The Lombard effect associated with Chinese male alaryngeal speech

References

• van den Berg, J., & Moolenaar-Bijl, A.J. (1959). Cricopharyngeal sphincter, pitch, intensity and fluency in esophageal speech. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 21, 298–315. doi:10.1159/000274217
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, J.W., Moolenaar-Bijl, A.J., & Damste, P.H. (1958). Oesophageal speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 10, 65–84. doi:10.1159/000262802
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.41, retrieved 6 August 2018 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bottalico, P., Passione, I.I., Graetzer, S., & Hunter, E.J. (2017). Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard effect. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 103, 169–172. doi:10.3813/aaa.919043
   Google Scholar
• Brumm, H., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2005). Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 151–209. doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(05)35004-2
   Google Scholar
• Brumm, H., & Zollinger, S.A. (2011). The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 *years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour, 148, 1173–1198. doi:10.1163/000579511x605759
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos, A., Benedí, J.-S., & Casacuberta, F. (1996). An analysis of general acoustic-phonetic features for Spanish speech produced with the Lombard effect. Speech Communication, 20, 23–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00042-8
   Google Scholar
• de Swart, B.J., Willemse, S.C., Maassen, B.A.M., & Horstink, M.W.I.M. (2003). Improvement of voicing in patients with Parkinson’s disease by speech therapy. Neurology, 60, 498–500. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000044480.95458.56
   Google Scholar
• Diedrich, W.M. (1999). The pharyngoesophageal segment after laryngectomy. In S.J. Salmon (Ed.), Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation – For clinicians by clinicians (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–28). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, J.J., & O'Neill, J. (1957). Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility for words and phrases. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 1320–1323. doi:10.1121/1.1908780
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, S. (1965). The effects of environmental noise on pseudo voice after laryngectomy. Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 79, 193–202. doi:10.1017/s0022215100063581
   Google Scholar
• Filter, M.D., & Hyman, M. (1975). Relationship of acoustic parameters and perceptual ratings of esophageal speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 63–68. doi:10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.63
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, M., Bailly, L., Dohen, M., Welby, P., & Loevenbruck, H. (2006). An acoustic and articulatory study of Lombard speech: Global effects on the utterance. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, M., Henrich, N., & Dubois, D. (2010). Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction in the Lombard effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 588–608. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0138)
   Google Scholar
• Hoops, H.R., & Noll, J.D. (1969). Relationship of selected acoustic variables to judgements of esophageal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2, 1–13. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(69)90049-5
   Google Scholar
• Junqua, J.C. (1993). The Lombard reflex and its role on human listener and automatic speech recognizers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 510–524. doi:10.1121/1.405631
   Google Scholar
• Junqua, J.C. (1996). The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex. Speech Communication, 20, 13–22. doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00041-6
   Google Scholar
• Junqua, J.C., Fincke, S., & Field, K. (1999). The Lombard effect: A reflex to better communicate with others in noise. In Proceedings of ICASSP ’99, the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 2083–2086. doi:10.1109/icassp.1999.758343
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, R., Tang, C.G., & Sinclair, C.F. (2017). The electrolarynx: Voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ), 10, 133–140. doi:10.2147/mder.s133225
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677–709. doi:10.1044/jshr.1404.677
   Google Scholar
• Letowski, T., Frank, T., & Caravella, J. (1993). Acoustical properties of speech produced in noise presented through supra-aural earphones. Ear and Hearing, 14, 332–338. doi:10.1097/00003446-199310000-00004
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H.J., & Ng, M.L. (2009). Formant characteristics of vowels produced by Mandarin esophageal speakers. Journal of Voice, 23, 255–260. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Wan, M., Wang, S., Wang, X., & Lu, C. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1016–1025. doi:10.1121/1.1942349
   Google Scholar
• McColl, D.A. (2006). Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise. Journal of Voice, 20, 605–615. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.005
   Google Scholar
• New Voice Club of Hong Kong. (2018). *The 18th Executive Committee Report (2015–2017). Retrieved from http://www.newvoice.org.hk/images/stories/2017%20NVC%20booklet%202_jpg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M.L. (2011). Aerodynamic characteristics associated with esophageal and trachea-esophageal speech of Cantonese. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 13, 137–144. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.534176
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., & Chan, M.W. (2012). Analyzing neoglottal vibration of Cantonese trachea-esophageal speech - A preliminary aerodynamic study using inverse-filtering. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64, 283–289. doi:10.1159/000346878
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Gilbert, H., & Lerman, J. (1998). Perceptions of tonal changes in normal laryngeal, esophageal, and artificial laryngeal male Cantonese speakers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 64–70. doi:10.1159/000021451
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Gilbert, H.R., & Lerman, J.W. (2001). Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 53, 36–47. doi:10.1159/000052652
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Kwok, C.-L.I., & Chow, S.-F.W. (1997). Speech performance of adult Cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation. Journal of Voice, 11, 338–344. doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80013-6
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Liu, H., Zhao, Q., & Lam, P.K.Y. (2009). Long-term average spectral characteristics of Cantonese alaryngeal speech. Auris Nasus Larynx, 36, 571–577. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2008.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Tong, E.T.-S., & Yu, K.K.M. (in press). Articulatory contact pressure during bilabial plosive production in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 71, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M.L., & Xiong, M.Y. (2015). Chinese alaryngeal speech rehabilitation and their acoustical characteristics: A comprehensive review. Rehabilitation Medicine, 25, 44–49. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1329.2015.02044
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Yan, N., Chiu, K.N., & Chen, Y. (2017). Acoustic and electroglottographic characteristics associated with tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese. Rehabilitation Medicine, 27, 5–11. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1329.2017.05005
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., & Schell, K.W. (2008). The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 209–220. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/016)
   Google Scholar
• Pick, H.L., Siegel, G.M., Fox, P.W., Garber, S.R., & Kearney, J.K. (1989). Inhibiting the Lombard effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 894–900. doi:10.1121/1.397561
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, J.M. (1956). Effect of vocal force on the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 902–905. doi:10.1121/1.1908510
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, C., & Rastatter, M.P. (1985). The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults. The Journal of Auditory Research, 25, 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, J., Fisher, H.B., Blom, E.C., & Singer, M.J. (1984). A comparative acoustic study of normal esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 202–210. doi:10.1044/jshd.4902.202
   Google Scholar
• Searl, J.P., & Reeves, I.S. (2007). Nonsurgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In E.C. Ward & C.J. van As-Brooks (Eds.), Head and neck cancer: treatment, rehabilitation and outcomes. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Snidecor, J.C., & Isshiki, N. (1965). Vocal air use characteristics of a superior male esophageal speaker. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 17, 217–232. doi:10.1159/000263044
   Google Scholar
• Summers, W.V., Pisoni, D.B., Bernacki, R.H., Pedlow, R.I., & Stokes, M.A. (1988). Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 917–928. doi:10.1121/1.396660
   Google Scholar
• Tartter, V.C., Gomes, H., & Litwin, E. (1993). Some acoustic effects of listening to noise on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 2437–2440. doi:10.1121/1.408234
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J.C., & Klumpp, R.G. (1962). Effects of ambient noise and nearby talkers on a face-to-face communication task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 936–941. doi:10.1121/1.1918224
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, B., Horii, Y., & Smith, E. (1980). Long-term spectral and intensity characteristics of esophageal speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1781–1784. doi:10.1121/1.384306
   Google Scholar
• Yan, N., Lam, P.K.Y., & Ng, M. (2012). Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64, 241–247. doi:10.1159/000342825
   Google Scholar
• Zeine, L., & Brandt, J.F. (1988). The Lombard effect on alaryngeal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 373–383. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(88)90022-6
   Google Scholar
• Zemlin, W.R. (1987). Speech and hearing science: Anatomy and physiology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S.-S., Xia, Q.-M., Zheng, R.-S., & Chen, W.-Q. (2015). Laryngeal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2010. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 11, 143–148. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.168175
   Google Scholar
• Zollinger, S.A., & Brumm, H. (2011). The Lombard effect. Current Biology, 21, R614–R615. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.003
   Google Scholar