Climate mitigation through soil amendments: quantification, evidence, and uncertainty

References

• Sanderman J, Hengl T, Fiske GJ. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(36):9575–9580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706103114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelung W, Bossio D, de Vries W, et al. Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield E, Eagle A, Rubin RL, et al. Crediting agricultural soil carbon sequestration. Science. 2022;375(6586):1222–1225. doi: 10.1126/science.abl7991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott LK, Macdonald LM, Wong MTF, et al. Potential roles of biological amendments for profitable grain production – a review. Agric Ecosys Environ. 2018;256:34–50. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundson R, Biardeau L. Opinion: soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(46):11652–11656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815901115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynarski KA, Bossio DA, Scow KM. Dynamic stability of soil carbon: reassessing the “permanence” of soil carbon sequestration. Front Environ Sci. 2020;8:514701. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.514701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins J, Durning B. Carbon definitions and typologies in environmental impact assessment: greenhouse gas confusion? Impact Ass Proj App. 2012;30:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu A, Hohne N, Kuramochi T, et al. A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nat Clim Change. 2019;9(1):11–17. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0338-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin WB, Rabinovich L, Weber K, et al. Public understanding of climate change terminology. Climate Change. 2021;167:37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moomaw W. 2017. To curb climate change, we need to protect and expand US forests (https://theconversation.com/to-curb-climate-change-we-need-to-protect-and-expand-us-forests-76380).
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. EPA’s treatment of biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from stationary sources that use Forest biomass for energy production. (Washington, DC: the United States Environmental Protection Agency); 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sintim HY, Flury M. Is biodegradable plastic mulch the solution to agriculture’s plastic problem? Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(3):1068–1069. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goll DS, Ciais P, Amann T, et al. Potential CO2 removal from enhanced weathering by ecosystem responses to powdered rock. Nat Geosci. 2021;14(8):545–549. doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00798-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye L, Camps-Abserstain M, Shen Q, et al. Biochar effects on crop yields with and without fertilizer: a meta-analysis of field studies using separate controls. Soil Use Manage. 2020;36(1):2–18. doi: 10.1111/sum.12546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster PT, Storelvmo K, Armour W, et al. The earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks, and climate sensitivity. In Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 923–1054; 2021. doi: 10.1017/9781009157896.009.
   Google Scholar
• EPA.gov. Greenhouse gas equivalancies calculator. April 2022. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator.
   Google Scholar
• Keiluweit M, Bougoure JJ, Nico PS, et al. Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nat Clim Change. 2015;5(6):588–595. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley BK, Dijkstra P, Rasmussen C, et al. Soil mineral assemblage and substrate quality effects on microbial priming. Geoderma. 2018;322:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey VL, Hicks Pries C, Lajtha K. What do we know about soil carbon destabilization? Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(8):083004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2c11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, et al. Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. Accounting framework for biogenic CO2 emissions from stationary sources. Office of atmospheric programs. 2011. (https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/0/2F9B572C712AC52E8525783100704886/$File/Biogenic_CO2_Accounting_Framework_Report_LATEST.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Novick K, Metzger S, Anderegg WRL, et al. Informing nature-based climate solutions for the United States with the best-available science. Glob Chang Biol. 2022;28(12):3778–3794. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G. Carbon input by plants into the soil. Rev. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2000;163(4):421–431. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200008)163:4<421::AID-JPLN421>3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson O, Quilliam RS, Stott A, et al. Rhizosphere carbon supply accelerates soil organic matter decomposition in the presence of fresh organic substrates. Plant Soil. 2019;440(1-2):473–490. doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04072-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West TO, Marland G, King AQ, et al. Carbon management response curves: estimates of temporal soil carbon dynamics. Environ Manage. 2004;33(4):507–518. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-9108-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson DS, Johnston AE. 1977 Soil organic matter in the hoosfield continuous barley experiment. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for. 1976;Part 2:87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford RM, Roderick ML. Soil carbon stocks and bulk density: spatial or cumulative mass coordinates as a basis of expression? Glob Change Biol. 2003;9(11):1507–1514. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00677.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Haden AC, Yang WH, DeLucia EH. Soil’s dirty little secret: depth based comparisons can be inadequate for quantifying changes in soil organic carbon and other mineral soil properties. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(7):3759–3770. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderman J, Baldock JA. Accounting for soil carbon sequestration in national inventories: a soil scientist’s perspective. Environ Res Lett. 2010;5(3):034003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Groenigen JW, van Kessel C, Hungate BA, et al. Sequestering soil organic carbon: a nitrogen dilemma. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(9):4738–4739. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board. 2019. CA-GREET3.0 model and tier 1 simplified carbon intensity calculators. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/lcfs-life-cycle-analysis-models-and-documentation. Accessed Jan 20, 2022
   Google Scholar
• RCRA. 1976. Criteria for the definition of solid waste and solid and hazardous waste exclusions. https://www.epa.gov/hw/criteria-definition-solid-waste-and-solid-and-hazardous-waste-exclusions. Accessed 7/22/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li Z, Chang SX, et al. Residue retention promotes soil carbon accumulation in minimum tillage systems: implications for conservation agriculture. Sci Total Environ. 2020;740:140147. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus BD, Brown K, Helmisaari HS, et al. Sustainable Forest biomass: a review of currency residue harvesting guidelines. Energ Sustain Soc. 2021;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13705-021-00281-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, et al. Greenhouse gas inventory model for biochar additions to soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(21):14795–14805. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol. 2009;58(4):921–929. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini C, Cayuela MC, Sinicco T. Soil C potential of exogenous organic matter at regional level under climate change simulated by RothC model modified for amended soils. Front Environ Sci. 2018;29:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Levavasseur F, Mary B, Christensen B, et al. The simple AMG model accurately simulates organic carbon storage in soils after repeated application of exogenous soil organic matter. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2020;117(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu E, Yan C, Mei X, et al. Long-term effect of manure and fertilizer on soil organic carbon pools in dryland farming in northwest China. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong ST, Rae Cho S, Lee JG, et al. Composting and compost application: trade-off between greenhouse gas emission and soil carbon sequestration in whole rice cropping system. J Clean Prod. 2019;212:1132–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Zhu B, Wang S, et al. Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23(10):4068–4083. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenbacher A, Sandén T, Haslmayr H-P, et al. Optimizing carbon sequestration in croplands: a synthesis. Agronomy. 2021;11(5):882. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11050882.
   Google Scholar
• DeLonge MS, Ryals R, Silver WL. A lifecycle model to evaluate carbon sequestration potential and greenhouse gas dynamics of managed grasslands. Ecosystems. 2013;16(6):962–979. doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9660-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao C, Liu L, Hu S, et al. How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. Glob Change Biol. 2015;21(3):1249–1257. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng S, Wipf HML, Pierroz G, et al. Microbial soil amendment dynamically alters the strawberry root bacterial microbiome. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):17677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53623-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corrochano-Monsalve M, Gonzalez-Murua C, Estavillo J, et al. Impact of dimethypyrazole-based nitrification inhibitors on soil-borne bacteria. Sci Total Environ. 2021;792:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. Biosolids Technology Factsheet. Land Application of Biosolids. EPA Office of Water. EPA. 2000. 832-F-00-064.
   Google Scholar
• CABR working group. Compliance Offsets Protocol Task Force Draft Final Recommendations. February 8, 2021 https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/offsets_task_force_draft_final_report_020821.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fertilizer costs make manure look better. Ohio State University, 2021. Accessed 6/07/23 from: https://wayne.osu.edu/news/fertilizer-costs-make-manure-look-better.
   Google Scholar
• Wade T, Classen R, Wallander S. Conservation-Practice adoption rates vary widely by crop and region. 2015. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Quilty JR, Cattle SR. Use and understanding of organic amendments in Australian agriculture: a review. Soil Res. 2011;49(1):1–26. doi: 10.1071/SR10059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayuela ML, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, et al. Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Sci Rep. 2013;3:1732. doi: 10.1038/srep01732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochum MD, McWilliams KL, Pierson EA, et al. Host mediated microbiome engineering (HMME of drought tolerance in the rhizosphere). PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Xu Y, Yu Y, et al. Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from chinese paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;46:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Kamman C, et al. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem. 2016;101:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhang Y, Liu B, et al. How does biochar influence soil N cycle? A meta-analysis. Plant Soil. 2018;426(1-2):211–225. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3619-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven E, Pereira E, Decock C, et al. Toward a better assessment of biochar-nitrous oxide mitigation potential at the field scale. J Environ Qual. 2017;46(2):237–246. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.10.0396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon MJ, Demarmels R, Watts-Williams SJ, et al. Global evaluation of commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants under greenhouse and field conditions. Appl Soil Ecol. 2022;169:104225. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Pedreno J, Almendro-Candel MB, Zorpas AA. The increase of soil organic matter reduces global warming, myth or reality? Science 2021;3(1):18. doi: 10.3390/sci3010018.
   Google Scholar
• Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature. 2005;437(7058):529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature03972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke-Whittle IH, Insam H. Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39(2):139–151. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin M, Alexander J, Bierbaum G, et al. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, antibiotic resistance genes, and antibiotic residues in wastewater from a poultry slaughterhouse after conventional and advanced treatments. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96169-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas BW, Luo Y, Li C, et al. Utilizing composted beef cattle manure and slaughterhouse wasted as nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers for calcareous soil. Compost Sci Util. 2017;25(2):102–111. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2016.1219681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayuela ML, Sinicco T, Mondini C. Mineralization dynamics and biochemical properties during initial decomposition of plant and animal residues in soil. Appl Soil Ecol. 2009;41(1):118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olayemi OP, Kallenbach CM, Scheekloth JP, et al. From factory to field: effects of a novel soil amendment derived from cheese production on wheat and corn production. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;3:127.
   Google Scholar
• Mona S, Malyan SK, Saini N, et al. Towards a sustainable agriculture with carbon sequestration, and greenhouse gas mitigation using algal biochar. Chemosphere. 2021;275:129856. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Cao X, Masek O, et al. Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater. 2013;1:256–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.015.
   Google Scholar
• Farhangi-Abriz S, Torabian S, Qin R, et al. Biochar effects on yield of cereal and legume crops using meta-analysis. Sci Tot Environ. 2021;775:145869. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintala R, Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, et al. Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2014;60(3):393–404. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2013.789870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammann C, Ippolito J, Hagemann N, et al. A tool to reduce the agricultural greenhouse gas burden- knowns, unknowns and future research needs. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage. 2017;25(2):114–139. doi: 10.3846/16486897.2017.1319375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale L, Luth M, Crowley D. Biochar characteristics relate to its utility as an alternative soil inoculum carrier to peat and vermiculite. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;81:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikder S, Joardar JC. Biochar production from poultry litter as a management approach and effects on plant growth. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult. 2019;8(1):47–58. doi: 10.1007/s40093-018-0227-5.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HP, Kamman C, Hagemann N, et al. Biochar in agriculture - a systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses. GCB-Bioenergy. 2021;13(11):1708–1730. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12889.
   Google Scholar
• Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, et al. Climate smart soils. Nature. 2016;532(7597):49–57. doi: 10.1038/nature17174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe S, Streck C, Beach R, et al. Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: potential and feasibility by country. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27(23):6025–6058. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrot FA, et al. Sustainable Biochar to Mitigate Global Climate Change. Nature. 2010;1:56.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, et al. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nat Geosci. 2021;14(12):883–892. doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Canqui H, Laird DA, Heaton EA, et al. Soil carbon increased by twice the amount of biochar carbon applied after 6 years: field evidence of negative priming. Bioenergy. 2019;12:240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, et al. Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009;41(2):210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh BP, Cowie AL. Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralization in a low-carbon clayey soil. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3687. doi: 10.1038/srep03687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima S, Riaz M, Al-Wabel MI, et al. Higher biochar rate strongly reduced decomposition of soil organic matter to enhance C and N sequestration in nutrient-poor alkaline calcareous soil. J Soils Sedim. 2021;21(1):148–162. doi: 10.1007/s11368-020-02753-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M, Huang J, Shah A, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from a red acidic soil by using magnesium-modified wheat straw biochar. Environ Res. 2021;203:11879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KG, Gloy B, Joseph S, et al. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic and climate change potential. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(2):827–833. doi: 10.1021/es902266r.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuštik Hnakova T, Koci V. Life cycle assessment of biochar-to-soil systems: a review. J Clean Prod. 2020;259:120998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Chen Z, Chen B. H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of biochars derived from diverse precursory materials. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22644. doi: 10.1038/srep22644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen G, Pandit N, Taylor P, et al. Emissions and char quality of Flame-Curtain "kon tiki" kilns for Farmer-Scale charcoal/biochar production. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019). Appendix 4 Method for Estimating the Change in Mineral Soil Organic Carbon Stocks from Biochar Amendments: basis for Future Methodological Development. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.
   Google Scholar
• Verra. 2021. Methodology for biochar utilization in soil and non-soil applications. Consortium: FORLIANCE, South Pole, and Biochar Works. In joint collaboration with Delaney Forestry Services. Accessed 7/2022 from https://verra.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/210803_VCS-Biochar-Methodology-v1.0-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, He ZL, Stoffella PJ. Land application of biosolids in the USA: a review. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2012;2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/201462.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard E, Bodas J, Brown S, et al. Carbon balance for biosolids use in commercial douglas fir plantations in the pacific northwest. J Environ Manage. 2021;295:113115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIvor K, Cogger C, Brown S. Effect of biosolids based soil properties on soil chemical and physical properties in urban gardens. Compost Sci Util. 2012;10:199–206. 2013
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Kurtz K, Bary A, et al. Quantifying benefits associated with land application of organic residuals in Washington state. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(17):7451–7458. doi: 10.1021/es2010418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa YB, Ryals R. Soil carbon response to long-term biosolids application. J Environ Qual. 2021;50(5):1084–1096. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace BM, Krzic M, Forge TA, et al. Biosolids increase soil aggregation and protection of soil carbon five years after application on a crested wheatgrass pasture. J Environ Qual. 2009;38(1):291–298. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian G, Granato TC, Cox AE, et al. Soil carbon sequestration resulting from long-term application of biosolids for land reclamation. J Environ Qual. 2009;38(1):61–74. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DE, Vlamis J, Pukite A, et al. Trace element accumulation, movement and distribution in the soil profile from massive applications of sewage sludge. Soil Sci. 1980;129(2):119. doi: 10.1097/00010694-198002000-00007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryals R, Silver W. Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecol Appl. 2013;23(1):46–59. doi: 10.1890/12-0620.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal DM, LeCain DR, Augustine DJ. Composted manure application promotes long-term invasion of semi-arid rangeland by bromus tectorum. Ecosphere. 2017;8(10):e01960. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tautges NE, Chiartas JL, Gaudin ACM, et al. Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils. Glob Change Biol. 2019;25:3754–3766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leip A, Busto M, Winiwarter W. Developing spatially stratified N2O emission factors for Europe. Environ Poll. 2011;159(11):3223–3232. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Qiao N, Xu X, et al. C:N stoichiometry of stable and labile organic compounds determine priming patterns. Geoderma. 2021;362:11422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez A, Artola A, Font X, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from organic waste composting. Environ Chem Lett. 2015;13(3):223–238. doi: 10.1007/s10311-015-0507-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaard A, Fraser R, Heaton THE, et al. Crop manuring and intensive land management by europe’s first farmers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(31):12589–12594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305918110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XR, Zhang P, Su YG, et al. Carbon fixation by biological soil crusts following revegetation of sand dunes in arid desert regions of China: a four year field study. Catena. 2012;97:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues – friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;84:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires AFA, Millner PD, Baron J. Assessment of current practices of organic farmers regarding biological soil amendments of animal origin in a multi-regional US study. Food Prod Trends. 2018;38:347–362.
   Google Scholar
• Maillard É, Angers DA. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(2):666–679. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A, Glaser B. Meta-analysis on how manure application changes soil organic carbon storage. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82739-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton P, Johnston J, Macdonald A, et al. Major limitations to achieving “4 per 1000” increases in soil organic carbon stock in temperate regions: evidence from long-term experiments at rothamsted research, United Kingdom. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(6):2563–2584. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenet B, Gabrielle B, Chenu C, et al. Can N2O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage? Glob Change Biol. 2021;27(2):237–256. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen JJ, Parton WJ, Silver WL. Long-term impacts of manure amendments on carbon and greenhouse gas dynamics of rangelands. Glob Change Biol. 2015;21(12):4533–4547. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger WH. Carbon sequestration in soils: some cautions amidst optimism. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;82(1-3):121–127. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00221-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Tian H, Lu C, et al. Global manure nitrogen production and application in cropland during 1860-2014: a 4 arcmin gridded global dataset for earth system modeling. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2017;9(2):667–678. doi: 10.5194/essd-9-667-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key N, Sneeringer S. Carbon emissions, renewable electricity, and profits: comparing policies to promote anaerobic digestion on dairies. Agric Resour Econ Rev. 2012;41(2):139–157. doi: 10.1017/S1068280500003312.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal R, Raza MAS, Valipour M, et al. Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches – a review. Bull Nat Res Centre. 2020;44:75.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar K, Wang W, Khan A, et al. Wheat straw mulching offset soil moisture deficiency for improving phyiological and growth performance of summer soybean. Agric Water Manage. 2019;211:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.031.
   Google Scholar
• Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, et al. The microbial efficiency-matrix stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19(4):988–995. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Zhang W, Wei W, et al. Soil organic matter priming and carbon balance after straw addition is regulated by long-term fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;135:383–391. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35(6):837–843. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Lu M, Cui J, et al. Effect of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(5):1366–1381. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber N, Jones M, Nelson L, et al. Life cycle assessment of mulch use on okanagan apple orchards: part 1 - Attributional. J Clean Prod. 2020;267:121960. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamizo S, Mugnai G, Rossi F, et al. Cyanobacteria inoculation improves soil stability and fertility on different textured soils: gaining insights for applicability in soil restoration. Front Environ Sci. 2018;6:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoja TM. Heterotrophic growth of blue-green algae Doctoral thesis, Durham University. 1973 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1315/.
   Google Scholar
• Meeks JC, Elhai J. Regulation of cellular differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria in free-living and plant-associated symbiotic growth states. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(1):94–121; table of contents. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.1.94-121.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronga D, Biazzi E, Parati K, et al. Microalgal biostimulants and biofertilisers in crop productions. Agronomy. 2019;9(4):192. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9040192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves AL. The use of microalgae and cyanobacteria in the improvement of agricultural practices: a review on their biofertilising, biostimulating and biopesticide roles. Appl Sci. 2021;11(2):871. doi: 10.3390/app11020871.
   Google Scholar
• De PK. The role of blue-green algae in nitrogen fixation in rice-fields. Proc R Soc B. 1939;127:121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kollah B, Patra AK, Mohanty SR. Aquatic microphylla azolla: a perspective paradigm for sustainable agriculture, environment and global climate change. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(5):4358–4369. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5857-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento MD, Battaglia ME, Rizza LS, et al. Prospects of using biomass N2-fixing cyanobacteria as an organic fertilizer and soil conditioner. Algal Res. 2019;43:101652. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101652.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez AL, Weyers SL, Goemann HM, et al. Microalgae, soil and plants: a critical review of microalgae as renewable resources for agriculture. Algal Res. 2021;54:2211–9264.
   Google Scholar
• Li G, Xiao W, Yang T, et al. Optimization and process effect for microalgae carbon dioxide fixation technology applications based on carbon capture: a comprehensive review. C J Carbon Res. 2023;9(1):35. doi: 10.3390/c9010035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25(3):294–306. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das NP, Kumar A, Singh PK. Cyanobacteria, pesticides and rice interaction. Biodivers Conserv. 2015;24(4):995–1005. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0886-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Zhang J, Peng C, et al. Replacing nitrogen fertilizer with nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria reduced nitrogen leaching in red soil paddy fields. Agric Ecosys Environ. 2021;312:107320. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams W, Budel B, Williams S. Wet season cyanobacterial N enrichment highly correlated with species richness and nostoc in the Northern Australian savannah. Biogeosciences. 2018;15(7):2149–2159. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-2149-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russow R, Veste M, Böhme F. A natural N-15 approach to determine biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by biological soil crusts of the negev desert. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19(23):3451–3456. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booshan N, Pabbi S, Singh A. Impact of blue green algae (BGA) technology: an empirical evidence from northwestern Indo-Gangetic plains. Biotechnology. 2018;8:324.
   Google Scholar
• Osman MEH, El-Sheekh MM, Naggar AH, et al. Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth and yield of pea plant. Biol Fertil Soils. 2010;46(8):861–875. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento MD, Rizza L, Di Palma AA, et al. Cyanobacterial biological nitrogen fixation as a sustainable nitrogen fertilizer for the production of microalgal oil. Algal Res. 2015;12:142–148.
   Google Scholar
• Dojani S, Büdel B, Deutschewitz K, et al. Rapid succession of biological soil crusts after experimental disturbance in the succulent karoo, South Africa. Appl Soil Ecol. 2011;48(3):263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razon LF. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas profile of a process for the production of ammonium sulfate from nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer L, Ranglová K, Masojídek J, et al. Digestate as a sustainable nutrient source for microalgae-challenges and prospects. Appl Sci. 2021;11(3):1056. doi: 10.3390/app11031056.
   Google Scholar
• Solovchenko A, Verschoor AM, Jablanoski ND. Phosphorus from wastewater to crops: an alternative path involving microalgae. Biotech Adv. 2015;:07012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Cotas J. Historical use of seaweed as an agricultural fertilizer in the European Atlantic Area. In: seaweeds as Plant Fertilizer, Agricultural Biostimulants and Animal Fodder. In Seaweeds as plant fertilizer, agricultural biostimulants and animal fodder. Chapter 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte CM, Wu J, Xiao X, et al. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EL Boukhari MEM, Barakate M, Bouhia Y, et al. Trends in seaweed extract based biostimulants: manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems. Plants. 2020;9(3):359. doi: 10.3390/plants9030359.
   Google Scholar
• Sible CN, Seebauer JR, Below FE. Plant biostimulants: a categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy. 2021;11(7):1297. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11071297.
   Google Scholar
• Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, et al. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28(4):386–399. doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filbee-Dexter K, Feehan C, Smale D, et al. Ocean temperature controls kelp decomposition and carbon sink potential. 2020 Preprint (Research Square).
   Google Scholar
• Santaniello A, Scartazza A, Gresta F, et al. Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract alleviates drought stress in arabidopsis by affecting photosynthetic performance and related gene expression. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1362. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh S, Johnson JA, Tambjerg L, et al. Closing yield gap is crucial to avoid potential surge in global carbon emissions. Glob Environ Change. 2020;63:102100. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla PS, Mantin EG, Adil M, et al. Ascophyllum nodosim-based biostimulants: sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth- stress tolerance and disease management. Front Plant Sci. 2019;20:665.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DA, Paul NA, Dworjanyn SA, et al. Biochar from commercially cultivated seaweed for soil amelioration. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9665. doi: 10.1038/srep09665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fesel P, Zuccaro A. Dissecting endophytic lifestyle along the parasitism/mutualism continuum in arabidopsis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;32:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, et al. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary consideriona for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79(3):293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SE, Read DJ. The mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Witzgall K, Vidal A, Schubert D, et al. 2021 (preprint). Soil organic carbon under lockdown: fresh plant litter as the nucleus for persistent carbon.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Xu Y, Han X, et al. Fungi contribute more than bacteria to soil organic matter through necromass accumulation under different agricultural practices. Eur J Biol. 2015;67:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad R, Khan AL, Bilal S, et al. What is there in seeds? Vertically transmitted endophytic resources for sustainable improvement in plant growth. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:24. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisen S, Kostenko O, Cnossen MC, et al. Seed and root endophytic fungi in a range expanding and a related plant species. Front Microb. 2017;8:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack KML, Rudgers JA. Balancing multiple mutualists: asymmetric interactions among plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and fungal endophytes. Environ Sci Ecol. 2008;117:310–320.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham KK. A meta-analysis of plant response to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytol. 2011;190(3):783–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Monica IF, Saparrat MCN, Godeas AM, et al. The co-existence between DSE and AMF symbionts affects plant P pools through P mineralization and solubilization processes. Fungal Ecol. 2015;17:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthelot C, Chalot M, Leyval C, et al. From darkness to light: emergence of the mysterious dark septate endophytes in plant growth promotion and stress alleviation. In T. R. Hodkinson, F. M. Doohan, M. J. Saunders, & B. R. Murphy (Eds.), Endophytes for a growing world 2019. (pp. 143–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Rai N, Limbu A, et al. Impact of trichoderma sp. in agriculture: a mini review. J Biol Todays World. 2020;9:7227.
   Google Scholar
• Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 2006;96(2):190–194. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnahal ASM, El-Saadony MT, Saad AM, et al. The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: a review. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2022;162(4):1007–1007. Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/s10658-022-02472-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rillig MC, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Camenzind T, et al. Why farmers should manage the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2019;222(3):1171–1175. doi: 10.1111/nph.15602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MH, Graham JH, Morton JB, et al. Research must use a systems agronomy approach if management of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is to contribute to sustainable intensification. New Phytol. 2019;222(13):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säle V, Palenzuela J, Azcón-Aguilar C, et al. Ancient lineages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi provide little plant benefit. Mycorrhiza. 2021;31(5):559–576. doi: 10.1007/s00572-021-01042-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepp SK, Davison J, Jairus T, et al. Non-random association patterns in a plant–mycorrhizal fungal network reveal host–symbiont specificity. Mol Ecol. 2019;28(2):365–378. doi: 10.1111/mec.14924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddington CL, Dodd JC. The effect of agricultural practices on the development of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Studies in experimental microcosms. Plant Soil. 2000;218:145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD, Gehring CA, et al. The promise and the potential consequences of the global transport of mycorrhizal fungal inoculum. Ecol Lett. 2006;9(5):501–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00910.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MH, Graham JH. Little evidence that farmers should consider abundance or diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi when managing crops. New Phytol. 2018;220(4):1092–1107. doi: 10.1111/nph.15308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart MM, Antunes PM, Chaudhary VB, et al. Fungal inoculants in the field: is the reward greater than the risk? Funct Ecol. 2018;32(1):126–135. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzeaux J, Hirel B, Dubois F, et al. Agricultural practices to improve nitrogen use efficiency through the use of arbuscular mycorrhizae: basic and agronomic impacts. Plant Sci. 2017;264:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich P, Roscher C, Clark AT, et al. Diverse plant mixtures sustain a greater arbuscular mycorrhizal spore viability than monocultures after 12 years. J Plant Ecol. 2020;13(4):478–488. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contos P, Wood JL, Murphy NP, et al. Rewilding with invertebrates and microbes to restore ecosystems: present trends and future directions. Ecol Evol. 2021;11(12):7187–7200. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubs ERJ, Putten WH, Mortimer SR, et al. Single introductions of soil biota and plants generate long-term legacies in plant community assembly. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(7):1145–1151. doi: 10.1111/ele.13271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Shachar-Hill Y. Carbon metabolism and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Physiol. 2000;124(3):949–958. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.3.949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavito ME, Jakobsen I, Mikkelsen TN, et al. Direct evidence for modulation of photosynthesis by an arbuscular mycorrhiza-induces carbon sink strength. New Phytol. 2019;223(2):896–907. doi: 10.1111/nph.15806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot JM, Allison SD, Treseder KK. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Funct Ecol. 2008;22(6):955–963. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treseder KK, Holden SR. Fungal carbon sequestration. Science. 2013;338:6127.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson GWT, Rice CH, Rillig MC, et al. Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi: results from long-term field experiments. Ecol Lett. 2009;12(5):452–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Booker FL, Tu C, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase organic carbon decomposition under elevated CO2. Science. 2012;337(6098):1084–1087. doi: 10.1126/science.1224304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen E, Veresoglou SD, Anderson IC, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhial fungi: short term liability but long term benefits for soil carbon storage? New Phytol. 2013;197(2):366–368. doi: 10.1111/nph.12079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnihotri R, Sahni S, Sharma MP, et al. Facets of AM fungi in sequestering soil carbon and improving soil health. In Fungal diversity, ecology and control management. Springer, Singapore. 2022;327–344.
   Google Scholar
• Franzluebbers AJ, Nazih N, Stuedemann JA, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools under low-and high-endophyte infected tall fescue. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999;63(6):1687–1694. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1999.6361687x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He C, Wang W, Hou J. Plant growth and soil microbial impact of enhancing licorice with inoculating dark septate endophytes under drought stress. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2277. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal J, Siegrist JA, Nelson JA, et al. Fungal endophyte infection increases soil carbon sequestration potential of southeastern USA tall fescue stands. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;44(1):81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzleubbers AJ. Short-term responses of soil C and N fractions to tall fescue endophyte infection. Plant Soil. 2006;383:153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins MB, Franzluebbers AJ, Humayoun SB. Assessing short-term responses of prokaryotic communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils to tall fescue endophyte infection. Plant Soil. 2006;289(1–2):309–320. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9141-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omacini M, Semmartin M, Pérez LI, et al. Grass-endophyte symbiosis: a neglected aboveground interaction with multiple belowground consequences. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;61:273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane KH. Effects of endophyte infection on drought stress tolerance of Lolium perenne accessions from the mediterranean region. Environ Exp Bot. 2011;71:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlin SN, Emery SM, Rudgers JA. Fungal symbionts alter plant responses to global change. Am J Bot. 2013;100(7):1445–1457. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JL, Bottomley PJ, Griffith SM, et al. Distribution and turnover of recently fixed photosynthate in ryegrass rhizospheres. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36(2):371–382. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen C. Rhizodeposition of organic C by plant: mechanisms and controls. In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Véronique S, Alberola C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 97–123; 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_9.
   Google Scholar
• Swinnen J, Van Veen JA, Merckx R. Carbon fluxes in the rhizosphere of winter wheat and spring barley with conventional vs integrated farming. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27(6):811–820. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)00230-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan K, Weisenhorn P, Gilbert J, et al. Soil pH correlates with the co-occurence and assemblage process of diazotrophic communities in rhizosphere and bulk soils of wheat fields. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;121:185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahan J, Schmalenberger A. The role of bacteria and mycorrhiza in plant sulfur supply. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:723. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmusk S, Timmusk K, Behers L. Rhizobacterial plant drought stress tolerance enhancement: towards sustainable water resource management and food security. J Food Sec. 2013;1:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin RL, van Groenigen KJ, Hungate BA. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are more effective under drought: a meta-analysis. Plant Soil. 2017;416(1–2):309–323. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3199-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, et al. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability: a review. Molecules. 2016;21(5):573. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman GE, Doni F, Khadka RB, et al. Endophytic strains of trichoderma increase plants’ photosynthetic capability. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130(2):529–546. doi: 10.1111/jam.14368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berhongaray G, Cotrufo FM, Janssens IA, et al. Below-ground carbon inputs contribute more than above-ground inputs to soil carbon accrual in a bioenergy poplar plantation. Plant Soil. 2019;434(1-2):363–378. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3850-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin RL, Jones AN, Hayer MH, et al. Opposing effects of bacterial endophytes on biomass allocation of a wild donor and agricultural recipient. FEMS Microb Ecol. 2020;96:fia012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie M, Bell C, Wallenstein MD, et al. Increased plant productivity and decreased microbial respiratory C loss by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under elevated CO2. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9212. doi: 10.1038/srep09212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi S, Gupta S. Impact of pesticides and biopesticides on soil microbial biomass carbon. Univ J Sci Res Technol. 2013;3(2):326–330.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Watts DB, Ames RN, et al. Microbial-based inoculants impact nitrous oxide emissions from an incubated soil medium containing urea fertilizers. J Environ Qual. 2013;42(3):704–712. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza EFC, Rosen CJ, Venterea RT. Contrasting effects of inhibitors and biostimulants on agronomic performance and reactive nitrogen losses during irrigated potato production. Field Crops Res. 2019;240:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennakoon PLK, Rajapaksha RMCP, Hettiarachchi LSK. Tea yield maintained in PGPR inoculated field plants despite significant reduction in fertilizer application. Rhizosphere. 2019;10:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger T, González López Ó, Bejarano A, et al. Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non-sporulating inoculants. Microb Biotechnol. 2018;11(2):277–301. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Fang Y, Sun D, et al. Efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors (dicyandiamide and 3, 4-dimethypyrazole phosphate) on soil nitrogen transformations and plant productivity: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):10. doi: 10.1038/srep22075.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guardia G, Marsden KA, Vallejo A, et al. Determining the influence of environmental and edaphic factors on the fate of the nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP in soil. Sci Total Environ. 2018;624:1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal RC, Wang W, Robertson GP, et al. Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: a review. Australian journal of. Soil Res. 2003;41(2):165–195. doi: 10.1071/SR02064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbarao GV, Searchinger TD. A “more ammonium solution” to mitigate nitrogen pollution and boost crop yields. PNAS. 2021;118(22):e2107576118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam SK, Suter H, Mosier AR, et al. Using nitrification inhibitors to mitigate agricultural N2O emission: a double-edged sword? Glob Change Biol. 2017;23(2):485–489. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar