White bark in birch species as a warning signal for bark-stripping mammals

References

• Agrawal A. 2007. Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends Ecol Evol. 22(2):103–109. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alakurtti S, Mäkelä T, Koskimies S, Yli-Kauhaluoma JT. 2006. Pharmacological properties of the ubiquitous natural product betulin. Eur J Pharm Sci. 29(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Serra J, Safronov O, Lim KJ, Fraser-Miller SJ, Blokhina OB, Campilho A, Chong SL, Fagerstedt K, Haavikko R, Helariutta Y, et al. 2019. Tissue-Specific study across the stem reveals the chemistry and transcriptome dynamics of birch bark. New Phytol. 222:1816–1831. doi:10.1111/nph.15725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson AMD. 1992. Betula Pendula Roth (B. Verrucosa Ehrh.) and B. Pubescens Ehrh. J Ecol. 80:837–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WL, Munroe JA, Hessl AE. 1997. The effects of elk on aspen in the winter range in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecography (Cop). 20(2):155–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00358.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraniewicz M, Perzanowski K. 2015. Are reintroduced Wisents a threat to mountain forests? Ann Zool Fennici. 52(5–6):301–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.5735/086.052.0505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RN, Wallsgrove RM. 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol. 127(4):617–633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02968.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Iason GR, Hester AJ. 2005. Feeding patterns by roe deer and rabbits on pine, willow and birch in relation to spatial arrangement. Oikos. 109(3):513–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13794.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall UA, Co M, Bergström R, Sjöberg PJR, Waldebäck M, Turner C. 2013. Anti-Browsing effects of birch bark extract on fallow deer. Eur J for Res. 132:717–725. doi:10.1007/s10342-013-0709-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bina H, Yousefzadeh H, Ali SS, Esmailpour M. 2016. Phylogenetic relationships, molecular taxonomy, biogeography of Betula, with emphasis on phylogenetic position of Iranian populations. Tree Genet Genomes. 12(5):1–17. doi:10.1007/s11295-016-1037-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski S, Kossak S. 1972. The natural food preferences of the European bison in seasons free of snow cover. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 17:151–169. doi:10.4098/at.arch.72-13.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant JP, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 1995. Ontogenic development of chemical defense by seedling Resin Birch: energy cost of defense production. J Chem Ecol. 21(7):883–896. doi:10.1007/BF02033796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant JP, Provenza FD, Pastor J, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP, du Toit JT. 1991. Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 22:431–446. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.002243.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell SA, Borden JH. 2005. Bark reflectance spectra of conifers and angiosperms: implications for host discrimination by coniferophagous bark and timber beetles. Can Entomol. 137(6):719–722. doi:https://doi.org/10.4039/N04-082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro T, Ruxton G. 2019. Aposematism: unpacking the defences. Trends Ecol Evol. 34(7):595–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Crilly N 2014. Modularity, redundancy and degeneracy: cross-domain perspectives on key design principles. 8th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, SysCon 2014 - Proceedings; Ottawa, Canada, p. 546–553.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Manchester S, Sun H. 1999. Phylogeny and evolution of the Betulaceae as inferred from DNA sequences, morphology and paleobotany. Am J Bot. 86(8):1168–1181. doi:10.2307/2656981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauss M, Frey R, Kiefer B, Lechner-Doll M, Loehlein W, Polster C, Rössner GE, Streich WJ. 2003. The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters. Oecologia. 136:14–27. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis JD. 1944. Appraisal of porcupine damage. J Wildl Manage. 8(1):88–91. doi:10.2307/3796204.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo GJ, Glasser A, Wendt M, Williams GA, Osborn DA, Gallagher GR, Warren RJ, Miller KV, Pardue MT. 2008. Visual specialization of an herbivore prey species, the white-tailed deer. Can J Zool. 86(7):735–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/Z08-050.
   Google Scholar
• Demment MW, Van Soest PJ. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. Am Nat. 125(5):641–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/284369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehér Á, Szemethy L, Katona K. 2016. Selective debarking by ungulates in temperate deciduous forests: preference towards tree species and stem girth. Eur J for Res. 135(6):1131–1143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1000-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Lindner M, Abs C, Lasch P. 2002. Vegetation dynamics in central european forest ecosystems (near-natural as well as managed) after storm events. Folia Geobot. 37(1):17–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland WJ, Janzen DH. 1974. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat. 108(961):269–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/282907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryxell JM, Doucet CM. 1993. Diet choice and the functional response of beavers. Ecology. 74(5):1297–1306. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1940060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gacic D, Danilovic M, Zubic G, Cirovic P. 2012. Bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the fenced rearing centre “Lomnicka Reka“. Glas Sumar Fak/bull Fac for. 105:35–50. doi:10.2298/gsf1205035g.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt P, Arnold JM, Hackländer K, Hochbichler E. 2013. Determinants of deer impact in European forests - a systematic literature analysis. For Ecol Manage. 310:173–186. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RMA. 1992a. A review of damage by mammals in North temperate forests. 3. Deer. Forestry. 65:145–169. doi:10.1093/forestry/65.2.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RMA. 1992b. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests. 2. Small mammals. Forestry. 65(3):281–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/65.3.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford T, Dawkins MS. 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav. 42(1):1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80600-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn C, Vospernik S. 2022. Position, size, and spatial patterns of bark stripping wounds inflicted by red deer (Cervus elavus L.) on Norway spruce using generalized additive models in Austria. Ann for Sci. 79(1):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01134-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harju A. 1996. Effect of birch (Betula pendula) bark and food protein level on root voles (Microtus oeconomus): I. Food consumption, growth and mortality. J Chem Ecol. 22(4):719–728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington LA, Feber R, Raynor R, Macdonald DW 2015. SNH commissioned report 685: The Scottish Beaver trial: ecological monitoring of the European beaver Castor fiber and other riparian mammals 2009-2014, final report.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes G. 2012. Elephants (and extinct relatives) as earth-movers and ecosystem engineers. Geomorphology. 157–158:99–107. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebets EA, Barron AB, Balakrishnan CN, Hauber ME, Mason PH, Hoke KL. 2016. A systems approach to animal communication. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 283(1826):20152889. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henker K 2009. What do beaver eat? [accessed 2022 August 25]. https://www.grandcanyontrust.org/sites/default/files/ut_beaverDietReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hummel J, Südekum KH, Streich WJ, Clauss M. 2006. Forage fermentation patterns and their implications for herbivore ingesta retention times. Funct Ecol. 20(6):989–1002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01206.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Niemistö P, Viherä-Aarnio A, Brunner A, Hein S, Velling P. 2010. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in Northern Europe. Forestry. 83(1):103–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iason G. 2005. The role of plant secondary metabolites in mammalian herbivory: ecological perspectives. Proc Nutr Soc. 64(1):123–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2004415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs GH. 1993. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 68(3):413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1993.tb00738.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamrozy G. 1980. Winter food resources and food preferences of red deer in Carpathian forests. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 25:221–238. doi:10.4098/at.arch.80-17.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston CA, Johnston CA. 2017. Beaver Loggers: beaver herbivory alters forest structure. In: Beavers: boreal ecosystem engineers. New York (NY): Springer; pp. 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Karels TJ, Boonstra R. 2003. Reducing solar heat gain during winter: the role of white bark in northern deciduous trees. Arctic. 56(2):168–174. doi:10.14430/arctic612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh PH, Shaw RC, Burns KC. 2016. Potential aposematism in an insular tree species: are signals dishonest early in ontogeny? Biol J Linn Soc. 118(4):951–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiffner C, Rößiger E, Trisl O, Schulz R, Rühe F. 2008. Probability of recent bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Norway spruce (Picea abies) in a low mountain range in Germany – a preliminary analysis. Silva Fenn. 42(1):125–134. doi:10.14214/sf.269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnaird JW, Welch D, Cummins C. 1979. Selective stripping of rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) bark by cattle in North-east Scotland. Trans Bot Soc Edinburgh. 43(2):115–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03746607908685344.
   Google Scholar
• Klich D. 2017. Selective bark stripping of various tree species by Polish horses in relation to bark detachability. For Ecol Manage. 384:65–71. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasutsky PA. 2006. Birch bark research and development. Nat Prod Rep. 23(6):919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/b606816b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiters AT, Van Der Sluijs LAM, Wytema GA. 2006. Selective bark-stripping of beech, Fagus sylvatica, by free-ranging horses. For Ecol Manage. 222:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen M-L, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Tahvanainen J, Heinonen J, Rousi M. 2005. Variation in birch(Betula Pendula) shoot secondary chemistry due to genotype, environment and ontogeny. J Chem Ecol. 31(4):697–717. doi:10.1007/s10886-005-3539-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert WD. 1992. The feeding habits of the shovel-tusked gomphotheres: evidence from tusk wear patterns. Paleobiology. 18:132–147. doi:10.1017/S0094837300013932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ, Clarke PJ, Jones R. 2013. Costs and benefits of relative bark thickness in relation to fire damage: a savanna/forest contrast. J Ecol. 101(2):517–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Yadun S. 2001. Aposematic (warning) coloration associated with thorns in higher plants. J Theor Biol. 210(3):385–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Yadun S. 2014. Why is latex usually white and only sometimes yellow, orange or red? Simultaneous visual and chemical plant defense. Chemoecology. 24(5):215–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-014-0160-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Yadun S. 2016. Defensive (anti-herbivory) coloration in land plants. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lev-Yadun S. 2019. Why is the bark of common temperate betula and populus species white? Int J Plant Sci. 180:632–642. doi:10.1086/702760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludt CJ, Schroeder W, Rottmann O, Kuehn R. 2004. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 31(3):1064–1083. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz H. 1956. Damage to paper birch by red squirrels in Alaska. J For. 54:31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie RI. 2002. Mutualistic fermentative digestion in the gastrointestinal tract: diversity and evolution. Integr Comp Biol. 42(2):319–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.2.319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayle B, Ferryman M, Pepper H. 2007. Controlling grey squirrel damage to woodlands. UK: Forestry Commission; pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Meira CS, Barbosa-Filho JM, Lanfredi-Rangel A, Guimarães ET, Moreira DRM, Soares MBP. 2016. Antiparasitic evaluation of betulinic acid derivatives reveals effective and selective anti-Trypanosoma cruzi inhibitors. Exp Parasitol. 166:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2016.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miquelle DG, Van Ballenberghe V. 1989. Impact of bark stripping by Moose on Aspen-Spruce communities. J Wildl Manage. 53(3):577–586. doi:10.2307/3809179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell B, Staines B, Welch D. 1977. Ecology of Red Deer: a research review relevant to their management in Scotland. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Moeck HA, Wood DL, Lindahl KQ. 1981. Host selection behavior of bark beetles (Coleoptera: scolytidae) attacking pinus ponderosa, with special emphasis on the western pine beetle, dendroctonus brevicomis. J Chem Ecol. 7(1):49–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morow K. 1976. Food habits of Moose from Augustów Forest of their range in certain regions of the country brought about serious acquire economic importance in forest management. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 21:101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford EP. 1997. A decade of grey squirrel bark-stripping damage to beech in Lady Park Wood, UK. Forestry. 70(1):17–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/70.1.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Schwarze D, Schulte BA, Sun L, Müller-Schwarze A, Müller-Schwarze C. 1994. Red maple (Acer rubrum) inhibits feeding by beaver (Castor canadensis). J Chem Ecol. 20(8):2021–2034. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevřelová M, Ruzickova J. 2015. Woody plants affected by ungulates in winter period, impacts and bark renewal. Ekológia (Bratislava). 34(3):235–248. doi:10.1515/eko-2015-0023.
   Google Scholar
• Niinemets Ü, Loreto F, Reichstein M. 2004. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends Plant Sci. 9(4):180–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ. 1999. The mechanical role of bark. Am J Bot. 86(4):465–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2656806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte DL, Kimball BA, Perry KR, Villalba JJ, Provenza FD, Johnston JJ. 2004. Development of a high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy method for the determination of strychnine concentrations in insects used to assess potential risks to insectivores. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 811(2):257–262. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 21. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgenç O, Durmaz S, Çelik G, Korkmaz B, Yaylı N. 2017. Comparative phytochemical analysis of volatile organic compounds by SPME-GC-FID/MS from six coniferous and nine deciduous tree bark species grown in Turkey. South African J Bot. 113:23–28. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palo RT. 1984. Distribution of birch (Betula Spp.), willow (Salix Spp.), and poplar (Populus Spp.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores. J Chem Ecol. 10:499–520. doi:10.1007/BF00988096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patočka J. 2012. Biologically active pentacyclic triterpenes and their current medicine signification. J Appl Biomed. 1(1):7–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2003.002.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper HW. 1998. The prevention of rabbit damage to trees in woodland. Edinburgh: Forestry Commisssion.
   Google Scholar
• Pulliainen E, Tunkkari PS. 1987. Winter diet, habitat selection and fluctuation of a mountain Hare Lepus timidus population in Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecography 10:261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Quine CP, Gardiner BA. 2010. Understanding how the interaction of wind and trees results in wind-throw, stem break-age, and canopy gap formation. In: Johnson E, Miyanishi K, editors. Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the Response. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier. p. 103–155.
   Google Scholar
• Raffa KF, Andersson MN, Schlyter F. 2016. Host selection by bark beetles: playing the odds in a high-stakes game. In: Tittiger C, Blomquist G, editors. Advances in insect physiology. Vol. 50. Oxford: Academic Press; p. 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Raffa KF, Grégoire JC, Lindgren BS. 2015. Natural history and ecology of Bark Beetles. In: Vega F Hofstetter R, editors. Bark Beetles: biology and ecology of native and invasive species. Oxford: Academic Press; pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen RM, Hieta JP, Immanen J, Nieminen K, Haavikko R, Yli-Kauhaluoma J, Kauppila TJ. 2019. Chemical profiles of birch and alder bark by ambient mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 411(28):7573–7583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02171-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayden TJ, Savill PS. 2004. Damage to beech woodlands in the Chilterns by the grey squirrel. Forestry. 77:249–253. doi:10.1093/forestry/77.3.249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renecker LA, Hudson RJ. 1985. Estimation of dry matter intake of free-ranging Moose. J Wildl Manage. 49(3):785–792. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3801712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivals F, Lister AM. 2016. Dietary flexibility and niche partitioning of large herbivores through the Pleistocene of Britain. Quat Sci Rev. 146:116–133. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivals F, Semprebon G, Lister A. 2012. An examination of dietary diversity patterns in Pleistocene proboscideans (Mammuthus, Palaeoloxodon, and Mammut) from Europe and North America as revealed by dental microwear. Quat Int. 255:188–195. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roppolo DJ, Miller RW. 2001. Factors predisposing urban trees to sunscald. J Arboric. 27:246–254.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe JJ. 1985. The susceptibility of tree species to bark-stripping damage by grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in England and Wales. Q J for. 79:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt MH, Shuttleworth A, Ward D, Shrader AM. 2018. African elephants use plant odours to make foraging decisions across multiple spatial scales. Anim Behav. 141:17–27. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šiman P, Filipová A, Tichá A, Niang M, Bezrouk A, Havelek R, Bach H. 2016. Effective method of purification of betulin from birch bark: the importance of its purity for scientific and medicinal use. PLoS One. 11(5):e0154933. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springthorpe G, Myhill N. 1994. Wildlife rangers handbook. London (UK): Forestry Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stults DZ, Axsmith BJ. 2009. Betulaceae from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Southwest Alabama, Southeastern United States. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 155(1–2):25–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutz RS, Banks PB, Dexter N, McArthur C. 2015. Herbivore search behaviour drives associational plant refuge. Acta Oecologica. 67:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2015.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutz RS, Croak BM, Leimar O, Bergvall UA. 2017a. Borrowed plant defences: deterring browsers using a forestry by-product. For Ecol Manage. 390:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutz RS, Croak BM, Proschogo N, Banks PB, McArthur C. 2017b. Olfactory and visual plant cues as drivers of selective herbivory. Oikos. 126(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03422.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan TP. 1992. Tree squirrels, Woodrats and beaver. In: Black H, editor. Silvicultural approaches to animal damage in Pacific Northwest forests, Portland (OR): United States Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; Vol. 287, pp. 271–288.
   Google Scholar
• Tenneson C, Oring L. 1985. Winter food preferences of Porcupines. J Wildl Manage. 49(1):28–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3801835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakkari P 2009. EUFORGEN: Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use of silver birch (Betula pendula).
   Google Scholar
• Verheyden H, Ballon P, Bernard V, Saint-Andrieux C. 2006. Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe. Mamm Rev. 36(3):217–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2006.00085.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vospernik S. 2006. Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Austria. Silva Fenn. 40(4):589–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vourc’h G, De Garine-Wichatitsky M, Labbé A, Rosolowski D, Martin JL, Fritz H. 2002. Monoterpene effect on feeding choice by deer. J Chem Ecol. 28(12):2411–2427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021423816695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch D, Scott D, Staines BW. 1997. Bark stripping damage by red deer in a Sitka spruce forest in western Scotland III. Trends in wound condition. Forestry. 70:113–120. doi:10.1093/forestry/70.2.113-a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim A. 2010. Visual conspicuity: a new simple standard, its reliability, validity and applicability. Ergonomics. 53(3):421–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903483705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley RH. 2006. Signal detection and animal communication. Adv Study Behav. 36:217–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yansa CH, Adams KM. 2012. Mastodons and mammoths in the Great Lakes Region, USA and Canada: new insights into their diets as they neared extinction. Geogr Compass. 6(4):175–188. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Yin J, Ren CL, Zhan YG, Li CX, Xiao JL, Qiu W, Li XY, Peng HM. 2012. Distribution and expression characteristics of triterpenoids and OSC genes in white birch (Betula platyphylla suk.). Mol Biol Rep. 39(3):2321–2328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0982-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidar J 2011. Factors affecting bark-stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus) – the importance of landscape structure and forage availability [ masters thesis]. Grimso: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Zielke L, Wrage-Mönnig N, Müller J, Neumann C. 2019. Implications of spatial habitat diversity on diet selection of European Bison and Przewalski´s horses in a rewilding Area. Diversity. 11(4):63. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040063.
   Google Scholar