Measurement accuracy: Enabling human rights for Fijian students with speech difficulties

References

• Access to Quality Education Program. (2017). Fiji education management information system (FEMIS) disability disaggregation package: Guidelines and forms. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.fj/images/FEMISdisabilitydisaggregation-packageFinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crialesi, R., De Palma, E., & Battisti, A. (2016). Building a module on child functioning and disability. In B. Altman (Ed.), International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application. The work of the Washington Group (pp. 151–166). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, W.H., & Rona, T. (2008). Educating children with complex conditions: Understanding overlapping and co-existing developmental disorders. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, E., DeLong, D., & Clarke-Pearson, D. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845. doi:10.2307/2531595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J.D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Flahault, A., Cadilhac, M., & Thomas, G. (2005). Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 859–862. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, L.J., McLeod, S., McAllister, L., & McCormack, J. (2017). Speech sound disorders in preschool children: Correspondence between clinical diagnosis and teacher and parent report. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 22, 35–48. doi:10.1080/19404158.2017.1289964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S.G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hopf, S.C., & McLeod, S. (2015). Services for people with communication disability in Fiji: Barriers and drivers of change. Rural and Remote Health, 15, 2863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, S.C., McLeod, S., & McDonagh, S.H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for school students in Fiji. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31, 487–502. doi:10.1080/02699206.2016.1268208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, S.C., McLeod, S., & McDonagh, S.H. (2018). Linguistic multi-competence of Fiji school students and their conversational partners. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15, 72–91. doi:10.1080/14790718.2016.1241256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, S.C., McLeod, S., McDonagh, S.H., Wang, C., & Rakanace, E.N. (2017). Communication disability in Fiji: Community self-help and help-seeking support. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17549507.2017.1337226
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. (2012). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In S. Boslaugh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of epidemiology (pp. 896–898). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mactaggart, I., Cappa, C., Kuper, H., Loeb, M., & Polack, S. (2016). Field testing a draft version of the UNICEF/Washington Group module on child functioning and disability. ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research, Journal Europeen De Erche Sur Le Handicap, 10, 345–360. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2016.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mactaggart, I., Kuper, H., Murthy, G.V.S., Oye, J., & Polack, S. (2016). Measuring disability in population based surveys: The interrelationship between clinical impairments and reported functional limitations in Cameroon and India. PLoS One, 11, 1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, M., Chepp, V., Zablotsky, B., & Creamer, L. (2014). Analysis of cognitive interview testing of child disability questions in five countries. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from https://wwwn.cdc.gov/qbank/…/Massey_NCHS_2014_UNICEF_Child_Disability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKean, C., Reilly, S., Bavin, E.L., Bretherton, L., Cini, E., Conway, L., … Mensah, F. (2017). Language outcomes at 7 years: Early predictors and co-occurring difficulties. Pediatrics, 139, 1–10. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Shahaeian, A. (2015). Intelligibility in Context Scale: Normative and validation data for English-speaking preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 266–276. doi:10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Harrison, L.J., & McCormack, J. (2012). The Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 648–656. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & McKinnon, D.H. (2007). The prevalence of communication disorders compared with other learning needs in 14,500 primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 37–59. doi:10.1080/13682820601173262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont, D., Alur, S., Loeb, M., & Miller, K. (2016). Cognitive analysis of survey questions for identifying out-of-school children with disabilities in India. In B. Altman (Ed.), International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application. The work of the Washington Group (pp. 167–181). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, S., Rietz, C., & Stenneken, P. (2016). The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G): Reliability and validity evidence. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52, 585–594. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K., To, C., & McLeod, S. (2014). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale as a screening tool for preschoolers in Hong Kong. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28, 316–328. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.865789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OMERAD. (2008). Evidence-Based Medicine Course - Diagnosis: Likelihood Ratios. Office of Medical Education Research and Development. Retrieved from http://omerad.msu.edu/ebm/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Phȧm, B., McLeod, S., & Harrison, L.J. (2017). Validation and norming of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Northern Vietnam. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31, 665–681. doi:10.1080/02699206.2017.1306110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjes, A., Reitsma, J., Vandenbroucke, J., Glas, A., & Bossuyt, P. (2005). Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clinical Chemistry, 51, 1335–1341. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.048595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonis, J. (1999). How to use and interpret interval likelihood ratios. Family Medicine, 31, 437.
   Google Scholar
• Spitalnic, S. (2004). Test properties 2: Likelihood ratios, Bayes’ formula, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Hospital Physician, 40, 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sprunt, B., Hoq, M., Sharma, U., & Marella, M. (2017). Validating the UNICEF/Washington Group Child Functioning Module for Fijian schools to identify seeing, hearing and walking difficulties. Disability and Rehabilitation, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1378929
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UNDP, ILO, UNICEF, WHO, OHCHR, UNFPA, … IDDC. (2016). Disability data disaggregation joint statement by the disability sector. Retrieved from http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Joint-statement-on-disaggregation-of-data-by-disability-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCAP. (2010). Guidelines for cognitive and pilot testing of questions for use in surveys. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP. Retrieved from http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Disability-question-testing-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF & Washington Group. (2015). Survey module on child functioning and disability – interview guidelines. New York: UNICEF & Washington Group. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
   Google Scholar
• Visser, M., Nel, M., Bronkhorst, C., Brown, L., Ezendam, Z., Mackenzie, K., … Venter, M. (2016). Childhood disability population-based surveillance: Assessment of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition and Washington Group on Disability Statistics/UNICEF module on child functioning in a rural setting in South Africa. African Journal of Disability, 5, e1–e9. doi:10.4102/ajod.v5i1.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, K.N., McDonald, M.M., McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Devonish, H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for Jamaican Creole-speaking preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 750–761. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health, children and youth version ICF-CY. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43737/1/9789241547321_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar