Towards a Deleuzoguattarian methodology for urban design

References

• Alexander, C. 1965. “A City Is Not A Tree.” Architectural Forum 122 (1 & 2): 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 1979. The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., H. Neis, and M. M. Alexander. 2012. The Battle for the Life and Beauty of the Earth: A Struggle between Two World-Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aravot, I. 2002. “Back to Phenomenological Placemaking.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (2): 201–212. doi:10.1080/1357480022000012230.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, E. N. 1976. Design of Cities. (Rev. ed). New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, A. 2007. Deleuze and Guattari for Architects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. 1999. Urban Transformations, Power, People and Urban Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2012. “The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.646251.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, M., and J. Protevi. 2004. Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Retrieved from about:home. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. “Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 19 (2–3): 151–182. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2010. “On Territorology: Towards a General Science of Territory.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (1): 52–72. doi:10.1177/0263276409350357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, G. 1995. Emerging Concepts in Urban Space Design. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Brott, S. 2011. Architecture for a Free Subjectivity: Deleuze and Guattari at the Horizon of the Real. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. 2008. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. 2015. “Assemblage Theory and Its Discontents.” Deleuze Studies 9 (3): 382–392. doi:10.3366/dls.2015.0193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bura, S., F. Guérin-Pace, H. Mathian, D. Pumain, and L. Sanders. 2010. “Multiagent Systems and the Dynamics of a Settlement System.” Geographical Analysis 28 (2): 161–178. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00927.x.
   Google Scholar
• Buser, M. 2014. “Thinking through Nonrepresentational and Affective Atmospheres in Planning Theory and Practice.” Planning Theory, no. 13: 227–243. doi:10.1177/1473095213491744.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2014. “The Place-Shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 2–36. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854695.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1977. The Urban Question, A Marxist Approach. Vol. 1. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2000. “Marxism and the Production of Nature.” Capital & Class 24 (3): 5–36. doi:10.1177/030981680007200102.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., and J. Ringrose, Eds. 2013. Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. 2007a. The Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. 2007b. “Urban Design: Requiem for an Era - Review and Critique of the Last 50 Years.” Urban Design International 12: 177–223. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200.
   Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., and O. Mould. 2013. “Beyond Urban Subcultures: Urban Subversions as Rhizomatic Social Formations: Urban Subcultures and Subversive Social Formations.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01198.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. 2006a. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. 2006b. “Deleuzian Social Ontology and Assemblage Theory.” In Deleuze and the Social, edited by M. Fuglsang and B. Meier Sorensen, 250–266. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2006. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Rev. ed.London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2012. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Trans. M. Seem and H. R. Lane. London; New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2002. A Thousand Plateaus Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and P. Patton. 2004. Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2010. Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2011. “Uprooting Critical Urbanism.” City 15 (3–4): 347–354. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.595109.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2012. “Informal Urbanism and Complex Adaptive Assemblage.” International Development Planning Review 34 (4): 349–368. doi:10.3828/idpr.2012.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2016. Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and E. Pafka. 2014. “The Urban Density Assemblage: Modelling Multiple Measures.” URBAN DESIGN International 19 (1): 66–76. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and R. King. 2012. “Informal Urbanism and the Taste for Slums.” Tourism Geographies 14 (2): 275–293. doi:10.1080/14616688.2011.613944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellin, N. 2006. Integral Urbanism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 1986. “Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology”. Research in Planning and Design 14. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, I., and T. Bender. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floch, J.-M. 1988. “The Contribution of Structural Semiotics to the Design of a Hypermarket.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 4 (3): 233–252. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(88)80007-7.
   Google Scholar
• Foroughmand Araabi, H. 2014. “Deleuze and Research Methodologies: The Impact on Planning.” City 18 (4–5): 589–593. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.939508.
   Google Scholar
• Foroughmand Araabi, H. 2016. “A Typology of Urban Design Theories and Its Application to the Shared Body of Knowledge.” URBAN DESIGN International21 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.6.
   Google Scholar
• Foroughmand Araabi, H. 2017. “Multiple Expectations: Assessing the Assumed Roles of Theory in Relation to Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 22 (5): 658–669. doi:10.1080/13574809.2017.1298402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroughmand Araabi, H. 2018. “Schools and Skills of Critical Thinking for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design23 (5): 763–779. doi:10.1080/13574809.2017.1369874.
   Google Scholar
• Frichot, H., Ed. 2013. Deleuze and Architecture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giedion, S. 2009. Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Vol. 5. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., and M. C. Gosling. 2003. The Evolution of American Urban Design. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 2013. Being and Time. Trans., J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Malden: Blackwell. (35. reprint).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2005. “Straddling the Post-Structuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence?” Planning Theory 4 (3): 271–299. doi:10.1177/1473095205058497.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2011. “Strategic Navigation across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning.” Town Planning Review 82 (5): 503–527. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.30.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, E. 1991. “Deterritorializing ‘Deterritorialization’: From the ‘Anti-Oedipus’ to ‘A Thousand Plateaus’.” University of Wisconsin Press 20 (66): 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, E. 1999. Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, E. 2013. Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Inam, A. 2011. “From Dichotomy to Dialectic: Practising Theory in Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 16 (2): 257–277. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.552835.
   Google Scholar
• Inam, A. 2014. Designing Urban Transformation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. 1996. Emancipating Space: Geography, Architecture, and Urban Design. 1st ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. 2005. Urban Design : A Typology of Procedures and Products : Illustrated with over 50 Case Studies. Burlington, MA: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larice, M., and E. MacDonald. 2007. The Urban Design Reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts.” In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 225–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. 2014. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity, Trans. J. D. Jordan. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. 2015. Governing by Debt. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2011. The Production of Space. Trans, D. Nicholson-Smith. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. (Nachdr.).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 1996. Design of Urban Space, an Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process. Chichester; New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2014. Urban Design, Space and Society. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 1996. “Becoming-Deleuzian.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 (4): 395–406. doi:10.1068/d140395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011a. “Assemblage and Critical Urbanism.” City 15 (2): 204–224. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.568715.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011b. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4): 649–671. doi:10.1068/d4710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V. 1992. “A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know.” Journal of Planning Literature 6 (4): 331–349. doi:10.1177/088541229200600401.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, A. 2010. The Deleuze Dictionary: 2nd Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2013. “A New Land: Deleuze and Guattary and Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 14 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.761279.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, K. N. 2011. “Assemblage and the Politics of Thick Description.” City 15 (5): 563–569. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.611287.
   Google Scholar
• Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, A., and P. Eisenman. 1982. The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2014. “The Challenges of the “Material Turn” for Planning Studies.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (4): 590–595. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.968007.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, D. G. 2005. Recombinant Urbanism: Conceptual Modeling in Architecture, Urban Design, and City Theory. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. 2009. “The End(S) of Urban Design.” In Urban Design, edited by A. Krieger and W. Saunders, 155–188, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, E. 2000. “An Integrative Theory of Urban Design.” Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (3): 265–278. doi:10.1080/01944360008976106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg, D. 2012. The Memory of Place: A Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wezemael, J. 2008. “The Contribution of Assemblage Theory and Minor Politics for Democratic Network Governance.” Planning Theory 7 (2): 165–185. doi:10.1177/1473095208090433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. 2009. “Desiring Docklands: Deleuze and Urban Planning Discourse.” Planning Theory 8 (2): 191–216. doi:10.1177/1473095209102234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, E. B. 2013. The Deleuze and Guattari Dictionary. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar