Sediment accretion in a lower-energetic location during two consecutive cold fronts

References

• Battjes JA, Janssen JPFM. 1978. Energy loss and set-up due to breaking random waves. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on coastal engineering. Am Soc of Civ Eng. 1:569–587.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett R. 2000. Mine Burial Prediction Workshop Report and Recommendations. SEAPROBE, Inc. Technical Report Number SI-0000-03.
   Google Scholar
• Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH. 1999. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. model description and validation. J Geophys Res. 104:7649–7666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunya S, Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ. 2010. A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for southern louisiana and Mississippi. part I: Model development and validation. Mon Wea Rev. 138:345–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantoni J, Staples T, Sheremet A. 2014. Long time series measurements of munitions mobility in wave-current boundary layer. Report SERDP Project Number 2320. https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Munitions-Response/Munitions-Underwater/MR-2320/(language)/eng-US.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan DP, Nielsen P, Ranasinghe R. 2008. Statistical simulation of wave climate and extreme beach erosion. Coastal Eng. 55:375–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC. 2009. Mine impact burial prediction from one to three dimensions. Appl Mech Rev 62:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Fan CW. 2005. Pseudo-cylinder parameterization for mine impact burial prediction. J Fluids Eng. 127:1515–1520.
   Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Fan CW. 2006. Prediction of falling cylinder through air-water-sediment columns. ASME J Appl Mechanics. 73:300–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Fan CW. 2022. User’s Guide: Underwater Munition Scour Burial (UnMUSB) Model. Technical Report, NPS-OC-22-002, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA., 1-70 (available at https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/69292/NPS-OC-22-002.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y).
   Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Fan CW, Calantoni J, Sheremet A. 2022. Prediction of mobility and burial of objects on sandy seafloor. IEEE J Oceanic Eng. 47(1):111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Fan CW, Evans AD, Gilles AF. 2004. Triple coordinate transforms for prediction of falling cylinder through the water column. J Appl Mech. 71:292–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Gilles AF, Fan CW. 2005. Experiment of falling cylinder through the water column. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 29:555–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Pauly P, Haeger SD, Ward M. 2006. Wind and tidal effects on chemical spill in St andrew Bay system. Coastal Environ Water Quality. 1:47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chu PC, Pessanha VS, Fan CW, Calantoni J. 2021. Coupled Delft3D-object model to predict mobility of munition on sandy seafloor. Fluids. 6(9):330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltares. 2019a. Delft3D-Flow—Simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments, User Manual. https://content.oss.deltares.nl/delft3d/manuals/Delft3D-FLOW_User_Manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deltares. 2019b. Delft3D-Wave—Simulation of short-crested waves with SWAN, User Manual. https://content.oss.deltares.nl/delft3d/manuals/Delft3D-WAVE_User_Manual.
   Google Scholar
• DiMego GJ, Bosart LF, Endersen GW. 1976. An examination of the frequency and mean conditions surrounding frontal incursions into the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Mon Weather Rev. 104:709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECMWF. 2019. ERA5 Reanalysis (0.25 Degree Latitude-Longitude Grid), Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Boulder, CO, accessed on 3 July 2019, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds633.0.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar PD, Borgman LE, Glover LB, Reinhard RD, Pope J, Swain A, Ebersole BA. 1994. Storm impact assessment for beaches at Panama City, Florida. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Report CERC-94-11. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.371.2181&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira Ó. 2005. Storm groups versus extreme single storms: predicted erosion and management consequences. J Coast Res. 42:155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Subrahmanyam MV, Li C. 2020. Waves on louisiana continental shelf influenced by atmospheric fronts. Sci Rep. 10:272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselmann K. 1974. On the spectral dissipation of ocean waves due to white capping. Boundary-Layer Meteor. 6:107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Klammler, H., Penko, A.M., Staples, T., Sheremet, A. and Calantoni, J. (2021). Observations and modeling of wave-induced burial and sediment entrainment: likely importance of degree of liquefaction. J Geophys Res Oceans, 126(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017378.
   Google Scholar
• Komar PD. 1976. Beach processes and sedimentation. USA: Prentice Hall, pp. 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lee GH, Nicholls RJ, Birkemeier WA. 1998. Storm-driven variability of the beach-nearshore profile at duck, north carolina, USA, 1981–1991. Mar Geol. 148:163–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser GR, Roelvink JA, van Kester JATM, Stelling GS. 2004. Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model. Coastal Eng. 51:883–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton RA, Gibeaut JC, Paine JG. 1995. Meso-scale transfer of sand during and after storms: implications for prediction of shoreline movement. Mar Geol. 126:161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOAA/NGDC. 2010. Northern Gulf 1 arc-second MHW Coast Digital Elevation Model, accessed on 17 December 2018, https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/northern-gulf-coast-digital-elevation-model156ed.
   Google Scholar
• NOAA/WPC. 2020. Weather Prediction Center’s Surface Analysis Archive, accessed on 10 August 2020, https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/archives/web_pages/sfc/.
   Google Scholar
• Pessanha VS. 2019. Modeling of Morphological Responses to a Storm Event During TREX13. Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, U.S.A., December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Plant NG, Long JW, Dalyander PS, Thompson DM, Raabe EA. 2013. Application of a hydrodynamic and sediment transport model for guidance of response efforts related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the northern Gulf of Mexico along the coast of Alabama and Florida, U.S, Geological Survey, Report number 2012–1234. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1234/.
   Google Scholar
• Roelvink D, Reniers A. 2012. A guide to modeling coastal morphology. Singapure: World Science Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, pp. 274.
   Google Scholar
• Roelvink D, Walstra DJ. 2004. Keeping it simple by using complex models. Adv Hydro-Science Eng. 6:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• SERDP-ESTCP. 2010. Munitions in the Underwater Environment: State of the Science and Knowledge Gaps. https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Featured-Initiatives/Munitions-Response-Initiatives/Munitions-in-the-Underwater-Environment/White-Paper-Munitions-in-the-Underwater-Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Taiani L, Benedet L, Silveira L, Keehn S, Sharp N, Bonanata R. 2012. : Sand borrow area design refinement to reduce morphological impacts: A case study of Panama City Beach, Florida, USA. Coastal Eng Proceedings. 1:103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijn LC. 2013. Erosion of Coastal dunes Due to storms. Blokzijl, The Netherlands: Leovanrijn-Sediment, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijn LC, Walstra D, Grasmeijer B, Sutherland J, Pan S, Sierra J. 2003. The predictability of cross-shore bed evolution of sandy beaches at the time scale of storms and seasons using process-based profile models. Coastal Eng. 47:295–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vousdoukas MI, Almeida LP, Ferreira Ó. 2012. Beach erosion and recovery during consecutive storms at a steep-sloping, meso-tidal beach. Earth Surf Process. Landforms. 37:583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J, Esteves L. 2017. Guidance on setup, calibration, and validation of hydrodynamic, wave, and sediment models for shelf seas and estuaries. Adv Civil Eng. 2017:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott CJ. 1981. On the validation of models. Physical Geography. 2:184–194.
   Google Scholar