Mapping urban assemblages: the production of spatial knowledge

References

• Adey, Peter, Mark Whitehead, and Alison Williams. 2013. From above. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Nadia. 2010. The Exposed City. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory. 2000 [1972]. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Michael. 2013. The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, Ma., MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhamer, David, John Corrigan, and Trevor Harris. 2010. The Spatial Humanities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, James. 1999. “The Agency of Mapping.” In Mappings, edited by Denis Cosgrove, 213–252. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, James, and Alex MacLean. 1996. Taking Measures across the American Landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Craig, and Liz Mason-Deese. 2012. “Counter (Mapping) Actions.” ACME 11 (3): 439–466.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2011. Philosophy and Simulation. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, Kim. 2010. Becoming Places. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, Kim. 2014. “Incremental Urbanism.” In Emergent Urbanism, edited by Tigran Hass and Krister Olsson, 45–54. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, Kim, and Richard Tomlinson. 2012. Dharavi. University of Melbourne, research report. edsc.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/DHARAVI
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, Kim, and Ian Woodcock, eds. 2014. Intensifying Melbourne, University of Melbourne, research report. http://msd.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/Intensifying%20Melbourne%202014_180dpi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gandelsonas, Mario. 1991. The Urban Text. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. 1989. “Deconstructing the Map.” Cartographica 26 (2): 1–20.10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, Katherine, and Gayle Clemans. 2009. The Map as Art. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Felipe, and Peter Kellett. 2010. “Introduction.” In Rethinking the Informal City, edited by Felipe Hernandez, Peter Kellett and Lea Allen, 1–19. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, Bill. 1996. Space is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoek, Joos van den. 2008. “The MXI (Mixed Use Index).” Proceedings of the 44th ISOCARP congress 2008. http://www.isocarp.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Cambridge: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, David, Michael Goodchild, and Michael Batty. 2005. GIS, Spatial Analysis, and Modeling. Redlands, Ca: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, Sallie, John Jones, and Keith Woodward. 2005. “Human Geography without Scale.” Trans Inst. Br. Geogr 30: 416–432.10.1111/tran.2005.30.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, Thomas. 1994. “Situationist Space”. October, 67: 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, George. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, plus or minus Two.” Psychological Review 63 (2): 81–97.10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monmonier, Mark. 1996. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226029009.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nes, Akkelies, Meta Berghauser Pont and Bardia Mashhoodi. 2012. “Combination of Space Syntax with Spacematrix and the Mixed Use Index.” Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago, January 3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, Sheela, Jockin Arputham, Sundar Burra, and Katia Savchuk. 2009. “Getting the Information Base for Dharavi’s Redevelopment.” Environment & Urbanization 21 (1): 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, Nancy. 1995. “Whose Trees Are These?” Antipode 27: 383–406.10.1111/anti.1995.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse, Edgar. 2011. “Building New Worlds.” In Design with the Other 90%: Cities, 40–53. New York: Smithsonian Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, David. 1996. “Subverting Cartography: The Situationists and Maps of the City.” Environment and Planning A 28: 405–427.10.1068/a280405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugali, Juval. 2000. Self-Organization and the City. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-662-04099-7
   Google Scholar
• Ristic, Mirjana. 2011. “Sarajevo Warscapes: Architecture, Urban Space and the Politics of Ethnic Nationalism.” PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Ristic, Mirjana. 2014. “‘Sniper Alley’: The Politics of Urban Violence in the Besieged Sarajevo.” Built Environment 40: 342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, Christian. 2008. “Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space.” In Space, Difference and Everyday Life, edited by Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, and Christian Schmid, 27–45. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shatkin, Gavin. 2004. “Planning to Forget.” Urban Studies 41 (12): 2469–2484.10.1080/00420980412331297636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPARC/KRVIA. 2010. Re-Dharavi. sdinet.org/media/upload/documents/ReDharavi
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Roger. 2013. Thinking about GIS. Redlands, Ca.: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, Barney, and Santa Arias. 2009. The Spatial Turn. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, Eyal. 2003. A Civilian Occupation. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Denis. 2010. Rethinking the Power of Maps. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S., and K. Dovey. 2015. “Creative Multiplicities: The Morphology of Creative Clustering.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (1): 52–74.10.1080/13574809.2014.972346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar