A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy

References

• Adrian J, Gonzalez M, Buiza J. The use of computer-assisted therapy in anomia rehabilitation: A single case report. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 981–1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aftonomos L B, Steele R D, Wertz R T. Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 841–846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almost D, Rosenbaum P. Effectiveness of speech intervention for phonological disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1998; 40: 319–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D V. M. The Test for Reception of Grammar. Published by the author and available from Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester, M13 9PL. 1983
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C, Cupples L. Parents and children together (PACT): A collaborative approach to phonological therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 35–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan A, Howard D. Frozen phonology thawed: The analysis and remediation of a developmental disorder of real word phonology. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1992; 27: 343–365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen W, Hodson A, O'Hare A, Boyle J, Durrani T, McCartney E, Mattey M, Naftalin L, Watson J. Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (Fast ForWord) in severe mixed receptive-expressive impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2005; 48: 715–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosbie S, Holm A, Dodd B. Intervention for children severe speech disorder: a comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 467–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denne M, Langdown N, Pring T, Roy P. Treating children with expressive phonological disorders: does phonological awareness therapy work in the clinic. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 493–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B. Procedures for classification of subgroups of speech disorder. The differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder, B Dodd. Whurr, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B, Bradford A. A comparison of three therapy methods for children with different types of developmental phonological disorder. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder 2000; 35: 189–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B, Iacano T. Phonological disorders in children: Changes in phonological process use during treatment. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1989; 24: 333–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn C, Barron C. A treatment program for disordered phonology: Phonetic and linguistic considerations. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1982; 13: 100–109
   Google Scholar
• DuPaul G. J. The ADHD Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability and Validity. 1990, Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts Medical Centre, Worcester
   Google Scholar
• Eikeseth S, Nesset R. Behavioural treatment of children with phonological disorder: the efficacy of vocal imitation and sufficient response exemplar training. Journal of Applied Behavioural Analysis 2003; 36: 325–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert M, Dinnsen D, Swartzlander P, Chin S B. Generalization to conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 694–699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elstein A S, Bordage G. Psychology of clinical reasoning. Professional judgement. A reader in clinical decision making, J Dowie, E Elstein. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988; 109–129
   Google Scholar
• Fink R B, Brecher A, Schwartz M F, Robey R R. A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: Evaluation of clinician guided and partially self-guided instruction. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 1061–1086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. Differential learning of phonological oppositions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 540–549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J. The conditions and course of clinically induced phonological change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 1049–1063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J. Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: S85–S100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J, Morrisette M, Hughes M, Rowland S. Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 215–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillam R B, Crofford J A, Gale M A, Hoffman L M. Language change following computer-assisted language instruction with Fast ForWord or Laureate Learning Systems software. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 10: 231–247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon G. The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2000; 31: 126–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon G. Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 381–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation 2. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 2000
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Phonological Assessment of Child Speech. NFER Nelson, Windsor 1985
   Google Scholar
• Harbers H M, Paden E P, Halle J W. Phonological awareness and production: Changes during intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1999; 30: 50–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh A, Adams C, Nightingale C, Hall R. Phonological awareness and articulatory training approaches for children with phonological disorders: A comparative outcome study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2000; 35: 337–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook P E, Macaruso P, Jones S. Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties – A longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia 2001; 51: 75–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson G. Children's attention on tabletop versus computer administered phonology therapy. 2004, Unpublished dissertation, College of St Mark & St John, Plymouth, UK
   Google Scholar
• Katz R C, Wertz R T. Computerized hierarchical reading treatment in aphasia. Aphasiology 1992; 6: 165–177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz R C, Wertz R T. The efficacy of computer provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 493–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein E S. Phonological/traditional approaches to articulation therapy: A retrospective group comparison. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 314–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 924–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger M C, Schwartz M F, Kohn S E. Computer based training of language production: An exploratory study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2001; 11: 57–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonigan C L, Driscoll K, Phillips B M, Cantor B G, Anthony J L, Goldstein H. A computer-assisted instruction phonological sensitivity program for preschool children at-risk for reading problems. Journal of Early Intervention 2003; 25: 248–262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loverso F L, Prescott T E, Selinger M. Microcomputer treatment applications in aphasiology. Aphasiology 1992; 6: 155–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich M M, Jenkins W M, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller S L, Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of language learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996; 271: 77–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio A W, Elbert M, Forrest K. The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 347–363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan D. Remediation of common phonological processes: Four case studies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1986; 17: 199–206
   Google Scholar
• Mortley J, Wade J, Davies A, Enderby P. An investigation into the feasibility of remotely monitored computer therapy for people with aphasia. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2003; 5: 27–36
   Google Scholar
• Nelson L K, Masterson J J. Computer technology: Creative interfaces in service delivery. Topics in Language Disorders 1999; 19: 68–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor L, Schery T. A comparison of microcomputer aided and traditional language therapy for developing communication skills in non-oral toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 356–361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pokori J L, Worthington C K, Jamison P J. Phonological awareness intervention: Comparison of Fast ForWord, Earobics and LiPS. Journal of Educational Research 2004; 97: 147–157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell T W. Phonetic inventory constraints in young children: Factors affecting acquisition patterns during treatment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1993; 7: 45–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell T W, Elbert M, Dinnsen D A. Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 37: 347–357
   Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven J C, Court J M. The Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford Psychology Press, Oxford 1998
   Google Scholar
• Reid J, Donaldson M, Howell J, Dean E, Grieve R. The effectiveness of therapy for child phonological disorder: The Metaphon approach. Child Language, M Aldridge. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon 1996; 165–175
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone S, Wren Y. Investigation of theoretical models and therapy activities: Phonological difficulties. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36(Suppl.)441–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew S, Rafaat S, Martin M. Stimulability, speech perception skills and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 33–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew S, Nowak M. The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 610–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew S, Nowak M, Cloutier G. Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 250–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saben C, Ingham J C. The effects of minimal pairs treatment on the speech sound production of two children with phonologic disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1023–1040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schery T, O'Connor L. The effectiveness of school-based computer language intervention with severely handicapped children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School 1992; 23: 43–47
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L, Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 256–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L, Kwiatkowski J, Snyder T. Articulation testing by microcomputer. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 309–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L, Kwiatkowski J, Snyder T. Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: Stabilization phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 233–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L, Kwiatkowski J, Snyder T. Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: Response evocation phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 635–655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith J, Downs M, Mogford-Bevan K. Can phonological awareness training facilitate minimal pair therapy?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1998; 33(Suppl.)463–468
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stackhouse J, Wells W. Children's speech and literacy difficulties: A psycholinguistic framework. Whurr, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Tallal P, Miller S L, Bedi G, Byrna G, Wang X, Srikantan S N, Schreiner C, Jenkins W M, Merzenich M M. Language comprehension in language learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 1996; 271: 81–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia G A, Whitney S D. A close look at the efficacy of Fast ForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2003; 28: 465–495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance M. Christopher Lumpship: Developing phonological representations in a child with an auditory processing deficit. Language disorders in children and adults: Psycholinguisitic approaches to therapy with children and adults, S Chiat, J Law, J Marshall. Whurr, London 1997; 17–41
   Google Scholar
• Vance M. Speech processing and short-term memory in children with normal and atypical speech and language development. 2001, Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London
   Google Scholar
• Vance M, Stackhouse J, Wells B. ‘Sock the wock the pit pat pock’ – children's responses to rhyming ability, 3–7 years. NHCSS Work in Progress 1994; 4
   Google Scholar
• Weiner F F. Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: Two case studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 97–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams A L. Generalization patterns associated with training least phonological knowledge. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 722–733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe V, Presley C, Mesaris J. The importance of sound identification training in phonological intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2003; 12: 282–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren Y. An evaluation of the use of computers in phonology therapy. 2005, Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Bristol, UK
   Google Scholar
• Wren Y, Roulstone S. Phoneme Factory Sound Sorter. Granada Larning, Manchester 2006
   Google Scholar
• Young E C. The effects of treatment on consonant cluster and weak syllable reduction processes in misarticulating children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1987; 18: 23–33
   Google Scholar