Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment

References

• Adams, E.J., Nguyen, A.T., & Cowan, N. (2018). Theories of working memory: differences in definition, degree of modularity, role of attention, and purpose. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 340–355. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0114
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The working memory rating scale: a classroom-based behavioral assessment of working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 242–245. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, L.M.D. (2018). The reciprocal influences of working memory and linguistic knowledge on language performance: considerations for the assessment of children with developmental language disorder. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 424–433. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0094
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, L., & Gathercole, S. (2007). The complexities of complex memory span: storage and processing deficits in specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 177–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Barrouillet, P., Gavens, N., Vergauwe, E., Gaillard, V., & Camos, V. (2009). Working memory span development: a time-based resource-sharing model account. Developmental Psychology, 45, 277–290. doi: 10.1037/a0014615
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., Norbury, C. F. (2005). Executive functions in children with communication impairments, in relation to autistic symptomatology. 2: Response inhibition. Autism: The International Journal Of Research And Practice, 9(1), 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., St Clair, M.C., Pickles, A., & Durkin, K. (2012). Developmental trajectories of verbal and nonverbal skills in individuals with a history of specific language impairment: from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1716–1735. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0182)
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Model of working memory: Mechanism of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Elliott, M., Saults, S., Morey, C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Fristoe, N., Elliott, E., Brunner, R., & Saults, S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1754–1768. doi: 10.3758/BF03195936
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Saults, J., & Blume, C. (2014). Central and peripheral components of working memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1806–1836. doi: 10.1037/a0036814
   Google Scholar
• Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1249–1260. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4205.1249
   Google Scholar
• Finney, M., Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., & Evans, J. (2014). Role of working memory storage and attention focus switching in children’s comprehension of spoken object relative sentences. Child Development Research, 54, 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/450734
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661–681. doi: 10.1017/S0305000904006269
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain and Language, 101, 50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Gaulin, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data.. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A., Cowan, N., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2009). Investigating the childhood development of working memory using sentences: new evidence for the growth of chunk capacity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 252–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R., Cowan, N., & Day, L. (1995). Sequential memory in children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 393–402. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3802.393
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R., Evans, J., Schwartz, S., Fargo, J., & Montgomery, J. (2018). Cognitive predictors of syntactic sentence comprehension in children with and without primary language impairment development of a measurement model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R.B., Gillam, S.L., Fey, M.E. (2017). Supporting knowledge in language and literacy (SKILL): A narrative-based language intervention. In R.J., McCauley, M.E., Fey, R.B. & Gillam (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders (2nd ed., pp. 389–420). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, S.L., Gillam, R.B., & Rogers, C.L. (2018). Supporting knowledge in language and literacy (3rd ed.). Logan, UT: Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, S., Holbrook, S., Mecham, J., & Weller, D. (2018). Pull the andon rope on working memory capacity interventions until we know more. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 434–448. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0121
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3506.1303
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R., & Pearson, N. (2017). Test of narrative language (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   Google Scholar
• Just, M., Carpenter, P., & Keller, T. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103, 773–780. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.773
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2014). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Circle pines. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., Deevy, P., Fey, M., & Bredin-Oja, S. (2013). Sentence comprehension in specific language impairment: a task designed to distinguish between cognitive capacity and syntactic complexity. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56, 577–589. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0254)
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., Ellis Weismer, S., Miller, C., Francis, D., Tomblin, J., & Kail, R. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50, 408–428.
   Google Scholar
• Mainela-Arnold, E., & Evans, J. (2005). Beyond capacity limitations: Determinants of word-recall performance on Verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48, 897–909.
   Google Scholar
• Manly, T., Robertson, I.H., Anderson, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1998). Test of everyday attention for children. Sydney, Australia: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 155–200. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(06)46005-9
   Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M. & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. doi:10.1037/a0028228
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. (1995). Sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: The role of phonological working memory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 187–199. doi:10.1044/jshr.3801.187
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., & Evans, J. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 269–288. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0116)
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J., & Gillam, R. (2009). Relation of auditory attention and complex sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: a preliminary study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 123–151. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408090061
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J., Gillam, R., Sergeev, A., & Finney, M. (2016). “Whatdunit?” developmental changes in children’s syntactically based sentence comprehension abilities and sensitivity to word order. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1281–1309. doi: 10.1017/S0142716415000570
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., & Evans, J. (2016). Syntactic versus memory-based accounts of sentence comprehension in children with SLI: looking back, looking ahead. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 1491–1504. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0325
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., Evans, J., & Sergeev, A. (2017). Whatdunit? Sentence comprehension abilities of children with SLI: sensitivity to word order in canonical and noncanonical sentences. Journal of Speech and Language Hearing Research, 60, 2603–2618. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0025
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. W., & Windsor, J. (2007). Examining the Language Performances of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: Contributions of Phonological Short-Term Memory and Speed of Processing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50(3), 778–797. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/054)
   Google Scholar
• Norbury, C., Bishop, D., & Briscoe, J. (2002). Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence of an innate grammar module? Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 247–268. doi: 10.1017/S0142716402002059
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Hein, L. (2012). Attention to information in working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 164–169. doi: 10.1177/0963721412444727
   Google Scholar
• Randall, L. & Tyldesley, K. (2016). Evaluating the impact of working memory training programmes on children – a systematic review. Educational & Child Psychology 33(1), 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M.L., Oetting, J.B., Marquis, J., & Bode, J. (1994). Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 106–121. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3701.106
   Google Scholar
• Scattone, D., Raggio, D., & May, W. (2012). Brief report: concurrent validity of the leiter-R and KBIT-2 scales of nonverbal intelligence for children with Autism and language impairments. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2486–2490. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1495-y
   Google Scholar
• Schwaighofer, M., Fischer, F. & Buhner, M. (2015). Does Working Memory Training Transfer? A Meta-Analysis Including Training Conditions as Moderators. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 138–166, doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1036274
   Google Scholar
• Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T., & Engle, R. (2016). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: Maintenance and disengagement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 771–779. doi: 10.1177/1745691616650647
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: the declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717–726. doi: 10.1038/35094573
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. (2017). Pupillary correlates of covert shifts of attention during working memory maintenance. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 79, 782–795. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1272-7
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn (2nd ed.). Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar