Akshara-to-sound rules for Hindi

REFERENCES

• Agrawala, V. S. (1966). The Devnagari script. In Indian systems of writing (pp. 12–16). Delhi: Publications Division.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A. R., & Ijaz, M. (2009). English to Urdu Transliteration System. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language & Technology (pp. 15–23). Lahore, Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Bali, K., Talukdar, P. P., Krishna, N. S., & Ramakrishnan, A. G. (2004). Tools for the development of a Hindi speech synthesis system. In Proceedings of the 5th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop (pp. 109–114). Pittsburgh, PA: CMU.
   Google Scholar
• Benua, L. (1997). Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Retrieved from http//www.roa.rutgers.edu/files/259–0498/roa-259-benua-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. W., Lenzo, K. A., & Pagel, V. (1998). Issues in building general letter to sound rules. In 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis (pp. 77–80). Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. W., & Taylor, P. A. (1997). Assigning phrase breaks from part-of-speech sequences. In Eurospeech 97. Volume 2 (pp. 995–998). Rhodes, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, W. (1996). The Devanagari script. In P. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 384–390). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. D. (2002). Corpus-driven splitting of compound words. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. F. (2003). Conditional and joint models for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Proceedings of European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 2033–2036.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, M. (2003). Rule-Based Grapheme to Phoneme Mapping for Hindi Speech Synthesis. In 90th Indian Science Congress of the International Speech Communication Association (ISCA), Bangalore.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, M., & Basu, A. (2002). A Rule-based schwa deletion algorithm for Hindi. In Proceedings of the International Conference On Knowledge-Based Computer Systems (pp. 343–353). Navi Mumbai.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. W. (1985). Stress assignment in letter to sound rules for speech synthesis. In Proceeding of 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 8–12). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Das Mandal, S., Lata, S., & Chandra, S. (2010). Use of Parts Of Speech (POS) and morphological information for resolving Multiple PLS Indian Languages- Bengali as a Case Study. Somerset, NJ: W3C Workshop on conversational applications, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1997). Learning to read in different orthographies: Phonological awareness, orthographic representations and dyslexia. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 131–152). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2004). Reading difficulties of Hindi-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 79–99. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000013823.56357.8b
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1995). A metrical theory of stress. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S. (2004). Letter-to-sound conversion for Urdu Text-to-Speech system. Workshop on Arabic Script Based Languages, COLING2004, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, Y. (2006). Hindi. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karanth, P., Mathew, A., & Kurien, P. (2004). Orthography and reading speed: Data from native readers of Kannada. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 101–120. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000013822.44739.c4
   Google Scholar
• Kelkar, A. R. (1968). Studies in Hindi-Urdu: Part I: Phonology. Pune: Deccan College.
   Google Scholar
• Kishore, S. P., Kumar, R., & Sangal, R. (2002). A data-driven synthesis approach for Indian Languages using syllable as basic unit. In International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON) (pp. 311.316). Mumbai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt, D. H., & Shipman, D. W. (1982). Letter-to-phoneme rules: A semi-automatic discovery procedure. Journal of the Acousical Society of Americal, 72(S1), S48–S48. doi:10.1121/1.2019914
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., McGrath, K., & Reuppel, J. (2004). Language identification and language specific Letter-to-Sound rules. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 17(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mannell, R. H., & Clark, J. E. (1987). Text-to-speech rule and dictionary development. Speech Communication, 6(4), 317–324. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(87)90006-9
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (1995). Faithfulness in Prosodic Morphology & Phonology: Rotuman Revisited. ROA-110, Rutgers Optimality Archive.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1993). Prosodic morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 3. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, R. S. (1977). Outline of Hindi Grammar. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. (2011). The akshara languages: What do they tell us about children's literacy learning? Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/media/psychology/crl/documents/sonalipapers/the%20akshara%20languages%20(Chapter%2016%20proofs).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, B., Sproat, R., & Kiraz, G. (2001). Schwa deletion in Hindi text-to-speech synthesis. In Workshop on Computational Linguistics in South Asian Languages. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, I., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Ohala, M. (1983). Aspects of Hindi phonology. New Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.
   Google Scholar
• Padakannaya, P. ( in press). Akshara reading and Psycholinguistic grain size theory. In M. Panda & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), Language, cognition, and education. New Delhi: Orient BlacksSwan.
   Google Scholar
• Padakannaya, P., Rekha, D., Vaid, J., & Joshi, M. (2002). Simultaneous acquisition of literacy skills in English and Kannada: A longitudinal study. (Poster presented at the 13th World Congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Singapore.)
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P. K. (1989). Word-stress in Hindi. Lingua, 77(1), 37–73. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(89)90038-7
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P. K. (1990). Hindi schwa deletion. Lingua, 82(4), 277–311. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(90)90067-U
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P. K. (2007). Phonology-orthography interface in Devanagari for Hindi. Written Language and Literacy, 10(2), 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P. G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, orthographic units, and reading acquisition. In Taylor, I. & D. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and reading: Reading and learning to read in the world's scripts (pp. 265–275). London: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P. G. (2007). Akshara as a linguistic unit in Brāhmī scripts. In: P. G. Patel, P. Pandey, & D. Rajgor (Eds.), The Indic scripts: Paleographic and linguistic perspectives (pp. 167–215). New Delhi: DK Printworld.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C., Soni, S., & Singh, N. S. (2012). The case of neglected alphasyllabary: Orthographic processing in Devanagari. Retrieved from http://www.nbrc.ac.in/download/annualreport/AR_2011–12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax. Masachussetts: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Sircar, S., & Nag, S. ( in press). Akshara-syllable mappings in Bengali: A language-specific skill for reading. In S. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (Chapter 11). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Sproat, R. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasanta, D. (2004). Processing phonological information in a semi-syllabic script: Developmental data from Telugu. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 59–78. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000013830.55257.3a
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80–90. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0004
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 57, 91–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90010-8
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain-size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   Google Scholar