Pine invasion decreases density and changes native tree communities in woodland Cerrado

References

• Abreu RCR, Assis GB, Frison S, Aguirre A, Durigan G. 2011. Can native vegetation recover after slash pine cultivation in the Brazilian Savanna?. For Ecol Manage. 262(8):1452–1459.
   Google Scholar
• Abreu RCR, Durigan G. 2011. Changes in the plant community of a Brazilian grassland savannah after 22 years of invasion by Pinus elliottii Engelm. Plant Ecol Divers. 4(2–3):269–278.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 26(7):333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Boulant N, Garnier A, Curt T, Lepart J. 2009. Disentangling the effects of land use, shrub cover and climate on the invasion speed of native and introduced pines in grasslands. Divers Distrib. 15(6):1047–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Boulant N, Kunstler G, Rambal S, Lepart J. 2008. Seed supply, drought, and grazing determine spatio-temporal patterns of recruitment for native and introduced invasive pines in grasslands. Divers Distrib. 14(5):862–874.
   Google Scholar
• Bourscheid K, Reis A. 2011. Dinâmica da invasão de Pinus elliottii Engelm. em restinga sob processo de restauração ambiental no Parque Florestal do Rio Vermelho, Florianópolis, SC. Biotemas. 23(2):23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Braga EP, Zenni RD, Hay JD. 2014. A new invasive species in South America: pinus oocarpa Schiede ex Schltdl. BioInvasion Records. 3(3):207–211.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo-Monasterio P, Pauchard A, Fajardo A. 2016. Pinus contorta invasion into treeless steppe reduces species richness and alters species traits of the local community. Biol Invasions. 18(7):1883–1894.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte MW, Barlow J, Nuñez MA, Pettorelli N, Stephens PA. 2017. Solving environmental problems in the Anthropocene: the need to bring novel theoretical advances into the applied ecology fold. J Appl Ecol. 54(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dodet M, Collet C. 2012. When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them? Biol Invasions. 14(9): 1765–1778.
   Google Scholar
• Emer C, Fonseca CR. 2010. Araucaria forest conservation: mechanisms providing resistance to invasion by exotic timber trees. Biol Invasions. 13(1):189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Falleiros RM, Zenni RD, Ziller SR. 2011. Invasão e manejo de Pinus taeda em campos de altitude do Parque Estadual o Pico Paraná, Paraná, Brasil. Rev Floresta. 41(1):123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer FM, Oliveira JM, Dresseno ALP, Pillar VD. 2014. The role of invasive pine on changes of plant composition and functional traits in a coastal dune ecosystem. Natureza Conservação. 12(1):19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Frehse F, Braga RR, Nocera GA, Vitule JRS. 2016. Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil. Biol Invasions. 18(12):3713–3725.
   Google Scholar
• Gorgone-Barbosa E, Pivello VR, Baeza MJ, Fidelis A. 2016. Disturbance as a factor in breaking dormancy and enhancing invasiveness of African grasses in a neotropical Savanna. Acta Bot Bras. 30:131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Gorgone-Barbosa E, Pivello VR, Bautista S, Zupo T, Rissi MN, Fidelis A. 2015. How can an invasive grass affect fire behavior in a tropical savanna? A community and individual plant level approach. Biol Invasions. 17(1):423–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol. 46:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Vilà M. 2013. Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. Trends Ecol Evol. 28(4):212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Klink CA, Machado RB. 2005. A conservação do Cerrado brasileiro. Megadiversidade. 1(1):147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Vila M, Antonio CMD, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 270(1517):775–781.
   Google Scholar
• Lima JEFW, Silva EM. 2005. Estimativa da produção hídrica superficial do Cerrado brasileiro. In: Scariot A, Sousa-Silva JC, Felfili JM, editors. Cerrado: ecologia, biodiversidade e conservação. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente; p. 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Machado IF, Moreira LFB, Maltchik L. 2012. Effects of pine invasion on anurans assemblage in southern Brazil coastal ponds. Amphib Reptil. 33(2):227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Martyniuk N, Morales C, Aizen M. 2015. Invasive conifers reduce seed set of a native Andean cedar through heterospecific pollination competition. Biol Invasions. 17(4):1055–1067. English.
   Google Scholar
• Nissanka SP, Mohotti KM, Wijetunga ASTB. 2005. Alleopathic influences of Pinus caribea on vegetation regeneration and soil biodiversity. In: Fourth World Congress on Allelopathy; Austrália.
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez MA, Chiuffo MC, Torres A, Paul T, Dimarco RD, Raal P, Policelli N, Moyano J, García RA, van Wilgen BW, et al. 2017. Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges. Biol Invasions. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2019. Vegan: community ecology package (R package). R package. Accessed 28 August, 2019. http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro C, Ganade G. 2009. Influência do microhábitat no processo de predação de sementes em uma área degradada. Neotrop Biol Conserv. 4(1):20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M. 2012. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biol. 18(5):1725–1737.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT. 2008. As Principais Fitofisionomias do Bioma Cerrado. In: Sano SM, Almeida SP, Ribeiro JF, editors. Cerrado: ecologia e flora v. 2. Brasília: EMBRAPA-CERRADOS; p. 876.
   Google Scholar
• Ricciardi A. 2007. Are Modern Biological Invasions an Unprecedented Form of Global Change?. Conserv Biol. 21(2):329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Higgins SI. 1998. Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. In: Richardson DM, editor. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 450–473.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers Distrib. 10(5–6):321–331.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Van Wilgen BW, Nuñez MA. 2008. Alien conifer invasions in South America: short fuse burning? Biol Invasions. 10(4):573–577.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DW. 2019. labdsv: ordination and Multivariate Analysis for Ecology. R package version 2.0-1. Accessed on 28 August, 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv
   Google Scholar
• Rossi RD, Martins CR, Viana PL, Rodrigues EL, Figueira JEC. 2014. Impact of invasion by molasses grass (Melinis minutiflora P. Beauv.) on native species and on fires in areas of campo-cerrado in Brazil. Acta Bot Bras. 28:631–637.
   Google Scholar
• Silva J, Bates J. 2002. Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American Cerrado: A tropical Savannah hotspot. Bioscience. 52(3):225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M, et al. 2012. Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol. 28(1):58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, Van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni RD, Bustamante R, et al. 2010. Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol. 35(5):489–504.
   Google Scholar
• Strassburg BBN, Brooks T, Feltran-Barbieri R, Iribarrem A, Crouzeilles R, Loyola R, Latawiec AE, Oliveira Filho FJB, Scaramuzza C, Scarano FR, et al. 2017. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat Ecol Evol. 1:0099.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud JT, Feeley KJ. 2017. Neglect of the tropics is widespread in ecology and evolution: a comment on clarke et al. Trends Ecol Evol. 32(9):626–628.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ, Beissinger SR, Benton T, Cameron DD, Carmel Y, Coomes DA, Coulson T, Emmerson MC, et al. 2013. Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol. 101(1):58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor KT, Maxwell BD, McWethy DB, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Whitlock C. 2017. Pinus contorta invasions increase wildfire fuel loads and may create a positive feedback with fire. Ecology. 98(3):678–687.
   Google Scholar
• Valduga MO, Zenni RD, Vitule JRS. 2016. Ecological studies reveal broad and heterogeneous impacts of exotic tree species plantations – examples from a megadiverse country. Ann Braz Acad Sci. 88(3):1675–1688.
   Google Scholar
• Viani RAG, Durigan G, de Melo ACG. 2010. Natural regeneration under forest plantations: “green deserts” or milieu for biodiversity? Ciênc Florestal. 20(3):533–552.
   Google Scholar
• Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 14(7):702–708.
   Google Scholar
• Voltolini JC, Zanco L. 2010. Densidade de plântulas e jovens de espécies nativas de Floresta Atlântica em áreas com e sem o pinheiro americano (Pinus elliottii). Rev Biociências. 16(2):102–108.
   Google Scholar
• Williams MC, Wardle GM. 2007. Pinus radiata invasion in Australia: identifying key knowledge gaps and research directions. Austral Ecol. 32(7):721–739.
   Google Scholar
• Zalba SM, Cuevas YA, Boo RM. 2008. Invasion of Pinus halepensis mill. following a wildfire in an argentine grassland nature reserve. J Environ Manage. 88(3):539–546.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD. 2014. Analysis of introduction history of invasive plants in Brazil reveals patterns of association between biogeographical origin and reason for introduction. Austral Ecol. 39(4):401–407.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD. 2015. The naturalized flora of Brazil: a step towards identifying future invasive non-native species. Rodriguésia. 66:1137–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD, Bailey JK, Simberloff D. 2014. Rapid evolution and range expansion of an invasive plant are driven by provenance-environment interactions. Ecol Lett. 17(6):727–735.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD, Dechoum M, Ziller SR. 2016. Dez anos do informe brasileiro sobre espécies exóticas invasoras: avanços, lacunas e direções futuras. Biotemas. 29(1):133–153.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD, Dickie IA, Wingfield MJ, Hirsch H, Crous CJ, Meyerson LA, Burgess TI, Zimmermann TG, Klock MM, Siemann E, et al. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of tree invasions: complementing the unified framework for biological invasions. AoB Plants. 9(1):plw085.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD, Simberloff D. 2013. Number of source populations as a potential driver of pine invasions in Brazil. Biol Invasions. 15(7):1623–1639.
   Google Scholar
• Zenni RD, Ziller SR. 2011. An overview of invasive plants in Brazil. Braz J Bot. 34(3):431–446.
   Google Scholar