Hidden density in single-family neighborhoods: backyard cottages as an equitable smart growth strategy

References

• Antoninetti,M.2008. “The Difficult History of Ancillary Units: The Obstacles and Potential Opportunities to Increase the Heterogeneity of Neighborhoods and the Flexibility of Households in the United States.”Journal of Housing for the Elderly22 (4):348–375.10.1080/02763890802458320
   Google Scholar
• Arrington,G. B., andRobertCervero.2008.Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel.Washington, DC:Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Bay Area Governments.2012.Sustainable Communities Strategy Preferred Scenario – Jobs-Housing Connection.www.abag.ca.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassare,Mark.2004.PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey on Californians and Their Housing.San Francisco, CA:Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell,Robert W.2005.Sprawl Costs: Economic Impacts of Unchecked Development.Washington, DC:Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabansagan,Clarissa K.2011. “Project Homesafe: From the Bay to LA – Lessons of Granny Flat Legalization in Daly City.” Masters Thesis. School of Public Affairs,University of California,Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Calavita,Nico,KennethGrimes, andAlanMallach.1997. “Inclusionary Housing in California and New Jersey: A Comparative Analysis.”Housing Policy Debate8:109–142.10.1080/10511482.1997.9521249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calavita,Nico,KennethGrimes, andAlanMallach.2007.Demand Estimate Update.Oakland, CA:Center for Transit-Oriented Development.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Transit-Oriented Development.2004.Hidden in Plain Sight: Capturing the Demand for Housing near Transit.Oakland, CA: Center for Transit-Oriented Development.
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, Karen, Jake Wegmann, Alison Nemirow, and Colin Dentel-Post. 2011. “Yes in My Backyard: Mobilizing the Market for Secondary Units.” Center for Community Innovation. Berkeley: University of California. http://www.communityinnovation.berkeley.edu/reports/secondary-units.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duany,Andres,ElizabethPlater-Zyberk, andJeffSpeck.2001.Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream.New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham-Jones,Ellen, andJuneWilliamson.2009.Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs.New Jersey, USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gellen,Martin.1985.Accessory Apartments in Single-Family Housing.New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser,Edward,JosephGyourko, andRavenSaks.2005.Why Have Housing Prices Gone up? NBER Working Paper.Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.http://www.nber.org/papers/w11129.10.3386/w11129
   Google Scholar
• Goetz,Edward G.,KarenChapple, andBarbaraLukermann.2005. “The Rise and Fall of Fair Share Housing: Lessons from the Twin Cities.” InThe Geography of Opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America, edited byXavierde Souza Briggs,247–265.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groth,Paul.2004. “Workers’-Cottage and Minimal-Bungalow Districts in Oakland and Berkeley, California, 1870–1945.”Urban Morphology8 (1):13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare,Patrick H.1991.Accessory Units: The State of the Art, Volumes 3 and 4, Summary of Experience with Accessory Units in the US and Canada.Patrick H. Hare Planning and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Howe,Deborah A.1990. “The Flexible House Designing for Changing Needs.”Journal of the American Planning Association56 (1):69–77.10.1080/01944369008975746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interview2011a.Interview with Mark Primack, Architect and Councilmember, City of Santa Cruz,June7.Santa Cruz, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Interview2011b.Interview with Former Planner, City of Seattle,June28. Via telephone.
   Google Scholar
• Klinenberg, Eric. 2012. Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp,G. J.,A.Bento, andS.Lowe.2008.Housing Market Impacts of Inclusionary Zoning.Maryland, USA: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kochera,Andrew,AudreyStraight, andThomasGuterbock.2005.A Report to the Nation on Livable Communities.Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koppen,Jean.2009.Effect of the Economy on Housing Choices.Washington, DC:American Association of Retired Persons.
   Google Scholar
• Landis,John D.,HeatherHood,GuangyuLi,ThomasRogers, andCharlesWarren.2006. “The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, and Feasibility.”Housing Policy Debate17 (4):681–725.KnowledgePlex.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis,Paul G.2005. “Can State Review of Local Planning Increase Housing Production?”Housing Policy Debate16 (2):173–200.10.1080/10511482.2005.9521539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow-Jones,Hazel A.,Elena G.Irwin, andBrianRoe.2004. “Consumer Preference for Neotraditional Neighborhood Characteristics.”Housing Policy Debate15 (1):171.10.1080/10511482.2004.9521498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers,Dowell, andElizabethGearin.2001. “Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments.”Housing Policy Debate12 (4):633–659.10.1080/10511482.2001.9521422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers,Dowell, andJohnPitkin.2009. “Demographic Forces and Turning Points in the American City, 1950–2040.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science626 (1):91–111.10.1177/0002716209344838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson,Arthur C.2011.The New California Dream: How Demographic and Economic Changes May Shape the Housing Market.Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson,Arthur C.,RolfPendall,Casey J.Dawkins, andGerrit J.Knaap.2004. “The Link between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence.” InGrowth Management and Affordable Housing: Do They Conflict? edited byAnthonyDowns,117–158. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, Rolf. 2009. “How Might Inclusionary Zoning Affect Urban Form?” In Urban and Regional Policy and Its Effects. Vol. 2, edited by Nancy Pindus, Howard Wial and Harold Wolman, 223–256. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., J.Martin, and R.Puentes. 2009. From Traditional to Reformed: A Review of the Land Use Regulations in the Nation’s 50 Largest Metropolitan Areas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell,Benjamin, andEdwardStringham.2005. “The Economics of Inclusionary Zoning Reclaimed: How Effective Are Price Controls.”Florida State University Law Review33:471.
   Google Scholar
• Ross,Andrew.2011.Bird on Fire: Lessons from the World’s Least Sustainable City. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel,T. K.1984. “Household Change, Accessory Apartments, and Low Income Housing in the Suburbs.”The Professional Geographer36 (2):174–181.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPUR (San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association).2001.Secondary Units: A Painless Way to Increase the Supply of Housing. San Francisco: SPUR.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher,David.2013. “City Unplanning.” Yale Law Journal122: 1670–2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher,David. “City Unplanning.”George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12–26. Cited with permission of the author.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz,J.,R.Meltzer, andV.Been.2009. “31 Flavors of Inclusionary Zoning: Comparing Policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Suburban 4Boston.”Journal of the American Planning Association75 (1):441–456.10.1080/01944360903146806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen,Emily.2006. “Design That Enables Diversity: The Complications of a Planning Ideal.”Journal of Planning Literature20 (3):233.10.1177/0885412205283104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau.2000 and 2010. Decennial Censuses. Tables DP-1 and QT-P3 (population and race/ethnicity data) using American FactFinder, http://factfinder2.census.gov; TIGER/GICS computer files (land area data) using http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/index.html; generated by Jake Wegmann.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau.2005-2009 and 2006-2010. American Community Survey. Tables DP03 (household income), B25003 (tenure), B25004 (units in structure), and B25034 (year structure built), using American FactFinder, http://factfinder2.census.gov; generated by Jake Wegmann.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau.2012a.Growth in Urban Population Outpaces Rest of Nation, Census Bureau Reports ( press Release).http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb12-50.html.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau.2012b.Censtats Building Permit Online Database.http://censtats.census.gov/bldg/bldgprmt.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Varady,David P.1990. “Which Elderly Home Owners Are Interested in Accessory Apartment Conversion and Home-Sharing?”Journal of Housing for the Elderly6 (1):87–100.10.1300/J081V06N01_06
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, Jake, and Alison Nemirow. 2011. “Secondary Units and Urban Infill: A Literature Review.” Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 2011–02. University of California, Berkeley. http://www.iurd.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/2011–02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, Jake. 2012. “Understanding the Market for Secondary Units in the East Bay.” Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 2012–03. University of California, Berkeley. http://www.iurd.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/2012–03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, Jake, Alison Nemirow, and Karen Chapple. 2012. “Scaling up Secondary Unit Production in the East Bay: Impacts and Policy Implications.” Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 2012–05. University of California, Berkeley. http://www.iurd.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/2012-05.pdf.
   Google Scholar