Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades

REFERENCES

• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2004). Statistics in psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 1, 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Backus, A. (2004). Turkish as an immigrant language in Europe. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 689–724). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Backus, A. (2013). Turkish as an immigrant language in Europe. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism, second edition (pp. 770–790). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. (2013). Bilingualism/multilingualism and second-language acquisition. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism, second edition (pp. 109–136). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G., & Hakuta, K. (2004). Bilingualism and second language acquisition. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism (pp. 114–145). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 2: Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., Wang, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Acquisition of compound words in Chinese–English bilingual children: Decomposition and cross-language activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 583–600. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60(1), 21–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2013). The role of accessibility of semantic word knowledge in monolingual and bilingual fifth-grade reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1195–1217. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. M. (2010). On the stability of representations in the multilingual lexicon. In L. Sicola & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 117–134). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw, M., Schreuder, R., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Processing of regular and irregular past-tense verb forms in first and second language reading acquisition. Language Learning, 63, 740–765. doi:10.1111/lang.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw, M., Verhoeven, L., & Schreuder, R. (2012). Morphological family size effects in young first and second language learners: Evidence of cross-language semantic activation in visual word recognition. Language Learning, 62(1), 68–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 23–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1171–1176. doi:10.3758/BF03193108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgunoglu, A. Y., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). (1998). Literacy development in a multilingual context: Cross-cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 307–336. doi:10.1080/016909698386546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Merle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gor, K. (2010). Introduction. beyond the obvious: Do second language learners process inflectional morphology? Language Learning, 60, 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M. C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst (2nd ed.) [ General guide to the Dutch language: A descriptive grammar of Dutch]. Groningen and Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff and Wolters Plantyn.
   Google Scholar
• Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The development of whole-word representations in compound word processing: Evidence from eye fixation patterns of elementary school children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 533–551. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberger, A., & Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2009). Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics, 47, 481–511. doi:10.1515/LING.2009.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612–1627. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223–244. doi:10.1348/000712603321661903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21, 783–804. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, A., & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Large constituent families help children parse compounds. Journal of Child Language, 32, 139–158. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895. doi:10.1037/a0013484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: Effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 364–370. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0044-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G., & Jarema, G. (Eds.). (2006). The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Chow, C. S.-L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese (L1) and English (L2). Reading and Writing, 19, 695–716. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-5742-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2002a). The cues that children use in acquiring adjectival phrases and compound nouns: Evidence from bilingual children. Brain and Language, 81, 635–648. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2002b). What's the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children's crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 29, 843–863. doi:10.1017/S0305000902005366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2003). Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 17–31. doi:10.1017/S1366728903001019
   Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E., & Krott, A. (2007). Word family size and French-speaking children's segmentation of existing compounds. Language Learning, 57, 201–228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdijk, K., Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Effects of morphological family size for young readers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 432–445. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02053.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445–485. doi:10.1080/01690960050119661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820–833. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481–504. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 117–140. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343–348. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Rattink, G. E. (1988). Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 447–473. doi:10.1007/BF01067911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhallen, M., & Schoonen, R. (1998). Lexical knowledge in L1 and L2 of third and fifth graders. Applied Linguistics, 19, 452–470. doi:10.1093/applin/19.4.452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. (1995). Drie-Minuten-Toets [Three Minutes Test]. Arnhem: CITO.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313–330. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Carlisle, J. F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Morphology in word identification and word spelling. Reading and Writing, 19, 643–650. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9010-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 457–466. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Schreuder, R. (2011). Morpheme frequency effects in Dutch complex word reading: A developmental perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 483–498. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Haarman, V. (2006). Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Reading and Writing, 19, 651–668. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234. doi:10.1017/S0142716401002041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar