Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic

REFERENCES

• Allen, W. S. (1953). Phonetics in ancient India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, W. (1996). The devanagari script. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 384–390). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, W. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 30(1), 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, S. (1996). A critical linguistic study of the Prātiśākhyas. Calcutta: Punthi-Pustak.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1996). The study of writing systems. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2009). Grammatology. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, M. M. (1997). Śaunakīyā Caturādhyāyikā [A book of four chapters written by Śaunaka]. Cambridge, MA: The Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Diringer, D. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (3rd ed.). 2 Vols. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Ideas about language. In Aims and perspectives in linguistics (pp. 32–55). Occasional papers, No. I. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. University of Melbourne: Parkville, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R. (2005). Learning to read Chinese. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 317–335). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Advances in psychology. Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M. (1968, February 11–13). Communicating by language: The reading process. Proceedings of the conference on communicating by language, the reading process U.S. department of health, education, and welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia (pp. 137–153). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, V. H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mangal, D. S. (1923). The Rgveda Pratisakhya vol III: With commentary of Uvata. Lahore: Ulan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masica, C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, I. G. (1985). Did orthographies evolve? Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 18–23. doi:10.1177/074193258500600605
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, I. G. (1992). Linguistic Awareness and orthographic form. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Advances in psychology. Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P. G. (2010). The Brāhmī writing system. Cross-fertilizing epigraphy, archaeology and linguistics. New Delhi: Black & White.
   Google Scholar
• Prasād, K., Sahāy, R., Srivāstava, M. L. (1992). Brihat Hindī Kosh [Brihat Hindī dictionary]. Varanasi: Gyanmandal.
   Google Scholar
• Rimzhim, A., Fowler, C. A., & Katz, L. (2013, November). On the alphabetic nature of Brāhmī-derived writing system: Evidence from Devanāgari/Hindi. Poster to be presented at the Psychonomic Society Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, H. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, R. (1998). Indian epigraphy: A guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prākrit, and the other Indo-Āryan languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, R. G. (1996). Brāhmī and Kharoshthi. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scancarelli, J. (1996). Cherokee writing. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 587–592). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, J. Ren, & O. Tzeng. (Eds.), Across languages: Orthography and the gene-brain-behavior link. MD, USA: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. S. (1996). Japanese writing. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 209–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sproat, R. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, S. (1961). Critical studies in the phonetic observations of Indian grammarians. London: Royal Asiatic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Warder, A. K. (1991). Introduction to Pali. Oxford: The Pali Text Society.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, W. D. (1889). Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, A. C. (1928). Introduction to Prākrit. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   Google Scholar