Perspectives for ecological networks in plant ecology

References

• Alcantara JM, Rey PJ, Manzaneda AJ. 2015. A model of plant community dynamics based on replacement networks. J Veg Sci. 26:524–537.
   Google Scholar
• Alcantara JM, Rey PT. 2012. Linking topological structure and dynamics in ecological networks. Am Nat. 180:186–199.
   Google Scholar
• Allesina S, Levine JM. 2011. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proc National Acad Sci USA. 108:5638–5642.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri AH, Silliman BR, Bertness MD. 2007. Hierarchical organization via a facilitation cascade in intertidal cordgrass bed communities. Am Nat. 169:195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM. 2015. Diversity increases indirect interactions, attenuates the intensity of competition, and promotes coexistence. Am Nat. 186:452–459.
   Google Scholar
• Bascompte J, Jordano P. 2014. Mutualistic networks. USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville EB, Dobson AP, Bedford T, Allesina S, Anderson TM, Pascual M. 2011. Spatial guilds in the serengeti food web revealed by a Bayesian group model. PLoS Comput Biol. 7:e1002321.
   Google Scholar
• Bersier LF. 2007. A history of the study of ecological networks. In: Kepes, editor. Biological networks. World Scientific. 365–421.
   Google Scholar
• Blick R, Burns KC. 2009. Network properties of arboreal plants: are epiphytes, mistletoes and lianas structured similarly? Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 11:41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Blick RAJ, Burns KC. 2011. Liana co‐occurrence patterns in a temperate rainforest. J Veg Sci. 22:868–877.
   Google Scholar
• Blick RAJ, Burns KC, Moles AT. 2012. Predicting network topology of mistletoe–host interactions: do mistletoes really mimic their hosts? Oikos. 121:761–771.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson PJ. 2003. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc National Acad Sci USA. 100:3531–3535.
   Google Scholar
• Bozec YM, Yakob L, Bejarano S, Mumby P. 2013. Reciprocal facilitation and non-linearity maintain habitat engineering on coral reefs. Oikos. 122:428–440.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F. 2008. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol. 96:18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Burns KC. 2007. Network properties of an epiphyte metacommunity. J Ecol. 95:1142–1151.
   Google Scholar
• Burns KC, Zotz G. 2010. A hierarchical framework for investigating epiphyte assemblages: networks, meta-communities, and scale. Ecology. 91:377–385.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield BJ, Cavieres LA, Callaway RM, Cook BJ, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Schöb C, Xiao S, et al. 2013. Alpine cushion plants inhibit the loss of phylogenetic diversity in severe environments. Ecol Lett. 16:478–486.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway RM. 2007. Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway RM, Pennings SC. 2000. Facilitation may buffer competitive effects: indirect and diffuse interactions among salt marsh plants. Am Nat. 156:416–424.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway RM, Walker LR. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology. 78:1958–1965.
   Google Scholar
• Chacòn-Labella J, de la Cruz M, Escudero A. 2016. Beyond the classical nurse species effect: diversity assembly in a Mediterranean semi‐arid dwarf shrubland. J Veg Sci. 27:80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chai LE, Loh SK, Low ST, Mohamad MS, Deris S, Zakaria Z. 2014. A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction. Comput Biol Med. 48:55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 31:343–366.
   Google Scholar
• Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM. 2001. Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology. 82:3295–3308.
   Google Scholar
• Connell JP. 1961. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology. 42:710–723.
   Google Scholar
• Csardi G, Nepusz T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ Complex Syst. 1695:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries DM, Baretta JP, Hamming G. 1954. Constellation of frequent herbage plants, based on their correlation in occurrence. Vegetatio. 6:105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Delalandre L, Montesinos-Navarro A. 2018. Can co-occurrence networks predict plant-plant interactions in a semi-arid gypsum community. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 31:36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF. 2007. On community matrix theory in experimental plant ecology. Web Ecol. 8:108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fruend J. 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News. 8:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison AM. 2019. Foundation species, non-trophic interactions, and the value of being common. iScience. 13:254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Fortuna MA, Bascompte J. 2008. The network approach in ecology. In: Valladares C, Elosegi E, Senar G, editors. Unity in diversity: reflections on ecology after the legacy of Ramon Margalef. Fundacion BBVA. 371–392.
   Google Scholar
• Freilich MA, Wieters E, Broitman BR, Marquet PA, Navarrete SA. 2018. Species co-occurrence networks: can they reveal trophic and non-trophic interactions in ecological communities? Ecology. 99:690–699.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller MM, Wagner A, Enquist BJ. 2008. Using network analysis to characterize forest structure. Nat Resourse Modell. 21:225–247.
   Google Scholar
• Genini J, Cortes MC, Guimaraes PRJ, Galetti M. 2012. Mistletoes play different roles in a modular host–parasite network. Biotropica. 44:171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Godoy O, Bartomeus I, Rohr R, Saavedra S. 2018. Towards integrating niche and network theories. Trends Ecol Evol. 33:287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Godoy O, Stouffer DB, Kraft NJ, Levine JM. 2017. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences. Ecology. 98:1193–1200.
   Google Scholar
• Grace JB, Tilman D. 1990. Perspectives on plant competition. USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli J, Barabás G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S. 2017. Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature. 548:210–213.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb PJ. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews. 52:107–145.
   Google Scholar
• HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM. 2012. Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 43:227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Jordán F. 2009. Keystone species and food webs. Philos Trans R Soc B. 364:1733–1741.
   Google Scholar
• Jordán F, Scheuring I. 2004. Network ecology: topological constraints on ecosystems dynamics. Phys Life Rev. 3:139–172.
   Google Scholar
• Keddy PA. 2017. Plant ecology. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kefi S, Berlow EL, Wieters EA, Navarrete SA, Petchey OL, Wood SA, Boit A, Joppa LN, Lafferty KD, Williams RJ, et al. 2012. More than a meal integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. Ecol Lett. 15:291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Kikvidze Z, Brooker RW, Butterfield BJ, Callaway RM, Cavieres LA, Cook BJ, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Xiao S, et al. 2015. The effects of foundation species on community assembly: a global study on alpine cushion plant communities. Ecology. 96:2064–2069.
   Google Scholar
• Klein T, Siegwolf RTW, Körner C. 2016. Belowground carbon trade among tall trees in a temperate forest. Science. 352:342–344.
   Google Scholar
• Körner C. 2018. Concepts in empirical plant ecology. Plant Ecol Divers. 11:405–428.
   Google Scholar
• Laird RA, Schamp BS. 2006. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. Am Nat. 168:182–193.
   Google Scholar
• Levine JM. 1999. Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology. 80:1762–1769.
   Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S. 2017. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature. 546:56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Levine SH. 1976. Competitive interactions in ecosystems. Am. Nat. 110:903–910.
   Google Scholar
• LLambi LD, Hupp N, Saez A, Callaway RM. 2018. Reciprocal interactions between a facilitator, natives, and exotics in tropical alpine plant communities. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 30:82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Losapio G, de la Cruz M, Escudero A, Schmid B, Schöb C. 2018a. The assembly of a plant network in alpine vegetation. J Veg Sci. 29:999–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Losapio G, Fortuna M, Bascompte J, Schmid B, Michalet R, Neumeyer R, Castro L, Cerretti P, Germann C, Haenni J-P, et al. 2019. Plant interactions shape pollination networks via nonadditive effects. Ecology. 100:e02619.
   Google Scholar
• Losapio G, Jordán F, Caccianiga M, Gobbi M. 2015. Structure-dynamic relationship of plant–insect networks along a primary succession gradient on a glacier foreland. Ecol Modell. 314:73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Losapio G, Pugnaire FI, O’Brien MJ, Schöb C. 2018b. Plant life history stage and nurse age change the development of ecological networks in arid ecosystems. Oikos. 127:1390–1397.
   Google Scholar
• Losapio G, Schöb C. 2017. Resistance of plant–plant networks to biodiversity loss and secondary extinctions following simulated environmental changes. Funct Ecol. 31:1145–1152.
   Google Scholar
• Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ. 2009. Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol. 97:199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Marcilio-Silva V, Cavalin PO, Varrasin IG, Oliveira RAC, deSouza JMT, Muschner VC, Marques MCM. 2015. Nurse abundance determines plant facilitation networks of subtropical forest–grassland ecotone. Austral Ecol. 40:898–908.
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield MM, Stouffer DB. 2017. Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities. Nat Ecol Evol. 3:62.1–62.7.
   Google Scholar
• McCann KS. 2011. Food webs. USA: Princenton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mescher MC, Pearse IS. 2016. Communicative interactions involving plants: information, evolution, and ecology. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 32:69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Moen J. 1989. Diffuse competition – a diffuse concept. Oikos. 54:260–263.
   Google Scholar
• Montesinos-Navarro A, Estrada A, Font X, Matias MG, Meireles C, Mendoza M, Honrado JP, Prasad HD, Vicente JR, Early R. 2018. Community structure informs species geographic distribution. PLoS One. 13:e0200556.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa Y, Yokozawa M, Hara T. 2015. Competition among plants can lead to an increase in aggregation of smaller plants around larger one. Ecol Modell. 301:41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ohgushi T, Hambäk PA. 2015. Toward a spatial perspective of plant-based indirect interaction webs: scaling up trait-mediated indirect interactions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 17:500–509.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen JM, Dupont YL, O’Gorman E, Ings TC, Layer K, Meliàn C., Trøjelsgaard C, Pichler DE, Rasmussen C, Woodward G. 2010. From Broadstone to Zackenberg. Space, time and hierarchies in ecological networks. Adv Ecol Res. 42:1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Olff H, Ritchie ME. 1998. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 13:261–265.
   Google Scholar
• Pianka ER. 1974. Niche overlaps and diffuse competition. Proc National Acad Sci USA. 71:2141–2145.
   Google Scholar
• Piazzon M, Larrinaga AR, Santamaria L. 2011. Are nested networks more robust to disturbance? A test using epiphyte-tree, commensalistic networks. PLoS One. 6:e19637.
   Google Scholar
• Roxburg SH, Wilson JB. 2000. Stability and coexistence in a lawn community: mathematical prediction of stability using a community matrix with parameters derived from competition experiments. Oikos. 88:395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Alados CL. 2011a. Structure and spatial self-organization of semi-arid communities through plant–plant co-occurrence networks. Ecol Complexity. 8:184–191.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Alados CL. 2011b. Effect of Stipa tenacissima L. on the structure of plant co-occurrence networks in a semi-arid community. Ecol Res. 27:595–603.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Alados CL. 2012. Changes in semi-arid plant species associations along a livestock grazing gradient. PLoS One. 7:e40551.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Alados CL. 2014. Effect of livestock grazing in the partitions of a semiarid plant–plant spatial signed network. Acta Oecologica. 59:18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Gómez-Gardeñes J, Nuche P, Girón A, Pueyo Y, Alados CL. 2017. Evidence of structural balance in spatial ecological networks. Ecography. 40:733–741.
   Google Scholar
• Saiz H, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Gross N, Maestre FT. 2018. Intransitivity increases plant functional diversity by limiting dominance in drylands worldwide. J Ecol. 107:240–252.
   Google Scholar
• Sauve AM, Fontaine C, Thébault E. 2014. Structure–stability relationships in networks combining mutualistic and antagonistic interactions. Oikos. 123:378–384.
   Google Scholar
• Sauve AM, Thébault E, Pocock MJ, Fontaine C. 2016. How plants connect pollination and herbivory networks and their contribution to community stability. Ecology. 97:908–917.
   Google Scholar
• Sáyago R, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Quesada M, Álvarez-Añorve MY, Cascante-Marín A, Bastida JM. 2013. Evaluating factors that predict the structure of a commensalistic epiphyte–phorophyte network. Proc R Soc B. 280:20122821.
   Google Scholar
• Schöb C, Armas C, Pugnaire FI. 2013. Direct and indirect interactions co-determine species composition in nurse plant systems. Oikos. 122:1371–1379.
   Google Scholar
• Schöb C, Brooker RW, Zuppinger-Dingley D. 2018. Evolution of facilitation requires diverse communities. Nat Ecol Evol. 2:1381.
   Google Scholar
• Schöb C, Michalet R, Cavieres LA, Pugnaire FI, Brooker RW, Butterfield BJ, Cook BJ, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Xiao S, et al. 2014b. A global analysis of bidirectional interactions in alpine plant communities shows facilitators experiencing strong reciprocal fitness costs. New Phytol. 202:95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Schöb C, Prieto I, Armas C, Pugnaire FI. 2014a. Consequences of facilitation: one plant’s benefit is another plant’s cost. Funct Ecol. 28:500–508.
   Google Scholar
• Scutari M, Denis J-B. 2014. Bayesian networks: with examples in R. USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfair JC, Casarin Rochelle AL, Rezende AA, van Melis J, de Lara Weiser V, Martins FR. 2010. Nested liana-tree network in three distinct neotropical vegetation formations. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 12:277–281.
   Google Scholar
• Silva IA, Coelho Ferreira AW, Silveira Lima MA, Soares JJ. 2010. Networks of epiphytic orchids and host trees in Brazilian gallery forests. J Trop Ecol. 26:127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Soliveres S, Maestre FT, Ulrich W, Manning P, Boch S, Bowker MA, Prati D, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Quero JL, Schöning I, et al. 2015. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecol Lett. 18:790–798.
   Google Scholar
• Sotomayor DA, Lortie CJ. 2015. Indirect interactions in terrestrial plant communities: emerging patterns and research gaps. Ecosphere. 6:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Staniczenko PPA, Sivasubramaniam P, Suttle KB, Pearson RG. 2017. Linking macroecology and community ecology: refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks. Ecol Lett. 20:693–707.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Saldana A, Zotz G, Kirby C, Diaz I, Burns K. 2016. Composition patterns and network structure of epiphyte–host interactions in Chilean and New Zealand temperate forests. N Z J Bot. 54:204–222.
   Google Scholar
• Turkington R, Harper JL. 1979. The growth, distribution and neighbour relationships of Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture. II. Inter- and intra-specific contact. J Ecol. 67:219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Valiente-Banuet A, Rumebe AV, Verdú M, Callaway RM. 2006. Modern quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient tertiary lineages. Proc National Acad Sci USA. 103:16812–16817.
   Google Scholar
• Vandermeer JH. 1990. Indirect and diffuse interactions: complicated cycles in a population embedded in a large community. J Theor Biol. 142:429–442.
   Google Scholar
• Verdú M, Jordano P, Valiente-Banuet A. 2010. The phylogenetic structure of plant facilitation networks changes with competition. J Ecol. 98:1454–1461.
   Google Scholar
• Verdú M, Valiente-Banuet A. 2008. The nested assembly of plant facilitation networks prevents species extinctions. Am Nat. 172:751–760.
   Google Scholar
• Verdú M, Valiente-Banuet A. 2011. The relative contribution of abundance and phylogeny to the structure of plant facilitation networks. Oikos. 120:1351–1356.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton JT. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 25:443–466.
   Google Scholar