A simple model of Persian reading

REFERENCES

• Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 67–84. doi:10.1177/0022219407310838
   Google Scholar
• Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
   Google Scholar
• Arab-Moghaddam, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2001). Orthographic and phonological processing skills in reading and spelling in Persian/English bilinguals. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(2), 140–147. doi:10.1080/01650250042000320
   Google Scholar
• Baluch, B. (1993). Lexical decisions in Persian: A test of the orthographic depth hypothesis. International Journal of Psychology, 28(1), 19–29. doi:10.1080/00207599308246915
   Google Scholar
• Baluch, B. (2006). Persian orthography and its relation to literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 365–376). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–652.
   Google Scholar
• Bowey, J. A. (2008). Is a Phoenician reading style superior to a Chinese reading style? Evidence from fourth graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 186–214. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3–43. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_2
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 167–175. doi:10.1080/026432997381655
   Google Scholar
• Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (Ran): Dyslexia differentiated from other earning-disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Google Scholar
• Everatt, J., Ocampo, D., Veii, K., Nenopoulou, S., Smythe, I., Al-Mannai, H., & Elbeheri, G. (2010). Dyslexia in biscriptal readers. In N. Brunswick, S. McDougall, & P. D. M. Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 221–245). Hoboken: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553–576. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   Google Scholar
• Gholamain, M., & Geva, E. (1999). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in English and Persian. Language Learning, 49, 183–217. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00087
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, G. T. (2005). Phonological awareness: Effecting change through the integration of research findings. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 346–349. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/034)
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2012). Universals of reading: Developmental evidence for linguistic plausibility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 287–288. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000052
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 7(1), 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, R. (2011). Literacy problems in Arabic: Sensitivity to diglossia in tasks involving working memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 571–582. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97. doi:10.1080/02702710050084428
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., Tao, S., Aaron, P. G., & Quiroz, B. (2012). Cognitive component of componential model of reading applied to different orthographies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 480–486. doi:10.1177/0022219411432690
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42(2), 75–82. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x
   Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., & Moradi, A. R. (2008). Reading & dyslexia test. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi.
   Google Scholar
• Mahfoudhi, A., Everatt, J., & Elbeheri, G. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on literacy in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 1011–1018. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9306-y
   Google Scholar
• Mahootian, S. (1997). Persian. London: Routledge.[doi:10.4324/9780203192887]
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Geva, E. (1999). The contribution of phonological and orthographic processing skills to adult ESL reading: Evidence from native speakers of Farsi. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 241–267. doi:10.1017/S0142716499002040
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(1), 199. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/017)
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2012). Thru but not wisht: Language, writing, and universal reading theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 299–300. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000234
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/10888438.2012.689786
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   Google Scholar
• Puolakanaho, A., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Leppänen, P. H. T., Poikkeus, A.-M., … Lyytinen, H. (2008). Developmental links of very early phonological and language skills to second grade reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 353–370. doi:10.1177/0022219407311747
   Google Scholar
• Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 29–53. doi:10.2307/747832
   Google Scholar
• Rahbari, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2008). The skilled reading and spelling of Persian: Do the same processes underlie skilled reading and spelling? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 289–289.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbari, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(5), 511–530.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbari, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2010). Learning to read and spell in Persian: A cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1514–1527. doi:10.1037/a0020377
   Google Scholar
• Rahbari, N., Sénéchal, M., & Arab-Moghaddam, N. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 511–533. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Nation, K. (2008). Investigating orthographic and semantic aspects of word learning in poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 117–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00365.x
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, A., Everatt, J., & McNeill, B. (2011). Reading comprehension in Persian-English bilinguals: Support for learning. Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Reading, Mons, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, A., Everatt, J., McNeill, B., & Rezari, A. (2014). Text processing in English-Persian bilingual children: A bilingual view on the simple model of reading. Educational and Child Psychology: Bilingualism and Language Diversity, 31(2), 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451. doi:10.1017/S0142716403000225
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
   Google Scholar
• Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., Secord, W., & Hannan, T. (2008). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). Marrickville: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., Wimmer, H., Leybaert, J., Elbro, C., … Olofsson, Å. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
   Google Scholar
• Smythe, I., Everatt, J., Al-Menaye, N., He, X., Capellini, S., Gyarmathy, E., & Siegel, L. S. (2008). Predictors of word-level literacy amongst grade 3 children in five diverse languages. Dyslexia, 14, 170–187. doi:10.1002/dys.369
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 453–466. doi:10.1177/0022219411432685
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 83–103. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.83
   Google Scholar
• Weismer, S. E., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., Chynoweth, J. G., & Jones, M. (2000). Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 865–878. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4304.865
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(1), 80–90. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0004
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, J. A., & Apel, K. (2010). Initial acquisition of mental graphemic representations in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(1), 179–195. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0130)
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., … Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. doi:10.1177/0956797610363406
   Google Scholar