Influence of distance from conspecific and heterospecific co-flowering plants on pollination and fecundity in the nectarless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina

References

• Ackerman JD, Phillips RD, Tremblay RL, Karremans A, Reiter N, Peter CI, Bogarín D, Pérez-Escobar OA, Liu H. 2023. Beyond the various contrivances by which orchids are pollinated: global patterns in orchid pollination biology. Bot J Linn Soc. 202(3):295–324. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boac082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albor C, Garcia-Franco JG, Parra-Tabla V, Diaz-Castelazo C, Arceo-Gomez G, Bartomeus I. 2019. Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co-flowering community differentially affect cakile edentula pollination at different spatial scales. J Ecol. 107(5):2167–2181. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandersson R, Ågren J. 1996. Population size, pollinator visitation and fruit production in the deceptive orchid Calypso bulbosa. Oecologia. 107(4):533–540. doi: 10.1007/BF00333945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 24(3):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue MJ. 2006. Allee effects and conspecific cueing jointly lead to conspecific attraction. Oecologia. 149(1):33–43. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0419-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy KJ, Johnson SD. 2017. Effects of distance from models on the fitness of floral mimics. Plant Biol J. 19(3):438–443. doi: 10.1111/plb.12555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy KJ, Stout JC. 2008. The effects of plant density and nectar reward on bee visitation to the endangered orchid spiranthes romanzoffiana. Acta Oecol. 34(2):131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy KJ, Stout JC. 2011. Effects of conspecific and heterospecific floral density on the pollination of two related rewarding orchids. Plant Ecol. 212(8):1397–1406. doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9915-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen C, Gregory T. 1989. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia. 81(1):120–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00377020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts R, Nic Lughadha E, Black N, Turner R, Paton A. 2021. The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci Data. 8(1):215. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich B. 1979. Bumblebee economics. Cambridge, Massuchusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henneresse T, Wesselingh RA, Tyteca D. 2017. Effects of floral display, conspecific density and rewarding species on fruit set in the deceptive orchid Orchis militaris (Orchidaceae). (Orchidaceae) Plant Ecol & Evo. 150(3):279–292. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2017.1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén E, Fries M. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer. Koeltz, Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Internicola AI, Juillet N, Smithson A, Gigord LDB. 2006. Experimental investigation of the effect of spatial aggregation on reproductive success in a rewardless orchid. Oecologia. 150:435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jersáková J, Johnson SD. 2006. Lack of floral nectar reduces self-pollination in a fly-pollinated orchid. Oecologia. 147(1):60–68. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0254-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jersáková J, Johnson SD. 2007. Lack of reward promotes outcrossing: nectar supplementation experiment with disa pulchra (Orchidaceae). S Afr J Bot. 73(2):328. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2007.02.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jersáková J, Johnson SD, Kindlmann P. 2006. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biol Rev. 81(2):219–235. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jersáková J, Traxmandlova I, Ipser Z, Kropf M, Pellegrino G, Schatz B, Djordjevic V, Kindlmann P, Renner SS 2015. Biological flora of Central Europe: Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 17(4):318–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SD, Neal PR, Harder LD. 2005. Pollen fates and the limits on male reproductive success in an orchid population. Biol J Linn Soc. 86(2):175–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00541.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SD, Peter CI, Nilsson LA, Ågren J. 2003. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology. 84(11):2919–2927. doi: 10.1890/02-0471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juillet N, Gonzalez MA, Page PA, Gigord LDB. 2007. Pollination of the European food-deceptive traunsteinera globosa (Orchidaceae): the importance of nectar-producing neighbouring plants. Plant Syst Evol. 265(1–2):123–129. doi: 10.1007/s00606-006-0507-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf M, Renner SS. 2008. Pollinator-mediated selfing in two deceptive orchids and a review of pollinium tracking studies addressing geitonogamy. Oecologia. 155:497–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller DA. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology. 85(12):3289–3301. doi: 10.1890/03-0810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran PAP. 1950. A test for the serial independence of residuals. Biometrika. 37(1–2):178–181. doi: 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma E, Bivand R. 2023. Spatial data science: with applications in R. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino G, Bellusci F, Musacchio A. 2005. Evidence of post-pollination barriers among three colour morphs of the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soó. Sex Plant Reprod. 18(4):179–185. doi: 10.1007/s00497-005-0011-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino G, Bellusci F, Musacchio A. 2008. Double floral mimicry and the magnet species effect in dimorphic co-flowering species, the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina and rewarding Viola aethnensis. Preslia. 80:411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall JL, Hilu KW. 1990. Interference through improper pollen transfer in mixed stands of Impatiens capensis and I. pallida. Amer J Botany. 77(7):939–944. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb15188.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathcke B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination (ed., Real L). Orlando, Florida: Academic Press; pp. 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• Rivest S, Forrest JRK. 2020. Defence compounds in pollen: why do they occur and how do they affect the ecology and evolution of bees. New Phytol. 225(3):1053–1064. doi: 10.1111/nph.16230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedivy C, Müller A, Dorn S. 2011. Closely related pollen generalist bees differ in their ability to develop on the same pollen diet: evidence for physiological adaptations to digest pollen. Funct Ecol. 25(3):718–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01828.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout JC, Allen JA, Goulson D. 1998. The influence of relative plant density and floral morphological complexity on the behaviour of bumblebees. Oecologia. 117(4):543–550. doi: 10.1007/s004420050691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson P, Stine M. 1996. Floral constancy in bumble bees: handling efficiency or perceptual conditioning. Oecologia. 106(4):493–499. doi: 10.1007/BF00329707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar