Assessing fossil fuel substitution through wood use based on long-term simulations

References

• Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J. An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood and Fiber Sci. 37(CORRIM Special Issue), 140–148 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Skog KE. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Prod. J. 56(6), 56–72 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Frühwald A, Solberg B. LCA – a challenge for forestry and forest products industry [Internet]. In: EFI Proceedings No. 8. Frühwald A, Solberg B (Eds.). Joensuu (1995). Available from: http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/publications/proc08_net.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lippke B, Wilson J, Perez-Garcia J, Bowyer J, Meil J. CORRIM: Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. Forest Prod. J. 54(6), 8–19 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taverna R, Hofer P, Werner F, Kaufmann E, Thürig E. The CO2 Effects of the Swiss Forestry and Timber Industry. Scenarios of future potential for climate-change mitigation. Bern (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sathre R, O'Connor J. A Synthesis of Research on Wood Products and Greenhouse Gas Impacts, 2nd Edition [Internet]. FPInnovations, Vancouver (2010). Available from: https://www.canfor.com/docs/why-wood/tr19-complete-pub-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reijnders L. Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use. Energ. Policy. 34(7), 863–876 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson L, Holmberg J, Dornburg V et al. Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction. Energ. Policy. 35(11), 5671–5691 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathre R, Gustavsson L. A state-of-the-art review of energy and climate effects of wood product substitution. School of Technology and Design Reports 57, University Växjö, Växjö, Sweden (2009).
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventh Session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1 [Internet]. Marrakesh (2002). Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use [Internet]. Hayama, (2006). Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) [Internet]. Hayama (2003). Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf_files/GPG_LULUCF_FULL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories; reference manual. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Hayama (2006).
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. Synthesis report of the technical assessments of the forest management reference level submissions. Note by the secretariat, Durban (2011).
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol. Hayama, (2013).
   Google Scholar
• York R. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature Clim. Change. 2(6), 441–443 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark T, Bergh J, Hofer P et al. Potential roles of swedish forestry in the context of climate change mitigation. Forests. 5(4), 557–578 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauf M, Köhl M, Mues V, Olschofsky K, Frühwald A. Modeling the CO2-effects of forest management and wood usage on a regional basis. Carbon Balance and Management. 10(1), 13 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit). Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen. Nationale und internationale Entwicklung. Berlin, Juli 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rüter S. Welchen Beitrag leisten Holzprodukte zur CO2-Bilanz? AFZ der Wald. 15, 15–18 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N. Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy. 4(6), 761–772 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson E, Tschudi D. Baseline effects on carbon footprints of biofuels: The case of wood. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 37 IS, 12–17 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtsmark B. Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Clim. Change. 112(2), 415–428 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtsmark B. The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass. GCB Bioenergy. 5(4), 467–473 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze E-D, Körner C, Law BE, Haberl H, Luyssaert S. Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. GCB Bioenergy. 4(6), 611–616 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner C. Slow in, Rapid out–Carbon Flux Studies and Kyoto Targets. Science. 300(5623), 1242–1243 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauf M, Frühwald A. Beitrag des NRW Clusters ForstHolz zum Klimaschutz. Langfassung der Studie [Internet]. Landesbetrieb Wald und Holz Nordrhein-Westfalen, Münster (2013). Available from: https://www.wald-und-holz.nrw.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/Broschueren/Broschuere_Studie_Klimaschutz_Langfassung.pdf..
   Google Scholar
• Haberl H. Net land-atmosphere flows of biogenic carbon related to bioenergy: towards an understanding of systemic feedbacks. GCB Bioenergy. 5(4), 351–357 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MKULNV (Ministerium für Klimaschutz Umwelt Landwirtschaft Natur- und Verbraucherschutz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen). Landeswaldbericht 2012 [Internet]. Düsseldorf (2012). Available from: https://www.wald-und-holz.nrw.de/fileadmin/Wald-und-Holz/Dokumente/Landeswaldbericht_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren M, Bandhold H. Scenario planning – the link between future and strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Körner C. Biologische Kohlenstoffsenken: Umsatz und Kapital nicht verwechseln! [Biological Carbon Sinks: Turnover Must Not Be Confused with Capital!]. Gaia. 18(4), 288–293 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz F, Polley H, Hennig P, Dunger K, Schwitzgebel F. Die zweite Bundeswaldinventur – BWI² Inventur- und Auswertungsmethoden; zu den Bundeswaldinventuren 2001 bis 2002 und 1986 bis 1988. Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institut (vTI). Hamburg (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Jüttner O. Ertragstafeln für Eichen. Ertragstafeln wichtiger Baumarten bei verschiedener Durchforstung. 2nd edition. Sauerländer, Frankfurt (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Mantau U, Bilitewski B. Stoffstrom-Modell-Holz. Bestimmung des Aufkommens, der Verwendung und des Verbleibs von Holzprodukten. Forschungsbericht für den Verband Deutscher Papierfabriken e. V. (VDP), Celle (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Seintsch B. Entwicklungen des Clusters Forst und Holz: Studie “Volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Clusters Forst und Holz“ im Rahmen der “Bundesweiten Clusterstudie Forst und Holz”. Holz-Zentralblatt. 134(49), 1390–1391 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Weimar H. Der Holzfluss in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2009. Methode und Ergebnis der Modellierung des Stoffflusses von Holz [Internet]. Institut für Ökonomie der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft (Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut), Hamburg (2011). Available from: http://literatur.vti.bund.de/digbib_extern/bitv/dn049777.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mantau U. Holzrohstoffbilanz Deutschland, Entwicklungen und Szenarien des Holzaufkommens und der Holzverwendung 1987 bis 2015 [Internet]. Hamburg (2012). Available from: http://literatur.vti.bund.de/digbib_extern/dn051281.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dieter M. Holzbilanzen 2005 und 2006 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Institut für Ökonomie der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst- und Holzwirtschaft, Arbeitsbericht, Hamburg (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bird DN, Pena N, Frieden D, Zanchi G. Zero, one, or in between: evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy. 4(5), 576–587 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wördehoff R, Spellmann H, Evers J, Nagel J. Kohlenstoffstudie Forst und Holz Niedersachsen. Beiträge aus der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Band 6, Göttingen (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Oehmichen K, Demant B, Dunger K et al. Inventurstudie 2008 und Treibhausgasinventar Wald [Internet]. Landbauforschung vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research, Braunschweig (2011). Available from: http://literatur.vti.bund.de/digbib_extern/dn048141.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt. Berichterstattung unter der Klimarahmenkonvention der Vereinten Nationen und dem Kyoto-Protokoll 2013. Nationaler Inventarbericht zum Deutschen Treibhausgasinventar 1990 – 2011 [Internet]. Dessau-Roßlau (2013). Available from: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/climate_change_08_2013_nir_2013_gniffke.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IBU (Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V.). Database: Environmental Product Declarations. [Internet]. Berlin (2014). Available from: http://bau-umwelt.de.
   Google Scholar
• Frühwald A, Knauf M. Carbon aspects promote building with wood. Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), Quebec (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Frühwald A, Wegener G, Krüger S, Beudert M. Forst- und Holzwirtschaft unter dem Aspekt der CO₂-Problematik. Forschungsbericht. Forstabsatzfonds Bonn (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M et al. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energ. Policy. 45(0), 18–23 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IT NRW (Information und Technik Nordrhein-Westfalen Geschäftsbereich Statistik). Energiebilanz und CO2-Bilanz in Nordrhein-Westfalen 2011. Jan 2014 [Internet]. Düsseldorf (2014). Available from: https://webshop.it.nrw.de/gratis/E449%20201100.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner H-J, Koch MK, Burkhardt J, Bockmann TG, Feck N, Kruse P. CO2-Emissionen der Stromerzeugung – ein ganzheitlicher Vergleich verschiedener Techniken. 59(10), 44–52 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Erkelenz. Umsiedlungen Garzweiler II [Internet]. Erkelenz (2014). Available from: http://www.erkelenz.de/de/bauen/garzweiler/.
   Google Scholar
• Icha P. Entwicklung der spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix in den Jahren 1990 bis 2012. Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau (2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Energy 2020 – a strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy. Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels. (2010).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Brussels. (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Klimaschutzgesetz NRW. Gesetz zur Förderung des Klimaschutzes in Nordrhein-Westfalen [Internet]. Düsseldorf (2013). Available from: https://recht.nrw.de/lmi/owa/br_bes_text?anw_nr=2&gld_nr=7&ugl_nr=7129&bes_id=22784&aufgehoben=N&menu=1&sg=0.
   Google Scholar
• Klimaschutzplan NRW. Der Klimaschutzplan [Internet]. Düsseldorf (2014). Available from: http://www.klimaschutz.nrw.de.
   Google Scholar
• Weidema BP. Market information in life cycle assessment. Environmental Project No. 863. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Earles JM, Halog A. Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 16(5), 445–453 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earles JM, Halog A, Ince P, Skog K. Integrated economic equilibrium and life cycle assessment modeling for policy-based consequential LCA. J. Ind. Ecol. 17(3), 375–384 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A. Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 17(7), 904–918 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel C, Herr M, Edel M, Seidl H. Die Mitverbrennung holzartiger Biomasse in Kohlekraftwerken. Ein Beitrag zur Energiewende und zum Klimaschutz? Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena), Berlin (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Scholz F, Hasse U. Permanent wood sequestration: The solution to the global carbon dioxide problem. ChemSusChem. 1(5), 381–384 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng N, King A, Zaitchik B et al. Carbon sequestration via wood harvest and storage: An assessment of its harvest potential. Clim. Change. 118(2), 245–257 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng N. Carbon sequestration via wood burial. Carbon Balance Manage. 3(1), 1 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Köhl M, Frühwald A. Permanent wood sequestration: No solution to the global carbon dioxide problem. ChemSusChem. 2(7), 609–613 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Europe. State of Europe's forests 2011: status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Oslo (2011).
   Google Scholar