Talking TOD: learning about transit-oriented development in the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands

References

• Alpkokin, P. 2012. “Historical and Critical Review of Spatial and Transport Planning in the Netherlands.” Land Use Policy 29 (3): 536–547. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badoe, D., and E. Miller. 2000. “Transportation and Land-Use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 5 (4): 235–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, C. 2002. “Orenco Station, Portland, Oregon: A Successful Transit Oriented Development Experiment?” Transportation Quarterly 56 (3): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Balz, V., and J. Schrijnen. 2009. “From Concept to Projects: Stedenbaan, the Netherlands.” In Transit-Oriented Development edited by C. Curtis, J. Renne and L. Bertolini, 75–90. Abingdon, Oxon: GBR Ashgate Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Belzer, D., and G. Autler. 2002. Transit-Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bernick, M., and R. Cervero. 1997. Transit Villages in the 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M., and N. Compin. 1999. “Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego County: The Incremental Implementation of a Planning Idea.” Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1): 80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, R., D. Listokin, and C. Galley. 2000. “Smart Growth: More than a Ghost of Urban Policy past, Less than a Bold New Horizon.” Housing Policy Debate 11 (4): 821–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis New York: New York Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 2004. “The Built Environment and Travel: Evidence from the United States.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2 (3): 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 (3): 199–219.10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., C. Ferrell, and S. Murphy. 2002. “Transit-oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review.” Research Results Digest No. 52, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, D. 2008. “Deconstructing Development Density: Quality, Quantity, and Price Effects on Household Non-Work Travel.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 42 (7): 1008–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, D. 2013. “Does TOD Need the T?” Journal of the American Planning Association 79 (1): 17–31. 10.1080/01944363.2013.791008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., J. Renne, and L. Bertolini. 2009. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G. 2011. “An Unlikely Urban Symbiosis: Urban Intensification and Neighbourhood Character in Collingwood, Vancouver.” Urban Policy and Research 29 (02): 105–124. 10.1080/08111146.2011.557995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R. T. 2005. Shaping Land Use as If Transportation Mattered. UDP Annual Symposium on “Rethinking Growth Management”, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R., and D. Porter. 2006. “Manifestations of Development Goals in Transit-Oriented Projects.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1977 (1): 172–178. 10.3141/1977-22
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R., D. Myserson, and M. Pawlukiewicz. 2003. Ten Principles for Successful Development around Transit. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Easly, G. V. 1992. Staying inside the Lines: Urban Growth Boundaries. Chicago IL: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• El-Geneidy, A., and D. Levinson. 2006. Access to Destinations: Development of Accessibility Measures. Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., R. Pendall, and D. Chen. 2002. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impacts. Washington DC: Smart Growth America
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L., and G. Pivo. 1994. “Impacts of Mixed-Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking.” Transportation Research Record 1466: 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K., K. Maat, P. Rietveld, and G. de Visser. 2012. “Transit-oriented Development in the Randstad South Wing: Goals, Issues and Research.” Paper presented at the Building the Urban Future and Transit Oriented Development Conference, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, E., and R. Cervero. 2013. “Is a Half-Mile Circle the Right Standard for TODs?” Access (42): 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. 2001. “Local Shopping as a Strategy for Reducing Automobile Travel.” Transportation 28 (4): 317–346. 10.1023/A:1011850618753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. 1959. “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25 (2): 73–76. 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headicar, P. 2003. “The Contribution of Land Use Planning to Reducing Traffic Growth: The English Experience.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 3 (2): 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstad, H. 2012. “Compact City Development: High Ideals and Emerging Practices.” European Journal of Spatial Development. http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereedarticles/refereed49.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J., and A. Forsyth. 2008. “Seven American TODs: Good Practices for Urban Design in Transit-Oriented Development Projects.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 1 (2): 51–88.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., G. Wulfhorst, T. Leysens, and A. L’Hostis. 2011. “Fostering Rail-Based Accessibility by Land Management.” European Transport Conference Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. 2003. “Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter?” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (3): 265–281. 10.1080/01944360308978019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmyak, R., and R. Pratt. 2003. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 95. Transportation Research Board: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, M., D. van Lierop, R. Wasfi, and A. El-Geneidy. 2015. “Chasing Sustainability: Do New TOD Residents Adopt More Sustainable Modes of Transportation?” Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, H. 2006. “Reasons for Living in a Transit-Oriented Development, and Associated Transit Use.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (3): 357–366. 10.1080/01944360608976757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat, K. 2001. “Effects of the Dutch Compact City Policy on Travel Behavior.” In Transport and Environment in Searn of Sustainable Solutions, edited by E. Feitelson, and E. Verhoef, 208–230. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meurs, H., and R. Haaijer. 2001. “Spatial Structure and Mobility.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 6 (6): 429–446. 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudon, A., P. Hess, M. Snyder, and K. Stanilov. 1997. “Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed-Use, Medium-Density Environments.” Transportation Research Record 1578: 48–55. 10.3141/1578-07
   Google Scholar
• Nabielek, K. 2012. “The Compact City: Planning Strategies, Recent Developments and Future Prospects in the Netherlands.” AESOP 26th Annual Congress Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P. 2003. “Urban Structures and Travel Behavior: Experiences from Empirical Research in Norway and Denmark.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 3 (2): 155–178.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P., A. Strand, T. Naess, and M. Nicolaisen. 2011. “On Their Road to Sustainability? The Challenge of Sustainable Mobility in Two Scandinavian Capital Regions.” Town Planning Review 82 (3): 285–315.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1999. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, DC. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 2006. “Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence.” Opolis 2 (1): 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Niles, J., and D. Nelson. 1999. “Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development.” Retail Market Dynamics and Other Key Determinants, Prepared for the American Planning Association National Planning Conference, Seattle, Washington, April.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, G. . 2001. “Transit-Oriented Development in Four Cities.” Partnership for Regional Liveability Conference Chicago, Illinois
   Google Scholar
• Podobnik, B. 2002. “Assessing the Social and Environmental Achievements of New Urbanism: Evidence from Orenco Station.” Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association San Francsico, California, August, 8 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, S. 2010. “Designing a Liveable Compact City: Physical Forms of City and Social Life in Urban Neighborhoods.” Built Environment 36 (1): 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J. 2008. “Smart Growth and Transit-Oriented Development at the State Level: Lessons from California, New Jersey, and Western Australia.” Journal of Public Transportation 11 (3): 77–108.
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J. 2009. “From Transit-Adjacent to Transit-Oriented Development.” Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 14 (1): 1–15. 10.1080/13549830802522376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renne, J., and J. Wells. 2002. State of the Literature: Transit-Oriented Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Voorhees Transportation Policy Institute, Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J., and J. Wells. 2004. “Emerging European-Style Planning in the USA: Transit-Oriented Development.” World Transport Policy & Practice 10 (2): 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J., J. Wells, A. Voorhees, and E. Bloustein. 2005. Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success. Transportation Research Board. Research results digest 294, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, M. 2009. “Reducing Cars and Increasing Development: How the Creation of a Viable Transit Oriented Development Corridor in Aarlington, Virginia Has Sparker Growth.” Cities of the 21st Century 1 (1): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurer, J., and A. Kroen. 2005. “A Marriage of Convenience? Rail-Supportive Transport Policies and Urban Consolidation in Station Precincts in Australia and Europe.” State of Australian Cities Conference Brisbane, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., and L. Bertolini. 2014. “Beyond the Case Study Dilemma in Urban Planning: Using a Meta-Matrix to Distil Critical Success Factors in Transit-Oriented Development.” Urban Policy and Research 32 (2): 119–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Translink. 2010. Transit-Oriented Communities: A Literature Review on the Relationship between the Built Environment and Transit Ridership. Vancouver, BC: Translink.
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D. 2013. “A Typology of New Urbanism Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 6 (2): 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Tumlin, J., and A. Millard-Ball. 2003. “How to Make Transit-Oriented Development Work.” Planning 69: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Venner, M., and L. Ecola. 2007. “Financing Transit-Oriented Development: Understanding and Overcoming Obstacles.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1996, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, C. 2007. “Transforming a Bus Station into a Transit-Oriented Development: Improving Pedestrian, Bicycling, and Transit Connections.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006: 114–121. doi:10.3141/2006-13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wee, B., and K. Maat. 2003. “Land-Use and Transport: A Review and Discussion of Dutch Research.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 3 (2): 199–218.
   Google Scholar