Vowel features in Turkish accented English

References

• Blomgren M., Robb M., Chen Y. A note on vowel centralization in stuttering and nonstuttering individuals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: 1042–1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeschoten H. The speakers of Turkic languages. The Turkic languages, L. Johanson, É. Á. Csató. Routledge, New York 1998; 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Briére E. An investigation of phonological interference. Language 1966; 42: 768–796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Census. 2000 US Census. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y. Production of tense-lax contrast by Mandarin speakers of English. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2006; 58: 240–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Robb M., Gilbert H., Lerman J. Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2001a; 15: 427–440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Robb M., Gilbert H., Lerman J. A study of sentence stress production in Mandarin speakers of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001b; 109: 1681–1690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L. Assessing Asian language performance: Guidelines for evaluating limited-English-proficient students. Aspen Publishers, Rockville, MD 1987; 38–77
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L. Asian-American cultures. Communication disorders in multicultural populations, D. Battle. Andover Medical Publishers, Boston, MA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Csató É.Á., Johanson L. Turkish. The Turkic languages, L. Johanson, É. Á. Csató. Routledge, New York 1998; 203–235
   Google Scholar
• Delattre P. Comparing the vocalic features of English, German, Spanish, and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 1964; 2: 71–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delattre P. An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 1969; 7: 294–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. Phonetic approximation in second language acquisition. Language and Learning 1980; 30: 117–134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. The phonological basis of foreign accent. TESOL Quarterly 1981; 15: 443–455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. The production of “new” and “similar” vowels in a foreign language: Evidence for the effects of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 1987; 15: 47–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. Chinese subjects' perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989; 86: 1684–1697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. Second language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience, W. Strange. York Press, Baltimore, MD 1995; 229–273
   Google Scholar
• Flege J. E. English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: more evidence for the “similar” vs. “new” distinction. Second-language speech: Structure and process, A. James, J. Leather. Mouton de Gruyter, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Flege J. E., Davidian R. Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 1985; 5: 323–347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E., Hillenbrand J. Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language production. Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system, G. Ioup, S. Weinberger. Newbury House, Cambridge 1987; 176–201
   Google Scholar
• Flege J. E., Frieda E. M., Nozawa T. Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 1997; 25: 169–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J. E., Schirru C., MacKay I. R. A. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication 2003; 40: 467–491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Gordon, Jr, 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the World15th ed. Dallas, TX, SIL International
   Google Scholar
• Grimes B. F. Ethnologue: Top 100 languages by population. 1996, Retrieved 27 February 2007, from http://web.archive.org/web/19990429232804/www.sil.org/ethnologue/top100.html
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J., Getty L., Clark M., Wheeler L. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995; 97: 3099–3111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James A. Phonetic transfer and phonological explanation: some theoretical and methodological issues. Cross-language influence in second language acquisition, E. Kellerman, M. Sharwood. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985; 183–197
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J., Newport E. Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition 1991; 39: 215–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliç M. A., Oğüt F. A high unrounded vowel in Turkish: Is it a central or back vowel. Speech Communication 2004; 43: 143–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliç M. A., Oğüt F., Dursun G., Okur E., Yildirim I., Midilli R. The effects of vowels on voice perturbation measures. Journal of Voice 2004; 18: 318–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J., Gerrat B. R., Kempster G. B., Erman A., Berke G. S. Perceptual examination of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 21–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon H. Foreign accent: implications for delivery of speech and language services. Topics in Language Disorders 1999; 19: 49–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindau M. Vowel features. Language 1978; 54: 541–563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minium E. Statistical reasoning in psychology and education2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Peterson G., Barney H. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1952; 24: 175–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett J. M. The acoustics of speech communication – Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Height, MA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Piske T., MacKay I. R. A., Flege J. E. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review. Journal of Phonetics 2001; 29: 191–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman J., Ingram J. Accuracy of perception and production of compound and phrasal stress by Vietnamese Australians. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 1992; 13: 1–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Róna-Tas A. The reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the genetic question. The Turkic languages, L. Johanson, É Á. Csató. Routledge, New York 1998; 67–80
   Google Scholar
• Tarone E. Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language and Teaching 1980; 18: 139–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubetzkoy N. Grundzüge der Phonologie. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 1932/1969, Travaux du Cercle Inguistique de Prague 7 (English translation by C. Baltaxe)
   Google Scholar
• Turkic Languages. May 2). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2008, Retrieved 6 May 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_languages
   Google Scholar