Identities.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (1): 75–89. 10.1080/01425690020030792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodham, Jonathan M. 1997. Twentieth Century Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Worden, Suzette, and Jill Seddon. 1995. “Women Designers in Britain in the 1920s and 1930s: Defining the Professional and Redefining Design.” Journal of Design History 8 (3): 177–193. 10.1093/jdh/8.3.177
   Google Scholar