Google doodles: Evidence of how graphemes' colour, shape, size and position can interact to make writing multidimensional

REFERENCES

• Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, R., & Graham, T. (2007). Introduction to manuscript studies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (1996). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of writing systems. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (2013). Writing and society Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1991). Is a structural graphemics possible? LACUS Forum, 18, 528–537.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1994). Reply to Herrick. LACUS Forum, 21, 425–431.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1996). Grammatology. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. (1952). A study of writing: the foundations of grammatology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1986). The origin of writing. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1995). Signs of writing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking writing. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2009). Speech and writing. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 46–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. (1985). On the use of the term ‘grapheme’. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(2), 135–148. doi:10.1080/01690968508402075
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, E. M. (1966). A linguistic description of roman alphabets ( M.A. dissertation). Hartford Studies in Linguistics, 19. Hartford Seminary Foundation, Hartford.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, E. M. (1994a). Of course a structural graphemics is possible. LACUS Forum, 21, 413–424.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, E. M. (1994b). Reply to Daniels' reply. LACUS Forum, 21, 432–440.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, E. M. (2008). Review of Sproat (2000). Retrieved from http://linguistlist.org/issues/19/19-1859.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A., Androutsopoulos, J., Sebba, M., & Johnson, S. (Eds.). (2012). Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, J. (1984/1922). Ulysses: The corrected text edited by Hans Walter Gabler. New York, NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, T. B., & Borgwaldt, S. R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Introduction to special edition. Written Language and Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. doi:10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy
   Google Scholar
• Kohrt, M. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In W. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 80–96). Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 3, 343–369. doi:10.1177/147035720200100306
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, D. G. (2001). Phoneme and Grapheme. How parallel can they be? LACUS Forum, 27, 307–316.
   Google Scholar
• Machan, T. W. (2011). The visual pragmatics of code-switching in late Middle English literature. In H. Schendl & L. Wright (Eds.), Code-switching in early English (pp. 303–333). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Neef, M. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4, 214–228. doi:10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, H. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, D. (2011). Grammaphonology: A new theory of English spelling. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 8(2), 2–30. Retrieved from http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL19/pdf_doc/01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Sebba, M. (2007). Spelling and society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sproat, R. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, B. (1955). The crystal goblet: Sixteen essays on typography. (H. Jacob, Eds.). London: Sylvan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. (2001). Orthographic diacritics and multilingual computing. Language problems and language planning, 24, 249–272. doi:10.1075/lplp.24.3.04wel
   Google Scholar