Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)?

REFERENCES

• Bai, X., Hu, X., & Yan, G. (S). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading: The influence of semantic transparencies of word n on word n − 1 processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 377–386. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00377
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., & Meseguer, E. (2002). Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209–217. doi:10.1037/h0087476
   Google Scholar
• Cui, L., Wang, S-P., Yan, G-L., & Bai, X-J. (2010). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in normal Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 547–558. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00547
   Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 839–855). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 79–103. doi:10.1080/09541440340000141
   Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621–636. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00301-7
   Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
   Google Scholar
• EyeLink II [Apparatus]. ( ????). http://www.sr-research.com/eyelinkII.html
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221. doi:10.1037/h0078814
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 104–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 523–532. doi:10.3758/BF03195844
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 544–555. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.544
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading. Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 431–439. doi:10.3758/BF03208203
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., Drieghe, D., & Rayner, K. (2009). Parafoveal processing within and between words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1356–1376. doi:10.1080/17470210802400010
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 279–292. doi:10.3758/BF03194879
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149–179). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 429–455. doi:10.1080/713755901
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45(2), 153–168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1307–1337. doi:10.1080/02724980244000071
   Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M., & Clifton Jnr, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 68–81. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12
   Google Scholar
• Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2004). Thai word frequency based on two million word corpus of written genre texts. Bangkok, Thailand: Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing. Faculty of Arts. Chulalongkorn University.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994–2000. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., & Kennedy, A. (2006). An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research, 46, 3786–3801. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–196. doi:10.2307/271063
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129–1144. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., & Bertera, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167–179. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.167
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
   Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 1021–1046. doi:10.1080/713755859
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
   Google Scholar
• White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205–223. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
   Google Scholar
• White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 52–78. doi:10.1080/09541440340000204
   Google Scholar
• White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 891–896. doi:10.3758/BF03196782
   Google Scholar
• Winskel, H., & Iemwanthong, K. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1021–1053. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
   Google Scholar
• Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: Evidence from eye movements when reading Thai. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1522–1536. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658409
   Google Scholar
• Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548–562. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.625094
   Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1069–1075. doi:10.1037/a0026935
   Google Scholar