Theory of mind impairment in right hemisphere damage: A review of the evidence

References

• Abell F., Happé F., Frith U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development 2000; 15: 1–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeleri R., Bosco F. M., Zettin M., Sacco K., Colle L., Bara B. G. Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment. Brain and Language, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A. M., Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition 1985; 21: 13–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby H., McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 99–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird C. M., Castelli F., Malik O., Frith, Husain M. The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on ‘theory of mind’ and cognition. Brain 2004; 127: 914–928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom P, German T. P. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 2000; 77: B25–B31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell H., Stringfellow A. Making requests: Illustrations of how right-hemisphere brain damage can affect discourse production. Brain and Language 1999; 68: 442–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell H., Griffin R., Winner E., Friedman O., Happé F. Cerebral lateralization and theory of mind. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience2nd ed, S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, D. Cohen. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000; 306–333
   Google Scholar
• Castelli F., Happé F., Frith U., Frith C. Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 2000; 12: 314–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne M., Virbel J., Nespoulous J. L., Joanette Y. Impact of right hemispheric damage on a hierarchy of complexity evidenced in young normal subjects. Brain and Cognition 2003; 53: 152–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne-Lavau M., Joanette Y. Why RHD individuals have more difficulties with direct requests than indirect requests? A theory of mind hypothesis. Brain and Language 2007; 103: 45–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis H. D., Gunter H. L. Asperger syndrome: A simple matter of white matter?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999; 3: 192–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell J. H. Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merill-Palmer Quarterly 2004; 50: 274–290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldi N. S. Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 1987; 31: 88–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith C., Frith U. Quick guide theory of mind. Current Biology 2005; 15: R644–R645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith U., Happé F. Language and communication in autistic disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1994; 346: 97–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher H. L., Happé F., Brunswick N., Fletcher P. C., Frith C. D. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 11–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice P. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 1957; 66: 377–388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin R., Friedman O., Ween J., Winner E., Happé F., Brownell H. Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: Refining the scope of impairment. Laterality 2006; 11: 195–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé F. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 1993; 48: 101–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé F., Brownell H., Winner E. Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition 1999; 70: 211–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington L., Siegert R., McClure J. Theory of mind in schizophrenia: A critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2005; 10: 249–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havet-Thomassin V., Allain P., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Gall D. L. What about theory of mind after severe brain injury?. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 83–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein A S., Adophs R. Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003; 101: 7487–7491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry J. D., Phillips L. H., Crawford J. R., Ietswaart M., Summers F. Theory of mind following traumatic brain injury: The role of emotion recognition and executive dysfunction. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 1623–1628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst W., LeDoux J., Stein S. Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology. Brain and Language 1984; 23: 26–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack A. I., Roepstorff A. Introspection and cognitive brain-mapping: From stimulus-response to script-report. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002; 6: 333–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren K., Brownell H., Cayer-Meade C., Spitzer J. Training theory of mind following right hemisphere damage: A pilot study. Brain and Language 2007; 103: 209–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin I., McDonald S. Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language 2003; 85: 451–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin I., McDonald S. That can't be right! What causes pragmatic language impairment following right hemisphere damage?. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 202–211
   Google Scholar
• Myers P. S. Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Ozonoff S., Miller J. N. An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language 1996; 52: 411–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roepstorff A., Frith C. What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and ‘top-top’ control of action in cognitive experiments. Psychological Research 2004; 68: 189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert C., Ahlsen E. Inference in right hemisphere damaged individuals' comprehension: The role of sustained attention. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2007; 21: 637–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson D., Apperly I. A., Chiavarino C., Humphreys G. W. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nature Neuroscience 2004; 7: 499–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields J. Semantic-pragmatic disorder: A right hemisphere syndrome?. The British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1991; 26: 383–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer B., Giroux F., Joanette Y. Production and evaluation of requests by right hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain and Language 1994; 47: 1–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello M. Constructing a language – A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins C. A., Lehman M. T. Interpreting intended meanings after right hemisphere brain damage: An analysis of evidence, potential accounts, and clinical implications. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1998; 5: 29–47
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins C. A., Scharp V. L., Fassbinder W., Meigh K. M., Armstrong E. M. A different story on ‘Theory of mind’ deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology 2008; 22: 42–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins C. A., Scharp V. L., Fassbinder W., Meigh K., Armstrong E. M. ‘Theory of mind’ in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language 2006; 99: 57–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uekermann J., Channon S., Winkel K., Schlebusch P., Daum I. Theory of mind, humour processing and executive function in alcoholism. Addiction 2007; 102: 232–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhalle C., Lemieux S., Joubert S., Goulet P., Ska B., Joanettee Y. Processing of speech acts by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients: An ecological approach. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 1127–1141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley R., Siegal M. Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology 2000; 10: 723–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weylman S. T., Brownell H. H., Roman M., Gardner H. Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language 1989; 36: 580–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer H., Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 1983; 13: 103–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner E., Brownell H., Happé F., Blum A., Pincus D. Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 1998; 62: 89–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini S., Bryan K., De Luca G., Bava A. The effects of age and education on pragmatic features of verbal communication: Evidence from the Italian version of the Right Hemisphere Language Battery (I-RHLB). Aphasiology 2005; 19: 1107–1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar