On influence of emissions trading on efficiency of the EU national steel sectors

References

• Council of European Union. EU directive No. 2003/87/EC. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Council of European Union. EU directive No. 2009/29/EC. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Council of European Union. Directive (EU) 2018/410 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Šmíd M, Zapletal F, Hančlová J. Which carbon derivatives are applicable in practice? A case study of a European steel company. Kybernetika. 2017;53:1071–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevallier J, Sévi B. On the stochastic properties of carbon futures prices. Environ Resource Econ. 2014;58(1):127–153. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9695-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenský L, Vrabcová P, Hájek M, et al. Searching for Correlations Between CO2 Emissions and Selected Economic Parameters. Statistika. 2019;99(2):151–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Perthuis C, Trotignon R. Governance of CO2 markets: lessons from the EU ETS. Energy Policy. 2014;75:100–106. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer S. Decoupling the EU ETS from subsidized renewables and other demand side effects: lessons from the impact of the EU ETS on CO2 emissions in the German electricity sector. Energy Policy. 2019;133:110858. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo JL, Zhu L, Fan Y. The impact of the EU ETS on the corporate value of European electricity corporations. Energy. 2012;45(1):3–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio J, Lovell CK, Pastor JT, editors. Advances in efficiency and productivity. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Woerdman E, Couwenberg O, Nentjes A. Energy prices and emissions trading: windfall profits from grandfathering? Eur J Law Econ. 2009;28(2):185–202. doi:10.1007/s10657-009-9098-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROFER. The impact of the European steel industry on the EU economy. Oxford, England: Oxford Economics; 2019. 100p.
   Google Scholar
• Council of European Union. EU decision No. 2014/746/EU. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Oda J, Akimoto K, Tomoda T, et al. International comparisons of energy efficiency in power, steel, and cement industries. Energy Policy. 2012;44:118–129. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flues F, Rübbelke D, Vögele S. An analysis of the economic determinants of energy efficiency in the European iron and steel industry. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;104:250–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He F, Zhang Q, Lei J, et al. Energy efficiency and productivity change of China’s iron and steel industry: accounting for undesirable outputs. Energy Policy. 2013;54:204–213. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demailly D, Quirion P. European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Econ. 2008;30(4):2009–2027. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanbeigi A, Morrow W, Sathaye J, et al. A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy. 2013;50:315–325. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson M, Wang C, Dahl J. Development of a method for analysing energy, environmental and economic efficiency for an integrated steel plant. Appl Therm Eng. 2006;26(13):1353–1361. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. EU ETS handbook. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2015. 139p.
   Google Scholar
• Branger F, Ponssard JP, Sartor O, et al. EU ETS, free allocations, and activity level thresholds: the devil lies in the details. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ. 2015;2(3):401–437. doi:10.1086/682343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijm J, Neuhoff K, Chen Y. CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy. 2006;6(1):49–72. doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hančlová J, Zapletal F, Šmíd M. On interaction between carbon spot prices and Czech steel industry. Carbon Manage. 2020;11(2):121–137. doi:10.1080/17583004.2020.1712262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Evans DG, Fuller RJ, et al. Technical efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry. Int J Prod Econ. 2002;76(3):293–312. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00195-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y. Technical efficiency and firm attributes in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Int Rev Appl Econ. 1996;10(2):235–248. doi:10.1080/02692179600000017.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Lee JY, Kim JY, et al. Sources of productive efficiency: international comparison of iron and steel firms. Resour Policy. 2006;31(4):239–246. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen S, Tuomaala M, Ahtila P. Variables affecting energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the steel industry. Energy Policy. 2010;38(5):2477–2485. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Shi J, Qiao H, et al. Regional technical efficiency of Chinese Iron and steel industry based on bootstrap network data envelopment analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci. 2017;57:14–24. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Cardenas JC, Hasanbeigi A, Sheinbaum-Pardo C, et al. Energy efficiency in the Mexican iron and steel industry from an international perspective. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;158:335–348. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo N, Moya JA. Prospective scenarios on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the European Iron & Steel industry. Energy. 2013;54:113–128. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin B, Wang X. Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy. 2014;72:87–96. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Worrell E. International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry. Energy Policy. 2002;30(10):827–838. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00130-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka A, Resce G, Mareschal B. Visual management of performance with PROMETHEE productivity analysis. Soft Comput. 2018;22(22):7325–7338. doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2884-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodoridis AM, Anwar MM. A comparison of DEA and SFA methods: a case study of farm households in Bangladesh. J Dev Areas. 2011;45(1):95–110. doi:10.1353/jda.2011.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Sartor O, Pallière C, Lecourt S. Benchmark-based allocations in EU ETS Phase 3: an early assessment. Climate Policy. 2014;14(4):507–524. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.872888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareschal B, Brans JP, Vincke P. PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis (No. 2013/9305). ULB–Universite Libre de Bruxelles. 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Olson DL. A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. Int J Prod Res. 2008;46(8):2313–2327. doi:10.1080/00207540601039775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granér M, Isaksson A. Firm efficiency and the destination of exports: evidence from Kenyan plant‐level data. Dev Econ. 2009;47(3):279–306. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1049.2009.00087.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazzi M. Export and firm performance: evidence on productivity and profitability of Italian companies. J Ind Compet Trade. 2012;12(4):413–444. doi:10.1007/s10842-011-0102-9.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Market Data. Private paid database of Carbon Market Data. 2019. Available online: https://carbonmarketdata.com/en/home.
   Google Scholar
• SENDECO2. Database of SendeCO2 trading platform. 2019. Available online: https://www.sendeco2.com/it/prezzi-co2.
   Google Scholar
• EUROFER. EUROFER: Annual Report 2018. 2019. Available online: http://www.eurofer.org/News&Events/News/EUROFER%20Annual%20Report%202018.fhtml.
   Google Scholar
• World Steel Association. World Steel in Figures 2018. 2019. Available online: https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:f9359dff-9546-4d6b-bed0-996201185b12/World+Steel+in+Figures+2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat database. Database of the European Union. 2019. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/.
   Google Scholar
• MEPS International. Paid database of MEPS International Ltd. – Independent Steel Industry Analysts, Steel Prices, Forecasts, News, Reports. 2019. Available online: http://www.meps.co.uk/publications/international/_steel/_review.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Amponsah SK, Darkwah KF, Inusah A. Logistic preference function for preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) decision analysis. Afr J Math Comput Sci Res. 2012;5(6):112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko V, Podviezko A. Dependence of multi‐criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 2010;16(1):143–158. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre A, Nachtigall D, Venmans F. The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Odysee. Energy Efficiency Monitoring in the EU. 2015. Available online: https://www.odyssee-mure.eu/publications/efficiency-trends-policies-profiles/.
   Google Scholar